Orbiter 🏳️‍🌈🐱 Nick Fuentes / Nicholas Joseph Fuentes / der America First Pürrer / "Nick the Knife" - CatboyKami's ex. Flipped fed asset after January 6th. Groypers are pardoned for January 6th, still a fag. Kept Ali Akbar, brown muslim boy-hungry pedophile, around groypers knowing what he was. Hates white women more than blacks and jews.

It says 50% of tickets sold. Not off. Don't give nick the satisfaction of "these guys are retards" and dismiss it. We know that he obsessively checks the thread.
I'm a retard that can't read. :(

So, he feels the need to slap a massive poster for selling 50% of tickets? That's just stupid. Do stores have advertisement for "50% stock left"?

What a cope.
 
I'm a retard that can't read. :(

So, he feels the need to slap a massive poster for selling 50% of tickets? That's just stupid. Do stores have advertisement for "50% stock left"?

What a cope.
He is trying to generate hype. If you don't buy now you won't be able to purchase an exclusive tour of his parents basement studio, an exclusive "Imagine eating this good" private luncheon, and having Bill Fuentes (Eugene Levy) be your personal Chauffeur who will pick you up and drop you off at the Airport.
 
He is trying to generate hype. If you don't buy now you won't be able to purchase an exclusive tour of his parents basement studio, an exclusive "Imagine eating this good" private luncheon, and having Bill Fuentes (Eugene Levy) be your personal Chauffeur who will pick you up and drop you off at the Airport.
I'll buy a ticket if I can watch how Lil'Nipplets was made on a petri dish with extraction from Billy, and then transferred into mama Fuentes. The kind of birth that Catholics will approve of. Is that why the grift right has such a delusional fake Christian complex? One of their Mexican child leaders was an example of virgin birth?

Really wonder how bright this event will glow. Will it be brighter than the biohazard waste produced by lil'Nipplets' insemination?
 
This is the result of immigration. The quicker it's cut, the better. The longer you wait, the worse this issue will become. Immigrants (and niggers) don't understand how our infrastructure works. Few white Americans even do. Our infrastructure is terribly outdated, and it's only getting worse. The more people you import, the quicker it continues to deteriorate. What will you do when the sewers stop working? When the power stations fail, as they do often already in places like California? 700 people died in Texas last winter because we lost power. It's only a matter of time before the rest of the country starts seeing similar and worse problems.

Hardship isn't necessarily a bad thing. It's an opportunity to adapt and overcome. Importing labor is like putting a band-aid on your arm after it's just been chopped off. You're choosing to pass the problem onto someone else who in all likelihood doesn't actually have the knowledge or understanding to solve it. You say "We better import migrants to drive all these trucks!" rather than taking the time to think of an alternative way to do what the trucks do. You mentioned working fields. If people of the past had your attitude, agriculture wouldn't be what it is today. We'd be using slaves instead of machines, which is effectively your proposition.


"The devaluation of labor is a good thing. The replacement of the native population is a good thing. Weak unions is a good thing. We have to destroy third world nations so I can have a comfy desk job." And I'm the one with his head up his ass? Have you ever worked a physical job before? I have. It's not easy, but it's rewarding. You learn things that help make life easier. And you'd rather push that work off onto foreigners who would dilute your society, be underpaid, further empower the wealthy, and contribute to the deterioration of your country's infrastructure. For what? So you can live a little bit easier? You won't live easier. Your society will just get worse, your precious education will likely be worth nothing, and you'll find yourself working some shitty job for on of the corporations that you help to empower by supporting pro-immigration policies.

Also, there isn't any middle class. Not in America, at least, and I wouldn't expect any to last in Europe either. Besides, what would you do when the children of these migrant laborers want to be middle class too? Let them, and then import more labor? What is the third world to you then other than a breeding ground for slaves? You're effectively trying to be Rome again. It doesn't work. It's not sustainable. Eventually the barbarians will come knocking on your door asking for their share of the land.


Why are you so unwilling to try and find solutions to problems? How about instead of shrugging your shoulders and saying "that's just how it is" we actually work toward building a better country. Revolutionary thought, I know. I do want a truly sustainable society. It's not remotely unrealistic, either. China is already on the path there, and it's frightening to think what might happen when we're inevitably left behind.
your grand idea is to kick minorities out? good luck with that, farmer bob RELIES on spics to pick oranges for pennies on the dollar
 
your grand idea is to kick minorities out? good luck with that, farmer bob RELIES on spics to pick oranges for pennies on the dollar
Farmer Bob has family members and friends who help with day-to-day work and on the rare occasion he does hire out, it will only be during harvest. Only giant companies with obscenely large, 100,000 acre operations need a steady stream of mexicans to stay afloat. Even large dairy farms don't need foreigners to stay competitive. Farmer Bob does not need millions of spics in his country for seasonal labor.
 
