Spicey McHaggis
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2019
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Buffalo sauce is degenerate. I wanna kill you in self defense.For me, the choice pairing is barbecue and buffalo. I must have the sweet/savory dichotomy when I eat tendies.
Its all Richards.This is an incredibly dull witness.
I don't believe the jury are getting anything from this.
Also you can compress sound. The sound he is listening to is likely compressed. You can also slow down sound.
If any jurors are computer literate they're probably scratching their heads at some of the stuff this guy says, which will impact credibility.
Everyone's gotta get their pay somehow.They really should have gotten 47 to do this. He has shown an ability to make things a bit animated.
To be honest I think anyone would struggle to make waffle about video quality interesting. I can't really blame richards its just a dull as shit topic.They really should have gotten 47 to do this. He has shown an ability to make things a bit animated.
He'd be a damn fool not to, which is why he won't. He seems to totally not understand that you need to make a narrative for the jury to follow.He's not going to do an end to end video is he?
When dealing with boring material, you should try to compress it as much as you can without damaging your point. Not go into it in pedantic detail.To be honest I think anyone would struggle to make waffle about video quality interesting. I can't really blame richards its just a dull as shit topic.
But you could make it much more visceral for the jury that it took place in only a moment.To be honest I think anyone would struggle to make waffle about video quality interesting. I can't really blame richards its just a dull as shit topic.
Making them act out how long the events took IRL is good approach. They should have done it earlier.Okay the first part was painful in part because Richards was doing it but I like when witnesses have the jurors get involved
Isn’t this a copypasta?I am not a religious person, but this Kyle Rittenhouse stuff is way too absurd to be explained by mere coincidence.
Dude is 17 years old, has barely experience using a rifle he owned less than half a year (iirc). After a stressful, long, tiresome day, he got ambushed, chased by an angry manlet, cornered by said manlet, managed to shoot him 4 times when he lunged for his gun, neutralizing the threat, he was chased again by an angry mob, forced to the ground, kicked, clobbered with a skateboard and threatened with a gun. He manages to shoot in perfect self defense from a compromised position, fighting off all 3 attackes successfully, gets back up and runs away to turn himself in.
And in all this.... in all of this fucking mess, he kills a pedo, a wifebeater and unarms (lol) a burglar. He does not hurt a single person unintentionally with missed shots or overpenetration. He only fires in clear self defense. And not only is all this filmed in such great detail, that there is no room for reasonable doubt to Kyle's innocence - oh no - on top of this entire clusterfuck of stuff coming together, the angles that show him shooting are lighted in such a way by the lamps in the background that you can perfectly tell when he fires, due to the smoke coming from the muzzle, so there is even without sound there can be no doubt that Kyle shot. Every. Single. Time. after being attacked or threatened.
Lest we forget: there's stuff like Richards and an expert talking about a guy they keep refering to as "jumpkick man"
I love this expert btw. This is a long and tedious affair, but his explanations are on point and easy to understand. Dude's providing great perspective into how quick everything went and how to treat the footage, blowing the "let's go through this shit frame by frame like there were entire ice ages of possible decisionmaking between them" by Binger into smaller bits than a certain byeceps.