Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Proceedings - Come for the trial, stay for….

What do you think will happen?

  • Guilty on all charges

    Votes: 282 8.8%
  • Full Acquittal

    Votes: 1,077 33.7%
  • Mistral

    Votes: 264 8.3%
  • Mixture of verdicts

    Votes: 479 15.0%
  • Minecraft

    Votes: 213 6.7%
  • Roblox

    Votes: 132 4.1%
  • Runescape

    Votes: 203 6.3%
  • Somehow Guilty Of Two Mutually Exclusive Actions

    Votes: 514 16.1%
  • KYLE WILL SUBMIT TO BBC

    Votes: 35 1.1%

  • Total voters
    3,199
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Here's a flash for you.

In my own home state (that'd be NY), the main reason the rioters were not dealt with by the police is that local officials (namely the at-the-time mayor of NYC) were on-board with their objective. The police answer to those who have hiring and firing authority over them, which in NYC is the mayor's office. As a result, more often than not, when the rioters started torching shit, stealing, assaulting people, and worse, the police would stand down and let them do it. Only the worst offenses did the police even bother to try to intervene, and there's a reason for that.

So let's say you have the cops that aren't willing to kiss DeBlasio's ass, and are willing to arrest the rioters for being complete pieces of shit. Well, congratulations, because the local-level District Attorneys won't fucking prosecute, short of a murder or manslaughter charge. Here in NY, Arson that causes a death carries the death penalty, one of the rare offenses that does. The DA basically rubber stamped every Arson that hit their desk as not worth prosecuting.

I bring this shit up because this is exactly what happened in Kenosha. The entire Rittenhouse case would not have fucking happened if city officials had bothered to do their fucking jobs. They didn't because they cynically intended to use the riots as a weapon against the opposition and give themselves more authoritarian control that none of their constituents would ever have approved of.

This, not the 2A argument, is the critical reason why the state is throwing the book at this case. Civil order broke down because of their actions.
I agree. I also think it pissed them off that one kid with a rifle successfully ended that arson in one night. Iirc they did not riot on the 26th. The state can not allow their willing incompetence to be highlighted like this. Even if Kyle did nothing wrong he must be punished for doing what the state refused to do.
 
Here's a flash for you.

In my own home state (that'd be NY), the main reason the rioters were not dealt with by the police is that local officials (namely the at-the-time mayor of NYC) were on-board with their objective. The police answer to those who have hiring and firing authority over them, which in NYC is the mayor's office. As a result, more often than not, when the rioters started torching shit, stealing, assaulting people, and worse, the police would stand down and let them do it. Only the worst offenses did the police even bother to try to intervene, and there's a reason for that.

So let's say you have the cops that aren't willing to kiss DeBlasio's ass, and are willing to arrest the rioters for being complete pieces of shit. Well, congratulations, because the local-level District Attorneys won't fucking prosecute, short of a murder or manslaughter charge. Here in NY, Arson that causes a death carries the death penalty, one of the rare offenses that does. The DA basically rubber stamped every Arson that hit their desk as not worth prosecuting.

I bring this shit up because this is exactly what happened in Kenosha. The entire Rittenhouse case would not have fucking happened if city officials had bothered to do their fucking jobs. They didn't because they cynically intended to use the riots as a weapon against the opposition and give themselves more authoritarian control that none of their constituents would ever have approved of.

This, not the 2A argument, is the critical reason why the state is throwing the book at this case. Civil order broke down because of their actions.
Now check who paid to get those DAs elected -- hint: it was Soros -- and you'll see this wasn't just an accidental coincidence, it was an active subversive attack on our nation by someone who should have been put down years ago.
 
I don't understand how some americans are willing to throw away this rights and this ability to protect themselves just by some cucked logic of "he should've stayed at home, the rioters could riot and set everything on fire, but this kid had no right to be there and protecting neighbourhood where his relatives lives!"
Over reliance on the government, the fact that the incident involved was one of their sacred cows, and the person involved was White.

My classic example was the Black Panthers and their armed patrols. Personally, I have no issue with both the Black Panthers, the roof Koreans, and the militia in Kenosha.

All three, when you remove anything to bias your opinions, are community defense. But two are different.

One is Blacks protecting their own communities. Just like Black on Black violent crime, what happens in the hood stays in the hood. Any criticism of this will get you labeled as racist if you are white.