Maybe this is just the alcohol talking since I've been drinking a bottle of brandy all on my own right now, but something tells me that Nick would be nothing at all if not for the constant signal-boosting by Andrew Anglin of the Daily Stormer (really took off during the so-called "Groyper War"), it's just that people get banned from Anglin's Gamer Uprising forums for talking shit against Nick because to Anglin, he's the future POTUS (how is that possible if Anglin doesn't even believe in democracy and elections anymore lmao). But at the same time, Anglin hates fags with a vengeance, he wouldn't even compromise on that even if for the sake of manliness as with the case of Jack Donovan who despite being a fag isn't really that bad.

So if we constantly associate Nick with catboy-loving faggotry and maybe grifting too (Anglin hates grifters) perhaps Anglin's gonna think twice before doing yet another shameless plug for Nick in a Daily Stormer article that doesn't even directly involve him.

TL;DR:
Anglin hates fags and grifters.
Nick is a fag and a grifter.
Therefore, keep associating Nick's brand with faggotry and grifting so Anglin won't support him anymore.

Alternatively, Anglin is too much of an autistic sperg to see that and too proud to admit when he's wrong hence the bannings for even asking questions about Fuentes. And I say that as an autist myself.
There are also posters on Anglin's forum who have called Nick a fag or bring up the catboy issue, but generally they get drowned out by the echo chamber there or insulted by Anglin. Anglin is almost certainly aware of this issue, but for several reasons he doesn't care. That said, the relationship between those is slightly complex, since Nick has sacrificed most of his chance at appealing to conservatives, etc., in the name of name-dropping Anglin and promoting Anglin's beliefs. The Groypers used to present themselves as 'concerned' patriotic Americans who took issue with 'Con Inc.,' by now they just straight up present themselves as pro-China white nationalist 'incels,' and probably as fags.

Nick lines up with Anglin on most issues, but both of their beliefs alienate much of the right-wing who they would typically cater to. For instance, strong pro-China stances tend to alienate most American patriots, Anglin's anti-Trump stances alienate many Qtards and MAGApedes, white nationalism and bad optics drive away many conservatives, and the belief in optics cucking drives away most white nationalists. Anglin has also placed an emphasis on anti-vaxx extremism by this point, and has claimed that this is the central issue for him in politics, going so far as to disavow Trump and Putin for it.

Due to this, Anglin tends to use Nick to give his views an appearance of mainstream acceptance, and Nick generally goes along with Anglin's line even though it sometimes tarnishes his own brand. Anglin would be unlikely to drop Nick just because his brand is associated with faggotry, which is already the case. He might drop Nick once Nick's movement fizzles out completely, but Nick is a grifter who pretends to be more influential than he is, and Anglin can always just play along with this. While Anglin's audience were often just there for a laugh, Anglin has instead moved towards projecting the image of being part of a 'serious' political movement, and so he doesn't mind playing along with Nick's grift. In all likelihood, neither of them really care about Christianity much, that's just posturing. Nick is a part of Anglin's grift and 'political movement' posturing, so Anglin might consider Nick a homosexual but still not publicly disavow.

Like, Nick hates females, but that doesn't stop him from associating with female grifters or adding them to cozy.tv.

tl;dr Anglin and Nick have a brand of Chinese white nationalism that lacks much mainstream appeal, and both siphon off each other's grifts to appear to be a serious political movement.
 
Farmer Bob has family members and friends who help with day-to-day work and on the rare occasion he does hire out, it will only be during harvest. Only giant companies with obscenely large, 100,000 acre operations need a steady stream of mexicans to stay afloat. Even large dairy farms don't need foreigners to stay competitive. Farmer Bob does not need millions of spics in his country for seasonal labor.
Absolutely wrong, look at Britain right now. English farmers used to rely on Eastern Europeans during harvest and now that Brexit happened they’re going out of business and their produce is mostly rotting in the fields.

You can’t use your family members to harvest from hectares of land, firstly because why would your family want to do that and secondly, because it’s too bloody big.
 
Farmer Bob has family members and friends who help with day-to-day work and on the rare occasion he does hire out, it will only be during harvest. Only giant companies with obscenely large, 100,000 acre operations need a steady stream of mexicans to stay afloat. Even large dairy farms don't need foreigners to stay competitive. Farmer Bob does not need millions of spics in his country for seasonal labor.
That’s and argument to take city and suburban youths load them on a bus and teach them some hard work for a summer. School buses aren’t used in the summer, so you can use them yo transport kids to the fields to assist with fruit picking / corn detassling (which already happens in the Midwest)
Absolutely wrong, look at Britain right now. English farmers used to rely on Eastern Europeans during harvest and now that Brexit happened they’re going out of business and their produce is mostly rotting in the fields.

You can’t use your family members to harvest from hectares of land, firstly because why would your family want to do that and secondly, because it’s too bloody big.
That’s and argument for selling the land to other small farmers who want to start their own farms. Closing off the common lands in England was a mistake.
 
