- Joined
- Sep 1, 2019
nate the lawyer was a prosecutor right? his line of reasoning for not jumping the judge for the mistrial is reasonable.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is the credo of their entire generation.Never underestimate a boomers ability to throw a child's life away to preserve the last couple years of theirs.
It's cope, I'm afraid. Schroeder doesn't want to be The Guy here -- he's rattled by the press attentionI had figured the judge was holding off until after the verdict, if it was hung/guilty to set aside the jury verdict and then, and only then declare mistrial with prejudice. Am I coping or is that likely?
Schroeder has the balls to chew out the prosecution for what they are doing but is too much of a pushover to act.No judge is based, no matter how fun it might be to meme about them over their old people behavior when nothing else is going on
If he is, that's retarded. If he wants to truly respect the courts he should personally strangle Binger and fatso right now.I had figured the judge was holding off until after the verdict, if it was hung/guilty to set aside the jury verdict and then, and only then declare mistrial with prejudice. Am I coping or is that likely?
This is what's making me think they are leaning towards guilty.Why do they even need the Grosskreutz footage in the first place? Doesn't the self defence claim hinge on the Rosenbaum shooting?
Word. He's willing to let this kid hang in hopes that MSNBC will be nice to him.Never underestimate a boomers ability to throw a child's life away to preserve the last couple years of theirs.
Eeeeeh, he hasn't ruled on the motion yet. Should he have? I'd say yes. But the problem is that it seems he is boomer enough to not be sure it -is- a Brady violation or at least an intentional one. The fact he was talking about sworn testimony says where he is going on that.That's the problem, don't care what jury asked, judge just glossed over the Brady violation in that discussion, did he not?
To be fair, I've replayed the clip of Gaige's arm being vaporized a few times myselfIt's supposed to but the jury can do some autistic shit if its unanimous
B-but Kyle is supposed to walk because I want him to!You whitepillers still with us?
CopingI had figured the judge was holding off until after the verdict, if it was hung/guilty to set aside the jury verdict and then, and only then declare mistrial with prejudice. Am I coping or is that likely?
Different time different place. Citizenship meant something. It was basically the equivalemt of a jury made up of 100 1%ers today. Distinguished gentlemen with their reputation (in those days their livelyhood) on the line.The ancient Greeks ensured trial juries numbered in the 100s for this very reason. Harder to corrupt with lies, threats, and bribery.
Anyone who joined in 2019 onwards is garbageI've been on KF since 2013. I never ignored a single user, but ffs this thread is choke full of one-note-jogger doomposters who regurgitate the same bullshit over and over that I am so fucking sick of their shtick, I actually put them in the quiet box. Will wipe the ignore list once this blows over, but 3 out of 4 joined within the past 3 months or so. Go fucking figure.
What about Roy Bean?No judge is based, no matter how fun it might be to meme about them over their old people behavior when nothing else is going on
Socrates literally condemned himself. His death was an irl shitpost where he convinced the "democratic" Athenians that their own philosophy was bullshit, and they sentenced him for death because of how angry that made them.And they still condemned Socrates.
exactly, scroll up to shit up the chat instead, that's why Jawsh put it up there.but ffs this thread is choke full of one-note-jogger doomposters who regurgitate the same bullshit over and over