This is the classic social justice take that critical theory and its children has beget so forcefully into the hands of all these pseudointellectuals:
Lavery: "We must abolish the entire system!"
Random Dude: "What should replace it?"
Lavery:
View attachment 2710398
It’s a dumb, cowardly way of getting out of an argument or avoiding having to provide a solution.
“A man is harassing me at work. What should I do?”
“Well in my opinion, no one should have to go to work at all!”
“I am worried about gun violence in this neighborhood.”
“Which is why I think we should invent bullet-proof exoskeletons to walk around in. All other gun-related ideas are not as clever as mine!"
“Can you help decide what to have for dinner tonight?”
“Actually I think it would be better if food could be created in a replicator like in Star Trek.”
Aren't troonz and ess jay double ewws euphoric atheists? Pretty sure they are, so which is it, Obama? Either God is dead, or you do believe in a higher power (even if that higher power walked straight off the set of Prometheus), pick a lane.
Because Lucifer, the Morning Star sought to defy God for similar reasons. But God is not your trick pony.
Pride comes before the fall, great professor.
Many might claim to be atheists, but gender ideology relies on the idea of a feminine or masculine “soul” that does or does not match up to one’s body and is somehow entirely separate from it (you can't be "born in the wrong body" unless you believe in a self outside of and separate from a body) as well as the idea of a non-material platonic ideal of female and male. Those are religious beliefs.
Anyway, God might be dead, but nature isn’t, and nature always wins lol
Seeing a narc's DARVOing repeatedly fail in such a way brings me immense joy. Doyle refuse to concede to any of his attacks without giving Joe any new angles or munition. Joe would get his ass handed to him on a silver platter if he engaged Doyle in a public debate. He's a loony "intellectual" only interested in winning despite all his claims to the contrary.
"Andrew. This is very silly." is a super condescending version of "Look Dave, I can see you're really upset about this. I honestly think you ought to sit down calmly, take a stress pill, and think things over." and manages to sound twice as robotic. Joe's been talking down at him all along, just like a smug teacher to a naughty student. What a fucking jackass.
Joe comes across as a smug little worm who is accustomed to pulling one over on midwits but who doesn't realize that smart people see right through him. He just keeps using the same weaselly tactics on people who see what he's doing, and doesn't realize he is embarrassing himself.
Yes Joe, everyone just woke up today and randomly decided to call you a nonce because you are "a trans woman at a university." Definitely not because you said a bunch of creepy pedo shit.
In all honesty, I don't think Joe is a nonce. I
do think he is too arrogant and narcissistic enough to realize or care that he is pushing a strain of ideology that aims to make children accessible to adult predators. To dip into that kind of self-reflection might mean having to think about the fact that he is part of a movement that mostly empowers male fetishists, and that he is a fetishist himself.
He also thinks he's smarter and more knowledgeable than anyone else, particularly when it comes to topics he associates with women, and so he cannot grasp that he knows
absolutely fucking nothing about kids or what is best for them. Families and protecting children are subjects that he, the enlightened feminist male, knows better than any of those silly women that might have given birth and raised kids themselves, or any of those dumb fathers who probably have not even written a single paper about gender theory.