The second is Black on Asian crime. This again is highly problematic for progressives. You have one of their favored minorities attacking a minority they have indifference for. Even talking about this issue will bring up disproportionate rates of Black against Asian violence as opposed to Asian on Black violence. Recently, in the US we had a rash of Asian "hate crimes" and it was covered by the media to smear Trump. But as it became more clear the violent aggressors we're Black this campaign evaporated.

Finally, we have a White guy having to use force after being attacked while they defended property. No need to talk about the violence in the Black community. No need to talk about disproportionate races of hate crimes between minorities. Most importantly this White guy was attacking a cause they support.

Well, their are no more restrictions. They can attack the heretic to thier cause and not seem racist.

So they begin their attack.

The police that are evil and flawed so much that Black communities could not rely on them suddenly becomes the only legitimate force for whites.

The guns used by Blacks and Asians to protect their own communities become tools for oppression. The crimes committed by Red Neck Revolt and the John Brown Gun Club where two Black kids were murdered are forgotten.

As stated repeatedly, don't bother pointing out their hypocrisy. They don't care. It's about achieving their goals and preserving their narrative.
 
People on this forum have called me everything from a troon to a pedophile because I'm pro-choice and don't like Trump, so y'all need to take your own advice. Don't dish it out if you can't take it.

My point is that this child should have been at home playing Xbox, not trying to play Rambo in another state because it makes him feel like a big man.
Don't like being called troon or pedophile? How about faggot? That suits you more.
As for why he should've been at home playing video game, not everyone is a coward that doesn't want to help and protect their community, even more so when the threat is coming from a bunch of screaming retards with a mix of convicts that want to burn shit down just because some nigger OD'd on fentanyl.
 
People on this forum have called me everything from a troon to a pedophile because I'm pro-choice and don't like Trump, so y'all need to take your own advice. Don't dish it out if you can't take it.

My point is that this child should have been at home playing Xbox, not trying to play Rambo in another state because it makes him feel like a big man.
Just because you're content with sitting at home and jerking off to videogames all day as a 17 y/o, doesn't mean everyone else should be. Kyle has actual aspirations to help people and become a useful member of society, and it was his legal right to go where he wanted, and it was his right to both have a gun and use it to protect himself.
He was serving his community by cleaning the aftermath of violent riots that should have never been permitted in the first place, and that's police and local authorities not doing their jobs, leaving people with no other choice. He put out fires and offered people medical assistance for which he was trained.

He wasn't there to shoot anyone, he had countless opportunities earlier that day but never did it. He only did it when he was ambushed by a rioter with the handgun and cornered by a psycho chasing him, the same one who threatened to kill him earlier that day. After that he was trying to get to the police to surrender, but rioters went after him for whatever reason and multiple of them assaulted him. He shot them because he had no other choice, he was alone surrounded by a hostile mob actively beating him.
These are facts.

And lastly, you're a cunt. Crawl under a rock and die.
 
Don't like being called troon or pedophile? How about faggot? That suits you more.
As for why he should've been at home playing video game, not everyone is a coward that doesn't want to help and protect their community, even more so when the threat is coming from a bunch of screaming retards with a mix of convicts that want to burn shit down just because some nigger OD'd on fentanyl.
"Ignore" is your friend, my friends.
 
Just had a long discussion with a friend about the trial and as expected it ended poorly. The friend in this case tends to be of a lefty persuasion more often than not while I tend to be centric. Now, this is a friend I care about a lot, he’s practically family to me and so I care a great deal about his opinions and input even if we can’t agree. His arguments unfortunately in regards to this case seem to be the very basic regurgitations of those heard on Twitter and Reddit. The exception being that even he can agree that Kyle has an unshakable claim to self defense.

Firstly, he believes that Kyle illegally purchased the gun through his friend Black with the sole intention of going to the riot and putting himself in a situation in which he would be “forced” to shoot people. This, he says, is based off of Kyle’s tweets wherein he talked about shooting shoplifters. I of course put it to him that such a claim was at worst coincidental as I know for a fact that such statements are made constantly through social media and often have no bearing on the reality of what a person would actually do in those scenarios.

