Vitriol, aside from some of those descriptions being contestable in of themselves, it doesn't matter that you can dig up shit on your lolcows. People intentionally choose victims they can, on some level, "justify" targeting. But it doesn't change the fact that those victims are in turn more likely to be trans, autistic, etc. or somehow marginalised. It's very much punch down, not punch up, which is cowardly amongst other things. I know there are some higher profile targets, but it's much rarer. People that are targeted are either very poorly supported in their community, or very strongly opposed by shit like GG.
Also, your "no true scotsman" is bullshit since you're basically just pulling an advanced version of the "Trans friend" argument, which is some sort of weird appeal to authority. Having a number of trans people on board does not suddenly make the outright transphobic behaviour here acceptable. Do you really think if you did a study you'd find that most trans people would be okay with the sort of comments being passed in this thread? This is the sort of shit NYS does when they claim to be ones that REALLY represent marginalised communities.
Conveniently - those who "really" represent the marginalised have beliefs and practices that are exceedingly convenient for the more privileged members of the group. It's the exact same here. The "Uncle Tom" concept exists for a reason.
While claiming that someone is or isn't any less "trans" because of their viewpoint would be no true scotsman, you also can't point to the trans members here as justification for behaviour that you can routinely find most dedicated trans communities speaking out against. The sample space is tiny, and biased in favour of those with abusive personalities that like to victimise others, or leech off them.