Dumb Shit on Wikipedia

More from the PR talk page and our old friend gorilla warfare has something to sayView attachment 2746445
Lmao reliable sources moar like reLIEable sources amirite?
"If we don't talk about it, it didn't happen."
Literal genocide denial. This is an "encyclopedia." Anyone who cites this shitpile should not just be flunked from the class they're in, but expelled and have a permanent black mark on their record.
 
Palmer still sperging over the fact that even Wikipedia of all places realizes that he is indeed fake news.
Trust he his feud with them goes back four years and reached its climax just this year with him basically wanting to sue them into oblivion
 
Are you telling me there is consensus among scholars that man-made famines are mass killings? This is contradicted even by the long-standing version of the article having a section devoted to this. In Red Holocaust, Steven Rosefielde does discuss North Korea, alongside Vietnam and the Big Three, but he considers them to be excess or mass mortality events, not mass killings, compare "Premature Deaths: Russia's Radical Economic Transition in Soviet Perspective". Davide King (talk) 00:54, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Wikipedia: Ever at the forefront of pushing newspeak. If the "scholars" say there were no communist genocides, then there were no communist genocides friends.
 
The Rittenhouse shooting thread is really confused, usually on these articles you get at least a micro-biography, but this thing is all over the place:


..full of a bunch of irrelevant shit like YouGov polls in the lead, and who cares shit like this:

Snopes tracked Facebook accounts they considered unusual and determined that "foreign-run Facebook accounts celebrated the Rittenhouse verdict." Facebook removed the accounts following the report.

"Foreign-run" I guess xenophobia is OK if it helps shitlibs advance their narrative of blaming Russia for every bad news cycle. There are alot of foreign wannabe commentators that use US news to get clicks, and no they aren't all the KGB. Also Snopes is a such a shitty website and always was.
 
Lmao reliable sources moar like reLIEable sources amirite?

Literal genocide denial. This is an "encyclopedia." Anyone who cites this shitpile should not just be flunked from the class they're in, but expelled and have a permanent black mark on their record.
Wasn't that always a rule that Teachers didn't want their students to use Wikipedia as a source when writing a paper and stuff. That what it was at least for me in high school. At the time I didn't understand but recent years I now realized why!
 
An article about the Turkish people in Germany
Screenshot 2021-11-26 at 10-33-16 Turks in Germany - Wikipedia.png

"voices heard"

"THE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE DIDN'T HAPPEN BUT THEY HAD IT COMING!"
 
Is this really necessary?
No, and it's disfavored. It's a major autistic fandom thing to create separate articles for every character in some autistic fandom, like bronies created separate articles for every MLP character until that was shut down. You'll still see this kind of thing pop up again from time to time.
 
No, and it's disfavored. It's a major autistic fandom thing to create separate articles for every character in some autistic fandom, like bronies created separate articles for every MLP character until that was shut down. You'll still see this kind of thing pop up again from time to time.
I mean, there is some precedent for major characters of a prominent piece of media having their own pages, but sometimes their fans take it too far. For instance, for Fire Emblem Three Houses, Byleth has a page on account of being in both FETH and Smash and the controversies surrounding the character, but of the lords, Edelgard, and only Edelgard, has a dedicated page, and it was clearly written by one of her fanboys. She is the only Fire Emblem character to have a page that isn't also a Smash fighter, and I can't even argue prominence unless they also gave characters like Alm, Celica, Dimitri, or Claude articles as well.
 
Back