US Joe Biden News Megathread - The Other Biden Derangement Syndrome Thread (with a side order of Fauci Derangement Syndrome)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Let's pretend for one moment that he does die before the election, just for the funsies. What happens then? Will the nomination revert to option number 2, aka Bernie Sanders? Or will his running mate automatically replace him just the way Vice-President is supposted to step in after the Big Man in the White House chokes on a piece of matzo? Does he even have a running mate yet?
 
I have never understood this line of thinking of suing the gun manufacturers because some mass shooters use them, to me it's like suing Toyota because some schizo incel used one of their cars to run over people, the manufacturer isn't responsable about what people do with their product right? So what even is the logic behind this?
It's to hit the companies with so many bullshit lawsuits that they either go out of business or the cost of guns goes up and basically prices poor people out of ownership. Effectively banning them without actually banning them.
 
I have never understood this line of thinking of suing the gun manufacturers because some mass shooters use them, to me it's like suing Toyota because some schizo incel used one of their cars to run over people, the manufacturer isn't responsable about what people do with their product right? So what even is the logic behind this?

I got a bit ninja'd by this response, but I'll go into more depth.

It's to hit the companies with so many bullshit lawsuits that they either go out of business or the cost of guns goes up and basically prices poor people out of ownership. Effectively banning them without actually banning them.

This exactly. The gun control NGOs that want to disarm the civilian populace realized long ago that they weren't going to get a lot of traction in getting laws passed the normal ways, so they decide to try lawfare. They decided to try a new tactic by suing gun companies and gun shops, sometimes with the help of Democrat city attorneys or mayors for ridiculous reasons that would never, ever prevail in a fair court of law. But the point wasn't to win, the point was to either leverage concessions or to to bleed the gun companies dry with legal fees fighting cases from cities and towns all across the country until they all go bankrupt. After all, they were either using donor money or more likely taxpayer money to fund these lawsuits while small stores and manufacturers had to pay out of pocket. (The irony of forcing money from people at gunpoint to argue against their right to have/use guns is dark.) It was a tactic used as an economic end run around the Constitution. They can't ban the guns outright, so they'll just make it too expensive to operate as a seller or maker.

Eventually things got so bad that Congress passed the PLCAA to block those suits. Normally you wouldn't need to have such legislation, and sometimes people will bring that up as a criticism, but then again you don't have countless cities and NGOs filing facially fraudulent lawsuits to bankrupt other industries, now do we?
 
I got a bit ninja'd by this response, but I'll go into more depth.



This exactly. The gun control NGOs that want to disarm the civilian populace realized long ago that they weren't going to get a lot of traction in getting laws passed the normal ways, so they decide to try lawfare. They decided to try a new tactic by suing gun companies and gun shops, sometimes with the help of Democrat city attorneys or mayors for ridiculous reasons that would never, ever prevail in a fair court of law. But the point wasn't to win, the point was to either leverage concessions or to to bleed the gun companies dry with legal fees fighting cases from cities and towns all across the country until they all go bankrupt. After all, they were either using donor money or more likely taxpayer money to fund these lawsuits while small stores and manufacturers had to pay out of pocket. (The irony of forcing money from people at gunpoint to argue against their right to have/use guns is dark.) It was a tactic used as an economic end run around the Constitution. They can't ban the guns outright, so they'll just make it too expensive to operate as a seller or maker.

Eventually things got so bad that Congress passed the PLCAA to block those suits. Normally you wouldn't need to have such legislation, and sometimes people will bring that up as a criticism, but then again you don't have countless cities and NGOs filing facially fraudulent lawsuits to bankrupt other industries, now do we?
And even WITH the PLCAA the gun-grabber left has never stopped trying to whack manufacturers with lawsuits.
 
Sometimes it's hard to tell how many of them actually believe the tripe, versus how many are just mouthing the words so they can get on with their own personal agendas (power, wealth, etc).

My rule is basically if they are fairly new, they might have been actual believers. AOC seems dumb enough to have believed this shit, but I think they quickly get schooled on how things are and will be if they want to maintain their position.

If they are firmly established, they absolutely fucking don't believe any of it. And all of the kingmakers are obviously established.

That's the only reason I gave any creedence to Trump, as he was a clear outsider and there was way too much of a pushback for him to be a ringer.

Guys like DeSantis though? I'm pretty sure he is a uniparty ringer and wouldn't be surprised if we suddenly see conservatives pushing for federalization to stop the progressive spread into law enforcement.
 
Sometimes it's hard to tell how many of them actually believe the tripe, versus how many are just mouthing the words so they can get on with their own personal agendas (power, wealth, etc).
I just go with the "brainwashed until proven otherwise" philosophy.

Poes Law/Clown World has gotten so out of hand to where up is down and good is bad, so literally anything is not only possible but plausible.
 
