ATTN: Joshua Connor Moon and the "board of directors" of LOLCOW, LLC

Should Josh and Lolcow Cave To Miss Tommie's Demands

  • Yes

  • No

  • Maybe

  • Screw both of them. Let's revolt!

  • Frank Ireland doesn't care and neither do I.


Results are only viewable after voting.
I didn't know that great harm is worth $100 a month.
We dont negotiate with terrorists.
Watching Tommy act as if he's suddenly got clout is hilarious.
watching you make a fool out of yourself gets better every day, cupcake.

1640170368710.png
 
You got bigger things to worry about, go buy 5 body guards to protect yourself next weekend.
i am under orders to just ignore that bullshit completely and let que sera fucking sera and enjoy the show if those insane infantile imbeciles are actually going to get up in my face with a camera expecting to get me to "chimp out"
It is sad that your mother predeceased you.
you're going to really be sad when this site gets taken away from jawrsh by the floribelle family farms foundation and fascist furry faggot fucktards like you have to register with a real name, address, phone number and banking address just to be able to see past the login screen.
 
What does the heiress get out of it?
the satisfaction of taking this site away from josh and liberating all the lolcows. we'll take it over and it will still be a fun site, but there won't be the harassment and defamation that goes on now.
Why do you assume the site would be handed to you? Why do you assume users would adhere to your bullshit signup/participation requirements?
because josh won't be able to pay the judgement against him and the plaintiffs will settle in exchange for the site.

why do you assume i would even care about retaining any current member?
 
So she has no connection to the site and is funding you in exchange for gaining a controlling interest in the domain? Sounds like champerty and maintenance to me.
Champerty and maintenance aren't illegal in most of the US, including Arizona. The few states that do have champerty doctrine generally don't enforce it because case law suggests the supreme court would spank it as unconstitutional.
 
Champerty and maintenance aren't illegal in most of the US, including Arizona. The few states that do have champerty doctrine generally don't enforce it because case law suggests the supreme court would spank it as unconstitutional.
Oh yeah, good point. But they're big words, so I win anyway, right?
 
Back