Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Proceedings - Come for the trial, stay for….

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What do you think will happen?

  • Guilty on all charges

    Votes: 282 8.8%
  • Full Acquittal

    Votes: 1,077 33.7%
  • Mistral

    Votes: 264 8.3%
  • Mixture of verdicts

    Votes: 479 15.0%
  • Minecraft

    Votes: 213 6.7%
  • Roblox

    Votes: 132 4.1%
  • Runescape

    Votes: 203 6.3%
  • Somehow Guilty Of Two Mutually Exclusive Actions

    Votes: 514 16.1%
  • KYLE WILL SUBMIT TO BBC

    Votes: 35 1.1%

  • Total voters
    3,199
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
>bringing a gun shows reckless endangerment and disregard for life
I swear, wtf do people think the 2nd amendment is for? Collectors?
The right to a militia. With the caveat that the militia isn't people like Kyle or the actual militia members there that night like Balch and Lackowski, those are bad white men militia. They mean scum like Rosenbaum, Huber, and Grosskreutz, those are the kind of people you'd see being the footsoldiers of good anti-racist militia.
 
Pretty accurate. Look at Trotsky, the Jews who made up the early Soviet government, and the Jews who ran the Weimar republic. They all heavily disliked religious Judaism and would write extensively about how secularism was the only way forward.
Jews jewing each other has always been a thing. Doesn't change the fact that they still all perceive themselves as a separate chosen tribe above the goyim, which is clear by how the Jews in the US govt and financial system have us beholden to Israel. The fact that most anti-Israeli opposition in the US is controlled is no coincidence either.
 
On the other hand, the kid is 17; for women who have sons, or even younger brothers for that matter, I think they'll be extremely biased in his favor. I honestly don't think they'll be able to bring themselves to convict babyfaced boyscout Kyle unless the evidence was absolutely overwhelming.
I agree with this. He has this innocent look to him and he blubbered like a baby on the stand. Bitches love that shit.
They think it's an amendment that is at best outdated and at worst is racist.
Yeah well tough shit. Article V says you can't do dick about it without going through the proper process. Also anyone who thinks it's racist should read Clarence Thomas's concurrence in McDonald v. Chicago, which addresses this issue fairly comprehensively.
 
im still trying to figure out what the fucking point of open carrying is if bringing a gun shows reckless endangerment and disregard for life?

i was always under the impression open carry was a signal to not fuck with this person. Like are the smooth brains who bang on about him carrying a gun openly honestly trying to say that if hed conceled a gun and shot these people it would have been better?

Chasing after someone with a gun is peak play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
 
Even if that giant black crack head was a pedo.. Chauvin still executed him.
I kinda doubt that from what was going on. From the amount of video I saw it seemed more like Floyd was either having an OD freak out and gave himself a heart attack after refusing to get into the car, Chauvin created undue stress, or Floyd legit just OD before. I think at most Chauvin made the guy panicked, I don't think he choked him out. Maybe he made it harder to breath, but I think at most you could say that Chauvin helped cause a heart attack.

Floyd was a massive prick who victimized countless people, I find it oddly poetic that in death and death he made life worse for black people, either by selling drugs or causing Minneapolis become the new Detroit in a few years when a leftist mayor goes full retard and kills the city.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Bingus Stan
im still trying to figure out what the fucking point of open carrying is if bringing a gun shows reckless endangerment and disregard for life?

i was always under the impression open carry was a signal to not fuck with this person. Like are the smooth brains who bang on about him carrying a gun openly honestly trying to say that if hed conceled a gun and shot these people it would have been better?

Chasing after someone with a gun is peak play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
They needed an argument and ran with whatever they could throw at the wall. The only question in this case is how influenced the jurors are by media and by political perceptions and threats.
 
im still trying to figure out what the fucking point of open carrying is if bringing a gun shows reckless endangerment and disregard for life?

i was always under the impression open carry was a signal to not fuck with this person. Like are the smooth brains who bang on about him carrying a gun openly honestly trying to say that if hed conceled a gun and shot these people it would have been better?

Chasing after someone with a gun is peak play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
what they're saying is he shouldn't have had a gun at all, he should have just let the violent criminals have their way with him because that's what he deserves for daring to oppose the mob.
 
Thanks doc

Also if the jury dosent acquit tomorrow, will be interesting to see how many people that pushes over the edge.

I've heard plenty of formerly hardcore pro police/military people say if he's found guilty, they'll take it as the people being declared enemy of the state.

Now what exactly they mean by that, I don't know. But at the very least I hope it means people will start viewing law enforcement as an active enemy to right leaning whites.
 
How much of a dipshit do you have to be to come in from halfway across the country to cause destruction in another state? I've never quite understood that. Not once in their lives do these bums go "wait, this is a tremendous waste of time, and I should either be drinking shotgun mouthwash or knitting blankets for babies"?
For all the people that claim Antifa is merely an idea, I think it's more of a cult.

During last summer's riots, look at all the social media posts that used coded or overtly open language to encourage other Antifa people to drop everything and travel to wherever the next protest site was. All these out of town protestors did just that because they're so blindly devoted to their cause and question nothing from their peers or those they deem to be authority figures -- just like those people part of a cult. Alternatively, it's as if mob mentality has replaced any semblance of thought with them.

Contrast this to normies who would stop, think things over, and realize they have a job, family, or other meaningful stuff going on in their life that makes traveling cross-country to participate in violent protests to be a bad idea and something to avoid.

To stay on-topic, it's great to read here how the defense attorney showed some fire in today's closing argument. After the extensive debate on whether the defense team did enough during the trial, it appears the defense was saving its passion for the closing argument to make a significant impression on the jury (for better or for worse).

If the jurors review the case objectively like they should, they have the defense pointing out everything wrong with the prosecution and their case whereas the prosecution dropped the ball big-time and spent most of its closing bouncing and squeaking about everything but the relevant details of case. Let's hope the jury is clued into that enough as it deliberates.
 
found a shit take

View attachment 2720986

View attachment 2720987

View attachment 2720988
also check out his bio

View attachment 2720991
cherry on top profile pic horsefaced

View attachment 2720992
also another lawyer which I deem possibly okView attachment 2720993

Huh, maybe his clients should know that he doesn't agree with how Kyle was protecting the small to medium businesses he's supposedly championing. What a hypocrite.

Screenshot 2021-11-16 12.19.40.png
 
If the jurors review the case objectively like they should, they have the defense pointing out everything wrong with the prosecution and their case whereas the prosecution dropped the ball big-time and spent most of its closing bouncing and squeaking about everything but the relevant details of case. Let's hope the jury is clued into that enough as it deliberates.
The fact that the prosecution said the quiet part out loud makes me a bit more hopeful.

Remember, the prosecution had to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt. It's a pretty high standard.
 
i really have to wonder… regardless of the verdict, what do you think this trial will do for gun sales?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back