US Joe Biden News Megathread - The Other Biden Derangement Syndrome Thread (with a side order of Fauci Derangement Syndrome)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Let's pretend for one moment that he does die before the election, just for the funsies. What happens then? Will the nomination revert to option number 2, aka Bernie Sanders? Or will his running mate automatically replace him just the way Vice-President is supposted to step in after the Big Man in the White House chokes on a piece of matzo? Does he even have a running mate yet?
 
So we have millions of N95 masks in a strategic national stockpile for a serious pandemic, and we're going to hand them out to every paranoid fuckmuppet to burn through multiple ones daily for a cold.

Bold fucking move, Cotton.
Apparently the real emergency all our strategic national stockpiles are stored up for is when Joe Biden's internal polling numbers go under 30%.

If this doesn't get him back up to 40% (it won't) expect us to go to war ... somewhere... to distract everyone.
 
Last edited:
With Snopes being used as a Credibility Sink by the left (1000 people saying "no that's wrong" doesn't have the impact of a 1000 people pointing to an "accredited fact checker") -- why hasn't the right done the exact same thing? Create something neutral sounding (don't call it PatriotFacts or something jfc) and debunk the left's lies. Then the right can point at it and go "No, fact checkers say that Biden actually DID shit his pants in front of the pope. See?"
It's been tried.

It gets The Kiwi Farms treatment from hosting sites, as well as getting swarmed and DDOS'd by liberals.

They tried it during Obama AND Trump, and the only thing that happened was they got taken offline and, IIRC, labeled a "hate site" by the SPLC and ADL.
 
With Snopes being used as a Credibility Sink by the left (1000 people saying "no that's wrong" doesn't have the impact of a 1000 people pointing to an "accredited fact checker") -- why hasn't the right done the exact same thing? Create something neutral sounding (don't call it PatriotFacts or something jfc) and debunk the left's lies. Then the right can point at it and go "No, fact checkers say that Biden actually DID shit his pants in front of the pope. See?"
Ben Shapiro actually started a right wing fact checking watchdog group that failed pretty miserably before he started Daily Wire.
 
It's been tried.

It gets The Kiwi Farms treatment from hosting sites, as well as getting swarmed and DDOS'd by liberals.

They tried it during Obama AND Trump, and the only thing that happened was they got taken offline and, IIRC, labeled a "hate site" by the SPLC and ADL.
There's a reason why leftoids have had their biggest successes in subverting institutions rather than trying to create parallel ones. With the side effect of being totally captured by the corporations they profess to hate, but you win some and you lose some.
 
Turks love that shit, and they put mayonnaise and ketchup on it.
SASHA
GET ZE CAN OF BUG SPRAY
serbia.jpg
 
With Snopes being used as a Credibility Sink by the left (1000 people saying "no that's wrong" doesn't have the impact of a 1000 people pointing to an "accredited fact checker") -- why hasn't the right done the exact same thing? Create something neutral sounding (don't call it PatriotFacts or something jfc) and debunk the left's lies. Then the right can point at it and go "No, fact checkers say that Biden actually DID shit his pants in front of the pope. See?"
Because the majority of the Right are high on conspiracy through social media, therefore making them incredible through their own making. You give me one right wing source that doesn't rely on pure sensationalism besides Andy Ngo.
 

Biden Can Still Rescue His Presidency​

(archive)
The view that the Biden presidency is flailing — and failing — has now moved from the opinion pages to the news pages, from right-wing criticism to Beltway conventional wisdom.

“With the White House legislative agenda in shambles less than a year before the midterm elections,” my colleagues Lisa Lerer and Emily Cochrane reported last week, “Democrats are sounding alarms that their party could face even deeper losses than anticipated without a major shift in strategy led by the president.”

Some of us have been sounding that alarm for months. What to do? Herewith, some suggestions for change:

1. The president needs a new team, starting with a new chief of staff.

The most surprising fact about the administration’s first year in office has been its political incompetence.

Why did the infrastructure bill languish for months in an intramural Democratic Party squabble? How did President Biden give his fire-breathing speech on voting rights in Georgia without first checking whether Kyrsten Sinema was going to cut him off at the knees? Why couldn’t the administration work out a deal with Joe Manchin on Build Back Better — and where was the political wisdom in having White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki publicly accuse him of breaking his word? Why has the president spent the year making overconfident predictions on everything from Afghanistan to migration to inflation? How was the coronavirus home test fiasco allowed to happen?

