US Joe Biden News Megathread - The Other Biden Derangement Syndrome Thread (with a side order of Fauci Derangement Syndrome)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Let's pretend for one moment that he does die before the election, just for the funsies. What happens then? Will the nomination revert to option number 2, aka Bernie Sanders? Or will his running mate automatically replace him just the way Vice-President is supposted to step in after the Big Man in the White House chokes on a piece of matzo? Does he even have a running mate yet?
 
6,000 people in a country of 9 million people apparently have the virus and this is a "state of emergency"?
Hey Bennett, March 2020 called they want the alarmism back.

Problem is there's genuine exhaustion for all this shit. They'll keep trying and steadily and surely people will listen less and less. Rambling about booster shots is already seeing more people skeptical than they were the first go round. Same as the BBC tries this bollocks along with Sky and people just switch off and go do stuff instead.

Unrelated to the thread but relavent to the themes I would say. Sweden's first female prime minister just resigned after seven hours.
The Green Party of Sweden left the government after the Nationalist Party rejected their budget plan and passed their own. The Prime minister proceeded to resign as it's in the constitution there if your ally leaves the government you have to or something.

Their plan is to start a new Swedish government with single party rule lmao.
If your presented budget doesn't pass it means the parliament doesn't have confidence in your Ministry. It's how parliamentary democracies work. So both one of her coalition partners walking and another being able to pass an alternative is just a hilariously unfortunate double blow. The Greens walking isn't a deathknell, it just means you're running a minority government (likely working on a system of confidence and supply, meaning you negotiate piece by piece with other parties to pass shit). The reason she resigned was the budget not passing.
 
This COVID shit has got to be the biggest scam I have ever seen anyone pull
  • Show a map of the world
  • blindfold yourself while throwing a dart at said map
  • Use whatever country it lands on as the new "ground zero" for man-made virus that came from China
  • Give info to media, allowing them to do what they do best: Make a mountain out of a molehill by causing worldwide panic
  • Normalfags that buy into this shit start to panic, get booster #82397645283976264572
  • Time passes by, boosters don't work and/or actually kill people
  • No one gives a shit anymore and tries to go back to what their lives used to be
  • "Ok time to play the game again!"
  • Show a map of the world
  • blindfold yourself while throwing a dart at said map
  • Use whatever country...

You also forgot:

* Youtuber posts nth "Karen" video showing aNtI vAxEr and aNtI mAsKeR
* "Hoo, wow, what a Karen, amirite? What a dum dummy dum dipshit white Karen!" Says the WHITE Youtuber
* tHeRe'S a sOoPeR cErEaL pAnDeMiC, Karen! Way to be selfish, republican and a Karen!
* Dipshit asspatters pontificate on anti vaxxxxxxxxxxxxxxers and worry their favorite Youtuber might get doxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxed

Fucking sick of these people. It takes, like, TWO seconds to find a stack of articles saying the "vaccine" is ineffective, kills and injures people, puts others at grave risk for heart problems, and id definitely against a whole LOT of people's religions and personal beliefs.
But, no...they're the dum dummy dipshits. Nope, not like these goodboyzz and girlzz voting CORRECTLY for a pedophile and his house nigress.
 
Problem is there's genuine exhaustion for all this shit. They'll keep trying and steadily and surely people will listen less and less. Rambling about booster shots is already seeing more people skeptical than they were the first go round. Same as the BBC tries this bollocks along with Sky and people just switch off and go do stuff instead.
That’s the problem with propaganda. The longer it’s used, the less effective it is. It’s like smack. The more you use, the more you become desensitized to it, the more it takes and the stronger the shit has to be to keep you high. Pretty soon you’re consuming enough each day to kill a horse and it still isn’t enough. Eventually there’s no amount of shit on earth that’ll get you high.

