Georgia 'LYNCHING' citizen fatally shoots unarmed black man ... Video Emerges, Grand Jury to Convene



The fatal shooting of Ahmaud Arbery -- a 25-year-old black man out for a jog when he was chased and killed -- was caught on video, prompting a call for a grand jury to review the case.

Arbery's death is being referred to as a modern-day lynching, as he was unarmed when he was gunned down in Brunswick, GA on February 23 by a white citizen named Travis McMichael ... who has not been arrested or charged. He also happens to be the son of a former district attorney investigator.

As you can see in the video, Arbery was jogging when he was stopped by McMichael and his father in a white pickup truck. McMichael was armed with a shotgun. Arbery appears to attempt to run around the truck before he and McMichael start grappling.

After at least 2 shots, the men continued struggling over the gun ... until Arbery stumbles away, shot in the mid-section, and then collapses to the ground. He was later pronounced dead.
94a5b7dd35e448f585d3b6ecf3e83e3e_md.jpg


McMichael has not been charged in the shooting ... reportedly because he and his father, who was in the back of the truck, claim they were trying to make a citizen's arrest. They claim Ahmaud fit the description of a suspect in a string of recent break-ins in the area.

After the emergence of the video, D.A. Pro Tempore Tom Durden has decided the case "should be presented to the grand jury of Glynn County for consideration of criminal charges against those involved in the death of Mr. Arbery.”

Ahmaud's family says the use of deadly force was unnecessary.

Here's the statement from the district attorney who was brought in to oversee the case and decide how and whether the case should be prosecuted.
EXRhs2vXkAINOAA.jpg


Attorney Lee Merritt, who represents Arberys mother, claims "The series of events captured in this video confirm what all the evidence indicated prior to its release— Ahmaud Arbery was pursued by three white men that targeted him solely because of his race and murdered him..."


EXRmSCPXsAYkx0v.jpg


==============

Imagine being hunted by two fat hillbillies in a truck.
 
Last edited:
Frankly, one thing I'm seeing in common with this and the Rittenhouse trial are arguments that ultimately amount to "it's stupid to take actions to promote a law-abiding society." These arguments obviously lead to some questions that people deliberately try to avoid asking or answering.

Firstly, why is it stupid to try and support a law-abiding society?
The answer to this is always the same which is "you'll be punished by the US government."

The second question that should naturally follow from this but seldom ever does is "why will you be punished by the US government?"
The only logical answer to this question is that the US is a criminal, and thus illegitimate government.


"Oh noes, mah polite society, we wuz kangs!"

1637848713228.png
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Reactions: IAmNotAlpharius
The fucked up part though, is they probably would have gotten off if Bryan hadn't released the video of the incident since most people don't have the stomach to watch people die on video and will get emotional enough that no serious argument will work on them.

At first I also thought it was Bryan who leaked the vid but it turns out it was McMichael sr.

There was a lot of outrage after their charges were dropped and Greg McMichael thought it was a brilliant idea to release the footage so people
would be convinced it wasn't racially motivated and that it was self defense. It would ease tensions and clear up some rumors.

The opposite happened. He, his son and Bryan are in jail for the rest of their life and they will be remembered forever as those racist killers who hunted a jogger.

1637847672799.png

 
Last edited:
Memo to you: The people doing the terrorizing were the 3 white guys.

That's kind of the point.
Niggers terrorize the entire country, I don't care if a nigger is only stealing a penny from a sock drawer, they deserve to die. STOP FUCKING STEALING AND YOU WON'T DIE. That is the message that needs to be delivered to these savages, and if it needs to be delivered by armed private lynch mobs I don't give a shit. Faggots always say "lives matter more than property", well then STOP RISKING YOU LIVES TO STEAL OTHER PEOPLES PROPERTY YOU DUMB APE. Every white town who has been harrassed by niggers should take up the same stance as the town Ken Rex McElroy harrassed which is "I didn't see anything, and I'm not telling you anything else other than whoever killed him is innocent and has a legitimate alibi".
 
Niggers terrorize the entire country, I don't care if a nigger is only stealing a penny from a sock drawer, they deserve to die. STOP FUCKING STEALING AND YOU WON'T DIE. That is the message that needs to be delivered to these savages, and if it needs to be delivered by armed private lynch mobs I don't give a shit. Faggots always say "lives matter more than property", well then STOP RISKING YOU LIVES TO STEAL OTHER PEOPLES PROPERTY YOU DUMB APE. Every white town who has been harrassed by niggers should take up the same stance as the town Ken Rex McElroy harrassed which is "I didn't see anything, and I'm not telling you anything else other than whoever killed him is innocent and has a legitimate alibi".
Jesus, you are racist - I'm not sure you even know it.

The local channel here is full every day of crime. Child neglect. Child abuse. Meth born babies. Arson. Theft. Door package thieves. Copper wire out of HVAC units or power plant substations. Murder.

Most of it is by poor whites - over 90%. Easily.

