I don't get why these people think EDS is so disabling. There are people in their 50s and older who actually do have it (proven by genetic testing); they've had severe issues since birth, but still live perfectly normal lives.
EDS absolutely can be, especially when it comes to pain. If the spine is affected, early onset Joint OA, chronic tendonities, nerve entrapments. These problems show up on tests and scans though. There is a type that is known to be painful without joint degeneration (myopathic EDS, recently discovered). The munchies (many of people diagnosed with hEDS online) say it's disabling, but when you talk to them it's almost always POTS/MCAS or eating disorder which they insist are from the hEDS - even though the medical community doesn't say there is a clear link. It's very sad because parents of children, and adults diagnosed late are almost in tears about how terrible they think the disease is. Problem is it's a bunch of munchies and it grossly exaggerates how bad it is on average. Apart from direct effects (stretchy skin, loose joints), how your impacted is extremely variable because all of your other genes have a chance to mitigate it or worsen it.
What's interesting is that you can look at those people and instinctively tell there's something genetically off (the exception usually being vEDS, which affects mostly the vascular system), whereas you can't see anything genetically off with these young women.
This isn't true. You can often tell with newborns - a floppy, alien appearance. But people with EDS can grow up to be absolutely beautiful - a mild/moderate marfinoid habitus can give (a man at least) very broad shoulders, the extra stretch of the lips a huge smile. Affected skin can look absolutely beautiful without scars. What's "off" about people varies based on the rest of their genetics. There are very, very pretty people with genetically confirmed EDS. What you do notice about the common types is the degree of hypermobility at rest. Looking at someone with their feet propped up without the knees supported is really offputting - a 45 degree backward bend.
I personally suspect hEDS is not real, and that's why they've not found a gene for it. Lots of people are extraordinarily bendy (especially if they did gymnastics, dance, etc as kids), so it's meaningless in itself. The EDS Society has gotten a lot of unearned clout by playing to that contingent, whereas those with actual EDS generally roll their eyes at the people claiming hEDS. Many real EDS patients have actually turned against the EDS Society over this dispute, and for good reason. Their very real concerns are being pushed to the side, for a disorder which may not even actually exist.e
The advent of affordable sequencing that would allow the discovery of these genes coincided with the growth of the internet and munchausen's by internet/extreme health anxiety. It took until 2017 for them to do something about the fact that every largeish study had been confounded by people lying about the severity of their joint issues. They have made two important discoveries (myopathic EDS, classical like ehlersdanlos due to TNXB deficiency), as well as find a correlation with hEDS and TNXB halpoinsufficiency - the problem being the latter isn't specific enough.
There are certain "tells" for EDS which have absolutely nothing to do with being bendy, and which absolutely cannot be faked. It's a genetic disease, so of course it's going to cause other problems. I'm not going to go into what they are, beyond saying I'd love to see their upper palate. That's one deformity in EDS which nobody can fake.
There are no hard and fast rules for what skeletal/muscular deformities someone will wind up with. Stenberg's sign, gorlin sign, marfinoid habitus, etc - all depend on other genes and sometimes luck. Someone can be absent all of them and still have more interesting issues like prolapsed bladder/bowel/genitals, multiple hernias, joint instability, etc.
EDS is complicated and without going off a central medical records repository it's impossible to know if anyone one person has it by what you can see from the outside. There's no reason people with genetically confirmable EDS can't also have factitious disorder. What's important is to look at the behavior - anyone who makes "sick" their identity has the chance to have their behavior driven by the same pyschological pathology that drives the extreme munchers.
Like with that girl in the wheelchair earlier. She very clearly wants the social benefits of being sick. She's actively pursuing it. The goal of empowerment was to encourage people with disabilities to live their best lives. These people are subverting how it's been encouraged to enhance the social benefit they get from being seen as sick. These people crept in and the woke mob kept them from getting mocked/shunned for not focusing enough on what they could do. Hey, let's all celebrate needing rollators/cains!
edit: a lot of pictures from people celebrating illness only show their hands. I'm always doing mental calculations to figure out how fat they'd need to be for their fingers and hands to be so hammy. There is something to the "FFF" thing, but thin people slip on by too.
EDS (except for some subtypes) wouldn't be any more painful or disabling than acquiring OA/spinal disease whatever without the condition, and EDS isn't a garauntee you will ever have those things.