Pictures on the Internet that have made you laugh hysterically - We have a funny videos thread in Multimedia

[Getwhatyou]

Just because we can produce food doesn't mean we will produce food. Famine is coming. Maybe not soon, but it is coming.

Better slash your wrists then aye pussy? Just give up now. The world is gonna end. Boo hoo. Go and touch grass faggot and realise that the interwebs isn't real.

 

[SneedEyeMitch]

 

[Jonah Hill poster]

 

[Bongocat]

 

[Stephanie Bustcakes]

With no underlying condition, men have a total 95% chance to survive COVID. That roughly translates to 19 in 20 men survive COVID and 1 in 20 men die from it. By comparison, 4% of the Furry fandom are spergs which translates to 1 in 25 while in the general population 1.8% of kids are diagnosed autistic which means 9 in 500 kids are autistic. As for the women, they prolly die less because they stay in the kitchen like the good housewives that they are.

100% of the furry fandom are spergs.

 

[Reporterward]

Hmm, the hardwood floors were covered with linoleum. I wonder why?

Hmm, could it be that the hardwood was more difficult to clean, given the finish used at the time? Could it be that hardwood floors were seen as "poor" where linoleum was seen as more 'modern' as well as easier to clean and safer? Could it be they weren't childless weirdos working safe clean jobs and the stains and wear on the wood floor from having 2-5 kids, a family that moves around more than from the bed to the computer, could have caused damage to the wood floor that made it look bad and thus is was more economically feasible to use linoleum rather than replace the floor?

Could it have been actually preferred by home owners insurance? Could it have actually increased the value of a modern home? Could it have actually been better for heating or cooling?

Could there have been actual reasons to do so?

No. They were just all stupid.

Faggots.

View attachment 2835612

No.
It’s because they really were that stupid. A generation (GG, Silent, Boomers) that were lazy, didn’t understand the value of hard work, the value of a dollar, the value of preserving the past, who had horrible taste in architecture and design, and were gullible rubes who were content to CONSOOM from DuPont because the fancy ads told them to.
This was an era where beautiful hardwood furniture was tossed in the landfill in order to Rent-to-Own cheap particle board crap.
These were the generations that molested great Victorian and Queen Anne architecture by covering it with aluminum and vinyl siding. Because they were too lazy to keep their houses painted.
They ripped out the interiors and clad everything with fake wood paneling and shag carpet and acoustic ceiling tiles.
They opted for cheap and disposable crap that would, ironically, have to be replaced every five or ten years.
So rather than having a hardwood floor that would last a century with minimum upkeep, they covered everything with linoleum that would have to be replaced every ten. And by “replaced” I mean just covered up with a second and a third and a fourth layer because they were just that lazy.

 

[Jet Fuel Johnny]

This was an era where beautiful hardwood furniture was tossed in the landfill in order to Rent-to-Own cheap particle board crap.
These were the generations that molested great Victorian and Queen Anne architecture by covering it with aluminum and vinyl siding. Because they were too lazy to keep their houses painted.
They ripped out the interiors and clad everything with fake wood paneling and shag carpet and acoustic ceiling tiles.
They opted for cheap and disposable crap that would, ironically, have to be replaced every five or ten years.
So rather than having a hardwood floor that would last a century with minimum upkeep, they covered everything with linoleum that would have to be replaced every ten. And by “replaced” I mean just covered up with a second and a third and a fourth layer because they were just that lazy.

You know, that's actually a good rebuttal.

It makes me laugh because I know what's being said.

 

[Captain Syrup]

It’s because they really were that stupid. A generation that were lazy, didn’t understand the value of hard work, the value of a dollar, the value of preserving the past, who had horrible taste in architecture and design, and were gullible rubes who were content to CONSOOM from DuPont because the fancy ads told them to.

Stephen King's Hearts in Atlantis is an indictment of his own generation.

 

[Rome's rightful successor]

I can't speak Russian but this caricature of a britbong made me laugh.

 

[Certified_Autist]

 

[Disc]

You're probably right on the 1 in 27 number for men who are 80+, but I meant in a cumulative way every single men no matter their age, what are their chances of dying from COVID. I added up each statistic which led to an approximately 95% rate total across all ages, and then I put the resulting percentage on an online calculator, see below.
View attachment 2835170
It would have been better if the statistics sheet also included an all ages total, so that I wouldn't have to calculate it myself.
I'll also add that the 1 in 285 for people aged 50 and below is not good, this is comparable to the autism birth rates which are at 9 in 500 per birth.

It definitely would have been better if the statistics sheet included an education in how statistics work.

I'm assuming your calculation went one of these two ways:
1: Determine the percentage of deaths for each tier, then sum up those percentages (which gets me about 4.28%)
2: Multiply the percentages of each tier together as if they were a sequence of events (which gets me 4.25%)

There's two problems here:

One, you're collated events across multiple years onto one person at one time. If you did method 1, you're completely making up numbers. If you did 2, you're msiunderstanding sequences of events in probability - that would be the approximate chance of someone surviving if they caught covid every 10 years from childhood to their 80s.

Secondly, you're not weighting the rows correctly. There are far more 10-39-year-olds than there are 80+ year olds. This means that the number will be far closer to the statistics for 10-39 than it will be for 80+.

What you're looking for here is a weighted average using population numbers for each age tier for weighting, which (cos I don't give enough of a fuck to hard-calculate it) is probably around 99.9% or higher.

Edit: For further reference, an unweighted average gets 99.5%.

Anyway, school's over, image tax

 

[XANA]

 

[Bongocat]

 

[JJLiautaud]

View attachment 2836826

That cat will always make me laugh

Image tax

Edit:
Double image tax:

 

[DDBCAE CBAADCBE]

View attachment 3A2B7F07-AE6D-44EE-9FB3-324056BB00F0.pngMade this for my D&D group over five years ago. It’s a large maze made of massive metal chambers which create an ever changing maze by individually turning each segment of the chamber left or right every turn based on three die rolls. It was ironically the smallest and least complex piece of what was a gargantuan 3D map I had designed of a mechanical fully automated dwarven city that could walk on spider like mechanical legs.

It’s funny to me because it’s in a way the ultimate fuck you kind of 3.5 dungeon.

 

[KKonger]

 

[Linako 2.0]

 

[Arthur Morgan]

 

[soggy london]

 

[Sexy Senior Citizen]