Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Proceedings - Come for the trial, stay for….

What do you think will happen?

  • Guilty on all charges

    Votes: 282 8.8%
  • Full Acquittal

    Votes: 1,077 33.7%
  • Mistral

    Votes: 264 8.3%
  • Mixture of verdicts

    Votes: 479 15.0%
  • Minecraft

    Votes: 213 6.7%
  • Roblox

    Votes: 132 4.1%
  • Runescape

    Votes: 203 6.3%
  • Somehow Guilty Of Two Mutually Exclusive Actions

    Votes: 514 16.1%
  • KYLE WILL SUBMIT TO BBC

    Votes: 35 1.1%

  • Total voters
    3,199
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Formerly respected lawyer Lin Wood has posted a long opinion about the Rittenhouse case revolving around David Hancock (a CIA agent that was secretly recording him).

The media usually refers to David Hancock as "Rittenhouse spokesperson"

Apparently Barnes talking about it triggered Lin Wood to info dump on his battles against David Hancock. One of which was a fist fight.
I’m liking Hancock already. And I have no idea who he is. However anyone willing to smack Lin Wood upside the skull is okay in my book. It’s one of the few areas Left and Right can find agreement on.
 
FACE5E4A-029C-4BCE-B859-1F444CC2756C.png
4CC6A8A7-1B24-4630-9398-790CFBB36056.png
52841DF3-6866-448C-8D68-A171E534C36A.jpeg
D8081C16-E61A-4E58-8C52-55D7DD162A1F.png
 
Case in point. You started this lie because I called Trump a fat lolcow on another thread.
RENT FREEEEEEE REEEEEEEEE holy shit Trump really broke you, didn't he?
Back on topic, you're all not living in the real world of you believe that this bloated beta male went to Kenosha because he "cared about his community".
You aren't fit to lick Kyles's shoes, I'd rather live in a community of a thousand Kyles than a ranting sperg such as yourself.
 
Yeah, its not cheap or free. Did you not hear what Black said during cross he charges an hour to testify? Anywhere from $150 to $500/hr and he was charging Kyle $350 an hour. Trial prep isn't free free for experts, either. Lawyers charge in 15 minutes increments, so even a phone eats away at a retainer pretty fast. That's phones calls to you, your experts and anyone else related to the case. Paralegals have to be paid and while not as expensive as lawyers they are not cheap, or free. They have to interview witnesses and keep records, private investigators also, who also may have to testify.
Well Barnes was talking about experts that would help the Lolyers and not those who will show up in trial...
coaches, analyst, dirty internet private eyes that do the work the farms do for money, etc.
all would have been needed for a short time each, short enough that peopöe outraged over this would have done it for free or at cost.
He also got gus pollster to poll the while state to find out if a motion to move the trial would be usefull, on his dime.

Yes. And it was always going to be. I assume everyone involved knew this and planned accordingly as it seems like they did.
so you halfass it because you have the upper hand? are you mexican or how can you come to such a shamefull view on work ethics?


I bet the judge has an arsenal of flintlock muskets and medieval melee weapons considering his age. He seems to have a good understanding of weapons though and I’m sure he has very good security.
well he knows what they inted from hearing them speak when he was a child...

 
Just had a long discussion with a friend about the trial and as expected it ended poorly. The friend in this case tends to be of a lefty persuasion more often than not while I tend to be centric. Now, this is a friend I care about a lot, he’s practically family to me and so I care a great deal about his opinions and input even if we can’t agree. His arguments unfortunately in regards to this case seem to be the very basic regurgitations of those heard on Twitter and Reddit. The exception being that even he can agree that Kyle has an unshakable claim to self defense.

Firstly, he believes that Kyle illegally purchased the gun through his friend Black with the sole intention of going to the riot and putting himself in a situation in which he would be “forced” to shoot people. This, he says, is based off of Kyle’s tweets wherein he talked about shooting shoplifters. I of course put it to him that such a claim was at worst coincidental as I know for a fact that such statements are made constantly through social media and often have no bearing on the reality of what a person would actually do in those scenarios.

