Cultcow Russell Greer / Mr. Green / @ just_some_dude_named_russell29 / A Safer Nevada PAC - Swift-Obsessed Sex Pest, Convicted of E-Stalking, "Eggshell Skull Plaintiff" Pro Se Litigant, Homeless, aspiring brothel owner

If you were Taylor Swift, whom would you rather date?

  • Russell Greer

    Votes: 117 4.5%
  • Travis Kelce

    Votes: 138 5.3%
  • Null

    Votes: 1,449 55.8%
  • Kanye West

    Votes: 283 10.9%
  • Ariana Grande

    Votes: 608 23.4%

  • Total voters
    2,595
NEW DOC:
Motion filed by Appellant Russell G. Greer to extend time to file appellant/petitioner's brief until 01/06/2022


View attachment 2781584

His lawyers, as per Russ admission, have not even read Russ' case
View attachment 2781586
View attachment 2781587
I kinda suspected this.

So these lawyers seem to be trying to make a name for themselves as fair use smashers so they can go work for some evil media conglomerate. What are the odds these guys just scan around for cases they think meet their criteria for letting them pose as IP lawyers? If they were the instigators, that would flatter Russ's ego ("We saw your brilliant case and the bias judge was totally wrong! Let us help!" as opposed to him needing to humble himself and reach out for assistance. And looking at their record, they don't seem to care much if they win or not, so it would explain why they didn't even bother looking into Russ's case before they took it on.

They're using him. This is what happens when a low-IQ narcissist is let loose on the world; they get preyed on by smarter predators.

If that's the case, it couldn't have happened to a nicer guy. I hope Russ's ego suffers a major blow and he tries to sue his lawyers for shit representation and false promises or whatever.

Russ is a loser. Russ is going to lose.
 
What are the odds these guys just scan around for cases they think meet their criteria for letting them pose as IP lawyers?
Probably low given they didn't even read Russ' case (as per Russ' own admission) before accepting. "Scanning" seems to be too much effort for them if how they accepted Russ' case is any indication.
 
I kinda suspected this.

So these lawyers seem to be trying to make a name for themselves as fair use smashers so they can go work for some evil media conglomerate. What are the odds these guys just scan around for cases they think meet their criteria for letting them pose as IP lawyers? If they were the instigators, that would flatter Russ's ego ("We saw your brilliant case and the bias judge was totally wrong! Let us help!" as opposed to him needing to humble himself and reach out for assistance. And looking at their record, they don't seem to care much if they win or not, so it would explain why they didn't even bother looking into Russ's case before they took it on.

They're using him. This is what happens when a low-IQ narcissist is let loose on the world; they get preyed on by smarter predators.

If that's the case, it couldn't have happened to a nicer guy. I hope Russ's ego suffers a major blow and he tries to sue his lawyers for shit representation and false promises or whatever.

Russ is a loser. Russ is going to lose.
The issue isn't winning or losing, because it's not likely Russ will win from what the rest of you are saying. The problem is that it gets costly for Null to defend himself.
 
The issue isn't winning or losing, because it's not likely Russ will win from what the rest of you are saying. The problem is that it gets costly for Null to defend himself.
Actually this might be good for Null. With lawyers holding Russ back (hopefully) the amount of frivolous motions might considerably lessen. I hope so anyway, for Null's sake
 
Which brings up a good point. In their notice of appearance they swore to the court they were a non-profit. As far as IRS records show, that may be a lie (their status was revoked and I don't see a any IRS docs suggesting it was returned).
I think this is a nothingburger. If their non-profit status is currently revoked and they're called out on it they could simply claim they didn't know their non-profit status had been revoked and made a good faith representation of what they believed to be correct.

Aside from the fact that they can easily just say it's an error (what even is a form 990? we were supposed to file those?), it simply isn't relevant whether they're a non-profit or not. How they get paid or even if they get paid is between them and their client.
 
The issue isn't winning or losing, because it's not likely Russ will win from what the rest of you are saying. The problem is that it gets costly for Null to defend himself.
I appreciate that. I'm just trying to unravel what's actually happening here. It's wildly out of character for Russ to accept, let alone seek out, help in this manner. He'll hire a band to play his genius music, and even consult with producers in the writing process, but he's not going to share the spotlight if he can help it. He must be incredibly desperate if he's reaching out for professional help. So I'm wondering if that's what's really happened here or if there's some other explanation.
 
