Tabletop Community Watch

Priestley Said-
Rick Priestley was one writer of many, and he was about the only one who was cramming his rather childish politics into the lore, which eventually got him shown the door when GW decided to focus on the lore as an actual story to sell their plastic crack. Stop using him as an end-all be-all for what 40k is supposed to be.
 
The notion that 40k and it's factions "are X and not Y" in my opinion is wrong alltogether.
Not only GW authors have different visions of the universe, but each individual player has also. So far there is no simple explaination to many lore facts arround which warhammer nerds are more than willing to start a flame war.
Tabletop outright ignores lore for the sake of working ruleset, not to mention "Your dudes" rule and hundreds of homebrewed astartes chapters, IG regiments, craftworlds etc.
Think of Imperium/Orks/chaos what you will, but don't try to force your view on them on otheres. Its: a) Useless, b) Waste of time.
Even GW can't do it. They only managed to start a dumpster fire that found it's way even into this thread.
 
Warhammer 40k lore is about as consistent as Marvel/DC Comics lore. For the same reason, too:

It's written by a ton of different people, without a cohesive vision or even a strong chief editor holding the reins to keep things consistent. And wouldn't you know it, it suffers from the exact same issues Marvel and DC do: trying to chase trends and being slaves to the marketing department.

Debating 40K lore as if it's this serious and immutable thing is pointless. It is and has always been just a cheap excuse to sell overpriced plastic, since the writing itself is the cheapest part of producing any rulebook or codex. Some people put a lot of effort into it, and there's certainly a lot of good stuff in it (hello, Ciaphas Cain), but 40K lore isn't there to tell a story. It's there to sell you shit.
 
Last edited:
It's literally because Orcs are the bad race in old school DnD IMO.

Ironically, they'd actually have some point in kvetching about Orc = Black people if they actually cracked open Shadowrun, since that was an allegory in that game. But that's way too not-hip and cool mainstream.
My Shadowrun game is set in Alanta and the city has literally built a wall to keep the SINless out. They walked off the south side of the city and put the SINless there. You have to go through a checkpoint that checks you have a SIN to get to the nice part of town. Guess who mostly lives in the south side. Also it became a joke with my players that “green is the new black” after they found out the city put mandatory building reinforcement requirements in for buildings housing orca and trolls. Convienently most people in the nice part of town never bothered to do that retrofit. It was interesting to see them use that to their advantage when breaking into an office once. They just had the cybered out orc jump up and down on the floor above the office they needed to get into. It also gave them cover as it looked like an accident.
 
No shit. Fascism was invented in Italy, the Nazis were just the German knockoff version of it.

Also, I spoke of the Clean Wehrmact as an idea, not a reality. Tons of war crimes were on their hands, especially in the early days before the SS stepped in to use gulags as a method of extermination.
>idea
the wehrmacht had over 13 million soldiers. each and every one of them being a war criminal personally involved is well.. "highly unlikely". or to put it on it's head absolutely no allied soldier committed any crime whatsoever - because they're obviously the good guys (inb4 "well they could've deserted, why did they fight under the nazi banner? that makes them evil!"). and that's why that whole good/bad dichotomy falls apart right from the start (not to mention good/bad as a concept highly varies between factions).

"To me the background to 40K was always intended to be ironic. The fact that the Space Marines were lauded as heroes within Games Workshop always amused me, because they're brutal, but they're also completely self-deceiving. The whole idea of the Emperor is that you don't know whether he's alive or dead. The whole Imperium might be running on superstition. There's no guarantee that the Emperor is anything other than a corpse with a residual mental ability to direct spacecraft. It's got some parallels with religious beliefs and principles, and I think a lot of that got missed and overwritten."

