Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
Bro! Look at all the dry grass and kindling surrounding the fucking fryer! Look at how closely packed the houses are! Does Bob count this doofus as one of his thinkers? I'm way more afraid of this idiot torching the neighborhood than I ever was of Covid.

I swear, if any firemen just happened to pass by this nightmare, they'd stop the truck and take turns shoving Halligans up his ass. This is like those dumbass gender reveal parties that burn down the woods, only with far greater potential risk to human life! Would somebody just beat this guy's ass already?

Damn, man. I'm actually upset by this! Right next to that dry grass! Wood! Very thin, flammable paper!
 
To be honest Movie Bobs reviews have actually improved as of lately and by that I mean they are not what they were during the Joker and Disney Star Wars sequel era of Movie Bob reviews. Even with all the unessary LGBT bullshit that he pulled in his Venom: Let There Be Carnage review it was still better YMS review of the flick which spends more time discussing the format of the theater then the actuall film
The only reason it could be better than YMS’ review is that YMS literally doesn’t give a shit about capeshit while Bob gets more passionate about it. It’s still dumb to say he’s good or improved when his Eternals review still shows he hasn’t changed at all compared to when he whined how Gamergate was a nefarious plan by the Republican Party to hurt Hillary Clinton
 
.png


Gonna "circle back" to this one @Positron posted early, because Robert really gets sandy on his vagina whenever a celebrated director shits on the MCU.

First, I love that he describes the clickbait as getting "empty clicks", as if the counter gives a shit, click is a click. Also, according to Robert himself, the MCU is the most important thing in cinema right now, so how could the journalist not ask if a director wants to get into the capshit gravy train.

But more so, it was just a question, no on is holding a gun to these directors demanding them to shit all over the capshit flicks for the clicks, a simple "I don't think these movies are for me" would suffice.

No, these directors are shitting on the capshit because they want, and Robert can't clap back because he resents being seen as just a mindless consumer, and although he wears the "geek culture" shirt, he is sophisticated and smart to appreciate the "smart movie for smart people" genre.

That is why Robert always try to weasel his way out by saying that the MCU movies are "B+ action movies mostly" and their importance is more being at the center of the zeitgeist, rather than the quality of the flicks.

And yet, whenever someone of relevance just fling some shit at these movies, here comes Robert with the passive agressive bullshit. Like I said, sand on his vagina.

You could try not giving a shit Robert, trust me, it works fine and you can still enjoy what you like.
 
These dime-a-dozen blockbuster flicks are all this fucker has.

I still remember my very first post in this thread was about how he could spend some time studying cinema at a more detailed level, so that on the very least, he could give some interesting takes on movies that aren't the same capeshit pap smear that has proven to become stale and repetitive. This way, he could keep evolving, one of the things he bitches about rural folks and right-wingers in general. Evolving his brand, at least.

But no, he can't and he won't. Not while there are troons to be defended and MAGA chuds to quarrel with on Twitter. Not while he still somehow earns 3k via hipster welfare, and some chump change off YouTube, with his brand of stupidity that hasn't evolved a single thing since 2009 or so. He's got it made, y'all.
 
View attachment 2728223

Gonna "circle back" to this one @Positron posted early, because Robert really gets sandy on his vagina whenever a celebrated director shits on the MCU.

First, I love that he describes the clickbait as getting "empty clicks", as if the counter gives a shit, click is a click. Also, according to Robert himself, the MCU is the most important thing in cinema right now, so how could the journalist not ask if a director wants to get into the capshit gravy train.

But more so, it was just a question, no on is holding a gun to these directors demanding them to shit all over the capshit flicks for the clicks, a simple "I don't think these movies are for me" would suffice.

No, these directors are shitting on the capshit because they want, and Robert can't clap back because he resents being seen as just a mindless consumer, and although he wears the "geek culture" shirt, he is sophisticated and smart to appreciate the "smart movie for smart people" genre.

That is why Robert always try to weasel his way out by saying that the MCU movies are "B+ action movies mostly" and their importance is more being at the center of the zeitgeist, rather than the quality of the flicks.

And yet, whenever someone of relevance just fling some shit at these movies, here comes Robert with the passive agressive bullshit. Like I said, sand on his vagina.

