Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey Stepping Down, Report Says

You don't even need a troon for that. The moment they begin to seriously consider flirting with the idea of ID requirements to register an account, Twitter is gonna go the way of Tumblr and the reprobate base of coomers that prop up this shitty site to begin with will probably go and fuck up Reddit instead. Not like things can get any worse there...

Of course, this is all just my personal fantasy of the outcome of events. A man can dream...
Won't happen because Hollywood, the media, big tech and the governments of the world have too much invested in Twitter to let it get Digged or Myspaced.

Hell, see how fast the media moves to blood libel ALL rival Twitter-type sites that try and capitalize on Twitter's various fuck-ups and bullshit and big tech then using those blood libel lies to crush said rival sites.
 
The new rule is so obviously unworkable in allowing virtually ANY photo or video of a person that it becomes clear to have only been conceive for the purpose of selective enforcement, and given the flavorful language throughout Twitter's official announcement, it's easy to figure out who the intended target of selective enforcement is:





Now here's some fun thought experiments regarding the new rule:

What becomes of all media that was posted preceding this announcement? Must they all be deleted if they have real-life people? Will they only be deleted if a featured person demands it? Will deletion also be coupled with punishment towards the original poster?

What exactly constitutes a public figure who is automatically exempt from the rule? A politician? A school board member from one of the most prominent counties on the US? A city council member from Nowhere, Nebraska? A CEO? A small business owner? A customer-facing service worker? A PR rep? A police officer? A public school teacher? A Hollywood actor? A small-town theater actor? A street protester? A convicted murderer? A convicted serial petty criminal? An arrested criminal suspect? An acquitted former criminal suspect? A Youtuber/streamer with 10k followers? A person who once appeared in news or "viral" media?

If the only "mainstream/traditional media" to cover a piece of media content is Fox News, is the content fair game for everyone else to post? What about The Daily Wire? What about Breitbart? What about The Post Millennial?

How exactly does the mandatory permission for media work? Consider a video of Person A that's posted by Person B:
  • How does Person B demonstrate that he got permission from Person A to post the video?
  • What if Person A retroactively withdraws consent? Will the video be deleted? Will Person B be punished?
  • Does permission for the video also apply automatically to other media derived from the same real event, such as individual screenshots of the video, a higher-quality version of the video, an embarrassing video edit, or an entirely different video that shows the event at a different angle?
  • Can Person A give permission to Person B to post the video, but simultaneously deny permission for Person C to do the same?
  • Can Person A give permission for anyone to post the video EXCEPT Person B?
  • If Person A posted the video first, does that automatically give Person B permission to do the same? What if Person A later deletes his post?
Of course, all of the above questions are moot when the whole point of the new rule is selective enforcement.
Stop with the Pilpul, my goy guy. That's something only us chosen people are capable of conducting
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dork Of Ages
A question for folks like Andy Ngo, is why the fuck don't they diversify and post content on other websites as well. I believe Ngo is not on Gab or Telegram.

Keeping all the eggs in one basket on Twitter to convince bots and retarded woke AWFLs is not saving America.

If anything, Twitter should be a barometer for which way the Democrats are heading.

The issue is that Big Tech WANTS to isolate and quarantine anything going against the anti-life Left narrative onto platforms like Telegraph that no one uses and which the media blood libels as racist so that normies never go near them/refuse to believe anything posted there.
 
How will they force people to use it? Put a gun to their head if they don't tweet?
Twitter is the platform of the elite and is promoted as a big deal with limited usage privileges for the unwashed masses so long as they don't post wrong think. And that going to other platforms will be seen as social suicide due to them blood libeling any alternatives, if not crushing them outright and making sure that all the "big important people" stay on Twitter (and to a lesser extent the Zuckerberg sites) by granting them exemptions from the rules the rabble are forced to follow.
 
