Manosphere SlayerOfTranny

  • Thread starter Thread starter HG 400
  • Start date Start date
  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
SlayerOfTyranny said:
By the way about evidence of the differences between men and women,I'll dig it up if I have to.

But I'm shocked that isn't just common sense.

I mean can you really not see the differences without me having to post some great scientific proof?

It's literally obvious and I didn't realize it was something that actually needed to be "proved" but alright then...
Click to expand...

Difference is not the same thing as superior or inferior. You're making a false equivocation and ultimately hurting whatever point you're trying to make. I'll explain. You're basically saying because men have differences that led to human accomplishment, that means the capabilities of men are superior to women and the subjugation of women is warranted. If you're not saying that, you need to modify your points because that's the conclusion you seem to be reaching for. Based on that, we can then look at a population of men. Within that population there is going to men that are stupid, weak, lazy and such just as there are men that are strong, intelligent, motivated and such. Using your assertions, we must then subjugate the weaker men just the same as women. What this shows is that your argument about the differences between women and men can equally be applied to just men as well.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: autisticdragonkin, chimpburgers, Sanae Kochiya and 2 others
Frank Rizzo said:
Funny how he wanted to be all smug and claim we were scared to debate him, yet he turns tail and ragequits like a pussy when we humor him and wreck him in a debate.
Click to expand...
It's not even a debate, really. What was asked is that he show scientific evidence that women are "inferior" to men. He used a roundabout claim providing no actual sources for said claim, nothing that was ever actually studied in an experiment and run through the usual channels of scientific investigation, and he'll likely use the broad assertion of how the establishment of early patriarchal societies that basically formed the basis of most early civilization as his reasoning for why women are inferior, despite the fact that it's already been explained why such a system propagated to begin with.

In short, he's caught in a weak argument of his own design and he'll just double down on his weak ass claims because, technically, we're not able to provide the evidence that specifically proves him wrong. It's the most egregious type of argument and no one with any actual academic background or vested interest in this field of study would take his autistic ramblings seriously. All he'll do is claim we're "brainwashed" and that no one could provide him a suitable answer to refute him because he's asking for something that is basically impossible to ever fulfill. It's typical goalpost shifting and no one who values their time would actually take this autistic shit seriously for more than five minutes.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Emiya Kiwitsugu, Rin, 24isthehighestnumber and 4 others
Isn't he the Layer of Trannies? I thought that's how he picked his screename, his incessant love for tranny sex.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sanae Kochiya
HickoryDickory said:
@SlayerOfTyranny posted a pic of a Tranny in the primer thread. I guess he showed us all.
Click to expand...

Yep, he sure did. Even if the pic is legit, he's asking us to vote on whether he should go and bang her when she apparently straight up said she wants him.

Slayer doesn't quite have the whole "trolling" thing down pat, does he?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: HickoryDickory, Sanae Kochiya, Emiya Kiwitsugu and 1 other person

Haven't even read all this thread yet but

I get that you guys are just trolling and trying to find some buttons push

But just to set the record straight

Ummmm me replying to this thread when I feel like it and at my leisure is not "rage quitting"....lol

Also the pic was of a hot girl not a tranny but I think we all already know that you just think it's amusing to delete the pic and say "it was a tranny!"

Thirdly lmao

I was not asking you to "vote" wheter I should bang her I was just goofing around and felt like posting it so I did.I never mentioned any such thing frank is just being a butthead and trying to troll

Also it's kind of ironic that you are trying to troll me by telling me I suck at trolling,don't you think?

We all know the only ones trolling are in fact the kiwi's as they have designed an entire trap forum to do so,luring in cows to their lair and then having their way with them

Those naughty schemers
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Dumb
  • Autistic
  • Deviant
Reactions: Scribbler, Trombonista, Positron and 6 others
SlayerOfTyranny said:
Haven't even read all this thread yet but

I get that you guys are just trolling and trying to find some buttons push

But just to set the record straight

Ummmm me replying to this thread when I feel like it and at my leisure is not "rage quitting"....lol

Also the pic was of a hot girl not a tranny but I think we all already know that you just think it's amusing to delete the pic and say "it was a tranny!"

Thirdly lmao

I was not asking you to "vote" wheter I should bang her I was just goofing around and felt like posting it so I did.I never mentioned any such thing frank is just being a butthead and trying to troll

Also it's kind of ironic that you are trying to troll me by telling me I suck at trolling,don't you think?

We all know the only ones trolling are in fact the kiwi's as they have designed an entire trap forum to do so,luring in cows to their lair and then having their way with them

Those naughty schemers
Click to expand...

Someone's salty....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back