Dumb Shit on Wikipedia

Look at this absolute retardation.

View attachment 2705707
This is not just poorly written and ungrammatical, it's just flat-out wrong. And no, the source cited for this bullshit doesn't say this bullshit, it is just typical Wikipedo bullshit. I assume this is some autistic weirdo with an obsession.

Also even if you ignore the bullshit about dogs not having them, the VAST MAJORITY of mammals including most non-human primates have them. This idiot is claiming only cats have them.
View attachment 2705736
Also, has whoever put this on Wikipedo ever even seen a dog? They have fucking whiskers! What the fuck is wrong with these people?
Might edit that page and see how long it lasts without that bullshit. I know I will bait whatever autist thinks that is true though.
 
I might have to cut a little slack here. I found the culprit.

Some autist put this there just three days ago.

Screenshot 2021-11-10 184153.png
 
This tweet from our favorite Wikipedia user, GorillaWarfare, sums it up.
View attachment 2710193
A quick look at GW's recent edits shows that we're not so different. I bet they'd be all over Shadman's page right now if he had one.
View attachment 2710199
There is no justice in the world that Ethan fucking Ralph got a Wikipedia page before Chris.

Not only that, but GW scrubbed the references to Chris that were on the Wikipedia KF article. So now someone reading the KF wikipedia article will have an unclear ideas of the origin of the name. Since when was it a Wikipedia policy that non-notable people cannot even be mentioned on a Wikipedia article? That's a new one for me, and one I suspect that GW made up on the fly.
 
GorillaWarfare really needs a thread of her own.

Assuming she doesn't already have one, anyway.

I considered that, but imo there wouldn't be enough milk to justify a whole thread. Gw's Twitter is just standard leftist shit that is a dime a dozen. I had also considered a thread for Wikipedia editors but since it's mostly in relation to the title of this thread I.e the dumb shit that these editors write on Wikipedia, it would seem kind of like a pointless duplication.

Bottom line is that GW is one of the worst cunts on Wikipedia, but there have been plenty before GW and there will be plenty after.
 
I considered that, but imo there wouldn't be enough milk to justify a whole thread. Gw's Twitter is just standard leftist shit that is a dime a dozen. I had also considered a thread for Wikipedia editors but since it's mostly in relation to the title of this thread I.e the dumb shit that these editors write on Wikipedia, it would seem kind of like a pointless duplication.

Bottom line is that GW is one of the worst cunts on Wikipedia, but there have been plenty before GW and there will be plenty after.
I posted her info somewhere on here but you have to look back for it it was during July or august i Think
plus you can probably do an ED page on her
Not only that, but GW scrubbed the references to Chris that were on the Wikipedia KF article. So now someone reading the KF wikipedia article will have an unclear ideas of the origin of the name. Since when was it a Wikipedia policy that non-notable people cannot even be mentioned on a Wikipedia article? That's a new one for me, and one I suspect that GW made up on the fly.
oh fuck her
 
I posted her info somewhere on here but you have to look back for it it was during July or august i Think
plus you can probably do an ED page on her

oh fuck her
One thing i will credit Wikipedia for is linking me to the My Immortal saga when the 'cow's own brother was a fellow kiwi reading the threads right now and holy shit my sides.
 
This tweet from our favorite Wikipedia user, GorillaWarfare, sums it up.
What a surprise some worthless wikipedo admits writing an article and it doesn't even have the foggiest clue what it's about.
Bottom line is that GW is one of the worst cunts on Wikipedia, but there have been plenty before GW and there will be plenty after.
This is why some professors just automatically flunk you for citing wikipedo, or at least used to, back when academic honesty was a thing. Many of the articles are just completely made up bullshit by utterly deranged freaks.
 
There is a new article on Mark McCloskey, which for some reason uses his middle name in the title. The McCloskeys were famous for sporting guns in their front yard after a BLM mob burst into their Missouri gated community. Mark McCloskey is preparing a 2022 Senate run.

His article includes this paragraph:
mccloskey.png


That last sentence is apparently encyclopedic. It is cited to a brainless opinion piece in The Atlantic which uses the "fear and domination" phrase in the subtitle.

