Waukesha, WI, Parade Vehicle Attack - Suspect is Darrell Edward Brooks, currently in custody.

Who's responsible?

  • Glowies

    Votes: 196 9.4%
  • Incel

    Votes: 57 2.7%
  • Truck of Peace

    Votes: 222 10.6%
  • BLM

    Votes: 708 34.0%
  • Retaliation for Kyle's Acquittal

    Votes: 539 25.9%
  • Minceraft

    Votes: 128 6.1%
  • Alt-Right Nazi Gamergater Chud

    Votes: 108 5.2%
  • Other (please specify)

    Votes: 127 6.1%

  • Total voters
    2,085
I think the worst part about this is it wasn't terrorism, it was a stupid nigger who in a moment of sheer nigger ignorance drove into a crowd of people for reasons that aren't understandable or logical to white people, you could say it was animal instinct. Niggers literally just do this because they do, usually when white people do something horrific they plan it, this nigger didn't even plan on doing this when he woke up, he saw a fucking parade and thought it would be a good idea to drive through it. That nigger is almost less than human it's almost pitiable.
"Why hello fellow racists!"

"Wtf..?"

"I think NIGGERS are such NIGGERS that they can't be held responsible by human standards. It's ok, he just did it for no reason at all! I don't even know what "white people are the enemy" means! Is it some sort of grunt to express a desire for bananas, mayhaps hmmmmm? BLACKS AMIRITE?"
 
The only thing people who are still hanging on to this terrorism angle can say is "well if he was whiiiiite" as if sinking to the level of dipshit leftists is somehow a justification that morphs reality. If you want to force this as a racist terrorist thing to fight fire with fire then just say that, but continuing with this bad faith argument when everything points the opposite way (except for your feelings) is stupid and a cope.

Also, saying that it wasn't a premeditated attack is different from saying it was "unintentional" as many exceptional individuals in this thread seem to think.
 
Second degree murder, not first degree murder. He had plenty of opportunity to stop so it's not manslaughter. On the other hand, unless they can prove that he planned to attack the parade or had some grudge against a high school band or the Dancing Grannies, there's no grounds for first degree murder.

EDIT: It would also be first degree if he was planning to kill *someone*, not caring who it was, but that would still be difficult to prove.
Considering he stabbed somebody before he ran people down in the street (and had also tried to run down a woman in his last brush with the law), I don't think it would be that hard to prove. The dude clearly enjoyed trying to kill people.

Get fucked the police chief just confirmed there’s no connection to terrorism known. Suspect acted alone.
The level of trust I have for those in authority to tell the truth about a situation like this is pretty low. And they may even try to cover it up based on noble intentions: trying to prevent an escalation of violence and to prevent, if not a race war, at least a race skirmish.

I don't personally think it fits the definition of terrorism, but what I really want to know is whether or not it fits the definition of a hate crime. Would he have run down a crowd of BLM protesters in order to get away or was he only okay with mowing down some honkies? That's the real question. And maybe that's why they keep focusing on terrorism rather than racism. One is easy to debunk and the other maybe not so much.
 
Guy's fucked though. Who cares how you label it. I hope he's fucked anyway. Wonder how long he'll get for killing 5 people (hopefully more don't die) and injuring, what was it? 40 others?
The narrative matters. If we take the NPC/corporate media line that at least two Kiwileftists are spewing in this thread, we file this shit under random acts of God, and the nation shrugs its shoulders and hits the snooze button. If we can't even put into words the self-evident fact that BLM rhetoric causes anti-white violence, nothing will ever be done to even criticize it, let alone oppose it.
 
These narratives are getting more complex all the time.
You see there was this racist black nationalist who was taking a day off from being a racist black nationalist when he just coincidentally stabbed someone but that's not important. THEN to get away from the scene of the crime the racist black nationalist who was on vacation headed TOWARDS the blaring sound of sirens at a Christmas parade and drove through 10 blocks of children to get away from the police who weren't chasing him. It's really very simple.
 
