Snowflake Pokimane / Pokimanelol / Imane Anys / OfflineTV - Abuses men for social climbing, hypocrite with double standards, doesn't own up to mistakes, lies about relationships, 'not like the other girls'

Freesia said:
They just want a relationship of any kind. If they could get the good parts they obviously would but beggars can't be choosers. I remember some stat that said over 30% of men in their 20's are sexless and that number is increasing every year. Don't underestimate the number of lonely guys out there.

If anything, these thot simps prove that men aren't just emotionless coomers since they could simply go get a prostitute. They instead spend huge amounts of money in the hopes they might get some shallow recognition from an average looking girl on the internet.
Click to expand...
I sort of agree with you but let's not get carried away. Pokimane is barely in the top 40 streamers, and everyone above her is a man. The next biggest female streamer after Pokimane is Amouranth, a glorified camgirl. A lot of these dudes are coomers on some level, they're just too shy to get laid either naturally or even by paying for it.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Ebony Way, Valhalla, grapeshark77 and 2 others
I actually have a little respect for Pokimane’s ability to keep up while also not being a whore. Let’s be honest here, she’s not a boob streamer. Does putting on too much makeup make you a whore? Has she done anything thotworthy? Vtubers look less tame in comparison.

That said, I still think she’s an idiot.
 
  • Disagree
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Ebony Way, Least Crazy VA Man, WebLurker and 6 others
George Lucas said:
I actually have a little respect for Pokimane’s ability to keep up while also not being a whore. Let’s be honest here, she’s not a boob streamer. Does putting on too much makeup make you a whore? Has she done anything thotworthy? Vtubers look less tame in comparison.

That said, I still think she’s an idiot.
Click to expand...
She kind of has a different approach to drawing in and keeping the simps watching. While she may not be streaming in a hot tub or with her chest out on display (I say chest and not tits as there are none to speak of) what she does instead is wear skin tight clothing like those god awful yoga pants. She'll often get up, turn around/walk away to fetch something during her streams, giving the audience a chance to oogle her ass. She does this often enough that there are compilation videos of these types of moments from her iirc.
So while she isn't doing the typical twitch-whore stuff, she just found more subtle ways to bend her ass over infront of the webcam.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Informative
Reactions: Ebony Way, Melonie, Jonah Hill poster and 6 others
Kosher Salt said:
The DMCA doesn't even require them to remove the user; literally just the user's allegedly infringing content, and only then after they receive a DMCA takedown notice for it.

As long as they do that, they're not liable for the user's content.

Short of something like Content ID flagging copyrighted material mid-stream, or some copyright troll watching for their content and striking it immediately, literally just deleting the streamer's VOD after the fact should be sufficient to shield Twitch from liability. And even if a streamer's content is struck mid-stream, there's a question of how fast Twitch is legally required to respond to remove it to reasonably stay within the requirements of the DMCA.
Click to expand...
There are several problems with this:
1) Twitch and content creators profit off the copyrighted material during the live broadcast. So damages are already inflicted even before VOD is created and therefore the brodcast should be shoah'd on air.
2) Twitch does literally nothing to prevent illegal dissemination and monetization of copyrighted material.
3) There's a shit ton of repeat infringements (dozens of streamers broadcasting the same show) so it's reasonable to assume that Twitch is not acting in good faith.

That is why Twitch fails to meet the safe harbor criteria and can be sued:
A Website is immune from copyright infringement under the Safe Harbor if they:

– Don’t know about the infringement and are not aware of red flags making the infringement apparent,
– Once the infringement is known, you must expeditiously take down the infringing material,
– Don’t directly financially benefit from the infringing materials,
– Designate an agent for receipt of copyright claims both on its own website and in an online U.S. Copyright Office filing,
– Manage and implement a notice and takedown procedure in compliance with the Safe Harbor, and
– Adopt and implement a repeat infringer policy.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Ebony Way, Jonah Hill poster, WonderWino and 2 others
So Jidion6 just got a 14-Day Ban on Twitch, for...
Saying that Pokimane has a boyfriend that dicks her down everynight.

Per Keemstar:
Capture1233.PNG
archive.is

KEEM 🍿 on Twitter: "So @Jidion6 got twitch banned for 2 weeks tellin…

archived 13 Jan 2022 09:23:21 UTC
archive.is archive.is

Also she protected her twitter after this came out.
FI911QvWQAEoE5h.jpg
 
  • Lunacy
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Ebony Way, Wingnut, Slutpuppies and 13 others
AnotherOne said:
I sort of agree with you but let's not get carried away. Pokimane is barely in the top 40 streamers, and everyone above her is a man. The next biggest female streamer after Pokimane is Amouranth, a glorified camgirl. A lot of these dudes are coomers on some level, they're just too shy to get laid either naturally or even by paying for it.
Click to expand...
You're right. I did say "men aren't JUST emotionless coomers". Simps are still coomers and have a deeply dysfunctional view of relationships and women, but they are attracted to the "relationship" aspect of these streamers as well. Sadly I think thots like pokimane will be even more common and popular in the next 10 years as gen Z starts being financially independent. I can't even imagine how bad things will be when gen alpha grows up.
 