Rick Priestley, Warhammer 40K lore author and creator, December 2015 interview with Unplugged Games
just like bad people can do good things and vice versa authors and creators can be dumb.

or let me put it this way: what is a hero? someone fighting for truth and justice? protector of the innocent? defeating evil? no surprise humans identify with the human faction in fiction, written from a human perspective with human values, first and foremost - and that's why it's a brainlet take, on top of missing the point. said innocents that exist within a faction full of assholes will laud a space marine that protects them from xenos. why? because otherwise it would likely mean death or worse. what they believe in while doing it makes zero fucking difference. another is the already mentioned "well if they're part of the imperium they must be assholes because everyone is". and least of all what fucking choice do you have? how could a oldcron (fuck the nulore), tyranid, orc or cultist be heroic? that only leaves tau and eldar and squats, and last time I looked people tended to put them down on the good guy's side.

you can absolutely have good guys fighting bad guys with a clear story arc if done it properly. that's why people call lamenters that fight to the last man to keep a planet from turning into another nurgle petri dish heroes - because they do heroic things. just like they will call any eldar or tau that fights against a corrupt inquisitor or dark eldar the same.
it's a matter of scale, and that's where things start to break - brainlet customers ask for stories involving important characters, completely oblivious that involving said characters will have wide reaching consequences in the lore because they're important characters. like, what would happen if gullyman gets #metoo'd in a book? or you might know it from star wars where "everybody is or knows a skywalker".

40k worked as long as GW kept conflicts and stories local, after all they're just some made up backdrop to push plastic into each other. trying to turn it into another MCU and have it connect with everything is the moment where it falls apart because neither the lore nor the setting can work this way without making no sense and/or just sounding stupid. which is the whole reason we have this discussion in the first place.

GW has no real focus on audiences. It's just them turning 40K into something that will sell for the current generation, and if they can make a money changing the franchise to appeal to someone new down the road, they will do it. They abandoned the satire of the 80s 40K for the grimdark edginess which they sold in the 90s, and they abandoned that to make a superhero empire in space with the current iteration of 40K.
so what is it, they don't focus on audiences to sell plastic crack or they constantly change to sell more of it?
 
Last edited:
>idea
the wehrmacht had over 13 million soldiers. each and every one of them being a war criminal personally involved is well.. "highly unlikely". or to put it on it's head absolutely no allied soldier committed any crime whatsoever - because they're obviously the good guys (inb4 "well they could've deserted, why did they fight under the nazi banner? that makes them evil!"). and that's why that whole good/bad dichotomy falls apart right from the start.
I'm not saying that every Wehrmacht soldier was a war criminal, but some certainly are, especially in the early days when it was the Wehrmacht that was given the task of killing undesirables, but obviously, some Wehrmacht soldiers didn't agree with the Nazi ideology (which led to some of them defecting to Allied hands) and there's also tons of war crimes on the Allied side, particularly with the Soviet Army (there's a reason German women didn't want to end up in the hands of Soviet soldiers, particularly after the brutality the Germans exhibited during Operation Barbarossa). It's just that the idea of the Clean Wehrmacht has been disproven a long time ago, especially by WW2 buffs who studied this stuff.

just like bad people can do good things and vice versa authors and creators can be dumb.
The franchise obviously has many authors, and you eventually get your Karen Travisses or Matt Wards who idolize an in-setting faction to the bone, as Rick Priestley complained.

or let me put it this way: what is a hero? someone fighting for truth and justice? protector of the innocent? defeating evil? no surprise humans identify with the human faction in fiction, written from a human perspective with human values, first and foremost - and that's why it's a brainlet take, on top of missing the point. said innocents that exist within a faction full of assholes will laud a space marine that protects them from xenos. why? because otherwise it would likely mean death or worse. what they believe in while doing it makes zero fucking difference. another is the already mentioned "well if they're part of the imperium they must be assholes because everyone is". and least of all what fucking choice do you have? how could a oldcron (fuck the nulore), tyranid, orc or cultist be heroic? that only leaves tau and eldar and squats, and last time I looked people tended to put them down on the good guy's side.
A hero is someone who fights on the side of GOOD. Not just someone who protects. The Nazis protected their people from Communism, does that make them heroes? Someone who protects can be an evil person fighting another evil for personal power, (for example, Chaos forces protecting their worlds from Tyranids or Necrons) or someone neutral who was just paid to do a job, but a hero is willing to get out there and save your ass even if you didn't ask for it, even if the people he's fighting pose no threat to him whatsoever.

