Batman and Superman are orphans, Spidey is doubly orphaned when Uncle Ben dies, Harry Potter is an orphan, Ironman is an alcoholic who misses his dead parents, Captain America is a man out of time and everyone he ever loved is dead.
They could've made Black Widow an orphan too but baby drama, or sexual abuse, is a cheap and easy way to create instant sympathy for female characters because humans immediately feel bad for women in those situations without the need for much exposition. And these movies are dumb CGI spectacles for children and retards anyway.
Mom cared more about the penis than the fact they were having sex in his room? That sounds like a "i have a cool mom" brag, unless that's the norm these days with teens.
On the other hand mom is probably relieved that at least son won't be coming home and saying she's going to be a grandma before he finishes high school.
Troons won't get to pretend to be normal because they all either look like they have FAS or look like ghouls. You don't get to pretend to be normal when you cut your cock off or shove a plastic tube on your pussy and wrap arm skin around it.
Batman and Superman are orphans, Spidey is doubly orphaned when Uncle Ben dies, Harry Potter is an orphan, Ironman is an alcoholic who misses his dead parents, Captain America is a man out of time and everyone he ever loved is dead.
They could've made Black Widow an orphan too but baby drama, or sexual abuse, is a cheap and easy way to create instant sympathy for female characters because humans immediately feel bad for women in those situations without the need for much exposition. And these movies are dumb CGI spectacles for children and retards anyway.
Y'all too hard on Marvel/Disney. I mean, we still have Scarlet Witch, who was an orphan but she at least had her brother who...um...died...but at least she was able to move on to find love with a...robot...who also "died"...but at least she somehow moved on to actually have a family...in her...imagination...you know what, bad example. Nevermind.
Because then they get to tell you that you have a third grade level of biology for thinking sex is a binary, and they get to explain to you what The Truth (c) is. By ridiculing your understanding of reality they put themselves in a position of authority and try to shove their bullshit down your throat.
Speaking of marvel, have we seen any tranny virtue signaling from them so far? And I'm talking about the MCU here. I can't recall any. Might be too spicy for Disney so far.
Speaking of marvel, have we seen any tranny virtue signaling from them so far? And I'm talking about the MCU here. I can't recall any. Might be too spicy for Disney so far.
as if. that garbage is made for the chinks to lap up like the transformers movies. if they did itd be some man in one cutaway they could easily chop out for poohbear.
Speaking of marvel, have we seen any tranny virtue signaling from them so far? And I'm talking about the MCU here. I can't recall any. Might be too spicy for Disney so far.
It's funny that so many people are willing to believe that this person did nothing to deserve being fired. My first instinct with sob stories like this on the internet is to assume the person is lying about how innocent they are.
"INADMISSIBLE NARRATIVES OF ABUSE #1 The typical narrative of abuse on social media doesn’t include the problems of the most vulnerable, like how public verbal harassment may only be an ultimately minor part of a trans fem’s exile. The most skilled abusers know that a good exile is done with pure silence, through the whisper network, by having the person wake up one day and have every second or third person she knows or who practices her profession block her and/or stop talking to her. No one tells her why. She has to painstakingly talk to every friend, every contact, every person she would normally have a cheerful conversation with. The electric shocks of knowing that every simple human interaction you have with a friend or stranger could turn into a nightmare of victim blaming or worse, a cold iciness where they pretend nothing is wrong. Imagine repeating that experience hundreds and hundreds of times, with no way to end it. After the noise, the long years of silence are what kill us. The backchannels that should be used to protect people from abusers and rapists are instead used to protect abusers and rapists. Any usefulness these channels have is reserved for Real Women. No one warned me about any of the comically large number of predators in my professions. I was considered unrapeable, unabuseable, not worthy of protection. A trans fem can try to talk about her experiences of abuse for years and have no one listen, but the instant one of her abusers smears her, everyone is alert and awake. One reason it took me so long to talk about my experiences was that I associated being able to speak against abuse with being an abuser. Because every abuser throughout my life was so good at being believed, I thought that being believed was the exclusive domain of abusers. This is why my first months in therapy were spent convincing me that I wasn’t a sociopath, crazy, abusive, or any of the other terms I had been brainwashed with. Abusers don’t spend years disabled by those thoughts because they don’t care if they hurt other people.
