Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Lol, why are lesbian women shacking up with dudes? I thought they hated penis? It also reports that they're still less likely to report if the violence is done by another woman than a man.

It's higher in bisexual couples than any other demographic, and lesbians have a rate of around 43%. They liked to blame minority stress or internalized homophobia but hey, love is love!
Hey there, if you read the study carefully, you might notice that it says "same sex cohabiting women", not lesbian women, meaning that study could be saying exactly what you are saying; that either bisexual women get abused a lot by men, or that bisexual women who are abused by men are more likely to seek relationships with women after that. Also some lesbians try dating men before going out with women and once again the violence lesbians face could be coming from male partners so majority of those 43% very likely got beaten up by males sweaty :) It does state that they look at the violence faced in life time which would include the previous in-closet time male partners.

edit: Dumbledore sperging: I think in UK they used to have "anti gay promoting" laws during the time Harry Potter was written that you couldn't mention or promote homosexuality in media, or especially in children's media so it would make sense why Dumbledore's sexuality wasn't out right mentioned in the books, it was illegal at the time.

edit2:

Section 28 or Clause 28[note 1] was a legislative designation for series of laws across Britain that prohibited the "promotion of homosexuality" by local authorities. Introduced by Margaret Thatcher's Conservative government, it was in effect from 1988 to 2000 (in Scotland) and 2003 (in England and Wales).


edit3: Nevermind this was already talked about
 
Last edited:
Okay but why did that guy describe his kid as “beautiful” in a story about being “attacked”? Isn’t that the kind of description you’d put in an obituary? I know that there’s such a thing as ~inner beauty~, but even then, why is that relevant? If it was an unprovoked attack (it clearly wasn’t), then surely whether they are attractive or nice is irrelevant. But it doesn’t matter, Kielan is clearly ugly inside and out and that family is fucked :) ywnbaw etc.
 
Omg this is gross





Screenshot 2021-11-19 22.38.20.png

edit: oops, hadn't caught up to the previous page to see this posted already
 
Last edited:
Check out this creepy cunt gloating about being able to get into women's spaces cos he calls himself a woman: -

View attachment 2730548

TikTok account: -



This video is starting to pick up some attention on Twitter: -



Starting the countdown until this gloating prick is outed as a sex pest of some kind.
 
Last edited:
Is flamboyancy/campiness always a signal for being gay now? So every historical character who isn't married, and/or has a court-jester or eccentric archetype is coded gay?
No, that's rather the point of using coding in the first place. Plausible deniability. Dumbledore could have just been eccentric straight guy, yes, but the point is that the gay reveal didn't come out of the blue. The clues were there.
The thing with Rowling is that she has always had really strong and solid convictions. She wasn't just pandering in the past, she really always has been a Nice Very Liberal White Lady who wasn't cynically acting for woke points. Which meant that she was a bit cringe and clueless at times, but she believed in what she was doing. And then when she saw things that diverged from her beliefs, she spoke out about them.

I point this out because it's obvious that this personality trait of Rowling's is utterly baffling to her detractors. They cannot grasp that most, but not all, of her beliefs line up with theirs: they can't seem to grasp what it is even like to have stable beliefs instead of just parroting the latest updated language, attacking anyone who doesn't, and calling it a day. They shriek with rage that her beliefs don't change no matter how much they yell at her.

Why can't she just say that transwomen are women? She doesn't want to be the enemy, does she? Just think what we are telling you to think this week, Joanne! It's what everyone else thinks so that is what we all must think WHY IS SHE NOT DOING IT? Why? Why??!!
Sorry that I keep harping on Rowling but since she's trending on twitter, it's still on my mind because I went down this stupid rabbithole of looking into other cringe Rowling moments. And there's a really infuriating illustration of just how cutthroat and fickle most woke people are, and how quick they are to throw their own under the bus.

Probably the most infamous Rowling twitter retcon is her "I never wrote Hermione as white, she could be black!" take. The thing is, she didn't just one day decide to tweet that, it was in response to a black woman being cast to play Hermione in the broadway Harry Potter play (JKR didn't oversee the casting, so it wasn't her decision). As is the way of the culture war, this created a controversy and the actress (allegedly) faced a lot of harrassment. So a fan on twitter asked JKR what she thought, and she dropped that retarded take in the actress's defense.

So. JKR permanently stained her reputation to defend that woman's job. And how did that cunt repay her when the shoe was on the other foot and Rowling was the one being harrassed? That's right, by joining the pile-on.

1637333692694.png


These people just have no concept of good faith, loyalty, or reciprocity.

Anyway, sorry for my JKR sperging, in other news, Buck Angel is getting really fed up with AGPs. This is in response to a short tiktok clip of a she/they dude bragging about using the women's restroom.

1637334146502.png


EDIT: I'm an idiot who didn't see that the tiktok clip in question is the one that was just posted.
 
Last edited:
"Say what you will about Hitler, he never claimed Jews aren't real" says so much about this troid's mentality, amazing he wrote it with no shame. Saying someone isn't real is worse than gas chambers or Mendele experiments? Please go tell Primo Levi how much worse you have it when an anonymous twitter radfem with 50 followers says "you are not a woman".