Meanwhile, the original authors of 40K DESPISED the fact that Space Marines were being written in as heroes by the later crop of authors, because they originally created the marines as self-delusional brutes enforcing a regime that is built on bullshit, a regime that, as others have pointed out here, inflicts just as much, if not more harm unto mankind as the enemy does. At least the Tau are willing to give you a comfortable life, the Chaos factions will allow you to let loose and have fun before you inevitably devolve into an animal, and the other aliens are honest about wanting to kill you; the Imperium, for the most part, works people to death or sends them to die as cannon fodder. So while there are genuinely good people in the Imperium, the whole faction for the most part are assholes, and Guilliman knows this.

you can absolutely have good guys fighting bad guys with a clear story arc if done it properly. that's why people call lamenters that fight to the last man to keep a planet from turning into another nurgle petri dish heroes - because they do heroic things. just like they will call any eldar or tau that fights against a corrupt inquisitor or dark eldar the same.
it's a matter of scale, and that's where things start to break - brainlet customers ask for stories involving important characters, completely oblivious that involving said characters will have wide reaching consequences in the lore because they're important characters. like, what would happen if gullyman gets #metoo'd in a book?
But that's not Warhammer 40K. In the end, ALL the factions are assholes. In fact, when they tried to introduce the Tau as a heroic faction that even takes in human deserters and treats them well, the fanbase ERUPTED IN A FURY and said that the Tau don't fit in 40K because they're too good. So while individual humans in the Imperium can be good or heroic, the faction they work for is not, and even some of those "heroes" enforce that brutal, corrupt regime unto their own people, casting doubts on whether or not they were heroic, or just following orders. A real hero does what's right, regardless of orders-being a good hero means doing what you know is right, regardless of what they're told to do.

40k worked as long as GW kept conflicts and stories local, after all they're just some made up backdrop to push plastic into each other. trying to turn it into another MCU and have it connect with everything is the moment where it falls apart because neither the lore nor the setting can work this way without making no sense and/or just sounding stupid. which is the whole reason we have this discussion in the first place.
That's exactly why the lore nuts are pissing their pants; they want to keep stories local and grimdark, so that status quo would remain as a backdrop for people to have a setting where everyone fights everyone and your personal fanfic story of the humans fighting both the Orks and the Eldar on the same day would fit in the greater narrative. When things start changing, the Imperium starts getting stronger, they start innovating tech-wise (ex: Primaris Marines) and they are potentially building up an alliance with the Eldar, the lore fans begin to disagree, since the whole grimdark story where everyone hates everyone is slowly being swept away.

so what is it, they don't focus on audiences to sell plastic crack or they constantly change to sell more of it?
No, the problem is, their only focus IS selling plastic crack, and they couldn't give less of a shit which audience they have, be it the goofball parody-lovers of the 80s, the edgelords of the 90s and early 2000s, or the superhero capeshit fans and tournament/model whales of the late 2010s/early 2020s. They will literally abandon one audience for another if the other audience is willing to buy more plastic crack, especially since the older fans from the 80s and 90s are still complaining about model prices.

Rick Priestley was one writer of many, and he was about the only one who was cramming his rather childish politics into the lore, which eventually got him shown the door when GW decided to focus on the lore as an actual story to sell their plastic crack. Stop using him as an end-all be-all for what 40k is supposed to be.
He was one of the original authors of Warhammer, and 40K started off as a parody of the right-wing. He's the guy credited with laying the groundwork for 40K's lore. Also, GW ditched him not because they wanted to focus on the lore as an actual story, but because Space Marines sell well and they need to hawk more stories about the SMs, so they wrote the Space Marines as heroes and that pissed him off.

Again, as I said before, imagine if you created a faction for a tabletop game that combines the worst of the KKK, the Nazis/Soviets, and the Spanish Inquisition, and you sold this story to a company, and the company decided to turn said faction into a heroic one because its top guys have dope armor. That's what it's like for the OG 40K authors, when the later authors started portraying the Space Marines as heroes, when the original crop of authors originally made them as a parody faction lampooning fascism and the military:

HomoMarines.jpg


The notion that 40k and it's factions "are X and not Y" in my opinion is wrong alltogether.
Not only GW authors have different visions of the universe, but each individual player has also. So far there is no simple explaination to many lore facts arround which warhammer nerds are more than willing to start a flame war.
Tabletop outright ignores lore for the sake of working ruleset, not to mention "Your dudes" rule and hundreds of homebrewed astartes chapters, IG regiments, craftworlds etc.
Think of Imperium/Orks/chaos what you will, but don't try to force your view on them on otheres. Its: a) Useless, b) Waste of time.
Even GW can't do it. They only managed to start a dumpster fire that found it's way even into this thread.
Warhammer 40k lore is about as consistent as Marvel/DC Comics lore. For the same reason, too:

It's written by a ton of different people, without a cohesive vision or even a strong chief editor holding the reins to keep things consistent. And wouldn't you know it, it suffers from the exact same issues Marvel and DC do: trying to chase trends and being slaves to the marketing department.

