Leighanna Rose Walsh / Princess of the Crystal / ScarletJusticeWitch / Wetflame - Irish Phil & Pro Ronald McDonald Cosplayer.

listen to me: I already answered the "It's not because you're trans" argument a thousand times. If it's not because I'm trans, it should never come up. Yet people use it as a means to attack me, constantly. If it's not because I'm trans - leave it out of it. And the fact is that I'd be vastly less likely to come up on your radar if it wasn't. Just because you keep repeating the same shit over and over doesn't make it true. Coming up with some bullshit excuse for why it's not transphobic doesn't mean it's not transphobic. Saying a trans woman looks like a man, and generally hurling abuse at them that focuses on their trans status or appearance due to trans is transphobic and you don't somehow get off scot free on that because you also think they're a bad person for other reasons.

The majority of people here are self centred, rotten, abusive, oblivious children who are unable to take any responsibility for their own reactions and project all their insecurities and failures onto people they know don't have much power to fight back. They're parasites. Even if I have my flaws, there's no way I'm in any worse than the average person here.
Up to you what you believe, I just aint gonna be afraid to call a cunt a cunt when I see one. And if you wanna form an identity around being the hero the trans community deserves, expect to be called a trans cunt.
 
... no.

Also, there was a huge difference to how people treated Chris when they first popped up compared to how you guys treat lolcows now.
You're right. We were far crueler back then.
Heard of Bluespike? That shit was totally fair game back then. Now we have rules, lines that we don't cross and have to abide by. Hell, Chris is even sorta liked these days, because compared to people like ADF he's a pretty decent guy.
Cry all you want, but the treatment you're getting now? That shit is fucking cushy compared to what you'd face back then.

Good. Now shut up.
upload_2015-10-29_23-19-0.png


Edit: Was it the "respectability politics" bit? I thought that might set you off.
 
Again, if it had nothing to do with me being trans, it wouldn't keep coming up. A disproportionate amount of your lol cows wouldn't be trans. Do I think I got this thread because they wanted a random trans person to beat on? No, but it's a huge factor for why creepers and assholes like you guys have given such disproportionate focus on me throughout the years. And I wouldn't get into a lot of the situations you love to rag on me for if I wasn't trans. I wouldn't have had a pre-transition avatar locked to me because there would be no pre-transition picture.

There is really nothing more to add to this argument. It is not my fault you've internalised this shit and refuse to admit that's even a thing that can happen.
we focus on you because you cause drama and get mad. trans shit is just how we get to you and it works.

anyway so what are your views on magic
 
listen to me

Lol no.

You're retarded. Why would anyone listen to you unless they were really desperate for poor life choices?

leigh-ploppy.jpg


You're the creepy man who describes in gross, disgusting detail how the person in a stall next to you is defecating while you creep out in a women's restroom, as a creepy man.

No wonder there are TERFs.
 
Vitriol, aside from some of those descriptions being contestable in of themselves, it doesn't matter that you can dig up shit on your lolcows. People intentionally choose victims they can, on some level, "justify" targeting. But it doesn't change the fact that those victims are in turn more likely to be trans, autistic, etc. or somehow marginalised. It's very much punch down, not punch up, which is cowardly amongst other things. I know there are some higher profile targets, but it's much rarer. People that are targeted are either very poorly supported in their community, or very strongly opposed by shit like GG.

Also, your "no true scotsman" is bullshit since you're basically just pulling an advanced version of the "Trans friend" argument, which is some sort of weird appeal to authority. Having a number of trans people on board does not suddenly make the outright transphobic behaviour here acceptable. Do you really think if you did a study you'd find that most trans people would be okay with the sort of comments being passed in this thread? This is the sort of shit NYS does when they claim to be ones that REALLY represent marginalised communities.

Conveniently - those who "really" represent the marginalised have beliefs and practices that are exceedingly convenient for the more privileged members of the group. It's the exact same here. The "Uncle Tom" concept exists for a reason.

While claiming that someone is or isn't any less "trans" because of their viewpoint would be no true scotsman, you also can't point to the trans members here as justification for behaviour that you can routinely find most dedicated trans communities speaking out against. The sample space is tiny, and biased in favour of those with abusive personalities that like to victimise others, or leech off them.
 