That’s and argument to take city and suburban youths load them on a bus and teach them some hard work for a summer. School buses aren’t used in the summer, so you can use them yo transport kids to the fields to assist with fruit picking / corn detassling (which already happens in the Midwest)
That’s some Soviet level fuckery, where medical and engineering students were forced to work the fields during summers for the good of the party under the penalty of failing their course. Nice logic bro, collectivisation and forced labour is definitely the way to bright future.
That’s and argument for selling the land to other small farmers who want to start their own farms. Closing off the common lands in England was a mistake.
Oh, so the state fucks over the landowners, so they have to sell their property at a disadvantage, reduce the agricultural yield because smaller farms = smaller produce and overall raise the price of food, because there is less of it. Great stuff, bro.
 
That’s some Soviet level fuckery, where medical and engineering students were forced to work the fields during summers for the good of the party under the penalty of failing their course. Nice logic bro, collectivisation and forced labour is definitely the way to bright future.

Oh, so the state fucks over the landowners, so they have to sell their property at a disadvantage, reduce the agricultural yield because smaller farms = smaller produce and overall raise the price of food, because there is less of it. Great stuff, bro.
Is it really down to either importing millions of beaners or some soviet style labor camps?
 
Is it really down to either importing millions of beaners or some soviet style labor camps?
Nobody is talking labour camps, it was way past that, from 1960s to 1990. Stroy-otryad and Subotniks were a thing, where educated students were used as free labour, to help with collectivised farming and governmental construction which in Soviet Union was all construction. But at least there was no migration, right? Mostly because nobody wanted to go there and actively tried to flee the country, but hey!

If you want a globalised world with free trade, lower prices and great product availability, then you need a steady flow of immigrants, because the richer core population gets, the less willing will it become to do hard or dirty labour. Automation isn’t there yet, needs another century at least.

Although in the case of the EU and formerly Britain, most of the seasonal agricultural workers weren’t staying in respective countries after harvest.
 
Last edited:
If you want a globalised world with free trade, lower prices and great product availability, then you need a steady flow of immigrants, because the richer core population gets, the less willing will it become to do hard or dirty labour. Automation isn’t there yet, needs another century at least.
Nothing steady about the flow, it's beyond the "necessary" amount and most of them either go into retail or welfare, and when it's not beaners it's chinks and brahmin taking over healthcare and the property market
 
Shame he still has influence in spite of all the stupid ironic yet edgy shit he's taken to spewing lately, he's probably to much of a faggot to say what's really on his mind except when it comes to matters pertaining to Fuentes.

And the funny part is that Fuentes won't acknowledge that he exists even with just a shoutout, let alone invite him over as a guest on one of his streams considering that "optics" doesn't really matter that much these days anyway.

But yeah, keep banning people on Gamer Uprising and call people feds who merely ask questions about your unwavering support for Fuentes, really smart move there Anglin.
Anglin simping for Fuentes makes me laugh my ass off.
 
Absolutely wrong, look at Britain right now. English farmers used to rely on Eastern Europeans during harvest and now that Brexit happened they’re going out of business and their produce is mostly rotting in the fields.

You can’t use your family members to harvest from hectares of land, firstly because why would your family want to do that and secondly, because it’s too bloody big.
Are there no unemployed people in the UK?
 
Because:
  1. What is the alternative?
The current state of USA (perhaps the whole world) is one both deeply flawed and resistant to change. I'd call it a system. A system giving power to an elite. A system making forbidden yet popular demands impossible to pass through with voters only being capable of swaying the elite slightly to one side or the other.
The only possible solution is to shake it. Trump bypassed the system, a tiny notch. Now Trump is shaking it and it doesn't like it.

This quaker can come from both left and right and simply needs to be capable of both entering the system and not be integrated into it. Trump is currently the only one who fits this title. There is no alternative.


2. Has it really affected anything?
Trump supporters republicans were called fascists by the democrats after the riots. Is that any different from what they were called before the riots?

Everything the democrats have been doing for the last few years is more than tantamount to the Capitol riots, if not FAR worse. Seeking compliance with an opposite hell-bent on NOT doing the same will only go their way.


I'd say the real issue with the capitol riots was they were just that. Riots, not insurrections. Not a complete overhauling of the system, simply a little smack. So far.
The establishment sure would hate it if you listened to Nick Fuentes/Enrique Tarrio/Stewart Rhodes and waved guns around federal buildings on CCTV with your internet frens so they can pass Patriot Act 2: Electric Boogaloo. I mean, Trump would totally have your back, so why not?

…the soreness over Trump and 1/6 is he didn’t have their backs, throwing them under the bus so he could get his Twitter back, and using his last pardons on Israeli drug dealers and Kwame Kilpatrick rather than his biggest supporters.
 
Last edited:
Abraham Lincoln referred to himself in third person too. He could thinking that he's another great American just like him. Lincoln was a nigger lover and so is Fuentes, so they have that in common.
"I will say then that I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races, [applause]—that I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality." - Abraham Lincoln

 
Back