The guy we got arrested for stealing up here where we live: White.

The guy who worked for the council and was secretly scoping places for theft for co-workers and people he knows: White.

Really, the argument you'll find crime by demographics of economics is pretty true. If you live where there are poor blacks, more blacks will be present in crime stories. If you live where there is a high percentage of poor whites you'll see stories of poor whites. No surprise - but don't confuse it for what it isn't.

You argument for killing all "niggers" is just as well based as the argument for killing all the whites where I live.

What you really should be advocating (for your argument to hold weight) is "Kill anyone without enough money and/or a drug habit and funds to support it."

I wonder if it ever occurred to you that while you advocate the elimination of the lower class (while thinking it is all blacks), that perhaps there are some very wealthy blacks and whites who think the elimination of the middle class (white or black) "suckling pigs" is just as a worthy cause?

Some tolerance goes a long way. I sometimes hire these lower class persons for occasional help and am thoroughly aware of their inclinations for crime, often with criminal histories (almost always, including convicted murderers). I've heard over a hundred stories in the last 8 years from blacks and whites. Sometimes they have worked for me for weeks. Once you take the color of the skin away, the stories are almost the same.

Some tolerance will not only make you a smarter person, it will make you a more mature person for others to bear to be around.
 
You argument for killing all "niggers" is just as well based as the argument for killing all the whites where I live.

What you really should be advocating (for your argument to hold weight) is "Kill anyone without enough money and/or a drug habit and funds to support it."
I think we should kill all whites, even the law-abiding ones.
 
Jesus, you are racist - I'm not sure you even know it.

The local channel here is full every day of crime. Child neglect. Child abuse. Meth born babies. Arson. Theft. Door package thieves. Copper wire out of HVAC units or power plant substations. Murder.

Most of it is by poor whites - over 90%. Easily.

The guy we got arrested for stealing up here where we live: White.

The guy who worked for the council and was secretly scoping places for theft for co-workers and people he knows: White.

Really, the argument you'll find crime by demographics of economics is pretty true. If you live where there are poor blacks, more blacks will be present in crime stories. If you live where there is a high percentage of poor whites you'll see stories of poor whites. No surprise - but don't confuse it for what it isn't.

You argument for killing all "niggers" is just as well based as the argument for killing all the whites where I live.

What you really should be advocating (for your argument to hold weight) is "Kill anyone without enough money and/or a drug habit and funds to support it."

I wonder if it ever occurred to you that while you advocate the elimination of the lower class (while thinking it is all blacks), that perhaps there are some very wealthy blacks and whites who think the elimination of the middle class (white or black) "suckling pigs" is just as a worthy cause?

Some tolerance goes a long way. I sometimes hire these lower class persons for occasional help and am thoroughly aware of their inclinations for crime, often with criminal histories (almost always, including convicted murderers). I've heard over a hundred stories in the last 8 years from blacks and whites. Sometimes they have worked for me for weeks. Once you take the color of the skin away, the stories are almost the same.

Some tolerance will not only make you a smarter person, it will make you a more mature person for others to bear to be around.
Yeah, and people who steal from peoples houses should be killed no matter whether they're a nigger or a cracker you dumb faggot. The only way to deter degenerate repeat criminals is to make them suffer in public view. You robbed multiple people over multiple years? HANG THEM. You raped multiple people? SKIN THEM ALIVE. You murdered multiple people? DRAW AND QUARTERED. You raped kids? TORTURED UNTIL DEATH. I don't give a fuck about whether the child rapist is a nigger, gook, chink, kike, or mick, kill them with no mercy. Brutal people don't learn unless faced by brutality. Gangs could be utterly destroyed if everyone with an MS13 tatoo was skinned alive and then impaled. Not my fault you're a weak faggot who would rather die begging like a bitch than skin a child rapist alive.
 
Yeah, and people who steal from peoples houses should be killed no matter whether they're a nigger or a cracker you dumb faggot. The only way to deter degenerate repeat criminals is to make them suffer in public view. You robbed multiple people over multiple years? HANG THEM. You raped multiple people? SKIN THEM ALIVE. You murdered multiple people? DRAW AND QUARTERED. You raped kids? TORTURED UNTIL DEATH. I don't give a fuck about whether the child rapist is a nigger, gook, chink, kike, or mick, kill them with no mercy. Brutal people don't learn unless faced by brutality. Gangs could be utterly destroyed if everyone with an MS13 tatoo was skinned alive and then impaled. Not my fault you're a weak faggot who would rather die begging like a bitch than skin a child rapist alive.
Okay so what should we do to people who hunt down and murder innocent black people in a redneck truck?
 
