Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Proceedings - Come for the trial, stay for….

What do you think will happen?

  • Guilty on all charges

    Votes: 282 8.8%
  • Full Acquittal

    Votes: 1,077 33.7%
  • Mistral

    Votes: 264 8.3%
  • Mixture of verdicts

    Votes: 479 15.0%
  • Minecraft

    Votes: 213 6.7%
  • Roblox

    Votes: 132 4.1%
  • Runescape

    Votes: 203 6.3%
  • Somehow Guilty Of Two Mutually Exclusive Actions

    Votes: 514 16.1%
  • KYLE WILL SUBMIT TO BBC

    Votes: 35 1.1%

  • Total voters
    3,199
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
I know. It's evidence that Binger would try slimy tactics to intimidate people.
I really wish Binger's breathing license gets revoked...in Minecraft of course. I have mixed feelings about Monday. I hope Kyle gets aquitted but the prosecutors have sneaked in questionable evidence and that gives me a bad feeling. And if the defense wants to fight dirty they should just casually mention "Rosenbaum was a convicted criminal. He liked touching boys" just to fuck with Binger. Even if the judge then throws a mistrial at this point I wouldn't care anymore. Let's face it the majority knows what kind of scumbags Pedobaum und Wifebeater Hubert were. What's the point of hiding it anymore?
 
So... The fact that he's getting a fair trial and not getting tossed under a bus is... fascist somehow?

Do these people know what words mean?
Believe me I hate to do this, but her explanation is that he is getting a fair trial, so anyone who is complaining that he isn't is falsely doing so to generate sympathy.
 
She claims that she was solicited for sex, but also claimed that they never had sex, no evidence was produced to demonstrate that they did, but evidence and testimony was given that she planned to rob and murder someone, hence her bringing a gun with her, and also that after committing the cold blooded execution she tried to frame other people for the crime, etc etc. She was a junkie and a killer that pulled the race card and defamed the man she executed in cold blood. There is no parallel.
But it's a excellent example that who ever the celebrities are supporting you should not support until proven otherwise.
 
Believe me I hate to do this, but her explanation is that he is getting a fair trial, so anyone who is complaining that he isn't is falsely doing so to generate sympathy.
But she specifically says the argument "he deserves due process" is indicative of being a fascist.

These are the same people who are threatening his life on Twitter.
 
Also worth mentioning that very few people use twitter compared to the global population, compared to even the US population, and even fewer people in that number actually use twitter. Twitter has just become a massive echo chamber for BPD wine aunts and guys who were ignored by girls all throughout highschool/college and have gotten addicted to having a girl tweet ":)" at them for defending milady's honor.
And gays. And furries. And gay furries (redundant, I know).
 
But she specifically says the argument "he deserves due process" is indicative of being a fascist.

These are the same people who are threatening his life on Twitter.
In this context "fascist" is just their name for the enemy team, it means about as much as "sus".
Also worth mentioning that very few people use twitter compared to the global population, compared to even the US population, and even fewer people in that number actually use twitter. Twitter has just become a massive echo chamber for BPD wine aunts and guys who were ignored by girls all throughout highschool/college and have gotten addicted to having a girl tweet ":)" at them for defending milady's honor.
To be fair, isn't that "3% of Twitter users make most of the tweets" statistic just a natural Pareto distribution? If you make a cumulative distribution of the top contributors to anything you end up with stats like this. Guys like Academic Agent also tweet a ridiculous amount, I think Twitter is an echo chamber for people who like the sound of their own voice, which is then slanted by the moderation.
 
I do love how Barnes insists that all of his ideas are correct and better than anyone else.

I am not a lawyer and that's how I act in real life. That's probably why he annoys me so much, even though I agree with him a fair bit.
 
Reddit dumb 1.png

Reddit dumb 2.png


Anally raping 9-11 year olds isn't rape. They can consent!!! 🤣
Some fucknugget ACTUALLY made that argument.
 
I do love how Barnes insists that all of his ideas are correct and better than anyone else.
I am not a lawyer and that's how I act in real life. That's probably why he annoys me so much, even though I agree with him a fair bit.
Have you watched the defense? Regardless of how you feel about Barnes, Where's the lie?

Barnes is kind of sleazy but that's the kind of lawyer you want to get you out of most criminal trouble, someone who wouldn't even flinch at shredding a little old lady on the stand if it means you walking free.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back