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Sage In All Fields and Neo-Nazi Rich Evans
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Donny Cheese, Wingnut, Jarch6 and 8 others
America's Hat said:
So Jidion6 just got a 14-Day Ban on Twitch, for...
Saying that Pokimane has a boyfriend that dicks her down everynight.

Per Keemstar:
View attachment 2883308
View attachment 2883303
Also she protected her twitter after this came out.
View attachment 2883304
Click to expand...
White (-ish) thot gets a slap on the wrist for systematic copyright infringement but when a black man speaks the truth the twitch jannies shoot to kill. Rise up, my n-words!
 
  • Like
  • Feels
  • Islamic Content
Reactions: Donny Cheese, Ebony Way, Redd and 14 others
tulskij_tochnyj said:
There are several problems with this:
1) Twitch and content creators profit off the copyrighted material during the live broadcast. So damages are already inflicted even before VOD is created and therefore the brodcast should be shoah'd on air.
2) Twitch does literally nothing to prevent illegal dissemination and monetization of copyrighted material.
3) There's a shit ton of repeat infringements (dozens of streamers broadcasting the same show) so it's reasonable to assume that Twitch is not acting in good faith.

That is why Twitch fails to meet the safe harbor criteria and can be sued:
A Website is immune from copyright infringement under the Safe Harbor if they:

– Don’t know about the infringement and are not aware of red flags making the infringement apparent,
– Once the infringement is known, you must expeditiously take down the infringing material,
– Don’t directly financially benefit from the infringing materials,
– Designate an agent for receipt of copyright claims both on its own website and in an online U.S. Copyright Office filing,
– Manage and implement a notice and takedown procedure in compliance with the Safe Harbor, and
– Adopt and implement a repeat infringer policy.
Click to expand...
I stand partially corrected; the DMCA does require providers to have and enforce a policy of banning repeat offenders.
1642087788991.png
However, everything else you marked in bold is covered under the standard DMCA takedown notice and counter-notice system which is laid out in the DMCA. Point by point:

1) Twitch does not directly financially benefit from the infringing materials. It financially benefits from its users, who are personally responsible for their own infringing actions, but if this was sufficient to be direct financial benefit then every ISP would immediately lose safe harbor because they financially benefit from their users.
2) Twitch adheres to the DMCA takedown notice and counter-notice system as they are required to under the DMCA. They are not required to go above and beyond the DMCA with some technological solution to identify and remove copyrighted content before they're notified of it, and since there is no possible way for an automated system to do a fair-use analysis before removing content, a fair argument could be made that they could not automatically remove illegal content, at least not without severely affecting legal content from users who are engaged in fair use.
3) "Repeat infringement" does not mean multiple streamers broadcasting the same show; it's the same streamer receiving multiple valid and justified DMCA takedowns. There is no reasonable way for Twitch to know whether an individual streamer is legally using copyrighted content (via a license or as fair use); it falls upon the copyright holder to notify Twitch with a DMCA takedown notice if they believe their content is not being used legally.
 
  • Disagree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: WonderWino and Effluvial Ooze
FarCentrist said:
Why the fuck is this average looking bitch so popular and paid so much
Click to expand...
As is with most e-girls, luck and footstooling.
Pokimane seems to be more in the vein of the social climbing/ footstooling department, be it with the staff/mods, or with other creators.
At the simplest, she's getting them off passively as she streams, perhaps doing some particular things they want at their pleasure. At the most complex, she's befriended the staff and mods a la Zoe Quinn, if you catch my drift.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Neo-Nazi Rich Evans and Falcos_Commisar
George Lucas said:
I actually have a little respect for Pokimane’s ability to keep up while also not being a whore. Let’s be honest here, she’s not a boob streamer. Does putting on too much makeup make you a whore? Has she done anything thotworthy? Vtubers look less tame in comparison.

That said, I still think she’s an idiot.
Click to expand...