You could try not giving a shit Robert, trust me, it works fine and you can still enjoy what you like.
Celebrated FilmMaker: “Superhero movies suck and are over saturated”
Moviebob: “NOOOO JUST PLEASE TALK ABOUT HOW TRUMP IS BAD! SUPERHERO MOVIES ARE MODERN GREEK MYTHOLOGY REEEEEE!”
 
Becoming a cultist would take some self-awareness on his part. I think Bob would be the kind of guy who embodies the worst vices of all the Chaos gods - always getting angry at random stuff, eternally thirsty and hedonistic consoomer, lazy and disgusting slob, has absurd ambitions way outside his reach - but thinks he's a model citizen and cheers for the Inquisition to crack down on those obsolete wasteland mutants.
Assuming he's an Imperial citizen and not a Chaos Cultist, there's only 3 possibilities for Robert:
  1. Lobotomized and turned into a Servitor when he refuses to get a real job.
  2. Burned at the stake for creeping on a Sister of Battle.
  3. Conscripted and sent to war at gunpoint.
Honestly, in the grim darkness of the far future, Robert's future is bleak no matter how you cut it.
 
The only reason it could be better than YMS’ review is that YMS literally doesn’t give a shit about capeshit while Bob gets more passionate about it. It’s still dumb to say he’s good or improved when his Eternals review still shows he hasn’t changed at all compared to when he whined how Gamergate was a nefarious plan by the Republican Party to hurt Hillary Clinton
Ehm, YMS is quite the Spider-Man and Black Panther fan actually
 
Assuming he's an Imperial citizen and not a Chaos Cultist, there's only 3 possibilities for Robert:
  1. Lobotomized and turned into a Servitor when he refuses to get a real job.
  2. Burned at the stake for creeping on a Sister of Battle.
  3. Conscripted and sent to war at gunpoint.
Honestly, in the grim darkness of the far future, Robert's future is bleak no matter how you cut it.

His present ain't exactly sunny, either.
 
I find the way people approach this clearly false dichotomy strange. Obviously it is false and people don't really need to think about that they just see it as it is. But then, when they start thinking, odd ideas like this 'quasi-religious' stuff comes out. So what is the difference between let's say 'thought' and 'belief'? Well... Ostensibly I'd say there's actually not a lot of difference. I could ask the question do you think/believe so and so and they are practically both the same question no?

This is where the false dichotomy reveals itself and falls flat on it's 'autistic' 'smooth-brained' face as you fellows love to say. The only tangible difference, at least that I can identify here, is the difference between action and contemplation. The way the human brain works is that you are either doing one or the other at any given time. You simply cannot do both at once which often causes people to freeze when they are unable to decide what they need to do for a variety of reasons. Ideally these things combine however in manner that allows a person to act on their 'thoughts' in a way that is congruent with any 'beliefs' they are in possession of.

What's most egregious about the way this false dichotomy approaches this is it precludes the possibility of what we'll call 'thoughtful belief'. In fact all 'belief' is arrived at by 'thought' and if said 'thought' does not lead to said 'belief' it is in fact useless. Impotent. For instance if I ask the question 'do you believe in this dichotomy' one is then trapped between the proverbial rock and hard place. There can be no right answer here. If I do 'believe' I am a 'believer' therefore as described. If I do not 'believe' I must discard the reasoning (or lack thereof) entirely as fallacious as having stopped to think about it I cannot possibly accept it by the parameters given unless it is by the very pejoratives mentioned regarding 'belief'. The word for that is 'hypocrisy' which does indeed get bandied about rather a lot with regard to 'religion' contributing to this odd digression no doubt but make no mistake. This is actually very simple and straightforward.

