At the start of this week's sidebar, they bring up the Jack Murphy/John (((Goldman))) fiasco:
Viva seemed confused as to why mentioning hypocrisy is so relevant when they're bringing a 'positive message today' and that public execution/evisceration is not good in the long run. He said that it might be relevant for someone high profile like Trudeau. Masterful backhanded compliment.
Barnes then says he represented Murphy "when he was targeted by antifa groups...to run him out of his job", but never entered into any litigation with him at the time, only giving him advice and so wouldn't go further into detail. I'd be very interested as to why they didn't pursue anything against his former employers. He agrees with Viva's view - "I don't see the great, grand significance of what Jack Murphy wrote six years ago or what his personal life is, has any great bearing on the public agenda of today" and generally dismisses it as drama.
On an entirely, completely unrelated note, can anyone remember what Viva's reaction to the Barnes vs Fuentes debate was?