That’s what’s coming. Eventually it won’t matter what the Govt says about COVID and about how evil you are for not listening to them. More and more folks are going to
tune them out
 
Omicron? Isn't that the name of an Autobot or something?
It's the name of a terrible David Cage game:

MV5BOGQ5NjFmNjctMTI0OC00Y2EzLTg3OTgtY2E2ZTFmOTc2OTJjL2ltYWdlL2ltYWdlXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMTA1OTEwNj...jpg
 
Why is Stacey Abrams so well liked amongst Democrats/the media? Other than being a heavy set black woman, what warrants all of the praise she gets?
As much as they call Trump claiming 2020 was frauded a Big Lie, they have their own myth narrative about her governor's election in Georgia being fraudedsuppressed (reminder that she's never consneeded and continues to claim she actually won in 2018 ). She's also been the face of a lot of work to turn Atlanta into as much of a corrupt Democatic machine as Chicago is, so they like to hold her up as a defender of voting rights. I view her as a Democratic attempt to astroturf another Hillary Clinton, without all of Hillary Clinton's baggage and as a much more optically friendly (to them) body-positive woman of color, and it's going to be her turn for something sooner or later.
 
Last edited:
Apparently Democrats want even more gun control even though its dropped among Independents and Republicans. I believe its part of the shift in voting bases as well as their nigger pets and Antifa soycucks making the best case for less gun control during the 2020 Chimpout.


 
Apparently Democrats want even more gun control even though its dropped among Independents and Republicans. I believe its part of the shift in voting bases as well as their nigger pets and Antifa soycucks making the best case for less gun control during the 2020 Chimpout.

Wow, it's almost like they are deliberately trying to lose the midterms even harder. What, do they think they'll build up some kind of credit they can use in 2024 or beyond? This is insanely stupid and absolutely oblivious to the current reality.
 
Wow, it's almost like they are deliberately trying to lose the midterms even harder. What, do they think they'll build up some kind of credit they can use in 2024 or beyond? This is insanely stupid and absolutely oblivious to the current reality.
The midterms are unimportant. They’re The Circus. They’re the distraction to keep all us Plebs in our seats expending all our energies cheering our favorite gladiators in the arena while the Senate fucks us all in the ass. The Circus is the lube. GOP and Dems are the same damn thing.
 
Apparently Democrats want even more gun control even though its dropped among Independents and Republicans. I believe its part of the shift in voting bases as well as their nigger pets and Antifa soycucks making the best case for less gun control during the 2020 Chimpout.


Gun control in 2021 is like opposing gay marriage in 2014. It's a losing fight and they're just going to make independents more rigid in their defiance. A lot more people care about gun rights after 2020.
 
Is "Necronomicon" going to be a variant name down the line?
except for tranny & jannies & crystal mom & antivaxxer & autism moms

shots are giving kids autism so guess polio & smallpox coming back is fine.
Tbf, the amount of illegals pouring in from across the border did more harm to herd immunity to diseases like polio and measles than Karen not wanting to vaccinate her crotch goblins. Anti-vaxx movement is loud but small, meanwhile Juan jumped the fence and believes putting an egg underneath his kid's pillow will cure the kid's cold. And then we have countless "refugees" that Obama AND Biden brought over from the Middle East that I doubt believe in western medicine.
 
Gun control in 2021 is like opposing gay marriage in 2014. It's a losing fight and they're just going to make independents more rigid in their defiance. A lot more people care about gun rights after 2020.
Oh, look. It's the familiar enemy of the Democrats.

The consequences of their own actions.
 
Gun control in 2021 is like opposing gay marriage in 2014. It's a losing fight and they're just going to make independents more rigid in their defiance. A lot more people care about gun rights after 2020.
The good news is that, as it stands, most gun control talk from the Dems seems to be just virtue signalling. Remember when Hochul said she wanted to make NY gun laws even tighter? Absolutely nothing has been proposed since then, because she's too busy begging people for campaign money and kickbacks from D.C. At least Cuomo had enough political clout to just befriend billionaires he could ask for the bribe money.
 