Probably low given they didn't even read Russ' case (as per Russ' own admission) before accepting. "Scanning" seems to be too much effort for them if how they accepted Russ' case is any indication.
I'd be moderately surprised if they legitimately know nothing about the case they've taken on. That's the sort of thing they'd say either way. It's basically impossible to argue against and it'll buy them some free extra time to file. It's basically guaranteed to be granted.
 
I think this is a nothingburger.
For Russ's case, yeah, I agree.
If their non-profit status is currently revoked and they're called out on it they could simply claim they didn't know their non-profit status had been revoked and made a good faith representation of what they believed to be correct.
"No, judge, see...uh...we didn't know we forgot to file our tax forms for three years straight, then got a notice, and then we just...uh...forgot to renew it for almost two years? Yeah! That's right!"

I mean, I don't think the judge will do anything to them, but that explanation wouldn't hold much water either.

Probably low given they didn't even read Russ' case (as per Russ' own admission) before accepting. "Scanning" seems to be too much effort for them if how they accepted Russ' case is any indication.
It's wildly out of character for Russ to accept, let alone seek out
It appears he was actually sought out, my bad:

Screenshot 2021-12-07 220736.png
I'd be moderately surprised if they legitimately know nothing about the case they've taken on. That's the sort of thing they'd say either way.

Maybe. But I'll take their word for it because it is funny.
 
Probably low given they didn't even read Russ' case (as per Russ' own admission) before accepting. "Scanning" seems to be too much effort for them if how they accepted Russ' case is any indication.
They can get an intern to do that, what else are they good for other than getting you your coffee?
 
About the lawfirm:
The Digital Justice Foundation (“DJF”) advocates for individual rights in digital spaces and aims to ensure that traditional notions of justice and civil liberties continue to thrive in the digital age. In carrying out this mission, the DJF places a particular focus on being a voice for underrepresented individuals and interests.

The DJF’s work in copyright law serves as an important cornerstone of this mission. Indeed, the DJF sees individual copyright protections as an integral part of a stable digital economy and well-functioning political system, advancing important humanistic values such as privacy, consent, and digital dignity.


While certain organizations feel that digital technologies have undermined the importance of copyright’s protections, the DJF firmly believes that these technologies have made copyright more important than ever. For example, an often-overlooked consequence of the internet is that, for the first time in history, most citizens are now regular creators and publishers of content. The emergence of a content-creating public gives copyright’s protections a newfound importance to a vastly wider class of citizens than in previous times.

Public debates on copyright should reflect this development. Yet the public’s interest in copyright often goes unrepresented in the inter-industry disputes that shape the development of copyright law. To correct this absence, the Digital Justice Foundation is a committed advocate before courts and policymakers for the rights of individual creators and for the often-underappreciated public interest in their rights.

Beyond the copyright context, the DJF promotes and protects civil liberties, privacy rights and employee rights as they are affected by new technologies. For these reasons, the DJF and its attorneys have been at the forefront of emergent legal issues surrounding algorithmic discrimination and governmental adoption of new technologies to administer traditional government functions. The DJF is also exploring novel ways to harness the power of technology to expand access to law.

In an age of rapid technological development, entrenched interests often drown out individual voices and overshadow the development of individual rights. The DJF is committed to ensuring that technology and traditional rights develop hand-in-hand.
They have only 3 lawyers, two of which took on Russ' appeal.

View attachment 2779942

Info from:


Yep, Russ is very much going to lose.
 
NEW DOC:
Motion filed by Appellant Russell G. Greer to extend time to file appellant/petitioner's brief until 01/06/2022


View attachment 2781584

His lawyers, as per Russ admission, have not even read Russ' case
View attachment 2781586
View attachment 2781587

View attachment 2781600
I'm a retard, so am I understanding this correctly that he is asking for 6 months for his lawyers that he tricked into taking this case (somehow) to catch up on this insanity?

Can he even ask for that much time?
 
I'm a retard, so am I understanding this correctly that he is asking for 6 months for his lawyers that he tricked into taking this case (somehow) to catch up on this insanity?
He's asking until the sixth of January (He's asking for a month of time). He's using the US Date Format (month–day–year) as opposed to the European one.
 
Back