INADMISSIBLE NARRATIVES OF ABUSE #2 And when verbal harassment does occur, it’s often cloaked in feminist language, making it impossible to fight. If they call a woman a bitch, people comprehend that as misogyny. But they call trans fems things that are harder to respond to. Rapist, pedophile, male conditioning, etc. They call us things so bad that even denying them is destructive. Who wants to stand up in public and say they aren’t those things? Who has the privilege to not get called those things in the first place? When I look at a cis woman these days, the first thing I think is, I bet no one ever casually called her a rapist. "
I got introduced to this in the NostalgiaChick thread, because she quoted it when she QuiT ThE InTeRNeT recently. I had a hunch and went looking around, and there's quite a few tweets out there saying that Porpentine was not driven out of these circles without reason
I can hardly pick my way through that tortured prose but he seems to be complaining that even if you force your way into female spaces, and make it nigh-impossible for those females to even verbalize any objections they might have to your presence, females will still exclude you.
If you were actually a woman you would have known this already. Women do it to each other all the time (not even maliciously most of the time, it’s just an aspect of being part of different social crowds). The difference is that if women are iced out by one group they can usually find another bunch of women that truly accepts them. You never will. Sucks to be you I guess.
Speaking of marvel, have we seen any tranny virtue signaling from them so far? And I'm talking about the MCU here. I can't recall any. Might be too spicy for Disney so far.
Have you watched Eternals? There's a character in there that is bewilderingly terrible, called sprite, that I feel was some sort of ham-fisted metaphor for being trans. She's eternally a 14 year old girl, because the Eternals are weird not-robots from a space god, and she has a big rant about how she has the wrong body and can't have Richard Madden love her because of it. It was skeevy as hell, and I'm glad I did not pay to see that movie.
Biologically they are women, except in all the ways that count, and are surgically altered in ways that we would call racist if someone tried to do it to "change their race". Socially they are women, in that they act out stereotypes about women that we claim we don't believe constitute gender, but actually do.
If you begin an argument with "determining what a woman is biologically is actually very difficult" then you've already lost the argument.
These people never will have a chance to improve any of their arguments since all disagreement of any kind is censored and blocked, so I don't know what they expect when they post this. Are they not just preaching to the troony choir?
Speaking of marvel, have we seen any tranny virtue signaling from them so far? And I'm talking about the MCU here. I can't recall any. Might be too spicy for Disney so far.
She-Man (2023) - after being struck by lightning in a government research laboratory during a top secret experiment into autoerotic asphyxiation, top FBI billionaire forensic scientist Dr. Otto Gynophile develops the uncanny ability to mimic the female body... poorly.
Armed with his fabulous new powers and a burning passion for justice and a filthy apartment full of crimefighting sex toys, She-Man takes to the streets to bring down his most powerful nemesis yet, the shadowy criminal terrorist misgendering syndicate known as T.E.R.F.
Ringkvinna wasn't even that. If someone died without a male heir but with a unmarried adult (over 20) female relative then she could inherit the land and take over her relatives responsibilities. When/if she married all male responsibilities would go to her husband and she'd return to being a typical woman. No actual contemporary sources claims that these women were less women.
It's funny how people in the 9th century would see a woman as a woman even when performing "male" duties , while modern people will see the same woman as lesser.
Apologies for overposting but it’s amazing how people attach the modern, fuzzy, useless concept of “gender” to what were obviously practical (if unfair and sexist) ways of dealing with property, inheritance, marriage, the running of farms, etc.
We were talking about the concept of the simulacrum in the Grace Lavery thread as it applies to trans surgeries and appearances and I think it applies here as well. No concept remains of the purpose of any of these “abnormal gender roles” and how they affected real life and contributed to the group’s survival and reproduction. Only the idea and the aesthetics of the role remain, detached from anything else.
In this conception, no one inherits land or works a farm or has children or marries or adopts relatives or performs any interconnected role in wider society as an integral part of these “gender roles.” Instead these “non-conforming” people are all just kind of floating there, alone, deracinated, waiting for trans people in the 21st century to adopt them as symbols.
No, I'm specifically arguing they're technically females. If SRY can't do its job, they're female. I'll agree that because SRY was able to do its job far enough that they have testes does make it legitimately debatable, but I think it's significant that the development doesn't go beyond that point. They're not functional testes and they otherwise have significantly female health considerations beyond that.