Asteroid Park said:
She kind of has a different approach to drawing in and keeping the simps watching. While she may not be streaming in a hot tub or with her chest out on display (I say chest and not tits as there are none to speak of) what she does instead is wear skin tight clothing like those god awful yoga pants. She'll often get up, turn around/walk away to fetch something during her streams, giving the audience a chance to oogle her ass. She does this often enough that there are compilation videos of these types of moments from her iirc.
So while she isn't doing the typical twitch-whore stuff, she just found more subtle ways to bend her ass over infront of the webcam.
Click to expand...

the horse faced cunt is just working the "good girl next door" angle. knows full well what it's doing which is even worse.
Still a whore.
Still pathetic.
Still wouldn't piss on it if it was on fire.
 
  • Like
  • Islamic Content
Reactions: Absolutetense, Neo-Nazi Rich Evans, Kevin Grumbles and 7 others
Kosher Salt said:
I stand partially corrected; the DMCA does require providers to have and enforce a policy of banning repeat offenders.
View attachment 2883777
However, everything else you marked in bold is covered under the standard DMCA takedown notice and counter-notice system which is laid out in the DMCA. Point by point:

1) Twitch does not directly financially benefit from the infringing materials. It financially benefits from its users, who are personally responsible for their own infringing actions, but if this was sufficient to be direct financial benefit then every ISP would immediately lose safe harbor because they financially benefit from their users.
2) Twitch adheres to the DMCA takedown notice and counter-notice system as they are required to under the DMCA. They are not required to go above and beyond the DMCA with some technological solution to identify and remove copyrighted content before they're notified of it, and since there is no possible way for an automated system to do a fair-use analysis before removing content, a fair argument could be made that they could not automatically remove illegal content, at least not without severely affecting legal content from users who are engaged in fair use.
3) "Repeat infringement" does not mean multiple streamers broadcasting the same show; it's the same streamer receiving multiple valid and justified DMCA takedowns. There is no reasonable way for Twitch to know whether an individual streamer is legally using copyrighted content (via a license or as fair use); it falls upon the copyright holder to notify Twitch with a DMCA takedown notice if they believe their content is not being used legally.
Click to expand...
1) They put ads on those streams. Plus, a share of superchats/subscriptions goes directly to Twitch. Users are personally responsible, yes, but Twitch facilitates it, the only thing protecting them is safe harbor status. As for ISPs - there are different safe harbor requirements for data transmission/caching services and for data storage/user-generated content.
2) Youtube thought the same and then they had to go above and beyond and hastily implement ContentID system to cover their asses. As for fair use, big copyright holders DGAF, the platform would have to fight them in court to prove fair use and risk losing the case, so they won't fight.
3) You're right. On the other hand, wouldn't each broadcasted episode of a show be a separate infringement? Multiple users streaming the same copyrighted content would also make stronger argument for revoking safe harbor status, because Twitch allows this to happen over and over while collecting ad revenue.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Agree
Reactions: grapeshark77, WonderWino, Effluvial Ooze and 1 other person
tulskij_tochnyj said:
1) They put ads on those streams. Plus, a share of superchats/subscriptions goes directly to Twitch. Users are personally responsible, yes, but Twitch facilitates it, the only thing protecting them is safe harbor status. As for ISPs - there are different safe harbor requirements for data transmission/caching services and for data storage/user-generated content.
2) Youtube thought the same and then they had to go above and beyond and hastily implement ContentID system to cover their asses. As for fair use, big copyright holders DGAF, the platform would have to fight them in court to prove fair use and risk losing the case, so they won't fight.
3) You're right. On the other hand, wouldn't each broadcasted episode of a show be a separate infringement? Multiple users streaming the same copyrighted content would also make stronger argument for revoking safe harbor status, because Twitch allows this to happen over and over while collecting ad revenue.
Click to expand...
1) Doesn't matter. Unless they know the content is infringing, they're not directly profiting from the infringement, and they know the content is infringing if and only if they receive a proper DMCA takedown notice.
2) Needing to do something because the plain letter of the law requires it is a slightly different situation from making a compromise that avoids a potential lawsuit over someone's interpretation of the law that may or may not hold up in court.
3) There's nothing that would prevent a Twitch streamer from independently purchasing a public performance license and streaming copyrighted content legally with the blessing of the copyright holder. There's additionally no existing way for Twitch to know whether this is the case other than the copyright holder not DMCA striking the streamer's content.

Twitch could get a lot more draconian with their restrictions on streamers, but it's a balancing act between appeasing the copyright holders vs. appeasing the streamers. It's fairly likely that they will eventually go the same route as YouTube but I'd like to see them resist it as long as possible simply out of principle, and stick to the actual requirements that were clearly laid out in the DMCA.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: WonderWino

Attachments

  • I CANT STREAM.png
    I CANT STREAM.png
    502.5 KB · Views: 230
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Wingnut, Starscreams Cape, Strong like Bruce Willis and 15 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back