Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Proceedings - Come for the trial, stay for….

What do you think will happen?

  • Guilty on all charges

    Votes: 282 8.8%
  • Full Acquittal

    Votes: 1,077 33.7%
  • Mistral

    Votes: 264 8.3%
  • Mixture of verdicts

    Votes: 479 15.0%
  • Minecraft

    Votes: 213 6.7%
  • Roblox

    Votes: 132 4.1%
  • Runescape

    Votes: 203 6.3%
  • Somehow Guilty Of Two Mutually Exclusive Actions

    Votes: 514 16.1%
  • KYLE WILL SUBMIT TO BBC

    Votes: 35 1.1%

  • Total voters
    3,199
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Did the defense actually object to anything this time? They sat on their ass and did nothing yesterday basically.
At least they put up a valiant effort on the objection to add that interpolated picture into evidence.
State expert's answers to most of the defense was practically"I click buttons and software goes brrrrrr" and said "I don't know" near constantly.
 
Last edited:
Absolute brainlet take. Media loses money. Twitter loses money. They want people to be mad at white people. So they white people get attacked.
Twitter is blatantly a skinner box. Everything about it is designed to get you addicted to it, to make you feel a physical need to load the app or site and constantly interact with it. Then, once they get you hooked, they can manipulate the addicts by threatening to cut them off, by manipulating who they can talk to, what have you.

Apparently, rape, domestic abuse and pedophilia is only okay when (((certain people))) do it.

You learn something new everyday.
That has always been their stance, yes. The ADL was literally founded because a bunch of people got tired of being told a Jewish pedophile was above the law.
 
I mean the system wants to make an example out of him. The system being the left wing/progressive media class.

But looking at this case he's going to get off so the system unable to convict will just say he got off because white surpremacy and progressives and antifa will become more blackpilled. Remember the 4 years of Biden are designed to make the left think they defeated fascism meanwhile more and more of the freedoms are stripped away in the name of "stopping domestic terrorism"
Anyone with brain cells knows he's going to get off. But anyone who is a disingenuous propagandist will spin he got off because white surpremacy and the blue pilled pozzed normies will eat that shit up because they know no better.
The system is Jews. No one is going to ban you for saying that here.
 
It's a little bit sad you lads had so little faith in the justice system. Government and society may be a bit flaky but the courts are still somewhat a professional arena.

Been following this thread for a while and decided to join up, partly also since I'm doing a project on something juicy that might interest you.

Anyway cheers for all the updates and meme's. Fucking great stuff.
Good to see the kid's gonna be alright.

On the Reddit libs and the other hypocrites who call for his death or lifetime imprisonment, has there been any comment on the fact that the main complaint is "illegally carrying arms" or what ever in relation to the rioter Rittenhouse shot was doing the same?

How are they coping with this dichotomy

Not them because I'm still optimistic but it's not necessarily the courts people are afraid of. It's the fact that the fate lies in the hands of normies who despite being told not to, will read media relating to this case and possibly be bias in the process. I work for apple, I've worked customer service for years. I do not trust the average human to determine my fate, the average human is a fucking retard.
 
Can someone explain why exactly Kyle crossing state lines matters in terms of his self defense claim? This keeps popping up and everytime I encounter it I just think "That woman deserved to be raped since she went down to Miami when she's from Georgia"
It doesn’t. Iirc, the “across state lines” talking point has been going around since the shootings gained national attention; people alleged that Kyle brought the gun from Illinois to Wisconsin, which wasn’t even accurate since the gun was stored in WI. I think they were salivating over the idea that the feds could get involved. Now it’s basically something people say to prove they don’t know what they’re talking about. Even the prosecution hasn’t made it a cornerstone of their case, they’ve just been saying that Kyle wasn’t from Kenosha.
So anyone saying it here is just memeing on the idiots online who think it matters.
 
What? What's wrong with it? He's being tried by a jury of his peers. You always bitch about how there aren't enough black folks on the jury when Dind U. Nuffin is on trial, so a jury that matches the racial makeup of the defendant should be completely A OK with you faggots.
Because the 'victims' were killed by white supremacy so they're honorary blacks. #SayTheirNames

 
It dosent they're grasping at straws and victim blaming.