Well and, no, they cannot produce sperm. Spermatogenesis shuts down at high temperatures. (and probably requires testosterone? Idk)
The problem with this line of thinking is: if an adult male has injured testicles and they no longer produce sperm is SRY still “doing its job”? In CAIS, SRY did do its job but another gene fucked things up.
I feel bad for CAIS women but defining them as biologicallyfemale is nonsensical unless you define a whole bunch of other males as female as well. SRY sent them down the male path, just because their male path didn’t express itself right doesn’t mean they didn’t go down that path.
I feel bad for CAIS women but defining them as biologicallyfemale is nonsensical unless you define a whole bunch of other males as female as well. SRY sent them down the male path, just because their male path didn’t express itself right doesn’t mean they didn’t go down that path.
I'm arguing it's more accurate to say they went down the female pathway.
Edit: To elaborate on this a bit more, there's no one simple determiner of sex. Not chromosomal, not gonads, not hormones. It's something of a "totality of the circumstances" thing. This is annoying , especially when arguing with troons who are keen to appropriate people's medical conditions for their fetishes, but unfortunately, biology is messy.
Like I said, I think the most reliable standard is "SRY present and able to do its job". That gives a reasonable answer for XX males, XY females, infertility, etc, etc. CAIS is one of the more debatable edge cases because of the presence of the testes, but I still think it fits with that standard; they're non-functional testes, and beyond just that, they cannot function.
There's a more profound difference between a castrated male, one that doesn't produce (as much) testosterone, and an individual that cannot react to any testosterone, even exogenous testosterone. A CAIS woman, for example, could not medically, hormonally transition to being a transman, because their bodies would just convert the T injections to estrogen. (this is a funny lie to catch interfakers in, btw)
Apologies for overposting but it’s amazing how people attach the modern, fuzzy, useless concept of “gender” to what were obviously practical (if unfair and sexist) ways of dealing with property, inheritance, marriage, the running of farms, etc.
We were talking about the concept of the simulacrum in the Grace Lavery thread as it applies to trans surgeries and appearances and I think it applies here as well. No concept remains of the purpose of any of these “abnormal gender roles” and how they affected real life and contributed to the group’s survival and reproduction. Only the idea and the aesthetics of the role remain, detached from anything else.
In this conception, no one inherits land or works a farm or has children or marries or adopts relatives or performs any interconnected role in wider society as an integral part of these “gender roles.” Instead these “non-conforming” people are all just kind of floating there, alone, deracinated, waiting for trans people in the 21st century to adopt them as symbols.
Ironically, the more gender unbalanced a society is, the more transpeople there are because the binary becomes stricter. "If you're not X, you're not a man" as opposed to "Men are anything from A to M, women are anything from N to Z".
The problem with this line of thinking is: if an adult male has injured testicles and they no longer produce sperm is SRY still “doing its job”? In CAIS, SRY did do its job but another gene fucked things up.
I feel bad for CAIS women but defining them as biologicallyfemale is nonsensical unless you define a whole bunch of other males as female as well. SRY sent them down the male path, just because their male path didn’t express itself right doesn’t mean they didn’t go down that path.
They are genetically male, but for the purposes of socialization they are phenotypically female. In regards to sport in particular, my own opinion is that someone with CAIS has more place competing in women's events than a woman with hyperandrogenism, because the woman with hyperandrogenism, even if she is genetically female, has the advantages that high testosterone produces. But, it's a hard line to thread, because genetic advantage is part of athletic performance anyway, so the question of where it's fair to draw the line will come up. I think it's sort of a red herring though, because while any definition you draw it going to split the line in some way for intersex people, trans women athletes are quite obviously not in that category. The advantages of going through puberty as a man are too great, the immediately obvious effect being that trans women dominate any sport they participate in. The trans lobby likes to throw up these edge cases as hypotheticals as a smokescreen. Like when it comes to "trans" kids and sports. I don't think it actually matters if the "trans" girl plays with the real girls, because puberty hasn't set in yet. But we all know that the reason that is being pushed is to trojan horse in adult participation.
Ironically, the more gender unbalanced a society is, the more transpeople there are because the binary becomes stricter. "If you're not X, you're not a man" as opposed to "Men are anything from A to M, women are anything from N to Z".