You should tell someone what would happen if a women didn't have a gun and she was about to be rape by a rapist?
She should've called the police and now that she has a gun she's more likely to murder her children/family. People who want gun control make this argument all of the time.
Lmao Texas should just deliver them the ultimate "fuck you" and start offering incentives for people with at least two election cycles of (R) votes to move from Cali to Texas
Too many transplants already. Our power grid is fucked 6 ways to Sunday because a bunch of blue fuckers and illegals have set up shop here in the past few decades. We need to clean out the parasites before offering incentives to legitimate conservatives.
 
You guys are talking about federalization/centralization of the police from an ideological, abstract point of view, but in the real world, what is going to happen if this isn't stopped is cartels taking over everything. A woke, centralized police force will take bribes on the ground and be basically identical with organized crime at the top, just with better manners and less flashy clothing.

The only way out of the entire North American continent becoming chilly pale Mexico is legalization.
 
You guys are talking about federalization/centralization of the police from an ideological, abstract point of view, but in the real world, what is going to happen if this isn't stopped is cartels taking over everything. A woke, centralized police force will take bribes on the ground and be basically identical with organized crime at the top, just with better manners and less flashy clothing.

The only way out of the entire North American continent becoming chilly pale Mexico is legalization.
The feds don't have the people to secure blue cities, let alone blue states, and in no way at all the ability to secure red states.

They don't have enough skilled workers to provision blue cities if everyone but libtards just stayed home for a month. Let alone blue states, or secure supply lines for attacks on red states. And all that with just us chuds withdrawing goodwill. Now imagine if we were actively hostile.

Most of our political structures will become localized in the next 10 years. Those areas that don't will die off if they trust the feds or depend on them for anything. Look at the vaccines and how many libtards they're killing - you don't come back from a loss of legitimacy that bad.
 
The feds don't have the people to secure blue cities, let alone blue states, and in no way at all the ability to secure red states.

They don't have enough skilled workers to provision blue cities if everyone but libtards just stayed home for a month. Let alone blue states, or secure supply lines for attacks on red states. And all that with just us chuds withdrawing goodwill. Now imagine if we were actively hostile.

Most of our political structures will become localized in the next 10 years. Those areas that don't will die off if they trust the feds or depend on them for anything. Look at the vaccines and how many libtards they're killing - you don't come back from a loss of legitimacy that bad.
the feds don't, the cartels do, is my point

I have a lot of faith in middle American political structures but they've never been tested against big fat sacks of Colombian cash. In border states and on the I-5 corridor those structures went down like a metaphor for abusive fellatio.

The extent to which Canada is already a narcostate I invite leafs to discuss if there are any on this thread.
 
the feds don't, the cartels do, is my point

I have a lot of faith in middle American political structures but they've never been tested against big fat sacks of Colombian cash. In border states and on the I-5 corridor those structures went down like a metaphor for abusive fellatio.

The extent to which Canada is already a narcostate I invite leafs to discuss if there are any on this thread.
The cartels don't have the manpower either. All they can do is bribe the leadership. If they have to bribe every low level guy, then there's no money coming home. Ditto for killing off their customer base, though to be fair that's probably their plan - genocide all the white people with dope, then move north. That's certainly China's plan, especially with Canada. Chinese nationals launder money for Mexican cartels, as part of China's strategy to turn everything that can be a weapon into one and to use them against us.

This strategy only works - like the uniparty strategy - if people don't notice it. People are noticing it. And the solution is obvious: consider all people who are from Mexico as cartel agents, all people from China as money launderers, and everyone in political leadership who doesn't explicitly oppose them with every tool at their disposal as corrupt.

Once everyone that can conceive of this is aware of it, the fix is obvious: "community justice" in the medieval sense.

The Mexican cartels and their Chinese money launderers can bribe politicians and cops, but politicians and cops aren't willing to die for them. And neither the cartels or the money launderers can "change their uniform" and blend in with us.

If you can guess who has money and useful good hidden away based on who stands out from your in-group, the cops are run out of town, then suddenly the predators have lost their teeth and are surrounded by those on whom they fed. They can't do hit-and-run assassinations like they do in Mexico when they're a foot shorter than the rest of us. At least, not for very long.
 
Trump may be running for the House in 2022. There's a new House seat opening up in Florida, he has a place there, he will 100% win that election and bring a ton of Republican voters out so they will want him to run.

His plan may be to oust Mitch as Speaker of the House, then impeach, delay, and subpoena Biden and Kamala at once. If they're both out, he's next in line to be President. If he becomes President with less than 2 years left in his term, it doesn't count as a full term.

I wish he had done this in 2016 and 2020, as backup should his Presidential elections fail.
....Mitch is not the Speaker of the House.
 