View attachment 2751434
Even the propagandists are getting shitty at their jobs. The 'Great Resignation' has been hard on the Dem Party apparatus I bet. (tweet)
lol still going hard against TN for removing their handgun permit requirement. Also note how they don't define the man's ethnicity.
 
Ah yes, because this is how every other disease has worked in which we have vaccinated against like smallpox and polio.

Oh wait

Edit because this is really fucking stupid: Where's the latest varient come from? South Africa? How's their vaccination rate?

24% vaccinated against. I'm sure it evolved in that tiny subset of the population and not the huge one which wont have been following anything not told to them by the fucking witch doctor.

This fucking thing is a chink bioweapon and the fact it keeps evolving this way instead of going the normal way of viruses shows that more clearly to me than claiming it's the vaccines doing it.

Again, be sceptical? But don't be so fucking dumb.
Its a leaky vaccine. Stops symptoms but not the disease itself. Go look into Marek's disease for what happens when you have a treatment like that. We went from mild paralysis and neural lesions to body-wide lymphomas.
Vaccination is the only known method to prevent the development of tumors when chickens are infected with the virus. However, administration of the vaccine does not prevent an infected bird from shedding the virus, though it does reduce the amount of virus shed in the dander, hence reducing horizontal spread of the disease. Marek's disease does not spread vertically.

Before the development of the vaccine for Marek's disease, Marek's disease caused substantial revenue loss in the poultry industries of the United States and the United Kingdom. The vaccine can be administered to one-day-old chicks through subcutaneous inoculation or by in ovo vaccination when the eggs are transferred from the incubator to the hatcher. In ovo vaccination is the preferred method, as it does not require handling of the chicks and can be done rapidly by automated methods. Immunity develops within two weeks.

Because vaccination does not prevent infection with the virus, Marek's is still transmissible from vaccinated flocks to other birds, including the wild bird population. The first Marek's disease vaccine was introduced in 1970. The disease would cause mild paralysis, with the only identifiable lesions being in neural tissue. Mortality of chickens infected with Marek's disease was quite low. Current strains of Marek virus, decades after the first vaccine was introduced, cause lymphoma formation throughout the chicken's body and mortality rates have reached 100% in unvaccinated chickens. The Marek's disease vaccine is a "leaky vaccine", which means that only the symptoms of the disease are prevented. Infection of the host and the transmission of the virus are not inhibited by the vaccine. This contrasts with most other vaccines, where infection of the host is prevented. Under normal conditions, highly virulent strains of the virus are not selected. A highly virulent strain would kill the host before the virus would have an opportunity to transmit to other potential hosts and replicate. Thus, less virulent strains are selected. These strains are virulent enough to induce symptoms but not enough to kill the host, allowing further transmission. However, the leaky vaccine changes this evolutionary pressure and permits the evolution of highly virulent strains. The vaccine's inability to prevent infection and transmission allows the spread of highly virulent strains among vaccinated chickens. The fitness of the more virulent strains is increased by the vaccine.

The evolution of Marek's disease due to vaccination has had a profound effect on the poultry industry. All chickens across the globe are now vaccinated against Marek's disease (birds hatched in private flocks for laying or exhibition are rarely vaccinated). Highly virulent strains have been selected to the point that any chicken that is unvaccinated will die if infected. Other leaky vaccines are commonly used in agriculture. One vaccine in particular is the vaccine for avian influenza. Leaky vaccine use for avian influenza can select for virulent strains.
Don't worry, the Wikipedia jannies have been hard at work scrubbing any COVID-related information from the page. Apparently its anti-vaccine propaganda to mention their leaky status...
 
Not again!!!!!!!!
Here's the thing,

"It shows that, so far as the data knows, while less effective against these strains it's still more effective than not being vaccinated at all for the groups they've checked."

This is actually a -very bad- thing. It's putting artificial evolutionary pressure onto the virus, disrupting its normal cycle of becoming easier to transmit but less deadly.
So "trust the science" crowd doom us in the end
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back