- Joined
- Apr 3, 2021
Someone added that picture of Null holding a bible to the KiwiFarms Wikipedia page. Unsure what that changes, but it’s kind of hilarious to see that on fucking Wikipedia of all things.
Dumb Shit on Wikipedia
- Thread starter AnOminous
- Start date
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
That's beautiful.
BootlegPopeye
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2021
They also made the opening of the article more vague (ie removing any real mention of Chris-chan) - 'the artist', 'the artists initials' SAY HIS NAME WIKINIGGERS. I thought wikipedia wasn't censored?
Again, cunt GorrillaWarfare made it less informative.
lol.
Again, cunt GorrillaWarfare made it less informative.
lol.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2020
He/she/it's sockpuppeted here before IIRC. He/she/it's got it out for the farms and just like his/her/its Wikipedia job he/she/it does it for free.
The Morgenthau Plan article also dismisses any claims of it being brutal or genocidal because a pair of German Marxists said so. Benz is also known for his "authoritative" claim that the Holocaust was unique and can't have other genocides or death tolls compared to it. Wonder if they think the Holodomor was a courageous agricultural plan that saved Soviet society too.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2020
I don't remmber joining this site to cause people to commit suicide? I just found it when looking for a place where I could state my opinions without getting dogpiled on (which happen to me on other forums). But what do I know?
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2019
Hey, Zac Bertschy did that to himself. Despite me tap dancing on his grave, he was the one with inner demons and needed to see a shrink instead of his circlejerk of geekazoid faggots. Even if I provided the information, he fucking did it to himself by posting it up on the internet. Even I was surprised when he went belly up on May 20th. I didn't fucking prod him by torturing him with information all day and night.
Not my problem. If he wasn't such a fucking rancorous cancerous tumor of a human being, he probably wouldn't have drank himself to death. lol fags
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2013
Wikipedia has a dumb rule with an embarrassing name that they don't enforce for literally every dumbshit thing its editors routinely do.
BootlegPopeye
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2021
Yeah he/she/it did, but under the same name: @GorrillaWarfare. The tone of the posts is the same as wikipedia, so I think it is Xir.
Never bothered to look at Gorilla's wall on KF, I am even more sure than I was it was her.
Someone posted one of Sanger's criticisms of Wikipedia, and Gorilla replies with 'Wikipedocracy''s version on the story that is nothing but an attack thread against Sanger without addressing anything he said.
Wikipediocracy used to be a criticism site, but devolved into a fansite of Wikipedia. If cunts like Gorilla are recommending it, you know it sucks.
BONUS:
@BugMe and @Pringles Can
Last edited:
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2021
I'm surprised with all the mundane shit on Wikipedia there isn't an article on that Sonic Sweepstakes he won.
Why am I not surprised Wikipedia cites Marxists as a authority on whether or not something as blatantly genocidal as the Morgenthau Plan is actually not a bad thing. I think the only reason they haven't shilled the Holodmor as nothing terrible is because they have stanned the poor Ukrainians since 2014 and their totally not NGO backed color revolution designed by rich elites.
The fact they start that article off poisoning the well on Sanger tells me they don't really have anything against him that is concrete.
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2021
Not one mention of the KKK in that article. You'd think Wikipedia lefties would salivate over the fact the Feds helped stoke the KKK for decades. EDIT: They do but it's almost always, "Yeah they infiltrated the Klan but not as bad as X lefty group" or "This Klansmen was on their payroll and attacked black people."
Last edited:
BootlegPopeye
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2021
The tone of that part suggests that the Wikians support that kind of infiltration. Never mind that the Klan had been a joke run by conmen since its 1940s 'revival'. I've mentioned this on here before, but my grandfather was a Klansman (something I don't support, but it is just a fact), the post 1940 revival groups were all viewed suspiciously and alot of the members of the 20s Klan wouldnt touch them - 'glowie' Klans in modern terms.
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2017
It was ran by conmen since its first revival, the reason to KKK needed to be revived in the 40s was because it was so discredited by conmen. Ever wonder why the Klan had so many members in the 20s? Because Kleagles made money signing people up and a bunch of people thought they too could be Kleagles or they could meet enough people to get into politics since the Klan was full of wannabe local bosses and politicians. The Third KKK was a lot more into violence and direct action which is why a lot of people, even other racists, didn't like them, so make of that what you will. That's why people like Robert Byrd quit the Klan, since by the 50s it wasn't a good way into politics but more a way to burn down some black preacher's house.