Yeah, and people who steal from peoples houses should be killed no matter whether they're a nigger or a cracker you dumb faggot. The only way to deter degenerate repeat criminals is to make them suffer in public view. You robbed multiple people over multiple years? HANG THEM. You raped multiple people? SKIN THEM ALIVE. You murdered multiple people? DRAW AND QUARTERED. You raped kids? TORTURED UNTIL DEATH. I don't give a fuck about whether the child rapist is a nigger, gook, chink, kike, or mick, kill them with no mercy. Brutal people don't learn unless faced by brutality. Gangs could be utterly destroyed if everyone with an MS13 tatoo was skinned alive and then impaled. Not my fault you're a weak faggot who would rather die begging like a bitch than skin a child rapist alive.
Clearly, you are a well balanced person with a just and sane viewpoint.

I'm sure the world would indeed be a better place with someone like you running things.

I can see you are well read in history and clearly, the path forward is so straight forward. It will remain a wonder to me why people can't agree with your point of view or see just how clearly black and white things really are.

Brute force. 👐 It is all just so simple. Brute force has always worked in societies, why there are countless examples are harmony reining in societies with brute force and zero tolerance.

If you find me muttering to myself later in this thread, it will be because it will be the only way to ensure I have an intelligent conversation.
 
He didn't think it was a good idea, these were random people who ran him down. He had no idea who they were and a guy got out with a shotgun armed. Not slung over his back, not racked in the car, in his hands. With a confederate flag on the back. Maybe he felt they were going to take him somewhere he didn't want to go.
How the Civil War started.

1861 - States rights, economic reasons, abolishment

2021 - THIS NIGGER STOLE MY HAMMER!
 
there are actual people in this thread who are basically arguing that it was okay to kill Arbery because he was existing while black in a neighborhood that is mostly white

but race has nothing to do with this, no sir. this would have happened /exactly/ the same way if Arbery were white.

god these fucking racists are like vermin, crawling out from the woodwork anytime a white person is held accountable for anything. fucking pathetic losers.
 
For me, the biggest issue is what people should do in a similar situation going forward. "Calling the police" wasn't going to cut it here, or there wouldn't have been months of thefts and complaints leading up to the shooting. Simply following a suspected thief avoids the confrontation, but doesn't do anything to fix the problem. If anything, it could create an opening for charges of racially-motivated stalking or intimidation.

I fully accept the court's decision, but I'm still not seeing a better alternative when the cops can't or won't show up in time.
 
How the Civil War started.

1861 - States rights, economic reasons, abolishment

2021 - THIS NIGGER STOLE MY HAMMER!
The Yugoslav civil wars can be traced back to some drunk that shoved a beer bottle in his ass to get off, then when it broke and he went to the hospital, claimed it had been some other ethnic group that had forcibly raped him with it. The ethnic cleansing in former Yugoslavia can without a doubt be at least partially to blame on a man who shoved something up his own ass and lied about it.

History can be fucking weird.

For me, the biggest issue is what people should do in a similar situation going forward. "Calling the police" wasn't going to cut it here, or there wouldn't have been months of thefts and complaints leading up to the shooting. Simply following a suspected thief avoids the confrontation, but doesn't do anything to fix the problem. If anything, it could create an opening for charges of racially-motivated stalking or intimidation.

I fully accept the court's decision, but I'm still not seeing a better alternative when the cops can't or won't show up in time.
The thing is that simply following someone isn’t illegal. As for the thefts, the ones the McMicheals were worried about the most, those of firearms, are a good reason why you don’t keep anything you don’t want to risk being stolen in your vehicle. Truck guns and glove box pistols don’t have to be fancy, if you’re that worried about being car jacked and want a glove box piece despite that being ungodly rare in your area, just buy a HiPoint and accept that you’re risking getting it stolen and being out a hundred to two hundred dollars. Hell, lock your vehicles too - the break ins happened on unlocked vehicles IIRC. Simply doing that can convince petty thieves to just move on. It isn’t worth the effort.

Secondly, the reason this becomes murder is that without any legal justification, you cannot detain someone. They didn’t have it. If someone doesn’t want to talk to you, they don’t have to. The worst that can happen if you follow them but don’t confront them is you have a self defense case that’s pretty air tight, or a minor civil suit that you’ll probably be able to get dismissed or win since it’s far easier to prove your case in civil court both ways. Is any of this perfect? No. Is it better than what happened in this situation? Yes.

Arbery was a low level criminal with mental issues. But they could have stopped someone who wasn’t, and they could have reached the same conclusion he did - I am in fear for my life. I need to defend myself.

Also a friendly reminder that the cops can’t always be dealing with your low level bullshit. You eat up time they could be using to harass motorists or less likely, handling more serious crimes. Unless you catch someone in the act, have a damn good description, and they’re able to trace that property, you’re likely not going to see whatever got stolen again. That’s the price we pay to not get roving groups of men attempting to be the law on their own.
 
Last edited:
Are you blind, cunt? Or just exceptional?
The video footage shows Armed Robbery attacking a man who is holding a shotgun. The only person responsible for the death of that worthless, thieving nigger is the nigger himself.
of arbery won and killed those 3 would you say it was the hillbillies fault? arbery has a right to self defense according to the law.
 
Back