They're essentially saying "if he just ignored the riots and didn't get involved they wouldn't viciously have tried to kill a child and no one would have gotten shot"
So, all of a sudden, red blooded Americans aren't allowed to defend their homes, livelihoods and cities?

Got it.
 
I can't believe they're going to pretend the judge is the reason that Kyle could get off of any of the charges.

We all sat here and watched through days of trial just to see what was going on and even though we all had pretty solid opinions about what happened, we still stuck with it and would have been prepared to talk about the trial should the defense have dropped the ball, the judge have sided firmly with the prosecution or the prosecution presenting a rock solid case; anything that would have resulted in a very bad ruling for Kyle.

But none of the idiots on TV act like they watched the trial and none of the big people on social media watched it, either. The people talking about wanting to impeach/attack the judge didn't watch it. The people commenting on Reddit and Youtube against Kyle are all still copy-pasting the "muh state lines" shit, with the occasional "judge bias" cope tacked on at the end certainly didn't bother watching it. And who will be the ones bringing consequences down on all of us for what happens in this case? People that didn't watch it.

Kyle winning the case doesn't change anything in the wider situation, because the huge mass of cognitive dissonance will write it off as a fluke and use it to justify more situations that put Kyle in a place where he needed to defend himself; and there won't be a sympathetic or unbiased judge next time because they're all being pushed out to make room for activists.

Something, anything, has to happen to either make these people pay attention and accept reality or get normal people to push them out of the conversation entirely; or else we're just going to end up here again and again and again. Sanity needs to have a voice, or else this lunacy is going to keep speaking for everyone.
 
So what should be done now and who will be the one, to give them the response that they are asking for.


I noticed a lot of liberal niggers are butthurt over this case and want Kyle in prison as well. They managed to turn a case involving 4 white dudes or 3 whites and 1 hispanic into an issue that affects niggers.

The fact that the phrase "people of color" keeps being used, despite it being passive voice for "colored people" shows how much has the political opposition to them, been dead for a long time.
How dare you call Rosenbaum white?

I am offended on behalf of all whites in this thread.
 
Here's my exceptional question: despite the fact that the jury has been instructed not to follow coverage of the trial or to discuss it in their household, what are the odds that they'll simply ignore those instructions and look at CNN anyways?
Despite the doomerism in here and the general floor licking of juries, they do mostly obey this edict. It's not 100% but most do cut down on their intake of basically all media. Many have expressed an interest in reading after their jury duty. So it's a bit of a mixed bag, but generally they obey.
 
Can someone explain why exactly Kyle crossing state lines matters in terms of his self defense claim? This keeps popping up and everytime I encounter it I just think "That woman deserved to be raped since she went down to Miami when she's from Georgia"
Because it makes it seem like Kyle has no ties to the community and wasn't actually trying to protect it, he was just going there just to kill pedos.

Depending on where you live, "CROSSING STATE LINES" may seem a greater distance than mentioning the actual distance. My drive downtown is more mileage than Kyle's drive across state lines.

Kyle traveled ~20mi from Antioch to Kenosha.

"He brought a rifle to a riot so he provoked the attack"
=
"She wore a short skirt in that bar/alley/street so she provoked the attack"

also:
Friendly reminder that the State Patrol closed all of the exits off the I-94 into Kenosha that night because of the massive stream of Chicagoans streaming in to trash the place.

This little "crossing state lines" rule to prove malice narrowly only applies to Kyle, somehow. Not the rioting arsonists, apparently.

Funny note. Gaige Grosskreutz also came armed and from West Allis WI, over 40 miles away. Twice the distance Kyle traveled from Antioch IL.
 
Binger asking the videographer today about making "disparaging" remarks about Rosenbaum was such an obvious attempt to get the witness to talk about the anal rape and pedophilia and trigger a mistrial and no press outlet will ever report on it.

The cotnrast between the highlights and interesting aspects of this trial for anyone watching, versus the press coverage is truly next level revisionism.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back