Exactly, it may not be a terrorist attack, but it could possibly be called a hate crime.
More than just possibly. It'd be a SEVERE case of negligence if the prosecution doesn't mention his social media presence. The prosecution constantly uses that shit to attempt character assassination in any case be it genuine murder or just threatening over the internet.
 
lmao




This bitch would say a lot less if she had a cock in her mouth like she deserves.
 
Yes, if I was a nigger who'd been breaking into houses and entering building sites to steal tools and copper (and been caught on video), then I was out looking for more places to steal from and was carrying a hammer for no good reason, I too might react guiltily when confronted by men who accused me of being a thieving piece of shit.
Honestly, unless you live in a ridiculously red area (70 to 80%+ Trump) I would not even bother.

The issue here is that the defendants never knew he was stealing and pursued him while he was fleeing. The jogger didn't even have anything on him at the time.

It's one thing do stop a burglary in progress at your neighbors house. In fact, we have a man called Joe Horn that did just that and the grand jury in Texas refused to indict when the burglars went for his gun as he confronted them.

The exceptional individuals on trial did not even see the crime occuring, but saw a guy they thought was the burglar (from earlier video) and chased him down. They went with guns to perform a citizens arrest and shit went south.

I am saying stopping burglars is wrong but just very had to justify even to the autists on the Farm so it will be nearly impossible to convince normies. Just follow the guy and wait for the police in the car.
 
The only thing people who are still hanging on to this terrorism angle can say is "well if he was whiiiiite" as if sinking to the level of dipshit leftists is somehow a justification that morphs reality. If you want to force this as a racist terrorist thing to fight fire with fire then just say that, but continuing with this bad faith argument when everything points the opposite way (except for your feelings) is stupid and a cope.

Also, saying that it wasn't a premeditated attack is different from saying it was "unintentional" as many exceptional individuals in this thread seem to think.
I mean he intentionally ran into a crowd of people. Also he wasn't fleeing the scene and hearing police scanner reports he just barreled through the roadblocks set up for the parade.

I mean if we're allowed to call the Charleston church shooter a white terrorist for shooting up a black church. Couldn't we at least in honesty call this guy one? Because what else do you call someone who deliberlity drives into a crowd of Christmas parade people and runs them down.

Like the evidence and social media profiles make me think this guy deliberlity drove into the parade.
 

Wisconsin: Police name victims after car ploughs into Waukesha Christmas parade​

What do we know about the victims?​

The victims named on Monday were:

  • Mr Wilhelm Hospel, 81
  • Ms Virginia Sorenson, 79
  • Ms Leanna Owens, 71
  • Ms Tamara Durand, 52
  • Ms Jane Coolidge, 52
Dozens remain in hospital. Police said the injured were taken to six area hospitals by first responders as well as other residents who were at the parade.

Eighteen children were admitted after the incident, the Children's Wisconsin paediatric hospital told reporters on Monday.

Care providers described the incident as one of the state's largest mass casualty events involving children in recent history. Physicians said some children sustained serious head injuries and broken bones.

The injured range in age from three to 16 and include three sets of siblings, medical staff said. Ten children required treatment in the intensive care unit.


 
1637611064987.png
 
I mean he intentionally ran into a crowd of people. Also he wasn't fleeing the scene and hearing police scanner reports he just barreled through the roadblocks set up for the parade.

I mean if we're allowed to call the Charleston church shooter a white terrorist for shooting up a black church. Couldn't we at least in honesty call this guy one? Because what else do you call someone who deliberlity drives into a crowd of Christmas parade people and runs them down.

Like the evidence and social media profiles make me think this guy deliberlity drove into the parade.
The
Rules
Do
Not
Apply
To
Themselves
Or
Their
Minions.
 