Debating 40K lore as if it's this serious and immutable thing is pointless. It is and has always been just a cheap excuse to sell overpriced plastic, since the writing itself is the cheapest part of producing any rulebook or codex. Some people a lot of effort into it, and there's certainly a lot of good stuff in it (hello, Ciaphas Cain), but 40K lore isn't there to tell a story. It's there to sell you shit.
That's because GW only really cared about the money in the end. Unlike Lucas or Tolkien who had a clear message with their stories, GW only wanted to create something to make money, so they followed trends. They went with a parody back then when liberal Brits were angry at Margaret Thatcher and wanted to lampoon what they saw as right-wing religious extremism and militarism, they went with a grimdark storyline to lure in the edgelords of the 90s and early 2000s who didn't like the sterile culture of the time, and they went with capeshit-style heroics now because that will sell plastic crack to normies today, not to mention that the model whales and tournament players will like new and improved marines for them to paint and use in a wargame, while all the lore nuts who fell in love with 40K in the 90s and early 2000s shat their pants and got mad because they were no longer the target audience.
 
Last edited:
That's because GW only really cared about the money in the end.
GW putting money above all else is their one constant. They can and will change 40K as the market shifts. The amount of butt hurt over the changes from a goofy setting to a more serious one was immense amongst older neckbeards, and is something they still whine about in any threads, groups, chats, etc., dedicated to Rogue Trader and 2nd edition. Their pivot from grim dark was inevitable. They can and will pivot again in the future.

That being said I think it’s fine to like 40K lore and grim dark, but imo one should be aware GW is a public traded company and they’ll do whatever they believe will make them the most cash. Including throwing some fans under the bus.
 
GW putting money above all else is their one constant. They can and will change 40K as the market shifts. The amount of butt hurt over the changes from a goofy setting to a more serious one was immense amongst older neckbeards, and is something they still whine about in any threads, groups, chats, etc., dedicated to Rogue Trader and 2nd edition. Their pivot from grim dark was inevitable. They can and will pivot again in the future.
They're currently pivoting from grimdark to superhero shit. Moving away from the Dark Ages-style of 3rd Edition and towards a Marvel/DC style superhero storyline with Guilliman and his bigger Primaris Marines saving the day and halting the Imperium's decline, while possibly setting up a future alliance with the Eldar. My guess is, they'll inevitably have Guilliman wage war on the more retrograde and traditionalist factions in the Imperium, especially since some in this thread have brought up the fact that Guilliman not being a raging dickhead is causing friction with the higher-ups among the Imperium hierarchy and will eventually lead to a breaking point.

That being said I think it’s fine to like 40K lore and grim dark, but imo one should be aware GW is a public traded company and they’ll do whatever they believe will make them the most cash. Including throwing some fans under the bus.
Of course they would throw the older fans under the bus. The ones that keep complaining about price hikes and lore contradictions. The whales and the newer audience will support them, and GW has seen their coffers increase in input after 8th Edition came in. They will always chase the almighty dollar even if it screws over the central themes and narratives that 40K was originally meant to show.

Here's the thing, though: the fans of the older 40K editions can always just cling to the older shit and buy second-hand models or 3D-print them. No one is forcing you to move on to 3rd or 8th edition, especially since this IS a tabletop game, you can enjoy the older models, rules, and lore with friends, and pretend that the newer shit doesn't exist. Or you can just pretend that Primaris Marines are just regular marines with bigger armor, like a cross between an OG marine and a Terminator marine. I mean, this strategy worked great for many Star Wars fans; many still see the old SW Expanded Universe as the only legitimate SW canon, while others take bits and pieces of the Filoniverse SW and add it to their own interpretation of SW while including bits and pieces of the old Star Wars Expanded Universe that they liked. A lot of fans even pretend that the Sequels were never canon and act as if they don't exist. 40K fans can do the same, and be liberated from their exasperation with GW.