Secondly, he claims as many have, that the case should be retried because the judge is biased towards Kyle and a racist. His reasoning for this believe is, according to him, that the Judge ruled that the defense could call the victims anything but. Additionally, he is of the belief that the ring tone used by the Judge is in fact a reason to believe that the Judge is necessarily pro Trump. Now to some extent I can agree that the Judge may be biased, however I believe this is due to the Prosecution’s actions throughout the trial thus far as opposed to a built in bias from the beginning. It’s my belief, and I have relayed as much to my friend, that the Judge began this trial as neutral as possible and then gradually became ever more annoyed by the actions of the prosecution thereby creating the bias.

Finally, and most annoyingly, he is of the opinion that Kyle is a racist supporter of the Proud Boys, claiming that they even flew a flag celebrating and depicting the number of people he shot. This, he insists, is further evidence that Kyle had every intention of shooting someone during the riot. He thereafter refused to take into account the circumstances that led up to that event or the suspicious individual whom had set it up and lured Kyle there to begin with. It is his belief that Kyle wouldn’t have done any of these things if he were really innocent.

How can I get through to him? I hate to see him so consumed by this leftist ideology that he feels the need to be so stubborn on what is quite clearly the story of a well meaning but perhaps dumb kid who just wanted to help out and be a hero, but ended up in a situation beyond his control in which he was forced to either defend himself or die. They all seem so hateful when they speak about their political views and leanings as though they were possessed by something unimaginable. He used to not be like this. In fact I would say there was a time that I knew him when even I considered him to farther right than I was left. I want to help him understand that the path he’s on is one that has historically embraced violence and hate. I don’t want to watch my friends, the people I love and care about suffer the way he is because of some petty politics. I know he’s better than this. I know they can all be better than this.
Try and try. If that fails, you can still be friends. Just don't a-log him.
 
So what kind of numbers are actually involved on the jury? Does it have to be unanimous in either direction, or how does that work?
 
Weird. Why did the thread lose 400+ pages suddenly?
Did it really? Is a janny going on a bender?
Well Barnes was talking about experts that would help the Lolyers and not those who will show up in trial...
coaches, analyst, dirty internet private eyes that do the work the farms do for money, etc.
all would have been needed for a short time each, short enough that peopöe outraged over this would have done it for free or at cost.
He also got gus pollster to poll the while state to find out if a motion to move the trial would be usefull, on his dime.]
I don't know how useful a pollster would be and as far as the other stuff again I don't know how well that would fare with the oldest and longest serving circuit court judge in Wisconsin, Schroeder. Old school judges like the basics ("Just the facts, ma'am") in a courtroom and the local lawyers know their judges.
 
Libs are saying we shouldnt idolize rittenhouse as a hero
i could agree with that, if they didnt slander him with every bad name on the book
according to them, he's a white supremacist nazi, who went there to shoot people and provoke a fight and other patently false things.
if you compare Kyle as what they portray him, to what he actually is. He's a hero.
Considering they like to idolize domestic abusers and pedophiles I don't think I'll be taking their advice on who to idolize.
 
This is probably exceptional behavior but I'm seriously considering ending a friendship due to someone believing Kyle faked his panic attack. While it would be the last straw that breaks a camels back in this situation, to have such little empathy to another human being who has PTSD from a situation that would be traumatic at the very least doesn't seem like someone anyone should have around in their life.

Exceptional I'm sure, but that level of either brainwashing, ideological possession, or just plain lack of empathy towards another human being present in someone feels like a good enough of a red flag to stop being close with someone. When people tell you who they are, believe them.
I believe he faked his panic attack. Why be a typical drama queen like the urban libs who couldn't stand that their friends voted for Trump?


Difference of opinion. Yes, killing someone is a big thing, yes he's a kid, yes, yes.
I still think that more factors speak for it being faked. And I don't blame him for faking it because he's trying to save himself the best he can.


Nor is this a hill I want to die on, so I won't even argue the many factors that speak for this. Im only arguing that you're pretty fucking lame for ending a friendship over a difference in opinions over someone's character.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back