US Joe Biden News Megathread - The Other Biden Derangement Syndrome Thread (with a side order of Fauci Derangement Syndrome)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Let's pretend for one moment that he does die before the election, just for the funsies. What happens then? Will the nomination revert to option number 2, aka Bernie Sanders? Or will his running mate automatically replace him just the way Vice-President is supposted to step in after the Big Man in the White House chokes on a piece of matzo? Does he even have a running mate yet?
 
NewsNation/Decision Desk decided to do a poll asking various questions regarding Covid. Included with one of the questions was a pretty stunning set of answers:

"Question 12: When it comes to information about COVID-19, which of the following sources would you say you trust? Select all that apply. (margin of error: 5.8%)"
  • Dr. Anthony Fauci: 30.8%
  • Federal health authorities like the CDC and the FDA: 49.8%
  • Your doctor: 63.2%
  • President Biden: 15.5%
  • The news media: 10.2%
The public as a whole only trusts health organizations and doctors they know for information about Covid. This trust of doctors doesn't extend to Fauci, though, because of how badly he's behaved this whole pandemic. 73.9% of the respondents were vaccinated and 73.4% support an indoor mask mandate too, so this really just goes to show how loud the Branch Covidians who love Fauci are. 91.9% of respondents are also either "somewhat" or "very" concerned about inflation.
 
You can also tell Sinema's doing the right thing because Amy Siskand is citing -SOURCES to claim that Sinema wants to run for President in 2024, which is the most hilarious misread of a person I've ever seen
As an Arizonan, haven't heard a peep about this at all. And Sinema, of all people, knows she'd get absolutely trounced if she did run for Prez at this point, especially against Trump. Personally, I've followed her for years here in the state and she was about as looney libtard as they come. Her beating McSally for the Senate seat was a surprise, but in retrospect, it was due to McSally trying to smear Sinema every time she opened her mouth and every attack campaign ad she ran on TV 24/7. People get tired of the constant negativity barrage. To her credit, Sinema stayed above board with the attack shit and stuck to the issues. It's been surprising to me that she's stuck to principles and not turned into some Arizona version of AOC. Given that, I'd even consider voting for her in the future (didn't before) as long as she continues to stay moderate and doesn't cuck completely to the Dems.

Mark Kelly, on the other hand, is very likely to go bye-bye. Absolute schmuck and you haven't heard about one fucking thing he's done since grifting his way into the Senate, other than his paid for "Mark Kelly is soooo great!" self-promoting commercials that run constantly here in AZ.

Trump is here tomorrow. I was considering going to see him, as I have in the past. It will be an absolute mob scene, to be sure, so I may end up just having a cocktail at home and streaming it live. He'll be at the Country Thunder venue in Florence, which is a huge outdoor venue. In the past for music festivals, it's drawn about 36,000 people a day. I don't doubt his attendance will be close to that. He always draws overflow capacity at every event he's done here in AZ.
 
Distraction. Diverts the eyes of the Plebs from the failures of the Admin.

Economy. Lots of money to be made in war.

Rallying the People. “We have to fight those Russian Nazis over there or else we’ll end up fighting them here, and if you disagree then you’re a traitor to the Motherland!”
BTW, the acronym for this strategy is D.E.R.P. Just noticed that.
 
1642190402896.png

1642190428908.png

Mother nature posting her W's & Pfizer rying to get unstuck on the protection answer like it matters
 
It's because the issue has been raised for the past few election cycles, both for state elections and nationally, that it's WEIRD that every moderator is a diehard Democrat and chooses to step all over the candidates' answers. It's been brewing since Romney got "corrected" by the moderator to try to save Obama, when it turned out she was factually wrong. This is one of the truly good decisions the GOP has made in a long time. In the Virginia governor's race, Youngkin refused to debate for months because the moderator they had picked out had a thousand conflicts of interest, and nobody wanted to admit it. It's basically growing out of that conflict: reform, or we will not participate. And it's very clear no viewer is getting any good information about candidates and policies out of the debates. They'd be better off just letting them loose on a stage for three hours.
Republicans should do parody debates where the moderator is Glenn Beck.
 