Imma just leave this here:
 
Here's the thing, though: the fans of the older 40K editions can always just cling to the older shit and buy second-hand models or 3D-print them. No one is forcing you to move on to 3rd or 8th edition, especially since this IS a tabletop game, you can enjoy the older models, rules, and lore with friends, and pretend that the newer shit doesn't exist. Or you can just pretend that Primaris Marines are just regular marines with bigger armor, like a cross between an OG marine and a Terminator marine. I mean, this strategy worked great for many Star Wars fans; many still see the old SW Expanded Universe as the only legitimate SW canon, while others take bits and pieces of the Filoniverse SW and add it to their own interpretation of SW while including bits and pieces of the old Star Wars Expanded Universe that they liked. A lot of fans even pretend that the Sequels were never canon and act as if they don't exist. 40K fans can do the same, and be liberated from their exasperation with GW.

There is nothing wrong with playing with your game your way, but it will be a problem when you've got to replace players.

I introduced some Pathfinder & 5e players to 4e. It was really frustrating because 4e used alot of the "D&D Words" but they had different meanings. One of the player's first questions was "I couldn't find the grapple rules" because they wanted to do the pathfinder thing of wrestling the wizard to take them out of the fight. Everything was very close to what they were expecting, but they did, and some still do, have issues with things that are close but not the same to the rules they are familiar with, like standing not provoke attacks of opportunity, there are not subclasses, Multiclass isn't really a thing, etc. Its very close, but not the exact same. If it was completely different they probably wouldn't be having as many issues.
But because the words were the same, everyone was wanting to do their usual PF/5e builds only to discover that 4e Barbarians are damage dealers not DR'ed HP tanks, Clerics can only heal twice (without feats/gear), you can't stun-lock enemies, grapple doesn't exist, there's two types of elves (which is two too many), you can only do your coolest shit once a day no matter how carefully you min/max. Grapple guy left partly because he actually had to do more in combat than go and wrestle a caster and have enough HP to outlast the 50% chance he's hit by his allies.

So you can just declare "We're playing 3e, Primaris models are just terminators" and that'll be fine for your group. Then you'll bring in a new player who's been playing whatever is current and they'll likely keep flopping to the new rules because the words are the same,and will keep trying to say "My Primaris Marines use Guilliman's Light to teleport" because that's their favorite move when they aren't at your table.
 
Last edited:
and is something they still whine about in any threads, groups, chats, etc., dedicated to Rogue Trader and 2nd edition.

Shoot, forums dedicated to Rogue Trader and 2nd Ed already show a magnitude more autonomy than your average battered-housewife GW slave.

Here's the thing, though: the fans of the older 40K editions can always just cling to the older shit and buy second-hand models or 3D-print them. No one is forcing you to move on to 3rd or 8th edition, especially since this IS a tabletop game, you can enjoy the older models, rules, and lore with friends, and pretend that the newer shit doesn't exist.

This is a thing I emphatically agree with, especially when GW torched WHFB and people ran around like the sky was falling. The trouble is in practise, for every one player who might simply 🤔 at your words, there will be 20 or 30 who are too set in the rut of turning up to a GW store and just playing. The idea of organizing something themselves - even just "hey, come round to my place and we'll play last ed" - is too much like work. Even then, GW customers have been conditioned so much to keep up with the churn, you could still have your work cut out to even make them look back at an old edition, let alone anything else. I said somewhere on KF, a few weeks ago, that GW stans are the biggest brainless mob of captive consoomers ever. It comes from observation and bitter experience.

That said, I might walk it back just an inch, and say it might have something to do with the kind of nerd brain that dives deep into wargaming. The wargaming club I once joined had a healthy contempt for 40K, but anything that wasn't two or three favored historical periods was just a silly diversion to them.
 
Shoot, forums dedicated to Rogue Trader and 2nd Ed already show a magnitude more autonomy than your average battered-housewife GW slave.