Ron Klain is a loyal assistant. But the president needs a chief of staff who’s a peer — what James Baker was to George H.W. Bush or Howard Baker to Ronald Reagan. What’s Tom Daschle up to these days?

2. The president needs to focus on American needs, not liberal wishes.

No, the two are not synonymous. Universal pre-K might be popular. But Americans have spent the past two years suffering from the government’s inability to meet basic needs. Public health. Price stability. Safe streets. Secure borders. Functioning supply chains. Public schools that open their doors to children.

Not all of this is the responsibility of the executive branch. But why has Biden outsourced the border issue to his overmatched vice president? Why is he nominating a progressive ideologue to the Fed at a time of spiraling inflation? How is it that he could unveil a package of crime-fighting measures last June and then basically drop the subject?

The president needs to communicate that he’s a step ahead of these problems. So far he’s been a perpetual step behind.

3. The president should remember that he won as a moderate and a unifier.

Biden’s performance thus far is sometimes compared with Jimmy Carter’s. Maybe the better source of comparison is Bill Clinton, who ran as a centrist, tilted left in his first year, saw his signature legislation blow up in Congress, suffered military humiliation in Somalia — and then figured out how to recapture the center and save his presidency.

Liberals have urged a floor vote for Build Back Better, as if a political kamikaze mission is going to win them a place in some future progressive pantheon. Biden would do better to move on from defeat and draft legislation with bipartisan appeal. Regulation for Big Tech is one good area. A bill that trades greater border security for citizenship for Dreamers is another. It could also help blunt G.O.P. inroads with Hispanic voters.

Standing up to the left on an issue or two wouldn’t hurt the president, either. Should noncitizens be permitted to vote in municipal elections, which is what New York City now allows? Presumably not, unless the administration is eager to confirm every Tucker Carlson caricature of Democrats as the party of open borders.

4. The president also won office as a trusted steward of American power.

He hasn’t been. Biden’s poll numbers have never recovered from an Afghanistan withdrawal that he called an “extraordinary success” but that most Americans witnessed as a national humiliation.

The administration now faces two near-term foreign policy emergencies. The first is over nuclear negotiations with Iran that so far promise either a bad deal or no deal at all. The second is over a potential Russian invasion of Ukraine that could turn into a debacle for NATO.

Biden may be eager to seize on any deal he can achieve, but he needs to be careful about stumbling into a world where adversaries don’t fear us, allies don’t trust us and Americans conclude their president is weak. The United States should meet Russia’s mobilization of forces on Ukraine’s borders with large-scale deployments of U.S. forces in the Baltics and Poland. And Iran should know there’s a sharp limit to U.S. tolerance for its nuclear brinkmanship.

5. And yes, the president should announce he isn’t running for re-election.

It isn’t just the administration that’s been enfeebled by a year of stumbles. It’s the Democratic Party at large. Biden can still rescue his presidency. But rising above the political fray so that a younger generation of Democrats can spark enthusiasm is part of the formula for his own renewal.
TL;DR a whole lotta shit Biden and the people in his ear aren't going to do because they think being in power is a right, not a privilege
 
Because the majority of the Right are high on conspiracy through social media, therefore making them incredible through their own making. You give me one right wing source that doesn't rely on pure sensationalism besides Andy Ngo.
For varying definitions of Sensationalism, and varying definitions on "pure" :

Breitbart.
Fox News.
Jack Posobiec.
Human Events.
Bongino Report.
American Thinker.
Not The Bee.
Deplatformed (deplatformed.space)
Citizen Free Press.
 
1642574534017.png


The 1/6 commission is violating the constitution and is being sued for it. They will almost definitely be stopped. But before then, they're doing whatever they can to abuse their power as much as possible and steal as much information as they can on Biden's political opponents.

1642574664287.png

1642574670892.png



(LOUD)

A new recovered video shows the moment that Ashii Babbitt arrived at the doors she was shot through by the serial fuckup glowy.

She wasn't part of the angry mob.
 
For varying definitions of Sensationalism, and varying definitions on "pure" :

Breitbart.
Fox News.
Human Events.
Jack Posobiec.
Human Events.
Bongino Report.
American Thinker.
Not The Bee.
Deplatformed (deplatformed.space)
Citizen Free Press.
Tell me this, why does journalism have to write articles like blogs? That's distracting. News are supposed to be objective.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back