- Joined
- Jun 14, 2016
Thanks doc
Also if the jury dosent acquit tomorrow, will be interesting to see how many people that pushes over the edge.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thanks doc
Probably alot of people will be pushed over to the edge. Hell if I ever get in a shootout I'm going to realize that it's Victory or death then.Thanks doc
Also if the jury dosent acquit tomorrow, will be interesting to see how many people that pushes over the edge.
The right to a militia. With the caveat that the militia isn't people like Kyle or the actual militia members there that night like Balch and Lackowski, those are bad white men militia. They mean scum like Rosenbaum, Huber, and Grosskreutz, those are the kind of people you'd see being the footsoldiers of good anti-racist militia.>bringing a gun shows reckless endangerment and disregard for life
I swear, wtf do people think the 2nd amendment is for? Collectors?
Jews jewing each other has always been a thing. Doesn't change the fact that they still all perceive themselves as a separate chosen tribe above the goyim, which is clear by how the Jews in the US govt and financial system have us beholden to Israel. The fact that most anti-Israeli opposition in the US is controlled is no coincidence either.Pretty accurate. Look at Trotsky, the Jews who made up the early Soviet government, and the Jews who ran the Weimar republic. They all heavily disliked religious Judaism and would write extensively about how secularism was the only way forward.
I agree with this. He has this innocent look to him and he blubbered like a baby on the stand. Bitches love that shit.On the other hand, the kid is 17; for women who have sons, or even younger brothers for that matter, I think they'll be extremely biased in his favor. I honestly don't think they'll be able to bring themselves to convict babyfaced boyscout Kyle unless the evidence was absolutely overwhelming.
Yeah well tough shit. Article V says you can't do dick about it without going through the proper process. Also anyone who thinks it's racist should read Clarence Thomas's concurrence in McDonald v. Chicago, which addresses this issue fairly comprehensively.They think it's an amendment that is at best outdated and at worst is racist.
They think it's for hunting, even though hunting isn't even constitutionally protected.>bringing a gun shows reckless endangerment and disregard for life
I swear, wtf do people think the 2nd amendment is for? Collectors?
If only this was the reality, but alas it is a delusion of the radical left.For Euros, Canadians etc - this illustration depicts what an average day in the United States is like:
View attachment 2720913
I kinda doubt that from what was going on. From the amount of video I saw it seemed more like Floyd was either having an OD freak out and gave himself a heart attack after refusing to get into the car, Chauvin created undue stress, or Floyd legit just OD before. I think at most Chauvin made the guy panicked, I don't think he choked him out. Maybe he made it harder to breath, but I think at most you could say that Chauvin helped cause a heart attack.Even if that giant black crack head was a pedo.. Chauvin still executed him.
They needed an argument and ran with whatever they could throw at the wall. The only question in this case is how influenced the jurors are by media and by political perceptions and threats.im still trying to figure out what the fucking point of open carrying is if bringing a gun shows reckless endangerment and disregard for life?
i was always under the impression open carry was a signal to not fuck with this person. Like are the smooth brains who bang on about him carrying a gun openly honestly trying to say that if hed conceled a gun and shot these people it would have been better?
Chasing after someone with a gun is peak play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
what they're saying is he shouldn't have had a gun at all, he should have just let the violent criminals have their way with him because that's what he deserves for daring to oppose the mob.im still trying to figure out what the fucking point of open carrying is if bringing a gun shows reckless endangerment and disregard for life?
i was always under the impression open carry was a signal to not fuck with this person. Like are the smooth brains who bang on about him carrying a gun openly honestly trying to say that if hed conceled a gun and shot these people it would have been better?
Chasing after someone with a gun is peak play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
That has to make Kick Vic Seethe.
Thanks doc
Also if the jury dosent acquit tomorrow, will be interesting to see how many people that pushes over the edge.
For all the people that claim Antifa is merely an idea, I think it's more of a cult.How much of a dipshit do you have to be to come in from halfway across the country to cause destruction in another state? I've never quite understood that. Not once in their lives do these bums go "wait, this is a tremendous waste of time, and I should either be drinking shotgun mouthwash or knitting blankets for babies"?
found a shit take
View attachment 2720986
View attachment 2720987
View attachment 2720988
also check out his bio
View attachment 2720991
cherry on top profile pic horsefaced
View attachment 2720992
also another lawyer which I deem possibly okView attachment 2720993
If Rittenhouse gets off, imagine the level of coping, seething, and dilating Law Twitter will be doing.That has to make Kick Vic Seethe.
The fact that the prosecution said the quiet part out loud makes me a bit more hopeful.what they're saying is he shouldn't have had a gun at all, he should have just let the violent criminals have their way with him because that's what he deserves for daring to oppose the mob.
Nobody cares what Lawl Twitter thinks, if you can even call what they do thinking.If Rittenhouse gets off, imagine the level of coping, seething, and dilating Law Twitter will be doing.
Their sworn enemy will have won huge in every conceivable way.
If the jurors review the case objectively like they should, they have the defense pointing out everything wrong with the prosecution and their case whereas the prosecution dropped the ball big-time and spent most of its closing bouncing and squeaking about everything but the relevant details of case. Let's hope the jury is clued into that enough as it deliberates.
The fact that the prosecution said the quiet part out loud makes me a bit more hopeful.