This is a thing I emphatically agree with, especially when GW torched WHFB and people ran around like the sky was falling. The trouble is in practise, for every one player who might simply 🤔 at your words, there will be 20 or 30 who are too set in the rut of turning up to a GW store and just playing. The idea of organizing something themselves - even just "hey, come round to my place and we'll play last ed" - is too much like work. Even then, GW customers have been conditioned so much to keep up with the churn, you could still have your work cut out to even make them look back at an old edition, let alone anything else. I said somewhere on KF, a few weeks ago, that GW stans are the biggest brainless mob of captive consoomers ever. It comes from observation and bitter experience.

That said, I might walk it back just an inch, and say it might have something to do with the kind of nerd brain that dives deep into wargaming. The wargaming club I once joined had a healthy contempt for 40K, but anything that wasn't two or three favored historical periods was just a silly diversion to them.
You're right that people don't need to rely on GW to enjoy Warhamer, but the reaction to End Times is understandable when you consider the loss of minis.. With basically every human faction squatted and replaced with the Sigmarines, you have to proxy like hell to even attempt at having an Empire Army, and that really hurts the game when designing minis has become half of the experience for the average Warhammer player.
The whole grognard strategy struggles when you consider that you have to try to compete against the current edition and will only become more and more obsolete as time goes on and new players are playing (Insert Tabletop Game here) nth edition while (insert grognard-preferred edition) becomes positively ancient. New players will likely start with new editions, and it's hard to get someone to start playing older editions when you consider the jank and balance differences compared to the new editions alongside lack of official support.
 
I mean, after End Times you can't trust them to not torch any of their IPs. Damndest thing is that Fantasy Battle clearly still had legs given how ludicrously popular and well selling the video games are, but it was GW's neglect and refusal to advertise it that did the most damage. Well, that, and the fact they refused to CONSISTENTLY UPDATE all their armies at once like a competent company would.

Then they had the audacity to blame the plastic buyers for their decision to kill it.

Literally this meme:
final_5cdde1c06811f00014e7f3c3_366747.jpg


It's why I honestly won't be shocked if they choose to nuke 40k at some point, especially since they're squatting several variants in the IG as it is. Armageddon being the newest victim.
 
It's why I honestly won't be shocked if they choose to nuke 40k at some point, especially since they're squatting several variants in the IG as it is. Armageddon being the newest victim.
I don't think they'll do that. That's a lot like nuking Star Wars, and GW won't nuke their own answer to Star Wars. More likely, they will take the same path Disney did, make it more politically sanitized and clean so the normies can partake in it.

I mean, the groundwork is already there. The Administratum and some of the Lords of Terra hate having to share power with Guilliman, and the latter was even revived with the help of aliens. The Imperium could eventually explode into civil war, with Guilliman and his Primaris Marines, and their supporters among other groups like the Custodes, would end up fighting the Administratum, the Inquisition, the more backwards Space Marine chapters, and the end result would be a more "progressive" Imperium that accepts alien allies like the Tau and the Eldar, fighting against hostile aliens and Chaos forces with a rational approach to both politics and combat.
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Ghostse and Adamska
I don't think they'll do that. That's a lot like nuking Star Wars, and GW won't nuke their own answer to Star Wars. More likely, they will take the same path Disney did, make it more politically sanitized and clean so the normies can partake in it.
Not everything is Star Wars or designed to counter it.

And no; they'd happily do it if they think they can do something like Age of Shitmar. Fantasy was their cashcow at one point and carried them over their numerous other products at the time. They nuked a franchise once; they'll fucking do it again.
 
Not everything is Star Wars or designed to counter it.

And no; they'd happily do it if they think they can do something like Age of Shitmar. Fantasy was their cashcow at one point and carried them over their numerous other products at the time. They nuked a franchise once; they'll fucking do it again.
I suppose so. But from my perspective, the more likely outcome is that they'll have Rowboat Girlyman turn progressive, since he already hates the Imperium as it is:

"Why do I still live? What more do you want from me? I gave everything I had to you, to them. Look what they've made of our dream. This bloated, rotting carcass of an empire is driven not by reason and hope but by fear, hate and ignorance. Better that we had all burned in the fires of Horus' ambition than live to see this.

We failed, father. You failed your sons, and we in turn failed you. And now, to compound our arrogance and vainglory we have failed all of them too. Did Horus not say you sought godhood? He built his rebellion on that claim. Oh how he would gloat and laugh at the state of the imperium now."

