Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Proceedings - Come for the trial, stay for….

What do you think will happen?

  • Guilty on all charges

    Votes: 282 8.8%
  • Full Acquittal

    Votes: 1,077 33.7%
  • Mistral

    Votes: 264 8.3%
  • Mixture of verdicts

    Votes: 479 15.0%
  • Minecraft

    Votes: 213 6.7%
  • Roblox

    Votes: 132 4.1%
  • Runescape

    Votes: 203 6.3%
  • Somehow Guilty Of Two Mutually Exclusive Actions

    Votes: 514 16.1%
  • KYLE WILL SUBMIT TO BBC

    Votes: 35 1.1%

  • Total voters
    3,199
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
I had figured the judge was holding off until after the verdict, if it was hung/guilty to set aside the jury verdict and then, and only then declare mistrial with prejudice. Am I coping or is that likely?
It's cope, I'm afraid. Schroeder doesn't want to be The Guy here -- he's rattled by the press attention
 
I had figured the judge was holding off until after the verdict, if it was hung/guilty to set aside the jury verdict and then, and only then declare mistrial with prejudice. Am I coping or is that likely?
If he is, that's retarded. If he wants to truly respect the courts he should personally strangle Binger and fatso right now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Puff
If kyle were to be found guilty, I'm pretty sure it would have happened by now. Requesting the gauge video only further proves that in my eyes. The fact that it hasn't been ruled a mistrial already is absolutely fucking insane. The judge can preach all about fairness but hes letting the prosecution get away with flagrant disrespect of the defendants rights to the point where some blame has to be blamed on him for being complacent. Shut the fuck up about the media and do your job.
 
That's the problem, don't care what jury asked, judge just glossed over the Brady violation in that discussion, did he not?
Eeeeeh, he hasn't ruled on the motion yet. Should he have? I'd say yes. But the problem is that it seems he is boomer enough to not be sure it -is- a Brady violation or at least an intentional one. The fact he was talking about sworn testimony says where he is going on that.
 
The ancient Greeks ensured trial juries numbered in the 100s for this very reason. Harder to corrupt with lies, threats, and bribery.
Different time different place. Citizenship meant something. It was basically the equivalemt of a jury made up of 100 1%ers today. Distinguished gentlemen with their reputation (in those days their livelyhood) on the line.
 
I've been on KF since 2013. I never ignored a single user, but ffs this thread is choke full of one-note-jogger doomposters who regurgitate the same bullshit over and over that I am so fucking sick of their shtick, I actually put them in the quiet box. Will wipe the ignore list once this blows over, but 3 out of 4 joined within the past 3 months or so. Go fucking figure.
Anyone who joined in 2019 onwards is garbage
 
This defense is so god damn inconsistent. They just sat there. Based off what just transpired I think Kyle buttcheeks might be in troulble now because I guess in the world of law if your a state prosecutor you can bend the laws and be as unethical as you want and get away with it. This is a fucking mess. Judge has suddenly become squishy because of reasons so he in part is being unethical for letting this bullshit slip through. Introducing evidence last minute and using weasel talk so it goes over boomer judges head is just gross.
 
And they still condemned Socrates.
Socrates literally condemned himself. His death was an irl shitpost where he convinced the "democratic" Athenians that their own philosophy was bullshit, and they sentenced him for death because of how angry that made them.

Socrates was a completely awesome dude, he knew that his death would be remembered for thousands of years, probably for the entire length of history humanity even exists, and used it to spit contempt at a philosophy he despised, and was correct to despise.

If you disagree, name a single one of the prosecutors of Socrates you remember.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back