Hey at least Gleen Beck would be a fair moderator and not be a liberal cock sucker who covers for dems
This is the same guy who smeared crushed Cheetos on his face. I have no confidence at all in Glenn Beck being able to moderate a Presidential debate.
 
This is the same guy who smeared crushed Cheetos on his face. I have no confidence at all in Glenn Beck being able to moderate a Presidential debate.

Well I mean that's less embarrassing than what Chris Wallace and that one woman moderator did.
That's what I mean also he won't be covering for Biden if he did a presidential debate. Fox News had to choose fucking Chris Wallance of all people. They could have gone with Tucker or Sean who fox News viewers actually like.
 
View attachment 2887423
The Trump Shitpost Charm must be rubbing off on the GOP, because holy SHIT, that's perfect.
About damn fucking time the GOP started to imitate Trump, it was literally his strongest marketing tactic, the deadass shitposting put him above anyone that had their head too far up their own ass.
They already are demonized by millennials might as well play the part for laughs to diffuse tension than pussy out trying to damage control
 
That's what I mean also he won't be covering for Biden if he did a presidential debate. Fox News had to choose fucking Chris Wallance of all people. They could have gone with Tucker or Sean who fox News viewers actually like.
But then you have the same problem from the other “side”. Debate is now impossible because it’s impossible to find a moderator that could be impartial, or could even claim to be and be believed by a majority of the public. Debate is pointless. Everyone knows what the positions of either “side” are, and no one is changing anyone’s mind by talking about them.
 
That's why I asked the rhetorical question to Branch Covidians.

WHY aren't you DEMANDING accountability, discrimination, and punishment with extreme prejudice for people like: Fauci, WHO, CDC, Pelosi, the Squad, Brandon and the Whore?--oh--and MSM?
THESE "People" and I use that term very loosely:

* FINANCED
* FACILITATED
* DIRECTED
* STAGED
* RELEASED ON PURPOSE

This "disease" on an unsuspecting public. For the high crime of us Americans who deigned to have an original thought and not vote DNC. So... AGAIN... why are you getting pissy with, and gravedancing on those of us who DISAGREE with this ONE non-vaccine? Why are you REFUSING to hold accountable the people WHO LIED TO YOU AND DID IT WITH GLEE?

I already know why. Don't give me that shit about "Ooh, ooh, people out there genuinely think others are being reawwy kiwwwed by did disease!"
SHADDUP. No, you already have hate, racism, fascism, homophobia, and everything ELSE you accuse Conservatives of in your hearts. YOU were praying (and received) a "socially acceptable" excuse to operate openly and with impunity.

My back is turned to you and your kind. There is no forgiveness as you had none for my fellow Conservatives.
Not a conservative but I feel the same way. These past two years really served as a delineation of people in my life who are sane, and possessed.

I'm expecting the next 3-5 years or so to be rough in this field so for some people shaudenfraude is om the menu.
 
But then you have the same problem from the other “side”. Debate is now impossible because it’s impossible to find a moderator that could be impartial, or could even claim to be and be believed by a majority of the public. Debate is pointless. Everyone knows what the positions of either “side” are, and no one is changing anyone’s mind by talking about them.
just find somebody who hates both sides----
 
But then you have the same problem from the other “side”. Debate is now impossible because it’s impossible to find a moderator that could be impartial, or could even claim to be and be believed by a majority of the public. Debate is pointless. Everyone knows what the positions of either “side” are, and no one is changing anyone’s mind by talking about them.
The difference is the Republicans can use their debates as roasts while also talking about their plans. Is that what Dems do? Of course, but they also seethe whenever anyone acts the way they do. The funniest person is the most persuasive one and the Dems castrated all their comedians.
 
But then you have the same problem from the other “side”. Debate is now impossible because it’s impossible to find a moderator that could be impartial, or could even claim to be and be believed by a majority of the public. Debate is pointless. Everyone knows what the positions of either “side” are, and no one is changing anyone’s mind by talking about them.
The point of modern debates isn't to have a good argument. It's to get cheap shots and shitty gotcha moments in on your opponent, except it tends to happen to the Republican candidate more because the moderator is a liberal.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back