I clearly don't believe they disappeared without a trace, see my numerous posts about the crematory layers at Belzec
, and yeah the Nazis could speak and use telephones and also destroyed documents. Yet local orders exist for killing Jews eg
View attachment 2768314
Jesus Christ, you are once again doing the exact same thing I complained about yesterday, by falsely conflating the anti-partisan police actions with the holocaust. It says in this very document that this was in response to the locals supporting partisans.
The claim here isn't that the German occupation of the east wasn't a harsh martial law police state, but that they didn't have a secret execution campaign going on alongside their reprisals. When the Germans talked about their police actions, they didn't mince words, they were quite open about them. What you will need to provide, is evidence of this top secret German conspiracy, and its alleged killing methods (gas vans, for example) which proves that Germans were actually killing jews upon obtaining custody of them as a policy of genocide, rather than as a martial law response to, say, a transport truck being bombed.
But I'm not gonna give you more of my generous time since you don't seem to be interested in pressing questions like
"How many resettlement cities do you have evidence of the Jews being put in?
1 resettlement city of 3 million?
10 resettlement cities of 300,000?
50 Birkenau sized resettlement cities of 60,000?"
Why does it have to be a camp? Why does it even have to be a permanent location?
en.wikipedia.org
After WW2 there were millions of people classified as Displaced People.
Also, you're happily ignoring the fact that the "3 million" number is likely forged.
The death toll attributable to the flight and expulsions is disputed, with estimates ranging from 500,000–600,000[14][15] and up to 2 to 2.5 million.[16][17][18]
They went back to Germany, and there's evidence of this lol.
Went back to Germany in body bags, you mean
On the other hand, there's zero evidence of the "resettled" Polish Jews ever making it into Russia.
Well I don't expect the soviets to produce evidence that contradicts their own claims. I've provided plausible explanations for what happened to them.
If the documents say 3 million jews went to Russia, and we can't find them in Russia, then perhaps you can then verify that the documents are accurate and provide some physical proof as to their deaths? I mean, this is 3 million dead bodies, right? You should be able to perform a forensic analysis on at least one person, and link them to the resettlements, right? But whoops we don't have this.
This is a "Holocaust of the Gaps". You point to the place where the least records exist, in the most oppressive police state dictatorship, known for falsifying massacres, and say "this is probably where most of the holocaust happened". The absence of this information you seek has multiple possible conclusions, not just "the Germans killed them all". Can you rule out any of the other options? Or are you just going to insist on the one you believe in, without providing evidence of it (because non exists)?
"If you want me to believe the holocaust as a planned genocide, you will have to AT LEAST provide more compelling evidence than what the soviets provided for their now-exposed falsifications at Katyn."
You posted some stuff by CW Porter, a true dum dum. I wouldn't expect you to necessarily pick up on this since you're clearly an amateur, but in his expose about Soviet forgeries re Katyn he doesn't list a single German document, like the many I've shown over here the past 2 months.
The document I linked to is a translation, his commentaries aren't important. He cites the source documents, and if you have an issue with the translation you can look it up and please inform me why it's inaccurate, as I don't speak Russian.
More talk of the stupid gas vans without a single gas van to show for it. Not a single gas van was ever found by any of the occupying powers. Spooky holocaust, no physical evidence.
So he tries to present Katyn as a precedent for the Holocaust when in fact the absence of forged German documents shows the Holocaust to be clearly a different animal.
Are you just going to go for the ridiculous route of saying "the Soviets lied about Katyn and forged papers for THIS, but would NEVER lie about the holocaust and forge papers for THAT!" just like you did with the British and their well-known lies?
Can you please explain what moral principle or otherwise what motivation they would have for upholding the sacredness and inviolability of the Holocaust while engaging in frameups elsewhere? This is absolutely bonkers logic you have going on.
What I am providing here is precedent that the USSR has produced falsified documents (forged letters to family from Polish people), which were used as evidence. So they clearly have no moral compulsions against forging letters and signatures and dates and attributing them to people. Is it because it is so hard to forge official German documents and put a German signature on them? No... You know that a copied German document can be easily editted to change its content, right? So this isn't particularly difficult.
Newly declassified U.S. army documents proving that two American POWs wrote encoded messages to Army intelligence, MIS-X, soon after their 1943 visit to Katyn, pointing to Soviet guilt for the 1940 massacre.
www.dailymail.co.uk
And the USA helped cover it up too, so the western allies are just as complicit. Just an FYI.
To be clear, for the Holocaust there are hundreds or thousands of apparently fake or manufactured German documents, yet for Katyn there isn't even one. Deniers ratfucked by their own arguments yet again
I think you may be insane. "Yes they forged documents before, that PROVES they didn't forge documents again!"
This is some troll logic.