- Joined
- Sep 9, 2021
A gay Jew (?) has been whining about Graham Linehan noting how he wants a witches' museum to include transwomen. He's a queer historian and he is 'evidence based'. Twitter.
Also, if you're a patron of the arts or master-at-arms, you're really gay.
Here is another photo.
He works at a Birmingham museum. The UK kind, not the hick kind. Here is another photo.
This was the same queer who said a witches' museum would be fine by him if it included gender diverse 'women', AKA males.
Here is him acting all scared that those transphobes are going to give him a bad review:
Yes, 'evidence based history' includes calling master-at-arms, a military term, a euphemism for faggots and cowering like a child when women call out your blatant disregard for the sheer shit women accused of witchcraft went through.
Website. Here is an example of his fair and balanced historical articles.
The flak he got for his trans witches thing was pretty tame, and well deserved. Here is a gay man highlighting how his gayness and his maleness is important, while erasing female history.
Historians like him deserve to be called out, because he is not only lying by omission, he's lying straight up.
Also, if you're a patron of the arts or master-at-arms, you're really gay.
Here is another photo.
He works at a Birmingham museum. The UK kind, not the hick kind. Here is another photo.
This was the same queer who said a witches' museum would be fine by him if it included gender diverse 'women', AKA males.
Here is him acting all scared that those transphobes are going to give him a bad review:
Yes, 'evidence based history' includes calling master-at-arms, a military term, a euphemism for faggots and cowering like a child when women call out your blatant disregard for the sheer shit women accused of witchcraft went through.
Website. Here is an example of his fair and balanced historical articles.
I just love how they talk about how import gender nonconformity is while saying that if you are gender nonconforming you MUST be trans or non binary.We know that the gender identity of a person in the Norse period was often tied to their role in Viking society, not just the biology they were born with. Someone assigned male at birth might practice ‘seiðr’, a particular kind of religious divination and magic associated with women and through this gain a kind of gender fluidity.
Similarly, unmarried women might become landowners and inherit property; These ‘Baugrygr’ or ‘Ringkvinna’ would be the head of the family occupying a traditionally masculine role in Viking society. At the very least, men and women in Viking society could break from traditional constructs of male and female roles and it is possible that we are talking about people who would today identify as transgender or nonbinary.
Queer theory is an important part of archaeology and can help us understand the complexity and diversity of past societies. Passing a queer eye over historical ‘fact’ does not mean flipping everything on its head for the sake of seeming ‘fair’. Instead it takes the idea that heteronormative assumptions made about peoples in the past can oversimplify the truth, and therefore need to be challenged or at least questioned.
The flak he got for his trans witches thing was pretty tame, and well deserved. Here is a gay man highlighting how his gayness and his maleness is important, while erasing female history.
Historians like him deserve to be called out, because he is not only lying by omission, he's lying straight up.