Yeah, a lot of commenters on various social media sites insist Kyle is fake crying. It’s truly disgusting.
I think the reason this case is so interesting is that you really see how people are conditioned into different realities. How those realities can be based on stories and not facts. People get told what to think and they believe it full heartedly.
There's virtue signaling that you believe this fake reality and story. Despite clearly knowing nothing. If you're not following the trail, don't know the situation or the facts. Completely ignorant to it. Despite some simplistic narrative, why would you comment with absolutely certainty?
I read all the, "the Oscar goes to" comments before I saw the video of him crying. I don't at all understand how those people could make those comments in good faith, unless they are brainwashed.
It's also so strange how the meme like retorts that fill modern discourse apply to this. You know, when someone has a prepared line to respond to criticism or an argument that isn't at all valid or making any sense. Yet they think it invalidates an argument, or facts when it does nothing of the sort.
I have seen endless, "well why did he carry a gun across state lines" comments about this today. It's a strange acknowledgement they know he'll get off, know it's self defence. Combined with a display of knowing fuck all about the case and not following it.
It's staggering.
There's just a smugness to the way the ignorant are commenting on this case which is so fucking irritating. Is this a feature of their ideology? To talk and discuss with absolutely certainty to present an established conclusion to avoid conversation or dissent?
It has so many features of everything that's wrong with the world, discourse, social media and the divide in society these days.