He's already GW's answer to Rey; a hero who has everything in his power to change things for the better. So once the traditionalists and the back-stabbing ass-kissers in the Imperium turn against him and launch a civil war with him, Guilliman will use it as an excuse to purge the Imperium of every backward, retrograde, traditionalist influence, and GW will use it to purge any "problematic" elements in the Imperium and have Guilliman be Mr. Rational, arranging an alliance with aliens like the Eldar, while having Belisarius Cawl innovate more new tech for the military. Guilliman will then go off eradicating the more fundamentalist parts of the Imperium, to create what amounts to an enlightened despot state that the normies can love without being called fascists. Instead of Space Nazis, they'll have Frederick the Great in space, now with more tolerance for those filthy xenos.

Mark my words. They'll turn 40K into an SJW agitprop eventually. Especially since it makes them lots of money, ever since 8th Edition dropped:

 
Last edited:
It's why I honestly won't be shocked if they choose to nuke 40k at some point, especially since they're squatting several variants in the IG as it is. Armageddon being the newest victim.
They did. The return of Girlyman and the dramatic shift in the universe with the Eye of Terror exploding into a rift across the galaxy is 40k's End Times.
 
Well aware. It, End Times, and their actions when they created Warhammer+ is why the franchise is dead-dead to me.
For most fans, (fans of 3rd-7th edition) it died when the Primaris Marines showed up in 2017. And for fans of the 1st and 2nd editions Warhammer, it died with 3rd Edition appeared in 1998.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Shaka Brah
Rick Priestley was one writer of many, and he was about the only one who was cramming his rather childish politics into the lore, which eventually got him shown the door when GW decided to focus on the lore as an actual story to sell their plastic crack. Stop using him as an end-all be-all for what 40k is supposed to be.
Andy Chambers was the real power. Hallowed be his name.
I suppose so. But from my perspective, the more likely outcome is that they'll have Rowboat Girlyman turn progressive, since he already hates the Imperium as it is:

"Why do I still live? What more do you want from me? I gave everything I had to you, to them. Look what they've made of our dream. This bloated, rotting carcass of an empire is driven not by reason and hope but by fear, hate and ignorance. Better that we had all burned in the fires of Horus' ambition than live to see this.

We failed, father. You failed your sons, and we in turn failed you. And now, to compound our arrogance and vainglory we have failed all of them too. Did Horus not say you sought godhood? He built his rebellion on that claim. Oh how he would gloat and laugh at the state of the imperium now."

He's already GW's answer to Rey; a hero who has everything in his power to change things for the better. So once the traditionalists and the back-stabbing ass-kissers in the Imperium turn against him and launch a civil war with him, Guilliman will use it as an excuse to purge the Imperium of every backward, retrograde, traditionalist influence, and GW will use it to purge any "problematic" elements in the Imperium and have Guilliman be Mr. Rational, arranging an alliance with aliens like the Eldar, while having Belisarius Cawl innovate more new tech for the military. Guilliman will then go off eradicating the more fundamentalist parts of the Imperium, to create what amounts to an enlightened despot state that the normies can love without being called fascists. Instead of Space Nazis, they'll have Frederick the Great in space, now with more tolerance for those filthy xenos.

Mark my words. They'll turn 40K into an SJW agitprop eventually. Especially since it makes them lots of money, ever since 8th Edition dropped:

At this point, frankly, why the fuck not?

Besides, after getting into Zombicide, I've found CMON does better and more affordable minis than GW ever did.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: LORD IMPERATOR
At this point, frankly, why the fuck not?
Exactly. Why the fuck not? The superhero capeshit fans get a superhero empire to root for that no longer has problematic elements, the "BASH THE FASH" people become happy that the Imperium is no longer a larping mechanism for those they deem fascist, and GW can market the Imperium as the good guys, with a straight face, without it being some kind of back-handed satire. Just have superhero marines being super and being heroes, wiping out both the alien and chaos threats, while also getting rid of the more "problematic" parts of the Imperium and having Belisarius Cawl advance the tech of the Imperium, possibly with Yvraine's help.

They might even finish that "human webway" project that the Emperor was working on before his dearly beloved Horus socked him in the face.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: IAmNotAlpharius
Back