Vitriol, aside from some of those descriptions being contestable in of themselves, it doesn't matter that you can dig up shit on your lolcows. People intentionally choose victims they can, on some level, "justify" targeting. But it doesn't change the fact that those victims are in turn more likely to be trans, autistic, etc. or somehow marginalised. It's very much punch down, not punch up, which is cowardly amongst other things. I know there are some higher profile targets, but it's much rarer. People that are targeted are either very poorly supported in their community, or very strongly opposed by shit like GG.

Also, your "no true scotsman" is bullshit since you're basically just pulling an advanced version of the "Trans friend" argument, which is some sort of weird appeal to authority. Having a number of trans people on board does not suddenly make the outright transphobic behaviour here acceptable. Do you really think if you did a study you'd find that most trans people would be okay with the sort of comments being passed in this thread? This is the sort of shit NYS does when they claim to be ones that REALLY represent marginalised communities.

Conveniently - those who "really" represent the marginalised have beliefs and practices that are exceedingly convenient for the more privileged members of the group. It's the exact same here. The "Uncle Tom" concept exists for a reason.

While claiming that someone is or isn't any less "trans" because of their viewpoint would be no true scotsman, you also can't point to the trans members here as justification for behaviour that you can routinely find most dedicated trans communities speaking out against. The sample space is tiny, and biased in favour of those with abusive personalities that like to victimise others, or leech off them.
Honey, where I live it is 11 pm and my Ritalin's worn off. Stop being ableist to people with ADD with your text walls.
 
you do realise i knew you were shady and was basically just playing up to the "God complex" that people on the board seemed to believe I have, right?

i mean it was still shitty of you to post the logs, but I figured out if you were legit or not pretty quick that way. i first posted here(well, after I posted in the Chloe thread) because i was bored and i didn't really care what people had to say back until you turned out to be major creepers who kept it going for over 100 pages and psychoanalyising me every time i post anything anywhere.

and no, that's not what i'm doing either. i don't think this board is going to come apart from me posting on it, lol. i think like most places it will eventually collapse into it's own hatred. this thought fills me with determination.

Nah, when your history of TL;DR and holier-than-thou during your tenure on Sonic Retro of all places is thoroughly documented in a Sonic 1 hack safe to say that it's all you. Just to let you know though, while there may have been people posting stuff throughout, the thread was not very active until you showed up. Your activity here has caused a ton more posting than would otherwise happen.

That said, I think that every lolcow that's come on here has eventually had the mandatory "lol I was faking the whole time" speech and expect the site to come down somehow. Congratulations, you should be getting your membership jacket pretty soon.

And yeah, you're trivializing abuse. Trans issues and acceptance in society are definitely a real and shitty thing and I won't ever dispute that, especially by people IRL you can't avoid, but us posting about you isn't abuse in the slightest. It's comments that you can simply avoid by, I dunno, not looking. Especially, for example, after having to watch and help in the aftermath of domestic violence growing up rather frequently; it's horrifying and awful on all fronts. People posting about you online is absolutely nothing compared to something very, very real like that, so ease up there...

Also, here's said Sonic hack for emphasis (I think it was posted, like, 60 pages ago. Don't watch the whole thing for the love of god):

I am kinda impressed at how fast you can spout off textwalls though, this one post's pretty much all I've got in me...
 
@ScarletJusticeWitch for me it's when you called other users here trans uncle toms and un-ironicaly defended sluthate.

That's why you suck, because you hide behind a veil of righteousness while you automatically have contempt for fucking everyone.

Look - I'm entitled to dislike people who justify hate towards me. Them being trans doesn't get them off the hook. Contrary to popular belief I DO believe trans people can do shitty things, but more often than not in my experience it's to other trans people, because those are the people they have power over.