Secondly, he claims as many have, that the case should be retried because the judge is biased towards Kyle and a racist. His reasoning for this believe is, according to him, that the Judge ruled that the defense could call the victims anything but. Additionally, he is of the belief that the ring tone used by the Judge is in fact a reason to believe that the Judge is necessarily pro Trump. Now to some extent I can agree that the Judge may be biased, however I believe this is due to the Prosecution’s actions throughout the trial thus far as opposed to a built in bias from the beginning. It’s my belief, and I have relayed as much to my friend, that the Judge began this trial as neutral as possible and then gradually became ever more annoyed by the actions of the prosecution thereby creating the bias.

Finally, and most annoyingly, he is of the opinion that Kyle is a racist supporter of the Proud Boys, claiming that they even flew a flag celebrating and depicting the number of people he shot. This, he insists, is further evidence that Kyle had every intention of shooting someone during the riot. He thereafter refused to take into account the circumstances that led up to that event or the suspicious individual whom had set it up and lured Kyle there to begin with. It is his belief that Kyle wouldn’t have done any of these things if he were really innocent.

How can I get through to him? I hate to see him so consumed by this leftist ideology that he feels the need to be so stubborn on what is quite clearly the story of a well meaning but perhaps dumb kid who just wanted to help out and be a hero, but ended up in a situation beyond his control in which he was forced to either defend himself or die. They all seem so hateful when they speak about their political views and leanings as though they were possessed by something unimaginable. He used to not be like this. In fact I would say there was a time that I knew him when even I considered him to farther right than I was left. I want to help him understand that the path he’s on is one that has historically embraced violence and hate. I don’t want to watch my friends, the people I love and care about suffer the way he is because of some petty politics. I know he’s better than this. I know they can all be better than this.
 
Can we expect protests/riots across the U.S if Kyle is not guilty?
3 white people were shot by a white guy. There will be riots but nothing on the George Floyd level of entertainment. Chicago will burn because it's chicago and nignogs only need a reason to loot and pillage that city.

I look forward to https://heyjackass.com/ report of deaths for the day or two after the verdict
 
You know what really boggles my mind in all of this?
The whole "he shouldn't have been there" argument. People are so fucking docile, so passive, so cucked, that they just conceded their cities to violent extremists, they default to the idea that it's okay for antifa/BLM whoever the fuck to destroy peoples' livelihoods, as if they have a fucking right to it. "Yeah, sure, go ahead and destroy property, what can ya do, right? Have fun!"
And they blame one kid who tried to do something about it (deter violent rioters from damaging local business and put out fires) for not being as cucked as they are?!
He had a life there, he didn't want to just sit and watch it all get burned down. Neither should've other citizens.

This is only going to get worse if government is allowed to take weapons away from people, leaving them defenseless at the mercy of the pozzed police that's effectively neutralized by ideologues and wouldn't do anything to help you when facing rioters. In a few years you'll be living in constant fear.
All these people should be ashamed. Shoot mostly peaceful protester in Minecraft, save your city, save your country.
 
You know what really boggles my mind in all of this?
The whole "he shouldn't have been there" argument. People are so fucking docile, so passive, so cucked, that they just conceded their cities to violent extremists, they default to the idea that it's okay for antifa/BLM whoever the fuck to destroy peoples' livelihoods, as if they have a fucking right to it. "Yeah, sure, go ahead and destroy property, what can ya do, right? Have fun!"
And they blame one kid who tried to do something about it (deter violent rioters from damaging local business and put out fires) for not being as cucked as they are?!
He had a life there, he didn't want to just sit and watch it all get burned down. Neither should've other citizens.

This is only going to get worse if government is allowed to take weapons away from people, leaving them defenseless at the mercy of the pozzed police that's effectively neutralized by ideologues and wouldn't do anything to help you when facing rioters. In a few years you'll be living in constant fear.
All these people should be ashamed. Shoot mostly peaceful protester in Minecraft, save your city, save your country.
The PTB have been working towards this mindset for a while. They want us docile sheep so they can larp as feudal lords.
 
His twitter account that he was tweeting from during the trial: https://twitter.com/dawnpatrolmke

His reddit account: https://reddit.com/u/find_your_line

I mean we could all send it for maximum reach

It was kind of hilarious when he was defending himself on his revoked CCW by posting a picture of the CCW card that he still possesses on Twitter. He lost his privilege to carry a concealed weapon because of his criminal history and I doubt he'll ever get it back again.

Like this one.
Read what he replied to. He denied it was illegal for him to possess a firearm and yet in trial he admitted to it that it was illegal.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back