The article's primary author has the username Activist. Their user page is just a mess of infoboxes, most of which are about having set foot in various countries.
 
Once again, I wasn't even looking for the wiki version of this, but I was searching on Google for 'James O'Keefe' due to the story about the raid on his home, and got the wiki take on Mr. O'Keefe from one of Google's 'helpful' sidebars:


James Edward O'Keefe III (born June 28, 1984) is an American right-wing[2][3][4] to far-right[5][6][7] political activist and provocateur.[8][9] He produces secretly recorded undercover audio and video encounters in academic, governmental, and social service organizations, purporting to show abusive or illegal behavior by representatives of those organizations.[10] He has selectively edited videos to misrepresent the context of the conversations and the subjects' responses.[11][12][13][14][15] In June 2010, O'Keefe formed Project Veritas, a far-right[22] activist group that uses the same deceptive editing techniques[11][16][23] to attack mainstream media organizations and progressive groups.[8][24]

Now, if they can brand the harmless normie-con O"Keefe as 'far right' it tells me that that your only choices is to have the politics of Mitt Romney or John McCain. But the rest of the article seems like a seething/butthurt left over from the ACORN undercover op from 10 years.

I was a little surprised to not see any name I recognize in the edit history, at least no one that has previously been on my radar.
 
I was reading the Wikipedia page for the Scientology cross, a symbol of the "religion," and decided to check out the talk page. It was all very normal. Years ago, there was some minor debate on whether or not to keep the page, considering there's a page for Scientology symbols already.

kahn iceay.png

Completely ordinary. I decided to click on all the user names and when I got to user Kahn Iceay, I saw this:
kahn iceay 2.png

The link took me to his account on a fucking Star wars roleplaying Wiki. And his Wikipedia page proper links to a different Star Wars wiki. His user page is deactivated due to inactivity, but he was an avid contributor.

khan iceay 3.png

He has very few other Wikipedia edits. Outside of some minor Talk and format edits for a video game company, his only other Wikipedia contribution is about crawfish/crayfish nomenclature.
 
I didn't know that beauty pageants were the source for a lot of sperging on Wikipedia. They've locked up most pages pertaining to them. This years "Miss Universe" pageant page has the good-old blue lock on its page, so only users who waste their time accumulating over 500 edits can edit the page.
In the reasons why, apparently they're doing this because of "sockpuppets", and any page edited by a "sockpuppet" account must immediately be locked up by an administrator.
Wiki sanctions.PNG

And these "sockpuppets" still continue to "infiltrate" Wikipedia. Miss Malaysia 2020, "Francisca Luhong James", had her page moved by a user who created an account and got the ability to edit pages with blue locks and move pages... only to end up being one of the many alleged sockpuppet accounts that Wikipedia mods and admins have been trying to purge.
extended lock.PNG

wiki user blocked.PNG
user blocked.PNG
 
There is a new article on Mark McCloskey, which for some reason uses his middle name in the title. The McCloskeys were famous for sporting guns in their front yard after a BLM mob burst into their Missouri gated community. Mark McCloskey is preparing a 2022 Senate run.

His article includes this paragraph:
View attachment 2724634

That last sentence is apparently encyclopedic. It is cited to a brainless opinion piece in The Atlantic which uses the "fear and domination" phrase in the subtitle.

The article's primary author has the username Activist. Their user page is just a mess of infoboxes, most of which are about having set foot in various countries.
They really hate the fact this couple defended their property from a violent mob and got away with it after a hacktivist court found them guilty.
Now, if they can brand the harmless normie-con O"Keefe as 'far right' it tells me that that your only choices is to have the politics of Mitt Romney or John McCain. But the rest of the article seems like a seething/butthurt left over from the ACORN undercover op from 10 years.
Consider the fact these people think Ben Shapiro is a pipeline to dah ult right!!!!

In a few years fucking Thomas Sowell will be called Nazi adjacent.
I didn't know that beauty pageants were the source for a lot of sperging on Wikipedia. They've locked up most pages pertaining to them. This years "Miss Universe" pageant page has the good-old blue lock on its page, so only users who waste their time accumulating over 500 edits can edit the page.
How can you sperg over fucking pageants?
 
Back