I think it's a way to distance one's self from their past self, a way to justify their actions.
Like, when one comes out as an atheist, they want to be assholes to anything christianity and christians have to offer., as if proving to the public that they can be a cunt, affirms to themselves that they are what they say they are.
I came out as an atheist, and was a dick to somehow affirm to myself. It was wrong.
The scientific, rational and empirical minds, want to distance from the past to confirm their growth.
Those of faith want to confirm destiny, they want to confirm that they grew in the right direction.
But in Radical Feminism, only men are narcissists, and Testosterone is the sole cause of that.
The Dog whistling from the TERF crowd only continues to grow.
What I'm not going to do is conflate an entire group of people with labels.
I.e. not all women are feminists, but I think certain feminist subcultures are going to fuck this all up.
In the same way, a lot of members of the trans community are both foolish, cruel and censorship crazy, but I'm not going to direct hatred onto all of them.
At a certain point, people have to take responsibility for their actions.
My issue with the TERFS is twofold.
Radical Feminism descends into a circle of man hating, I think that they despise anyone who is not like them.
I believe RadFem, and Radical Lesbianism will eventually cause more trans movements in the future, and damage their cause.
The trans community will react, it's instinct for them, and they will condition and reaffirm their beliefs.
I think the Rhetoric and actions of the TERFS will eventually cool, and then the future generations will embrace it again.
Feminism tends to work in cycles, period jokes aside.
But, I think the moment you get extremists like RadFems involved, which is what is happening with the Unusual Subjects as we speak.
It's a matter of time before this shit dissolves, and the current Status Quo stablizes.
The current status quo is Troons stay and continue being victims of Big Pharma, while they percieve TERFS as the enemy.
The Radical Feminists will highjack the movement against this and focus on Academic Sperging, as opposed to helping people, specifically child victims.
The RadFem victim complex is starting to show now.
It's Scientology 2.0. vs. Marxist Feminism.
What I find pretty fucked up, is that Feminists want to conflate that all women who don't agree with them are NPCs, and anyone of the opposite sex is a dumb animal.
It's obvious they want to project all of their flaws onto men, and they use language to do it.
I agree the troons, specifically Contra Points, among others, want to hypnotize people.
But I'm beginning to believe that any group of Academic thinkers engaged in this wants to recreate monotheism through a marxist lens.
They want to justify supremacy of their tribe, it doesn't end at getting equality, it doesn't end with protecting spaces, and occupying other spaces to break taboo.
It's about affirming supremacy.
The Trans community wants supremacy, and so do the TERFs.
Again, I don't totally disagree with the TERFs, but the feminine supremacy nutcracker bullshit, is where the line needs to be drawn.
TERFS need to be radical toward the trans community.
But they're also pretty much conflating all men as rapist colonizers, when most of us are as pissed off as they are about this.
Why?
Because women aren't the only people being affected by this.
The TERF perspective is a two sided coin.
On the one hand, they have good perspectives when it comes to Gender Atheism, Reproductive rights, and the desire for their own spaces.
The bad side is, they also want women and men completely divorced from each other in all walks of life, and don't believe women are responsible for any of their actions.
I think the TERFS are anti Nuclear Family, in nearly all components.
Even if you have a modern nuclear family with gay partners, or an egalitarian hetero couple.
TERFS believe in feminine supremecy, their only interest is in themselves and not society as a whole.
Intersectional Feminists want to eat the feminist movement.
The rest of the Feminists want Trans Rights.
It's a triangle of Autism.
And we even have an IRL Feminist with a SyFy name, "Star Hawk".
There are endless academic articles and videos about women being gaslighted by the medical industry.
Exulansic even made a video about a medical tool, designed in the 1800s to stablize a cervix.
The Feminists can write academic bullshit about how this tool is racist, and causes pain, and while all correct,
I have yet to see a Feminist Inventor develop an alternative medical tool that would stabilize a cervix and move the medical community in a more female friendly way.
TERFs are even proposing sex segregated education.
I've said dumb things before, but I don't know if boys and girls being segregated at schools is a good idea, for a number of reasons.
I think it could potentially create more rape scenarios when those kids reach adulthood, and they're not socially adjusted to being around each other.
I agree with the TERFS on matters of protecting female spaces and reproductive rights.
I also don't think it's fair to compare all of the men or male troons to cuttlefish, who are trying to "maximize insemination oppourtunities."
Some women also want to be inseminated, and thus provide oppourtunities, the majority of the time it's consensual.
Not always, rape still happens and needs to be stopped.
80 percent of reproduction is done by women.
40 percent is men.
80 percent of sexual assaults are female victims.
40 percent of sexual assaults are male victims.
Those are the stats.
Feminism may be pro choice, but it also doesn't answer questions in regard to abortion.
i.e.
