Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Proceedings - Come for the trial, stay for….

What do you think will happen?

  • Guilty on all charges

    Votes: 282 8.8%
  • Full Acquittal

    Votes: 1,077 33.7%
  • Mistral

    Votes: 264 8.3%
  • Mixture of verdicts

    Votes: 479 15.0%
  • Minecraft

    Votes: 213 6.7%
  • Roblox

    Votes: 132 4.1%
  • Runescape

    Votes: 203 6.3%
  • Somehow Guilty Of Two Mutually Exclusive Actions

    Votes: 514 16.1%
  • KYLE WILL SUBMIT TO BBC

    Votes: 35 1.1%

  • Total voters
    3,199
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
there will be a blood moon today. the day we speculate the final verdict comes in.
it also happens to be the day Chris Chan and Shadman go to court
the merge might be real
edit: the vic mignona thing might be going down today as well. im not sure about that one. what are the odds?
View attachment 2727981
Kyle will slay the nameless Moon Presence and become a Great Old One. Binger and Fatty's minds will explode, and he shall reward those who aided him.

topstrongest.jpg
 
I only just read the previous page, and I now understand why some people want the entirety of this thread's current participants threadbanned.

Even in Australia we have our fair share of armchair lawyers commenting online on what's self-defense and what isn't - in one of the least self-defense-friendly countries in the world.

the spanish right had powerful allies in nazi germany and fascist italy, both sent volunteers that helped franco win the war.
the american right does not have that luxury sadly. it could probably draw a significant amount of foreign volunteer fighters on an individual basis, sure, but that does not compare to the well trained and highly organized military units that hitler and mussolini sent to help franco.
A comparison would be it was the early 20th Century's Korean or Vietnamese war - with regards to how they tested newly developed weapons, tactics, and technologies. From the Krauts, Soviets, Internationale etc.

For the Soviets' part, their psyops went well - they managed to sabotage the Republican unity!
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Gravemind
I only just read the previous page, and I now understand why some people want the entirety of this thread's current participants threadbanned.

Even in Australia we have our fair share of armchair lawyers commenting online on what's self-defense and what isn't - in one of the least self-defense-friendly countries in the world.
Threadban everyone here? Perish the thought. This is a containment thread. Last thing the forum needs is for all this tism to go somewhere else.
 
Well being wrong and not caring if what you're saying is true are a little different
Not to mention affirmatively setting out to misinform the public in the hope that rioting ensues.

I'm betting today is the day. Be ready for anything.
My plan is to go into work and actually work rather than run laps around this thread every ten minutes. Figure that will last for---about ten minutes.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It seems to me that there are 3 types of people that want Kyle to get locked up, and they are:
1) People with bad intel (read/saw some story about it that was full of lies that they based their opinion on. FFS some still believe that Kyle shot black people)
2) People who really really don't like guns (just the fact that he was walking around with an AR-15 paints him as a troublemaker to these guys)
3) People who absolutely hate trump supporters to an alarming extent (whether they saw somewhere that he supports 'blue lives matter', or saw that one article claiming he went to a trump rally, real or fake, that's all it takes)

I can understand if someone falls into the first category because there have been so many lies made about this incident, and MAYBE I can understand if someone falls into the 2nd category because they've never been around guns and only see them as psychotic murder tools that movies make them out to be. Everyone else is probably just plain-old-fashioned retarded.
 
I am blown away that there are people out there simping for the prosecution. Aren’t these the same people who say the criminal justice system is rigged? Or do they just want it to let black and brown people commit whatever crimes they want and have white people be jailed for defending themselves? I can’t say I’ve ever approved of the State cheating and violating anyone’s rights. In fact, most conservatives would be outraged at seeing such behavior because the defendant might be released on appeal for it. Leftists are so obsessed with a conviction they want to do things that will make it impossible to do so. To them: as long as he’s convicted they don’t care if he’s released later, in fact they probably want a good excuse to riot and intimidate people because of it.
 
I don't get why the other MSM outlets and Twatterati can't do what TYT did in this segment where they admitted to being wrong about the case

View attachment 2727998
TYT does this shit all the time where they start laying the groundwork to memory hole all the times they were flat fucking wrong cause their viewers are ingrates who don't have the power to remember the things they said in the past.

Also no shit Anna didn't watch the video, TYT are hacks that like redditors just react to headlines and spout uninformed opinions.
 
I only just read the previous page, and I now understand why some people want the entirety of this thread's current participants threadbanned.

Even in Australia we have our fair share of armchair lawyers commenting online on what's self-defense and what isn't - in one of the least self-defense-friendly countries in the world.


A comparison would be it was the early 20th Century's Korean or Vietnamese war - with regards to how they tested newly developed weapons, tactics, and technologies. From the Krauts, Soviets, Internationale etc.

For the Soviets' part, their psyops went well - they managed to sabotage the Republican unity!
Maybe we should ban Australia?
 
I only just read the previous page, and I now understand why some people want the entirety of this thread's current participants threadbanned.

Even in Australia we have our fair share of armchair lawyers commenting online on what's self-defense and what isn't - in one of the least self-defense-friendly countries in the world.
You should've seen the pages upon pages of people unironically shilling monarchism/dictatorships and screaming about how democracy has failed over the course of yesterday. Half of this thread's prominent posters should have halal threads at this point.
 
I only just read the previous page, and I now understand why some people want the entirety of this thread's current participants threadbanned.
I am a humble shitposter, I am simply bidding my time to start dumping BLACKED mems of Kyle when we are at peaking posting in hopes that someone schiz's out at me. Please understand, I am also here for trial news, but I also want to stoke the fires of a flame war between autists. As an Australian you should be able to understand why, look into your heart and ask yourself is what I'm doing any different from what your ancestors did when they sold Eucalyptus Trees to Californians so many years ago?
 
We'll ban ourselves, if the post-christchurch theatrics are anything to go by. The ISP's, not the government, willingly blocked access to websites during those two weeks.
While all the west has fallen, nowhere and no thing fell as fast and hard as Australia. Straight off a cliff--no warning signs--just trotted up to a cliff out of the blue and leapt.
 
Can someone clarify? I know a guilty has to be unanimous, how many has to be for an aquittal, and how many for hung jury? I’m just unsure what the difference in total is
 
the spanish right had powerful allies in nazi germany and fascist italy, both sent volunteers that helped franco win the war.
the american right does not have that luxury sadly. it could probably draw a significant amount of foreign volunteer fighters on an individual basis, sure, but that does not compare to the well trained and highly organized military units that hitler and mussolini sent to help franco.
Luckily the American right was millions of recent combat experienced veterans from the GWOT.

Can someone clarify? I know a guilty has to be unanimous, how many has to be for an aquittal, and how many for hung jury? I’m just unsure what the difference in total is
all 12 for guilt or not guilt. any mix is a hung jury.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back