Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Proceedings - Come for the trial, stay for….

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What do you think will happen?

  • Guilty on all charges

    Votes: 282 8.8%
  • Full Acquittal

    Votes: 1,077 33.7%
  • Mistral

    Votes: 264 8.3%
  • Mixture of verdicts

    Votes: 479 15.0%
  • Minecraft

    Votes: 213 6.7%
  • Roblox

    Votes: 132 4.1%
  • Runescape

    Votes: 203 6.3%
  • Somehow Guilty Of Two Mutually Exclusive Actions

    Votes: 514 16.1%
  • KYLE WILL SUBMIT TO BBC

    Votes: 35 1.1%

  • Total voters
    3,199
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Won't let me quote the post because bugs.

Celebrating citizen vigilantism is dangerous. It’s considerably harder to communicate that to the public when legal authorities fail to condemn or prosecute unlawful militia engagement. Worse, in some cases, law enforcement actively support or participate in paramilitary or militias themselves.
I've said it before probably in this very thread. But these fuckers should be wishing for Vigilantes, because the way they are treating Soldiers and Cops will end up inevitably with some Brabant Murder style shit happening, possibly all over the country. For those not aware of the Brabant Murders, they were a series of completely pointless killings and tortures that happened in Belgium. Basically 3 or 4 dudes would hop out of a car, run into a place like a supermarket, gun down everyone inside and then just drive away. Alot of the time they would set off a distraction to slow down cops getting there. The reason I bring this up is because the most accepted theory is that the killers were ex-military/LEO who were sick of crime and wanted to skyrocket the crimerate so people would basically vote themselves into a police state.
 
"Celebrating citizen vigilantism is dangerous. It’s considerably harder to communicate that to the public when legal authorities fail to condemn or prosecute unlawful militia engagement."

its considerably harder to communicate that to the public when you have mobs of assholes the media whipped up into a frenzy burning whole communities down.
He cries out in pain as he strikes you.
 
FACTS. Facts are how case are decided. 1. Kyle stole the rifle. 2. Kyle was out past curfew. 3. Kyle broke into a care dealership. 4. Kyle impersonated a medical technician
He is a murderer and will be found guilty!
HE Also caused Ethan Ralph to crash his car!
 
"Celebrating citizen vigilantism is dangerous. It’s considerably harder to communicate that to the public when legal authorities fail to condemn or prosecute unlawful militia engagement."

its considerably harder to communicate that to the public when you have mobs of assholes the media whipped up into a frenzy burning whole communities down.
He cries out in pain as he strikes you.
>people forming militias to protect themselves when the authorities can't or won't bad
>people burning and looting because racial justice good

I genuinely fucking hate these 'people'.
 
In May 2015 Gaige Grosskreutz ran a red light right as a police officer was advancing to go through his green light - nice one! It get's much better.

The cop was able to catch up to him and pull him over. This is what was revealed during, and after, that traffic stop:
1. Gaige had no car insurance
2. Gaige was driving under the influence, he blew .16
3. Gaige had a warrant out for his arrest in another county
4. Gaige had a Glock 9mm on his person (with a bullet in the chamber)
5. Gaige did not have a permit for the Glock, let alone an open carry
6. Gaige was already a felony offender with a disqualification for firearms

This is weird... April 2016 he's charged with a Misdemeanor
Screen Shot 2021-11-07 at 11.37.46 PM.png


Then on September 16, 2020 (over 4 years later and post Kenosha) his 2015 OWI goes from Misdemeanor to 'Municipal Ordinance Violation' Am I missing something?? Or is this extremely sus...

Screen Shot 2021-11-07 at 11.41.02 PM.png


I'm posting the pdf again, if anyone wants to look it over. He's a real asshole.
 

Attachments

I wonder if the prosecution is going to skip Grosskreutz and wait for the defense to bring him in.
 
IF the prosecution brings in Grosskreutz what questions should the defense ask? For me it would be:

1. When you put up your arms in surrender why did you draw the pistol?
2. Were you allowed to carry a firearm? According to your criminal histroy you should not have access to one
3. Who gave you the firearm?
4. did you set fires that night?
5. did you clash with other protestors / the folks who guarded businesses (avoiding the word milita)?

Anything else? There are most likely way more questions for this then those I came up with right now.
 
