it's probably more reasonable than total lockdowns. The "only" issue is that the vaccines stil aren't (despite the widest testing in the history of mankind) guaranteed by the pharma companies and still operate under emergency measures and aren't approved by the FDA in the US or the EMA equivalent in the EU.
If these companies are willing to take multi-billion-dollar-lawsuits instead of shovelling everything on the taxpayer as it is now in the EU then I'd be super thrilled. It would mean some cold-calculated-mofo's up in the chain of command of these reptilian mega-corps figured it's worth it. And these people care as much about their monies as I care about my life.
Heck, let's be frank, maybe more.
It's really problematic if they start forcing people to be injected with something that isn't approved by the government or in other terms by the corporation itself. Who is to blame then? Who bares responsibility? What institution?
Just the elected officials that hold legislative and executive power, are changed every 4 or so years and have legal immunity? Fuck that's a scary thought.
Also this article literally says "Big cots, Few Benefits" for approval:
The F.D.A. is encouraging people to get a Covid-19 shot — but hasn’t formally approved those vaccines.
www.nytimes.com
Guess for who? The mother fucking FDA.
They are dodging us because they don't want to risk quote "— Americans would not react by feeling confident in the F.D.A.".
Probably the same for the EMA.
Yeah fuck our governments.
edit. An other article I found that I won't even link to because it's so full of horse-shit is that "they lack data".
The whole world has ,literally, been a test-bed for these vaccines. They are telling the public to trust them but still can't form a conclusion on the vaccines themselves.
Let alone that they seem very inefficient at handling the new mutations coming all the time, so its not only a question of if they are safe but if they have a significant enough impact at this point to warrant enforcement.