Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Proceedings - Come for the trial, stay for….

What do you think will happen?

  • Guilty on all charges

    Votes: 282 8.8%
  • Full Acquittal

    Votes: 1,077 33.7%
  • Mistral

    Votes: 264 8.3%
  • Mixture of verdicts

    Votes: 479 15.0%
  • Minecraft

    Votes: 213 6.7%
  • Roblox

    Votes: 132 4.1%
  • Runescape

    Votes: 203 6.3%
  • Somehow Guilty Of Two Mutually Exclusive Actions

    Votes: 514 16.1%
  • KYLE WILL SUBMIT TO BBC

    Votes: 35 1.1%

  • Total voters
    3,199
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
they just hate cops because the cops don't (yet) work for their side exclusively.
their goal isn't a society without cops, their goal is a society where they themselves are above the law while the cops exclusively punish and crack down on their political opponents.
So basic they want to be the Communist Party of the Soviet Union/NSDAP and to replace law enforcement with their own Militsiya/Gestapo type shit?

I'm honestly not seeing any difference at this point.
 
Rosenbugger's roommate in Hell. What scares me is the fact I cannot tell if it's parody.
View attachment 2726808
restyle.jpg
 
So basic they want to be the Communist Party of the Soviet Union/NSDAP and to replace law enforcement with their own Militsiya/Gestapo type shit?

I'm honestly not seeing any difference at this point.
Yes, that's exactly what they want. Though they probably wouldn't use that historical example. They want to rule, to be above the law, and to crush you and me under their heel.
 
The ultimate irony is that these idiots hate cops yet want all their political opponents in prison. Like how the fuck does that even work.
They don't want you in prison. They want you broke, they want you homeless, they want you dead, they want your kids raped and brainwashed, and they think it's funny.

I know that Sam Hyde quote's been around a while. But it's no joke. The only thing that separates people like them from Moviebob is that they don't have a Chris Chan-like obsession with Mario.
 
I realize she's exaggerating because she's crazy and wants retweets, but the general concept of society moving back toward a timeframe where we are so devoid of empathy that we can as a people attend an execution and treat it as entertainment is deeply concerning.
I would argue Rapinbum's criminal history is important, because it establishes a pattern of violence.
Gaige Grosskrauts' history is irrelevant because it has no bearing on his behavior that night, but Rapinbum's has a track record for assaulting minors. This makes Kyle's claim to self-defense more relevant, because Rapinbum has a fucking track record for being the aggressor.

It makes the prosecution's claim that Rapinbum was provoked by Kyle less likely, because looking at past history Rapinbum doesn't need to be provoked into attempting to hurt a minor.
Fair, but I feel like that's really an argument that their criminal history doesn't belong anywhere outside the courtroom. It can help in weighing the evidence about intent and provocation, but the identity of a victim has no bearing on whether a kill is justified or not. A murder is still a murder even if the target happened to be deserving of murder. That's what the justice system should really be about: discarding the emotional pleas and examining the facts as they apply to the law only. Outside of using it to weigh the probability of provocation, it shouldn't really come up. Conversely, they shouldn't be 'heroes' just because the person who shot them was guilty of wrong thought, but that's what I mean about applying it evenly.
Fahrenheit is better for everyday uses.
Kelvin is better for scientific purposes.
Celsius BTFO

Celsius is good for cooking. All three have their purpose.
 
Yes, that's exactly what they want. Though they probably wouldn't use that historical example. They want to rule, to be above the law, and to crush you and me under their heel.
You're right, they'd rather have a wokesoy version of the SS instead. The insanity is close enough.
 
I'm not even sure if it matters whether Kyle was correct in his perception, only whether he reasonably did perceive so.
Yes, it's literally "put yourself in his shoes". If you were in the situation he was in, facing the things he was facing, would you reasonably be in fear of death or great bodily harm? That's why the self-defense experts are going apeshit over this one. When someone is trying to pry your rifle from your hands, you are facing the prospect of death or great bodily harm if they succeed. When someone jumps above your prone body and intentionally kicks you in the face on the way down, you are facing the prospect of death or great bodily harm. When someone swings a skateboard at your head by the trucks (fucking twice!), you are facing the prospect of death or great bodily harm. And finally, when someone brings a pistol to bear on you from mere feet away, you are facing the prospect of death or great bodily harm.

Provocation probably went out the window when Rittenhouse ran away and kept running away. If he was provoking with intent to get a response that would allow him to credibly claim self-defense, he would have stood his ground and blasted Rosenbaum by the initial clutch of cars. And the prosecution's witness saying he felt as though he was following but definitely not chasing a presumed active shooter is obviously wrong on its face due to the fact that the individual was running away from the mob and towards the police. Did you perhaps think that someone you thought said was "with the police" was going to get close to them and open fire on them?

At least 6 people attempted to murder Kyle Rittenhouse that night, singly or in groups, and none of them succeeded. The reason they did not succeed was because Kyle Rittenhouse used his weapon to neutralize all true threats, and as he did so, he attempted to minimize the danger to anyone who wasn't actively trying to kill him. That this trial is happening at all is a travesty of justice.
 
We mock these people on Kiwifarms, but it should always be remembered they have no moral limits, and no conscience. That is their greatest strength, beyond the fact all the institutions of our rotten anti civilization are behind them.

That makes them dangerous, and you should treat these people seriously as clownish as they look and act.
 
Oops, mixed up posters. People realizing that the legal system is biased and doesn’t operate according to its theoretical principles is what I said was good. I was responding to someone who thought people just wanted the outcome to be violence, so I’m pretty sure my point makes sense. I definitely didn’t indicate that I wanted “bodies to hit the floor” at any point.
Then I miss interpreted your post by attributing it to Random Internet Person was saying and apologize.
 
They don't want you in prison. They want you broke, they want you homeless, they want you dead, they want your kids raped and brainwashed, and they think it's funny.

I know that Sam Hyde quote's been around a while. But it's no joke. The only thing that separates people like them from Moviebob is that they don't have a Chris Chan-like obsession with Mario.
You're right, they have a Chris Chan-like obsession with Disney Star Wars and Funko Pop figures instead.
 
So basic they want to be the Communist Party of the Soviet Union/NSDAP and to replace law enforcement with their own Militsiya/Gestapo type shit?

I'm honestly not seeing any difference at this point.
The ideal leftist law enforcement setup would be the FBI having a uniformed national police force doing street level law enforcement work, what's left of the local police as some feel-good public safety social workers with guns if that, and then CHAZ in every city across the US.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back