- Joined
- May 4, 2020
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes.Is there a point where the court can decide "fuck you I'm not reading any more of this shit"?
That was in the district court. The two latest docs have been from the appellate court which issued no such warning.I know the judge in this case has warned about these constant irrelevant filings but it seems to have gone over Mel's head.
No fair.ETA: Ashley has rated this autistic on her newest sock, because of course she has. Every autistic sticker she awards gets her one step closer to bringing the site down, and towards the inevitable communist takeover of America.
That kiwi has long since been banned. 5 times.likely triggered by a concerned kiwi![]()
That kiwi has long since been banned. 5 times.
There's a point?I know it's late but I really, really hate the way she writes. She's far too wordy and it makes for a tiresome read. She could cut out about half of the words she uses and it would still get her banal point across.
Haha. Touché.There's a point?
New Mel doc in the appellate court
View attachment 2762390
View attachment 2762391
View attachment 2762392
View attachment 2762393
View attachment 2762394
View attachment 2762395
View attachment 2762396
View attachment 2762397
View attachment 2762398
View attachment 2762399
View attachment 2762400
View attachment 2762401
View attachment 2762402
View attachment 2762403
View attachment 2762404
View attachment 2762405
View attachment 2762406
View attachment 2762407
View attachment 2762408
View attachment 2762409
View attachment 2762410
View attachment 2762411
View attachment 2762412
View attachment 2762413
Judge: Please, stop spamming me with irrelevant shit!Melinda: *files insane 22-page manifesto about her understanding of the terms "scandalous" and "color of law"*
That was in the district court. The two latest docs have been from the appellate court which issued no such warning.
There are two courts involved. The District Court and the Appeals Court. The District Court Judge just issued such a warning. But I’m not sure if he will issue any further rulings until the Appeals Court kicks it back down to him. Which they unquestionably will do. The only actual valid question Mel has before the Appelate Court at this time is actually whether or not the District Court can impose an Appeal Bond on an IFP Pro Se litigant. Which they certainly can. And the appeals court will give wide discretion in such things to the trial court. Once they rule on that it gets kicked back down to the District Court to set the Apoeals Bond and fees. Before she can even begin filing an actual appeal on the merits of her case, once she satisfies the required bond. Which is pointless as her case has no merits, as has already been determined by the 4th circuit in a prior ruling on the same facts just presented with a different theory of law.Is there a point where the court can decide "fuck you I'm not reading any more of this shit"? I know the judge in this case has warned about these constant irrelevant filings but it seems to have gone over Mel's head.
And she uses it incorrectly every time.Mel is so in love with the phrase " Color Of Law" I bet she writes it over & over a hundred times a day.
It might be her safety phrase too.
Whoever is their own lawyer has a fool for a client.What makes this utterly hilarious is in the case she cites as for why she should not owe fees, the appeals court essentially kicked it back down to the District Court with instructions to recalculate the fee sanctions assigned against the Plaintiff to include the Defendants costs for the Appeal as well. Mel handed the 4th Circuit a roadmap of how to fuck her hard, and Mel being Mel, she didn’t realize it. Because she doesn’t fully read shit. She just skims for keywords and statements and assumes they validate her insane beliefs. God she’s a Moron.
Or her safe wordMel is so in love with the phrase " Color Of Law" I bet she writes it over & over a hundred times a day.
It might be her safety phrase too.
What good is a safe word in a relationship where spousal rape is a-OK? Abuse is on the table, but healthy boundaries are definitely off. Besides Marshall is a sov-cit weirdo, and we've all seen how excited they get while they are shouting that phrase at cops and judges, so it would probably confuse and turn him on, although he wouldn't really understand why, or what she was saying.Or her safe word![]()