FACTS. Facts are how case are decided. 1. Kyle stole the rifle. 2. Kyle was out past curfew. 3. Kyle broke into a care dealership. 4. Kyle impersonated a medical technician
He is a murderer and will be found guilty!
Okay.
 
IF the prosecution brings in Grosskreutz what questions should the defense ask? For me it would be:

1. When you put up your arms in surrender why did you draw the pistol?
2. Were you allowed to carry a firearm? According to your criminal histroy you should not have access to one
3. Who gave you the firearm?
4. did you set fires that night?
5. did you clash with other protestors / the folks who guarded businesses (avoiding the word milita)?

Anything else? There are most likely way more questions for this then those I came up with right now.
He can't ask number 2, since they retroactively made him not-a-felon.

I'm guessing Grosskreutz either is a glowy or has some (((friends))) in high places.
 
FACTS. Facts are how case are decided. 1. Kyle stole the rifle. 2. Kyle was out past curfew. 3. Kyle broke into a care dealership. 4. Kyle impersonated a medical technician
He is a murderer and will be found guilty!
You're quite the exceptional individual lol
 
He can't ask number 2, since they retroactively made him not-a-felon.

I'm guessing Grosskreutz either is a glowy or has some (((friends))) in high places.
The only reason the prosecution would be bringing him in so far as I can see is if they are going to try and argue that he was there to do some good or some shit, and that him pulling out the pistol was because he thought he was "doing the right thing". That's got to open the door to the defense opening up his past, but I'm not a lawyer so I don't know. Either way him being on the stand has got to bring up the fact that he faked surrender only to try and murder Kyle. If he truly thought Kyle was an active mass shooter why would he put his hands up and approach a person he believed was there just to shoot people? If Kyle was there to kill people why didn't he put half a mag in that faggots body after blowing his bicep off? There is basically a 0.0001% chance his testimony doesn't either involve him perjuring himself or only helping Kyle.
 
The reason I bring this up is because the most accepted theory is that the killers were ex-military/LEO who were sick of crime and wanted to skyrocket the crimerate so people would basically vote themselves into a police state.
That sounds like the kind of harebrained plot the glow-in-the-darks would come up with, rather than disgruntled military.
Compare Operation Gladio's shenanigans in Italy, for instance.

The only reason the prosecution would be bringing him in so far as I can see is if they are going to try and argue that he was there to do some good or some shit
There was something in the opening statements about Grosskreutz claiming he tried to protect Kyle from Huber,
thus making him an innocent victim of the triggerhappy Kenosha Kike Killer they need to paint Kyle to be.
If that's really the narrative they're trying to go with, they're going to lose today. Badly.
 
That sounds like the kind of harebrained plot the glow-in-the-darks would come up with, rather than disgruntled military.
Compare Operation Gladio's shenanigans in Italy, for instance.


There was something in the opening statements about Grosskreutz claiming he tried to protect Kyle from Huber,
thus making him an innocent victim of the triggerhappy Kenosha Kike Killer they need to paint Kyle to be.
If that's really the narrative they're trying to go with, they're going to lose today. Badly.
"Mr Grosskreutz, could you please identify the point in this video where you attempt to protect the defendant from his attackers?"
 
He needed the "AR-17" because of pavement apes and commie soycucks running around rioting and looting.

Apparently these three generally agree that there might be a direct verdict involved and Kyle will get acquitted.

rekieta is a dumbfuck and this view solidifies each fresh day
and those who take his word for granted are df too btw
 
In May 2015 Gaige Grosskreutz ran a red light right as a police officer was advancing to go through his green light - nice one! It get's much better.

The cop was able to catch up to him and pull him over. This is what was revealed during, and after, that traffic stop:
1. Gaige had no car insurance
2. Gaige was driving under the influence, he blew .16
3. Gaige had a warrant out for his arrest in another county
4. Gaige had a Glock 9mm on his person (with a bullet in the chamber)
5. Gaige did not have a permit for the Glock, let alone an open carry
6. Gaige was already a felony offender with a disqualification for firearms

This is weird... April 2016 he's charged with a Misdemeanor
View attachment 2698534

Then on September 16, 2020 (over 4 years later and post Kenosha) his 2015 OWI goes from Misdemeanor to 'Municipal Ordinance Violation' Am I missing something?? Or is this extremely sus...

View attachment 2698535

I'm posting the pdf again, if anyone wants to look it over. He's a real asshole.
Well, I guess that answers the question as to whether or not he's a Jew.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back