The narrative matters. If we take the NPC/corporate media line that at least two Kiwileftists are spewing in this thread, we file this shit under random acts of God, and the nation shrugs its shoulders and hits the snooze button. If we can't even put into words the self-evident fact that BLM rhetoric causes anti-white violence, nothing will ever be done to even criticize it, let alone oppose it.
I think you afford the common public too much credit. A LOT of people have a "at least it's not me" complex of indifference, if BLM was admitted to be the white lynching version of the old time KKK nobody would do anything about it. If the police and authority let it happen the common public will too.
 
They don't do coordinated attacks, they just kill a lot of people in the process of robbing, raping, or murdering in tard rage. There are very few examples of actual terrorists, mostly BHI or NOI types. Africa has more via Boko Haram et al, but I think it's unfair to call them joggers since they're just the people of their country, not people living as a separate victim class in another.

Similarly, the woke like to call school shooters "domestic terrorists" when they're really people just pissed off because they've been bullied and they can't get laid. The only incel mass shooters that could even remotely qualify are people like Minassian who did their acts as part of some higher cause. The Rodge himself might qualify, as he inspired others.
And even then, terrorist cells like Boko Haram, Al-Shabab, Al-Mourabitoun or the insurgents of far-northern Mozambique tend to be very regionalist. You don't see them targeting places like Maputo or Lagos, which is why the Westgate Mall attack in Nairobi a few years back came as such a surprise.
 
I haven't been watching this closely, please let me know if this recap is correct:

The people who tell us James Fields carefully and deliberately drove into a bunch of left wing protestors during a rally because he had Pepe memes on his phone are now telling us Darrell Brooks, the black nationalist who posted a meme about running into people with a car, then ran into a bunch of white people with his car, did not do so deliberately? And this is because he was driving away from something, therefore it would have been impossible for him to decide to drive into people as he had previously contemplated, unlike James Fields, who was driving away from something before he decided to drive into people, which he had not previously contemplated?

These narratives are getting more complex all the time.
Four legs good, two legs bad
The narrative hasn't changed. Only white people have the capacity for evil and we must fight every day to contain it.
 
More than just possibly. It'd be a SEVERE case of negligence if the prosecution doesn't mention his social media presence. The prosecution constantly uses that shit to attempt character assassination in any case be it genuine murder or just threatening over the internet.
Yeah I agree, the hate crime angle needs to be thoroughly pursued, and it may highly be the case since the police have not ruled it out as of yet.
 
I mean he intentionally ran into a crowd of people. Also he wasn't fleeing the scene and hearing police scanner reports he just barreled through the roadblocks set up for the parade.

I mean if we're allowed to call the Charleston church shooter a white terrorist for shooting up a black church. Couldn't we at least in honesty call this guy one? Because what else do you call someone who deliberlity drives into a crowd of Christmas parade people and runs them down.

Like the evidence and social media profiles make me think this guy deliberlity drove into the parade.
Yes this is where they need to work on their narrative.

So he was fleeing the scene of a crime and he decided it would be a great idea to barrel through a parade with thousands of people and dozens of cops in attendance? Sure that sounds plausible.

Never trust anyone who would quote Chris Rock saying nigger and refuse to drop a hard R.
 
Watching the press conference and two thinks jump out to me:
1) The black police chief has the most "Wisconsin" accent ever
2) Ginger cop says the charges will be first degree murder, not second. Might be the typical overcharge. Might not.
The narrative matters. If we take the NPC/corporate media line that at least two Kiwileftists are spewing in this thread, we file this shit under random acts of God, and the nation shrugs its shoulders and hits the snooze button. If we can't even put into words the self-evident fact that BLM rhetoric causes anti-white violence, nothing will ever be done to even criticize it, let alone oppose it.
The guy was a blood gangsta soundcloud rapper career felon from Killwaukee. The way they think and their mindset predates BLM. In fact, BLM is just a way to try to legitimize and excuse their fucked up dysfunctional hood culture to the rest of America.
 
Back