I am not obliged to accept the credentials of trans people who sit by while another trans person meets with transmisgoynistic rhetoric. Trans people themselves can harbour transphobic viewpoints. The presence of trans people here doesn't prove anything. If it did, then the whole abortion rights movement would be worth nothing because "Pro Life" movements have a lot of women in them. Do you not see how it's the same shitty logic, and how frustrating it is to continually deal with people that should be standing with you against oppressive language, but instead joins in? Probably not, but either way fuck off.
 
Vitriol, aside from some of those descriptions being contestable in of themselves, it doesn't matter that you can dig up shit on your lolcows. People intentionally choose victims they can, on some level, "justify" targeting. But it doesn't change the fact that those victims are in turn more likely to be trans, autistic, etc. or somehow marginalised. It's very much punch down, not punch up, which is cowardly amongst other things. I know there are some higher profile targets, but it's much rarer. People that are targeted are either very poorly supported in their community, or very strongly opposed by shit like GG.

Also, your "no true scotsman" is bullshit since you're basically just pulling an advanced version of the "Trans friend" argument, which is some sort of weird appeal to authority. Having a number of trans people on board does not suddenly make the outright transphobic behaviour here acceptable. Do you really think if you did a study you'd find that most trans people would be okay with the sort of comments being passed in this thread? This is the sort of shit NYS does when they claim to be ones that REALLY represent marginalised communities.

Conveniently - those who "really" represent the marginalised have beliefs and practices that are exceedingly convenient for the more privileged members of the group. It's the exact same here. The "Uncle Tom" concept exists for a reason.

While claiming that someone is or isn't any less "trans" because of their viewpoint would be no true scotsman, you also can't point to the trans members here as justification for behaviour that you can routinely find most dedicated trans communities speaking out against. The sample space is tiny, and biased in favour of those with abusive personalities that like to victimise others, or leech off them.
leigh shut up you dont know what youre talking about.
 
Vitriol, aside from some of those descriptions being contestable in of themselves, it doesn't matter that you can dig up shit on your lolcows. People intentionally choose victims they can, on some level, "justify" targeting. But it doesn't change the fact that those victims are in turn more likely to be trans, autistic, etc. or somehow marginalised. It's very much punch down, not punch up, which is cowardly amongst other things. I know there are some higher profile targets, but it's much rarer. People that are targeted are either very poorly supported in their community, or very strongly opposed by shit like GG.

We justify targeting them because they'll provide laughs when they overreact to strangers on the internet including, among other things, posting text walls. How do you still not get this? Is your victim complex so deeply embedded that you literally cannot see the world as anything other than trans/not-trans?
 
Lol no.

You're retarded. Why would anyone listen to you unless they were really desperate for poor life choices?

View attachment 56517

You're the creepy man who describes in gross, disgusting detail how the person in a stall next to you is defecating while you creep out in a women's restroom, as a creepy man.

No wonder there are TERFs.

>you're a man
>no wonder there are TERFs

Lol
 
Look - I'm entitled to dislike people who justify hate towards me. Them being trans doesn't get them off the hook. Contrary to popular belief I DO believe trans people can do shitty things, but more often than not in my experience it's to other trans people, because those are the people they have power over.

I am not obliged to accept the credentials of trans people who sit by while another trans person meets with transmisgoynistic rhetoric. Trans people themselves can harbour transphobic viewpoints. The presence of trans people here doesn't prove anything. If it did, then the whole abortion rights movement would be worth nothing because "Pro Life" movements have a lot of women in them. Do you not see how it's the same shitty logic, and how frustrating it is to continually deal with people that should be standing with you against oppressive language, but instead joins in? Probably not, but either way fuck off.
So it's the "Everyone who disagrees with me is an Auntie Tran" bit. We've seen it before, it's always been bullshit, and it's still a "no true scotsman" fallacy.
What else you got?
 
People intentionally choose victims they can, on some level, "justify" targeting. But it doesn't change the fact that those victims are in turn more likely to be trans, autistic, etc. or somehow marginalised. It's very much punch down, not punch up, which is cowardly amongst other things. I know there are some higher profile targets, but it's much rarer. People that are targeted are either very poorly supported in their community, or very strongly opposed by shit like GG.
Who gives a fuck? If you're amusing, you're amusing; if being an autistic tranny is a factor in that, so be it.
 
Back