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2021
Second Klan was plenty violent, but it was exponentially bigger than the third and it existed in a time when racism was the norm, so Third Klan seems worse in comparison, but it is hypocritical to view it as somehow "worse". Sure, the Third Klan dynamited a niggo church, but the Second one had open lynchings the whole town gathered to gawk at and they leveled parts of small towns. The Third Klan never got close to that, if anything the third klan was less, not more violent. And the impact of the third was less as well, the second klan had a Supreme Court Justice and Truman flirted with the Klan, third klan mostly just had rednecks burnings crosses innawoods. See, it's funny how historical memory gets distorted like this. I have had many, many neo-nazis tell they're not neo-nazis, "like those skinheads/"hollywood nazis" giving bad name to nazism". When in fact the original Nazi brownshirts were exactly the same as modern skinheads, working class troublemakers beating their political enemies and getting drunk. Horst Wessel even famously said "German culture cannot be defended with a typewriter, but with chair legs and beer glasses". But after a few decades of watching movies about aristocratic, prussian nazis with monocles the reality gets forgotten.
TL;DR Nazis, klan, commies, all political extremists have always been violent and retarded
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
It was always a Faustian bargain to get into politics via the Klan, although it was more practical during the '20s incarnation. The problem was it could get you into politics but later, you'd be answering questions about why you were in the Klan at all. Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black, for instance, was in the '20s incarnation of the Klan, which was more or less a necessity to get into politics in Alabama at the time, but resigned before becoming a U.S. Senator, in 1925.
Nevertheless, he was answering questions about it the rest of his life, including at his Senate confirmation hearing after his appointment as a Supreme Court Justice by FDR.
Byrd's situation was quite similar, although somewhat worse in that he was in the later incarnation of the Klan at a time there was less excuse for it. Note, Byrd was not a Grand Wizard as sometimes reported. He was merely an Exalted Cyclops, a lead of a local chapter which he had, in fact, actually founded. I think one of the more embarrassing things about former Klan membership has to be the ridiculous titles.
Byrd is my second favorite Exalted Cyclops. You can guess the first.
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2020
I already posted her info somewhere on here and her name is molly white and its confirmed she lives in the same state as Brianna wu aka the home of the Revolution, boston MassachusettsYeah he/she/it did, but under the same name: @GorrillaWarfare. The tone of the posts is the same as wikipedia, so I think it is Xir.
Never bothered to look at Gorilla's wall on KF, I am even more sure than I was it was her.
View attachment 2695648
Someone posted one of Sanger's criticisms of Wikipedia, and Gorilla replies with 'Wikipedocracy''s version on the story that is nothing but an attack thread against Sanger without addressing anything he said.
Wikipediocracy used to be a criticism site, but devolved into a fansite of Wikipedia. If cunts like Gorilla are recommending it, you know it sucks.
BONUS:
View attachment 2695659
Last edited:
murgatroid
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2018
I'm sure they sit around the table and have dinner as a family just like anyone else. Then the dad asks each member of the family what they coomed to today.
BootlegPopeye
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2021
She/he/it (shit?) really has a SPLC staffer vibe, i.e., obsessively tracking minor figures and then amplifying them.
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2020
it would be surprising if she works for them or ADL or a glowie
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
Look at this absolute retardation.
This is not just poorly written and ungrammatical, it's just flat-out wrong. And no, the source cited for this bullshit doesn't say this bullshit, it is just typical Wikipedo bullshit. I assume this is some autistic weirdo with an obsession.
Also even if you ignore the bullshit about dogs not having them, the VAST MAJORITY of mammals including most non-human primates have them. This idiot is claiming only cats have them.
Also, has whoever put this on Wikipedo ever even seen a dog? They have fucking whiskers! What the fuck is wrong with these people?
This is not just poorly written and ungrammatical, it's just flat-out wrong. And no, the source cited for this bullshit doesn't say this bullshit, it is just typical Wikipedo bullshit. I assume this is some autistic weirdo with an obsession.
Also even if you ignore the bullshit about dogs not having them, the VAST MAJORITY of mammals including most non-human primates have them. This idiot is claiming only cats have them.
Also, has whoever put this on Wikipedo ever even seen a dog? They have fucking whiskers! What the fuck is wrong with these people?