Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Proceedings - Come for the trial, stay for….

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What do you think will happen?

  • Guilty on all charges

    Votes: 282 8.8%
  • Full Acquittal

    Votes: 1,077 33.7%
  • Mistral

    Votes: 264 8.3%
  • Mixture of verdicts

    Votes: 479 15.0%
  • Minecraft

    Votes: 213 6.7%
  • Roblox

    Votes: 132 4.1%
  • Runescape

    Votes: 203 6.3%
  • Somehow Guilty Of Two Mutually Exclusive Actions

    Votes: 514 16.1%
  • KYLE WILL SUBMIT TO BBC

    Votes: 35 1.1%

  • Total voters
    3,199
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
An underappreciated lesson of the American Civil War is "do not play by Marquis of Queensbury rules with psychopaths, they will not reciprocate."

Funny how people have spent the last 160 years conspicuously failing to learn that lesson.
Machiavelli said it best in The Prince, if you injure your enemy a little, they will seek revenge. So either do not injure them, or destroy them so utterly they are forever incapable of revenge.

Hell, even the Bible says the same thing in Samuel 1 15:3
 
Most fuck ups in military history have been from generals wanting decisive battles from what I've seen. Honestly, if it had been up to me, day one of the war I'd have left a small force behind in the south to fight unconventionally against Union attacks, and then marched the bulk of my army straight north with an emphasis on speed. I wouldn't worry about supplies since there were plenty of places that could have been sacked for supplies in the northeast, and the north had better equipment anyway. This would have robbed the Union of most of its advantages since their population size just becomes more hungry mouths to feed, and their supply lines just become fodder.
The civilian populace would hate your guts unless you got a knockout blow straight away though, because that would let the Union troops destroy their livelihoods while the irregular home defense can do little more than snipe at them from the woods and whittle them down with ambushes. Though it's not impossible to overcome this hurdle, that's basically how Heraclius beat Khosrau II. He also happened to have an impregnable fortress for a capital.
 
Last edited:
Not just 1871. The Austrian had a decisive advantage in numbers and artillery in 1866 at Koeniggratz in the Austro-Prussian War. And their generals threw wave after wave of their own muzzleloader-equipped infantry at the Prussian elite dug into cover and armed with breechloading Dreyse rifles like Zapp Brannigan facing killbots. Unfortunately for them, nobody's been able to discover a Prussian killbot's limit, not even the Soviet Union. To go with what @Only an exceptional individual Sometimes said, there was no excuse for the poor showing in 1870 or 1914.

Nothing at all really, aside from having a full 1/3 of their forces either dead or wounded and having pushed the capabilities of a supply line that stretched from Pennsylvania all the way back to Virginia to its limits. His men were exhausted and low on food and ammunition, with 8k wounded that needed to be evacuated, and with his advance stopped cold the North had time to resupply and replenish its forces... a luxury Lee did not have all the way in Pennsylvania.
A march is easier than a battle and sacking a city fixes your supply problems.
i clicked this thread to find out the news on this and theres jabronis in here talking about the franco prussian war or some shit wut
We live in interesting times.
The civilian populace would hate your guts unless you got a knockout blow straight away though, because that would let the Union troops burn all their shit while the home defense can do little more than snipe at them from the woods.
You don't really need one straight away, and the problem with appealing to the masses cuts both ways. Sun Tzu basically did the same thing to the Chu forces and the Chu wanted to invade Wu, but really couldn't because that would mean abandoning their own population. I'd argue you really saw the same kind of strategy employed by Hannibal during the second punic war and there really wasn't much Rome could do about it.
 
Last edited:

Jesus. Perjury, violation of Brady Law, withholding evidence.... And we only know this because the prosecution was fucking incompetent.

It all begs one question:

How many people who these cocksuckers ultimately knew to be innocent do you think Binger and Fatty put away using these same tactics beforehand?
 
Information on the NBC News Producer who ordered the Jury Bus followed (everything was scrubbed 10 minutes after the Judge mentioned her)

FEfn14dX0AIBfRf.jpg
FEfqLmiX0AYLJ2b.jpg
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Oh piss off!
Napoleon III did nothing everything wrong
the emperor himself didn't actually want the war and did not think it a good idea, but was more or less forced into going forward with it by a combination of public opinion and political pressure. he resigned himself to his fate and went along with it, marched to the front with his army even though he knew it was doomed. tragic figure, that man.

The_fallen_emperor_and_triumphant_statesman_talked_together.jpg
 
Binger and Krause should deserve credit for destroying any faith in America's justice system that was left.

And apologies to the state of Minnesota, at least your consistent. Also apologies to Pennsylvania and Michigan. The state of Wisconsin is led by incompetent imbeciles whose deserve lobotomies.

If Boomers had a little faith in Jesus, endimg this farce last week would have probably saved whatever respect the prosecution had.
 
Jesus. Perjury, violation of Brady Law, withholding evidence.... And we only know this because the prosecution was fucking incompetent.

It all begs one question:

How many people who these cocksuckers ultimately knew to be innocent do you think Binger and Fatty put away using these same tactics beforehand?
I'm glad this came up, not just because it helps Kyle but because I hope you all understand this is not at all unusual; in fact, most prosecutors are just like Binger and Fatty. They suppress evidence, violate defendants constitutional rights all day, every day and don't care if they put away innocent people.
 
Binger and Krause should deserve credit for destroying any faith in America's justice system.

And apologies to the state of Minnesota, at least your consistent. Also apologies to Pennsylvania and Michigan. The state of Wisconsin is led by incompetent imbeciles whose deserve lobotomies.

If Boomers had a little faith in Jesus, endimg this farce last week would have probably saved whatever respect the prosecution had.
Nah Michigan is completely fucked too especially with that "terrorist plot" to kidnap the governer. Whitmer is garbage.
 
the emperor himself didn't actually want the war and did not think it a good idea, but was more or less forced into going forward with it by a combination of public opinion and political pressure. he resigned himself to his fate and went along with it, marched to the front with his army even though he knew it was doomed. tragic figure, that man.
Napeoleon III wanted to scale up the military so that France would be able to fight Prussia. But he got cucked by public opinion and political pressure. He was a weak king who can't even control his own country even though he had good ideas.

Also, after he was captured by the Prussians, his wife is reported to have said something to the effect of "He should have committed suicide! An emperor does not surrender!"
 
ourguys.PNG

Binger, You cunning son a gun, You little rascal, You done it again didn't You? You know this isn't what good lawyers do! Now go to that corner to reflect what you've done, we resume in 20 minutes.
And no lunch for you mister!
 
Can somebody explain to a legal moron; does 'deadlocked' mean '6 guilty, 6 not guilty' or can 6 be for one charge and 6 more be for other charges/not guilty? Basically a mixture of opinions.
Deadlocked just means that the jurors feel there's no hope of a unanimous verdict. It can be 11-1
Edit: Oh, and they can agree on some verdicts but not others. Can be unanimous on some and hung on others
 
Machiavelli said it best in The Prince, if you injure your enemy a little, they will seek revenge. So either do not injure them, or destroy them so utterly they are forever incapable of revenge.

Hell, even the Bible says the same thing in Samuel 1 15:3
Exactly. When you're dealing with American Cromwell and his goons, you don't win by playing defense and forcing a settlement, you win by putting his head on a pike. The southern strategy was too passive, if they'd converted their early victories into momentum (specifically by taking DC early) they might have been able to win. Instead they say back until they got ground down by their strategic disadvantages.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back