Sorry for being off topic. Is there a thread on the farms to mock white people lolcows who masquerade as indigenous people for the purpose of being "diversity hires" and other gibs?
Someone needs to make one, I love it cause they are usually the most dramatic about hating whites. I volunteer to contribute to research if anyone wants to make one (I could make it if people help with examples, I think)

If you go to John Money’s wikipedia page, there is a section mentioning his immediate response to the David Reimer exposé. He attempts to utilize the typical far left strategy when faced with legitimate criticism -deflect by calling your critics “right-wing” so that their accusations are immediately dismissed.
From the article the quote is from, seems pretty obvious Money felt no shame at all:

Though he refused to discuss John Thiessen directly, Money claimed that the media's reporting of the case has reflected a conservative bias. "It's part of the antifeminist movement," he said. "They say masculinity and femininity are built into the genes, so women should get back to the mattress and the kitchen." As to his failure to report the case's outcome, Money was unapologetic, saying that he had lost contact with the Thiessens when they did not return to Johns Hopkins and that the opportunity to conduct a follow-up had been denied to him. He stood by his original reporting of the case and dismissed my suggestion that he "misperceived" what was going on with the child. Furthermore, he implied that John's sex change to male at age 15 may not have been entirely his own decision. "I have no idea," Money said, "how much he was coached in what he wanted, since I haven't seen the person." He also hinted that the Diamond-Sigmundson paper had a hidden agenda. "There is no reason I should have been excluded from the follow-up, was there?" he asked. "Someone had a knife in my back. But it's not uncommon in science. The minute you stick your head up above the grass, there's a gunman ready to shoot you." (Diamond insists that there was "nothing personal" in his decision to publish the outcome of John's case.)

When I asked Money about Diamond's appeal to delay surgery on intersexual babies until they are old enough to speak for themselves, Money emphatically rejected the idea. "You cannot be an it," he declared, adding that Diamond's recommendations would lead intersexes back to the days when they locked themselves away in shame or worked as circus freaks.

I reminded Money that his book Man Woman, Boy Girl is still in print and that it reports the John/Joan case as a success. Asked if it would not be worthwhile for him to make changes in the text for a future edition, Money said flatly, "I'll be dead by then."

Supporting John Money is proof positive those people don't care about intersex people, beyong the horror of David Reiner's case, the creepy/borderline pedo behaviour he displayed with David was also reported by intersex patients:

Kira Triea was assigned as a boy at age 2 and did not learn of her intersexuality until puberty, when she began to menstruate through her phallus. She was a patient of Dr. Money's at the Johns Hopkins Psychohormonal Research Unit from age 14 to 17; this was in the mid-1970s, concurrent with John Theissen.

They have never met, but Triea's story bears striking parallels to his. She describes how Dr. Money, evidently attempting to ascertain whether she had assumed a male or female gender identity, questioned her about her sex life - in the frank language for which he was well known. "Have you ever fucked somebody?" she remembers Dr. Money asking. "Wouldn't you like to fuck somebody?" She also describes how Dr. Money showed her a pornographic movie. "He wanted to know who I identified with in this movie," she says.

And he is one of the biggest reasons surgery on infants became so common, which is the main aspect of intersex activism across the board (the quote about "you cannot be an it" is pretty telling about his disdain for those children whose genitals might become damaged after surgery)

Is it me or is transgenderism, has a vague connection between cuck, chastity and humiliations fetishism, along with incel-dom. I just notice that a lot of them have a translucent connection between each other. It's a feeling which is hard to describe in words.
Think of sissy fetish, in straight men it's usually a part of a humiliation fetish, which goes hand-in-hand with chastity belts and stuff and cuck fetishes (for the unholy combination of all, see the fetish sub r/BlackWorldOrder, I find that seeing those kinds of degenarate communities really puts stuff into perspective)
 
really enjoying the current meltdown that’s happening on r/traaa
all the TIFs are upset because apparently tons of TIMs just lurk that sub looking for women (ie trans men) who post and then DM them incessantly about their tits, especially if they’re underage. i tried to archive these links but archive.org keeps giving me error messages.
why are all these trans women acting like creepy men? the world may never know
D7418C1A-9E7E-49B8-8537-D7D9D2B1EE9D.jpeg

3347D3B6-2FCB-44A4-945A-4C69DE07C7AD.jpeg

please stop dming me about my manly tits
6FA547F9-AE0D-48D0-9342-86E4B364C7D3.jpeg



bonus unrelated lunacy from TikTok
 
really enjoying the current meltdown that’s happening on r/traaa
all the TIFs are upset because apparently tons of TIMs just lurk that sub looking for women (ie trans men) who post and then DM them incessantly about their tits, especially if they’re underage. i tried to archive these links but archive.org keeps giving me error messages.
why are all these trans women acting like creepy men? the world may never know
View attachment 2731094
View attachment 2731107

please stop dming me about my manly tits
View attachment 2731111


bonus unrelated lunacy from TikTok
View attachment 2731116
Fucking shit, that's gross. And I like the double think, "transmisandry." These people are so far up the asses of their fictional identities, they can't even accurately express how a bunch of girls are getting harassed by a bunch of hypersexual misogynist pedo dudes.
 
I also hated seeing butch women. They made me
so.…. Uncomfortable….. My mom would cut her
hair short with me just to make me feel worse
about myself
and I'd think like "Do I look like
THIS?" "Do people see me as THIS now???"

Doubt. Few mom's would cut their hair short to make their child feel bad. 99% of moms would do it because short hair is easy to take care of. Teenagers. Not everything is about you.

0CB7E699-D736-4448-8CB8-E89172696E3D.jpeg

This billboard went up in a city nearish me. This progressive/liberal page I follow on Facebook for news articles was REEEEEEEEEEEEING about it. I'd buy the person who put up the sign a beer and I don't even drink.
 
really enjoying the current meltdown that’s happening on r/traaa
all the TIFs are upset because apparently tons of TIMs just lurk that sub looking for women (ie trans men) who post and then DM them incessantly about their tits, especially if they’re underage. i tried to archive these links but archive.org keeps giving me error messages.
why are all these trans women acting like creepy men? the world may never know
View attachment 2731094
View attachment 2731107

please stop dming me about my manly tits
View attachment 2731111


bonus unrelated lunacy from TikTok
View attachment 2731116
They're cannibalizing each other.
 
Back