The cartels don't have the manpower either. All they can do is bribe the leadership. If they have to bribe every low level guy, then there's no money coming home. Ditto for killing off their customer base, though to be fair that's probably their plan - genocide all the white people with dope, then move north. That's certainly China's plan, especially with Canada. Chinese nationals launder money for Mexican cartels, as part of China's strategy to turn everything that can be a weapon into one and to use them against us.

This strategy only works - like the uniparty strategy - if people don't notice it. People are noticing it. And the solution is obvious: consider all people who are from Mexico as cartel agents, all people from China as money launderers, and everyone in political leadership who doesn't explicitly oppose them with every tool at their disposal as corrupt.

Once everyone that can conceive of this is aware of it, the fix is obvious: "community justice" in the medieval sense.

The Mexican cartels and their Chinese money launderers can bribe politicians and cops, but politicians and cops aren't willing to die for them. And neither the cartels or the money launderers can "change their uniform" and blend in with us.

If you can guess who has money and useful good hidden away based on who stands out from your in-group, the cops are run out of town, then suddenly the predators have lost their teeth and are surrounded by those on whom they fed. They can't do hit-and-run assassinations like they do in Mexico when they're a foot shorter than the rest of us. At least, not for very long.
at least you're now acknowledging that the US isn't floating in space
 
You don't need "woke" laws. Not wholly. You need selective enforcement. Look at Rittenhouse - did nothing wrong, State twists every truth they can into a pretzel trying to convict him. Hell, outright lying. An arsonist setting fire to buildings, even children's homes, don't prosecute. Release with a warning or on trivial bail. There's all sorts of things that can be done without needing to explicitly contradict the Constitution. For example, make an institution dependent on Federal funding (e.g. schools) and then threaten to withdraw it if they don't comply.

The primary motivation in "defund the police" is to backdoor in federal law enforcement. Like O'Brien said in 1984: "Power is the goal".

The Constitution still requires people to defend it. And I'm not talking people's militias (yet) but DAs, judges, congress people, school boards... That has to be taken back. If you're not involved in local politics, get involved. The time is now.
I think you make a valid point here. The feds can take over law enforcement via funding and threaten them if the results are too racist. But this is mostly a negative power, the power to not put blacks in prison crimes they did commit, not the power to put whites in prison for crimes we didn't commit. There's a flipside lesson to the Rittenhouse case. The 6th amendment means it requires a lot of effort and expense for the state to imprison you, and the right to trial by jury and a lawyer means it's even harder if you didn't do anything. For the kinds of things the woke want to do, you need to be able to conduct mass trials in secret.

Too many transplants already. Our power grid is fucked 6 ways to Sunday because a bunch of blue fuckers and illegals have set up shop here in the past few decades. We need to clean out the parasites before offering incentives to legitimate conservatives.

Don't forget that Texas Republicans also lapped up federal "green energy" subsidies for a massive number of wind turbines that failed, because at the end of the day, they're a bunch of drooling morons who think that anything involving money is an automatic good. There is no left-wing initiative so sociopathic or economically harmful that you can't get Republicans on board by tying it to "bringing business to the state."
 
at least you're now acknowledging that the US isn't floating in space
I don't see why you're so blackpilled about this. A bunch of 4' 10" Indios in Southern Mexico fought the Mexican government to a standstill and beat the cartels into bribing them, we shouldn't have any problems.

The left owns every federal institution and many state ones, but they also need to maintain these institutions. They can't do that without us, so our goal should be a round of "please don't throw me in that briar patch b'rier fox". We need to troll libtards into going after normies and purging all who are essential to maintaining their institutions from them.

The ideal thing to do is to infiltrate Patriot Front, get info on when they're going to have one of their demos, then hand that off to BLM and antifa and say that Patriot Front is planning to shoot and run over BLM/antifa. BLM/antifa go there primed for violence, and they kill a bunch of Patriot Front goons - either federal agents, cops, criminal informants taken avoiding prison time for drug dealing or equally degenerate behavior, or total fucking morons who fell for the bait and probably would have gone on a spree shooting if prompted to by their fed handlers.

BLM/antifa get blowback, a bunch of feds and 78 IQ wignats get martyred by the libtards pets, and the federal hand in controlled opposition is revealed for the likes of Tucker Carlson and his boomer audience - three birds with one stone.

And our hands are clean. Lying to BLM/antifa isn't a crime, and in the eyes of libtards it's actually fairly reasonable to assume that wignat goons are going to go on killing sprees. One could claim that they were just leaking this to the public for the greater good, and that you're just opposing fascism.

Pressure from boomers gets state govts to go after antifa and to start monitoring the feds schizo shooter ops, which gets the feds and antifa focused on that instead of us, giving us breathing room from both feds and libtard goons.

tl;dr

Step 1: Let's you (BLM/antifa) and him (Patriot Front feds) fight.
Step 2: Let's you (state govts) and him (BLM/antifa and PF feds) fight.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back