Thought without belief exists. But all thought serves the inherent purpose of arriving at belief. Anything else would be mere procrastination. Think of it in terms of the most basic aspects of the scientific method. One constructs an experiment based on what they have decided/reasoned/believe will provide the results they hope for which they then put into action. Without said belief there can be no action.
Bob's rationalization of this dichotomy is, "Thought" as he defines it, is backed by "evidence and science", while "belief" is based in nothing but the feelings scribblings of scribes who somehow think they're transcribing the words of the Invisible Sky Daddy (or whatever) and which are based in superstition (like the Romans reading chicken entrails to predict the weather) rather than any solid evidence, and the assumption that since Sky Daddy doesn't exist, that people are either hallucinating, assuming what the nonexistent Sky Daddy would want based on what they think should be, or people malevolently trying to control whamen people (which is what the pro-choice crowd keeps crying about the pro-life side).
Well actually. The taboos against autopsy make a lot of sense before sanitation became a thing. Which was fairly recent that the doctors started washing their hands between the morgue and the maternity wing.
Well, I'm talking about societies whose beliefs are so primitive, that "messing with a body" had nothing to do with sanitation - it was just people afraid that their bodies would be messed with, as if they would know if it happened because WHOOPS SUDDENLY I'M IN HELL/WANDERING THE EARTH IN TORMENT, WTF HOW DID THIS HAPPEN. I don't think it had much to do with sanitation, because if it initialy was, the emphasis would be that doing things to a dead body (like cutting it open/taking things out) would put the soul of the person doing things to the body in jeopardy, rather than the soul of the already-dead corpse.
 
That shit still makes me sick to remember it
The trussing and lacing fail was palpable (and the turkey was painfully overstuffed; they'd have been better off to roast the turkey without stuffing and put the stuffing in a pan on another rack in the oven instead or do it "stove-top" style). It's like Chris, dude, learn how to secure a skewer?!
 
Last edited:
Honestly, I feel like DC and MCU would be if they made their cartoons and movies more realistic. And when I say realistic, I mean believable.

They should make more human in nature, give them actual goals, motivations, flaws and insecurities.

And not just the characters, the world-building too. In my opinion, they fucked up Wakanda.

They made it a futuristic sci-fi city where people live in glowing spires, a forcefield dome, sonic weaponry and a fleet of laser-armed, hovercraft with cloaking capabilities.

But at the same time their city at the ground-level still has dirt roads, wooden huts, ranches and their entire ground forces consist of unarmored, melee-armed infantry with spears and sickles.

And to top it all off, they still have tribal warlords and trial-by-combat leadership duels.

You see where I’m going here?
What you want superheroes to exist in a real world like ours? That would be way too complicated! It's best to just have all the bad guys be easily knocked down stereotypes or caricatures. If we go too far into individual motivations for these characters, and the people making the films are allowed to speak their mind, they might accidentally point out how messed up the world is. Thats not what we want, we want placation and a warm fuzzy feeling of being in a secure place in the world. Best to just leave the plebs to their bread and circuses. Oh the good guys beat Thanos and the world was saved by lasers and punches? The good guys came together to beat the common threat? That was great, now back to work at your corporate job. Remember to pay your taxes.
 
What a fucking dump. Like having a cookout in a landfill.

I am legitimately disgusted by how close he's cooking to the garbage cans. It looks like he's in his driveway, which suggests they didn't have a safe spot in the backyard (you can't put down a layer of sand?) ... so push the fucking cans down to the street, you literal troglodyte.

EDIT: Oh, and concrete paving or no, this whole setup is incredibly dangerous, not just because it's so close to the cans that are filled with God-knows-what, not just because there's actual kindling from the home renovation a few feet away from the fire, but he's right next to his scrapwood garage, goddamn the more I look at this picture the worse it gets.

EDIT x2: The dead shrub right behind the fucking fire in the second pic, good Kali save us.
 
Last edited:
What you want superheroes to exist in a real world like ours? That would be way too complicated! It's best to just have all the bad guys be easily knocked down stereotypes or caricatures. If we go too far into individual motivations for these characters, and the people making the films are allowed to speak their mind, they might accidentally point out how messed up the world is. Thats not what we want, we want placation and a warm fuzzy feeling of being in a secure place in the world. Best to just leave the plebs to their bread and circuses. Oh the good guys beat Thanos and the world was saved by lasers and punches? The good guys came together to beat the common threat? That was great, now back to work at your corporate job. Remember to pay your taxes.
Very funny. 😏

But you bring up a good point,

Thats not what we want, we want placation and a warm fuzzy feeling of being in a secure place in the world.

People never want to be challenged or face failure. They want to feel safe and validated all the time.

It’s really sad how these people want to be infantilized.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back