US Joe Biden News Megathread - The Other Biden Derangement Syndrome Thread (with a side order of Fauci Derangement Syndrome)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Let's pretend for one moment that he does die before the election, just for the funsies. What happens then? Will the nomination revert to option number 2, aka Bernie Sanders? Or will his running mate automatically replace him just the way Vice-President is supposted to step in after the Big Man in the White House chokes on a piece of matzo? Does he even have a running mate yet?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Billy Beer, Splinters RCVD, GenderCop and 22 others
Click to expand...
m1ddl3m4rch said:
Was the video taken down? Do you have a backup?
Click to expand...
Working on it.

Edit : trying to download the video on this PC. So I downloaded VLC to try to put the link in that, but since this isn't my PC that I'm using right now, I can't complete the installation without knowing the password for the main account. So if anyone wants the link to the video I can give it to you. It should still play the video just not on here for some reason.
 
Last edited:
  • Feels
Reactions: Yamma Damma, Vyse Inglebard and m1ddl3m4rch
Re: Walensky - the context adds nothing contrary to what was initially said. Unless I am missing something. All the highlighted portion does is show that a LOT of people were involved in the study, and goes on to explain the numbers. So they ran a summary, not the minutiae.

For fucks sake.
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: LurkNoMore, Humble Crab, thyme's up and 4 others
verissimus said:
*cough*


*cough*

Edit : Oh now youtube won't let me link the Biden election fraud clip?
Click to expand...
you mean not suffiecient fraud (not enoguh fraud to tip the balance)

1641931887428.png
.
most likely support for stricker lockdowns
but isreal question is finally done booster don't work.
WHO experts warned Tuesday that repeating booster doses of the original Covid vaccines is not a viable strategy against emerging variants and called for new jabs that better protect against transmission.

An expert group created by the World Health Organization to assess the performance of Covid-19 vaccines said simply providing fresh jabs of existing Covid vaccines as new strains of the virus emerge was not the best way to fight the pandemic.

“A vaccination strategy based on repeated booster doses of the original vaccine composition is unlikely to be appropriate or sustainable,” the WHO Technical Advisory Group on Covid-19 Vaccine Composition (TAG-Co-VAC) said in a statement.

It said preliminary data indicated the existing vaccines were less effective at preventing symptomatic Covid disease in people who have contracted the new Omicron variant, currently spreading like wildfire around the world.

But protection against severe disease, which is what the jabs were especially intended to do, “is more likely to be preserved”.

It recommended developing vaccines that not only protect people against falling seriously ill but could also better prevent infection and transmission in the first place.

“Covid-19 vaccines that have high impact on prevention of infection and transmission, in addition to the prevention of severe disease and death, are needed and should be developed,” TAG-Co-VAC said.

“Until such vaccines are available, and as the SARS-CoV-2 virus evolves, the composition of current Covid-19 vaccines may need to be updated, to ensure that (they) continue to provide WHO-recommended levels of protection against infection and disease by VOCs (variants of concern), including Omicron and future variants.”
Click to expand...
 
  • Feels
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: SCSI, LurkNoMore, Rustic Ruthenian and 7 others
Salubrious said:
Trump has scarily been the best President in my lifetime simply because of his narcissism: Trump would give you whatever you want as long as you loved him back. You want jobs? Boom, record low employment for rural Americans and black people. Trump's whole life was based on making business deals that made everyone rich as long as he got the biggest slice (or any slice if he was a mediator). I don't think any other President in my lifetime has given a fuck about actual American people, even if the people loved him. Obama didn't give a fuck. Clinton didn't give a fuck. Bush didn't give a fuck. Trump loves being loved by people, and will give them whatever they want as long as they love him back (and I presume get a cut on the backend too, but that goes without saying.)
Click to expand...

Trump is the only President who's been on America's side since Reagan, and the only President with balls since Jackson.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: StevieLasVegas, the fall of man, like_shutup_&_drive_scoob and 29 others
soy_king said:
Jews having Italian ancestry (debatable) doesn't mean Italians have Jewish ancestry. Your logic is fundamentally flawed
Click to expand...
Yes, just like not all East German women were roided-out freaks. Jews are a special Italian biological superweapon, hatched in a secret meeting of what would become the Freemasons consisting of the Medicis, the Caesars, and the Tortellinis.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: LurkNoMore, More AWS-8Q Than You, Humble Crab and 9 others
1641932513460.png

OK annon pick your poision one or other.:punished:
A perfect storm in the Democratic Party is making a once-unfathomable scenario plausible: a political comeback for Hillary Clinton in 2024.

Several circumstances—President Biden’s low approval rating, doubts over his capacity to run for re-election at 82, Vice President Kamala Harris’s unpopularity, and the absence of another strong Democrat to lead the ticket in 2024—have created a leadership vacuum in the party, which Mrs. Clinton viably could fill.

She is already in an advantageous position to become the 2024 Democratic nominee. She is an experienced national figure who is younger than Mr. Biden and can offer a different approach from the disorganized and unpopular one the party is currently taking.

If Democrats lose control of Congress in 2022, Mrs. Clinton can use the party’s loss as a basis to run for president again, enabling her to claim the title of “change candidate.”

