General GunTuber thread

Up until very recently Nuke silos still utilized Floppy disks.
A lot of people think of the really cheap and awful 3.5" floppies you'd see a bunch around the turn of the millennium, where the standards of manufacture were made as low as possible so the obsolete format could be pushed at a real cheap price. Those are horribly unreliable, but a lot of people forget or aren't aware of that high quality diskettes were also made, and if you look back at stuff like the 8.5" diskettes (which are soft and literally floppy), those were available at a very high level of quality if you were willing to pay for that, and they are actually surprisingly hardy even in substandard storage conditions.

I have a lot of confidence that the old floppy setups they used in those silos were still working absolutely perfectly the day they were replaced.

In one episode of the fighter pilot podcast the guest said that F-15s still used magnetic tape data cartridges. But this might have been for the F-15Cs and not the Es.
This is also another thing where quality and type is a critical aspect, looking at cheap as fuck 8-track tapes, those wear easily, but there's other forms of tape media which is not just surprisingly hardy, but there's modern forms of tape media which can hold hundreds of gigabytes easily. I don't know what format they use for F-15s, but it's probably more than adequate if it has worked this far.

The funniest thing is how the stereotypical boomercon just uncritically accepts outdated doctrine because the Israelis did it. No, it's not the fact that they essentially had European refugees handling a mix of firearms with different manuals of arms and it was difficult to make them all safe and trained with them. It's because it's "tactical".
Right? Israeli carry was a smart idea for the circumstances at the time. It's a ragtag army with little money and they gotta buy all kinds of different surplus to arm themselves, so sidearms are a wild mix. Safeties off, chambers empty, magazines full: this works consistently and safely with any service pistols I can think of, which is great for making sure various people who may not have the best training don't go and have an accident with an unfamiliar pistol.
I always thought that was a great approach for this exact context. Naturally, the IDF continues to do this even though they are well past the point of actually needing it, they have standardized pistols and far better training today.

However, if you're in a force with standardized sidearms, or you're otherwise familiar with your pistol, there's very little good reason to carry it that way. Unless you're a poorfag who only has some little Ring Of Fire pistol, I see no reason to carry with the chamber empty.
 
Right? Israeli carry was a smart idea for the circumstances at the time.
I love idiots thinking copying Israel is a great idea.

It can be, they're extremely practical in a lot of ways. But you always have to be aware of the context behind any decision they make, because as a result of that pragmatic attitude their shit is designed to work for them, in their conditions. One of the most visible examples being the Merkava. It's a very able tank in their context as a small nation with a good amount of hills and relatively limited resources. Not so much for most other nations.
 
I love idiots thinking copying Israel is a great idea.

It can be, they're extremely practical in a lot of ways. But you always have to be aware of the context behind any decision they make, because as a result of that pragmatic attitude their shit is designed to work for them, in their conditions. One of the most visible examples being the Merkava. It's a very able tank in their context as a small nation with a good amount of hills and relatively limited resources. Not so much for most other nations.
They do a lot of quirky and probably stupid things with their military and police tactics because they've never needed to change. Like outfitting Mossad with .22 rimfire handguns for decades (they did change this), or refusing to create standardized MREs for troops (each squad gets what amounts to a cardboard box of high calorie snacks and supermarket canned tuna in their APC, and full meals come from the mess truck).
 
They do a lot of quirky and probably stupid things with their military and police tactics because they've never needed to change. Like outfitting Mossad with .22 rimfire handguns for decades (they did change this), or refusing to create standardized MREs for troops (each squad gets what amounts to a cardboard box of high calorie snacks and supermarket canned tuna in their APC, and full meals come from the mess truck).
The MRE thing makes perfect sense considering their entire country is the size of New Jersey, so their supply lines are ridiculously short. We're used to the idea of having an expeditionary army out on long deployments so we need that sort of infrastructure. Meanwhile, if shit goes down in Israel I wouldn't be surprised if your average soldier got stationed so close to home his grandmother would be calling him home for dinner instead.
 
The MRE thing makes perfect sense considering their entire country is the size of New Jersey, so their supply lines are ridiculously short. We're used to the idea of having an expeditionary army out on long deployments so we need that sort of infrastructure. Meanwhile, if shit goes down in Israel I wouldn't be surprised if your average soldier got stationed so close to home his grandmother would be calling him home for dinner instead.
My point is more that it's not forward-thinking, because they don't care much about facing a future war at all. They're prepared for constant border skirmishes with civvies trapped inside a giant refugee camp and the shaved apes in fatigues that Egypt employs as a military.

Similarly with Mossad having low-caliber handguns, the rationale at the time seemed to be "if you're caught you're dead, so why bother paying for a better carry gun?"
 
I require more info on this podcast.
It's a pretty good show. For aviation nuts it covers a lot of information that's already available but you get details you wouldn't have heard of otherwise. They have a talk with Bruce Gordon (also has a youtube channel) where he states that as part of air defense command if they were intercepting Russian bombers and the missiles failed, the doctrine was that they were supposed to use the F-106's wing as a knife to cut off the rear elevators of the bomber and then eject. But the pilots knew they wouldn't survive going up against the tail gunner so they knew the only option would be a suicide dive on the bomb bay to try and detonate the explosives around the core, creating a fizzle instead of a nuclear explosion.
 
...if they were intercepting Russian bombers and the missiles failed, the doctrine was that they were supposed to use the F-106's wing as a knife to cut off the rear elevators of the bomber and then eject. But the pilots knew they wouldn't survive going up against the tail gunner so they knew the only option would be a suicide dive on the bomb bay to try and detonate the explosives around the core, creating a fizzle instead of a nuclear explosion.
I used to do the same thing in War Thunder. Very honourable!
 
Karl complaining about people liking FAs now.
Polish_20211202_161646368.png

He's not even wrong he's just such a smug cunt about everything.
FB_IMG_1638479722665.jpg

FB_IMG_1638479729493.jpg

I didn't even take these, they were floating around meme groups mocking Karl.
 
Karl complaining about people liking FAs now.
View attachment 2768908
He's not even wrong he's just such a smug cunt about everything.
View attachment 2768911
View attachment 2768910
I didn't even take these, they were floating around meme groups mocking Karl.
And this, @SinistralRifleman, is why we make fun of Karl. That is the Karl we get to see: an arrogant, snarky asshole who refuses to concede the most basic of factual points.

Hell, I don't even like forward assists and I admit it was useful in Rittenhouse's situation. It's not that hard to admit one's opinion isn't final and immutable.
 
"Running the charging handle would have been a better choice"

Kyle was on his ass. Anyone who has tried to rack the charging handle from a seated position knows how much easier pressing the FA would be.

This situation is a better argument to test your rifle for function from unconventional shooting positions and angles. Does your rifle work fired off your shoulder, upside down, sideways etc? Higher gas pressure for more bolt velocity generally helps with this.

This is why you don't take tactical advice from never beens.

Are you saying that Rittenhouse is a combat veteran now?
 
Tim from Military Arms Channel? The asshole who fucked over all the people who were on the buy list for the Hungarian SVD on AKFiles? Fuck dude, at least post the 9-Hole Review video that was probably a paid promotion.

What does a practical accuracy test video on 9hole have to do with the use of the forward assist?

Brownells sent them a rifle. To my knowledge that is the extent of any “financial benefit” they got from it.
 
Back