Putting a street shitter in a position of power has really helped them. These people can't even keep their holy river clean, let alone a large company like Twitter.
Designated shitting Ganges.
Twitter is the platform of the elite and is promoted as a big deal with limited usage privileges for the unwashed masses so long as they don't post wrong think.
Twitter is boring and stupid and if normies aren't even allowed to express normal opinions there, they'll go elsewhere. Their product is their users. If they give them the equivalent of Brawndo instead of water, even those people will leave. Normies don't even pay attention to or care much about Twitter, and many of them literally know it only as that place where Trump always used to post.

I spent time with a lot of related boomers over the weekend, and while all of them have Facebook accounts, none of them have any idea what Twitter even is. Some tweet about something got put on some news story and someone asked, verbatim, "what the fuck is a hashtag?" "Who cares?"

People aren't swayed at all by tweets from randos. If they do pay attention it's because of who is saying it, not because it's on Twitter.
 
Designated shitting Ganges.

Twitter is boring and stupid and if normies aren't even allowed to express normal opinions there, they'll go elsewhere. Their product is their users. If they give them the equivalent of Brawndo instead of water, even those people will leave. Normies don't even pay attention to or care much about Twitter, and many of them literally know it only as that place where Trump always used to post.

I spent time with a lot of related boomers over the weekend, and while all of them have Facebook accounts, none of them have any idea what Twitter even is. Some tweet about something got put on some news story and someone asked, verbatim, "what the fuck is a hashtag?" "Who cares?"

People aren't swayed at all by tweets from randos. If they do pay attention it's because of who is saying it, not because it's on Twitter.

The media have decided Twitter is supreme, especially since they control it way more directly than Facebook (also why the left keep scapegoating Zuck, as Zuck at least TRIES to play neutral if only because he knows he will make money playing both sides whereas Twitter and Dorsey had sold their soul to the DNC). Note how much shit is flung at Facebook when Twitter does much worse bullshit?

And the organized campaign of blood libel and deplatforming ALL known Twitter rivals, especially when one tries to capitalize on Twitter's latest evil act, shows that they want Twitter to be the only game in town social media-wise with Facebook close second (hence them also trying to get rid of Zuck/bully him to let the left bully and terrorize conservatives and normies).
 
Speaking of worse shit that Twitter does, the Doe v. Twitter suit drags on, about Twitter absolutely refusing to remove literal child pornography from the site despite it being an ongoing criminal matter with a case number, because they said child pornography didn't "violate policy."

The latest move is Twitter has filed an interlocutory appeal to the Ninth Circuit to drag the case out longer, hoping the child molestation victim they helped the perps molest runs out of money and goes away.
 

Attachments

...probably a coincidence, but...

The more I see of these coincidences, the less im convinced they're coincidences.
 
Twitter is the platform of the elite and is promoted as a big deal with limited usage privileges for the unwashed masses so long as they don't post wrong think. And that going to other platforms will be seen as social suicide due to them blood libeling any alternatives, if not crushing them outright and making sure that all the "big important people" stay on Twitter (and to a lesser extent the Zuckerberg sites) by granting them exemptions from the rules the rabble are forced to follow.
lmao Twitter is as good as fucking dead. They were one foot in before Trump made them relevant and they are tripping over themselves to self-sabotage. I don't give a fuck how many glow in the dark lizard people support it, Twitter is looking at it's last days
 
I spent time with a lot of related boomers over the weekend, and while all of them have Facebook accounts, none of them have any idea what Twitter even is. Some tweet about something got put on some news story and someone asked, verbatim, "what the fuck is a hashtag?" "Who cares?"

People aren't swayed at all by tweets from randos. If they do pay attention it's because of who is saying it, not because it's on Twitter.

My favorite was #MeToo. My father saw it as a fucking old-school pound sign. So he figured it was just someone asking for it -- like they probably did the first time.

Tards just need to stop using those platforms in general. They say Facebook is dying as the young fucks don't have an attention span longer than 10 secs. Twitter really is just for the elites to throw their 'adoring fans' some scraps of drama. I can't even say 'nigger' there unless I have a black face portrait
 
Back