Based on her latest public statements, it’s clear that Mrs. Clinton not only recognizes her position as a potential front-runner but also is setting up a process to help her decide whether or not to run for president again. She recently warned of the electoral consequences in the 2022 midterms if the Democratic Party continues to align itself with its progressive wing and urged Democrats to reject far-left positions that isolate key segments of the electorate.

In a recent MSNBC interview, Mrs. Clinton called on Democrats to engage in “careful thinking about what wins elections, and not just in deep-blue districts where a Democrat and a liberal Democrat, or so-called progressive Democrat, is going to win.” She also noted that party’s House majority “comes from people who win in much more difficult districts.”

Mrs. Clinton also took a veiled jab at the Biden administration and congressional Democrats in an effort to create distance: “It means nothing if we don’t have a Congress that will get things done, and we don’t have a White House that we can count on to be sane and sober and stable and productive.”

Even Bill Clinton recently set the stage for his wife’s potential 2024 candidacy, referring to her in an interview with People magazine as “the most qualified person to run for office in my lifetime, including me,” adding that not electing her in 2016 was “one of the most profound mistakes we ever made.”

We can infer based on these recent remarks that Mrs. Clinton would seize the opportunity to run for president again if an opening presents itself. But what are the odds that an opportunity will arise?

The Democrats’ domestic agenda is in disarray given the failure of Mr. Biden’s Build Back Better plan in Congress. Senate Democrats’ latest desperate push to repeal the legislative filibuster to pass their secondary legislative priority, voting-rights reform, will likely weaken their agenda further.

Mr. Biden’s overall approval rating is low (40%), as is his rating on issues including the economy and jobs (38%) and taxes and government spending (33%), according to a recent Economist/YouGov poll. Nearly two-thirds of independent voters disapprove of the president.

Barring a major course correction, we can anticipate that some Democrats will lose important House and Senate races in 2022—in part for the reasons Mrs. Clinton identified—giving Republicans control of both chambers of Congress.

Polls generally show the GOP with a solid lead of at least 2 or 3 points in the 2022 generic congressional vote—a margin that likely would be enough to take back the House, given the narrow Democratic majority and the anticipated outcomes of redistricting in several states that could affect key races.

Given the likelihood that Democrats will lose control of Congress in 2022, we can anticipate that Mrs. Clinton will begin shortly after the midterms to position herself as an experienced candidate capable of leading Democrats on a new and more successful path.

Mrs. Clinton can spend the time between now and midterms doing what the Clinton administration did after the Democrats’ blowout defeat in the 1994 midterms: crafting a moderate agenda on both domestic and foreign policy. This agenda could show that Mrs. Clinton is the only credible alternative to Mr. Biden, Ms. Harris, and the entire Democratic Party establishment.

Hillary Clinton remains ambitious, outspoken and convinced that if not for Federal Bureau of Investigation Director James Comey’s intervention and Russian interference that she would have won the 2016 election—and she may be right.

If Democrats want a fighting chance at winning the presidency in 2024, Mrs. Clinton is likely their best option.

Mr. Schoen is founder and partner in Schoen Cooperman Research, a polling and consulting firm whose past clients include Bill Clinton and former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg. Mr. Stein is a former New York City Council president, Manhattan borough president and state assemblyman.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: the fall of man, SCSI, LurkNoMore and 15 others
It's hard for me to believe anything serious will come out of the Project Veritas leaks. After all, it's litcherully a cOnSpiRaCy and a threat to democracy.
Oats12345 said:
Still it shows that the majority conservative base do not care for the McCains and Mitt Romney. They Just wish they would fuck off since they betrayed everything they claim to stand for. I'm sure many that are angry once voted for McCain and Romney. So the anger is real.

But honestly Mehgan McCain should stop calling herself a conservative since she will never win majority of Republican voters again. Since they openly despise Biden. She honestly should have just said she wouldn't surpport any candidate in 2020. She could have came out a little better.
Click to expand...
There is still an old pink Sarah Palin t-shirt in the back of my closet that was my mother's. Somewhere, I have a classic button. The righties of my family (majority) voted McCain and Romney. I remember this very clearly despite being so young. What a lot of people liked about McCain was actually what they liked about Palin, even if they gave him specifically special respect for being a POW.

They either dislike or are apathetic towards them now.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: like_shutup_&_drive_scoob, LurkNoMore, Humble Crab and 8 others
verissimus said:
Working on it.

Edit : trying to download the video on this PC. So I downloaded VLC to try to put the link in that, but since this isn't my PC that I'm using right now, I can't complete the installation without knowing the password for the main account. So if anyone wants the link to the video I can give it to you. It should still play the video just not on here for some reason.
Click to expand...
Yt1s.com
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vyse Inglebard
Salubrious said:
How in the FUCK would Hillary Clinton be the "CHANGE" candidate?
Click to expand...
Because change is in the Eye of the Beholder.:punished:

Yeah because Trump vs. Hillary went real well the last time.
Click to expand...
It will be different trump will be barred because of jan 6th with some reason or backroom deal for not presing charges & full stop.
 
  • Feels
  • Dislike
Reactions: the fall of man, LurkNoMore, Yamma Damma and 2 others
  • Feels
Reactions: Yamma Damma, Vyse Inglebard and Corn Flakes
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back