What if a man knocked his wife up, and pushed this woman into getting an Abortion? How does that mesh with their belief system.
What if a woman decides to abort the child, solely because the child isn't the right sex? I've read about articles involving this.
Then you have odd cases about some women getting tens of Abortions within a year, is feminism going to have a standard in place to prevent that?
Finally, if Feminists legitimately believe that men are afraid of the child not being theirs, i.e. affiairs, one has to conced that birth certificates are from a time
where genetic passports and DNA tests weren't invented yet?
So, why not advocate for a DNA test upon birth of a child, to remove or confirm doubts.
I think such solutions would only be fair.
Instead Feminists would rather bitch, focus on gender studies, and political correctness with academic papers than do the heavy lifting.
again, if a Gynecologist is using tools from the dark ages, it would only be logical to invent a new tool that stabilizes a cervix, without causing a woman
to black out during an exam.
Hell, in all honesty, if Feminsim wanted to change the medical system for the better, it looks like they would start pushing more feminists to become Gynecologists
just for the sole purpose of having influence, better standards of care and control.
Political activists live in the past, and live for subsidy, they don't seem to provide solutions or inventions that are going to help them out.
The TERFs want to accuse all of the MTFs as AGP Rapists.
But if an FTM transgender exists they're a victim of the Patriarchy.
If you have Gynophiles, you have Phallophiles.
We have two groups of mentally ill victim, but it seems that one group doesn't want to allow members to take responsibility for their actions.
(Sounds like a double standard)
Instead of Big Pharma is taking advantage of people, and a variety of factors have caused mental illness, this has to be politicized through a feminist lens.
It affects women but it doesn't stop at where it affects them and how, we have to go down the Academic/Autistic Animal Psychology rabbit hole, things are going to get retarded.
Hence why we hit peak autism with Exulansic's Cuttlefish comparison.
Segmenting your cock into a Fauxgina and castrating yourself seems antithetical to the goal of maximising insemination oppourtunities, especially when the end game is to get other men to penetrate them.
Something else is going on there.
Add into it, Transhetero couples, i.e. an MTF marrying and impregnating an FTM, and them playing hetero roles out in their transitioned Genders.
I think the TERFs are cherrypicking a lot of details out, so that they can make the narrative about themselves.
Alongside the need to list the mother as the father, and the father as the mother on official documents.
Exulansic hit a point when she brought up the SRY gene.
But she didn't cover the paperwork parts of this argument.
Mothers pass on Mitochondrial DNA to their children, hence why you can trace out all Jews to 4 women ancestrally.
But the trans community wants to list an F2M as the Father, and a M2F as the mother.
Couldn't this fuck up genetic tests if the paperwork is delivered, and the DNA test turns up that the "Father" isn't related, because they were looking at the wrong genes.
The trans community wants this to be the case.
Again, they are affected, but they're not the only people being affected here, and they act like they are.
Then the dog whistling and Feminist Paranoia comes into it.
I don't agree when it comes to man bashing, because men aren't the only people to blame here.
As I recall, she wanted to be a man at one point, and now wants to call men dumber than squids.
Slowly this is going to turn into a Valerie Solanas type Society for Cutting up Men shit.
I don't know what Feminism advocates.
Since the only thing I've seen is "Male Paranoia" this and "Male Paranoia" that.
As for Jazz, he was 3, and wanted a sparkly bikini.
His mother for some reason thought he was gay, and made him trans.
What I don't get, is how stupid this bitch is, I mean, she looks like Sarah Jessica Parker, if Sarah Jessica Parker had been beat with an ugly stick.
It's very likely he would have been heterosexual if she'd not been a complete fucking retard.
But Jazz is potentially another Walt Heyer.
What I'd love to see Exulansic do, is interview Walt Heyer.
I think Walt Heyer would have some insights into this as well.
Exulansic isn't the only apostate, and the dog whistling that's going to be coming from her camp in the coming years is only going to get louder.
TERFS aren't going to solve the problem, because they're too busy proving what good academics they are, and they're too preoccupied with Man Bashing, Patriarchy and Matriarchy.
A union of Apostates like Exulansic and Walt Heyer and others like them would.
Since the Detransitioner movement needs to be more vocal, those two in particular would make excellent leaders.
So, what I've read and listened to and learned about Feminism, is it's fatal flaw, Man Bashing, Feminism always degrades into Manbashing, and not allowing women to take responsibility for their own actions, they're like atheists who sit and blame God(Patriarchy) for all of their problems.
Like all men are part of some illuminati group, and they've been kept in the dark about it for Millenia.
Which isn't the case, Patriarchy died in the 1960s.
Is Feminism pro Polyamory? Or is it AntiPolyamory?