RPGnet Forums

An discussion on how problematic it is to run an game that features slavery in the Bronze Age, because talking about how your PC is an former slave might be triggering someone.
Screenshot_20220131-153334_Brave.jpg

Putting down a slave revolt? I smell an adventure hook!

As much as they like to explore issues on the tabletop, I can't imagine any of them exploring why slavery was so ubiquitous across the ancient world. If slavery is 100% morally wrong, why did so many diverse (yay!) cultures practice it?
 
If slavery is 100% morally wrong, why did so many diverse (yay!) cultures practice it?
Cheap labor, it was an means of discouraging people from falling into debt, closest thing to bringing home an trophy from an war (the Aztecs actually did this, by the way), affordable way of stroking your RL e-peen.

I'm not sure if sexual slavery was actually an thing, though.
 
So let me get this straight, if you're Jewish then no one can ever disagree with your opinion?

I remember in the old days of forums people would debate back and forth endlessly, this modern climate of banning people for a difference of opinion in insane, what's even the fucking point? Why is anyone even wasting their time?

This notion that if you're part of a special group that any outsider opinion is worthless is asinine to the extreme, an outsider perspective can allow you to see something in a light you never would as an insider, there's no harm in allowing someone to voice it and taking it into consideration, people are fucking retards these days, human intellectual ability is being strangled by this climate.
 
So let me get this straight, if you're Jewish then no one can ever disagree with your opinion?
I'm just trying to wrap my head around the idea that being Jewish is somehow a "race", that the racism policy would even apply. So if I convert to Judaism, do I have to change my race from White to Jew? I don't seem to remember that option existing on any government or job forms, lol.

And by extension... according to RPG.net is Christian a race? What about Muslim? Buddhist? Pagan? Is Atheist a race?

:thinking:
 
This is all another attempt at social engineering, if you think about it.
So let me get this straight, if you're Jewish then no one can ever disagree with your opinion?
As we all know, the subject of religion is akin with playing hot potato with an live grenade. And to make it so bad, there isn't "one, true version" of being Jewish; mostly because it went through the same type of schisms as Christianity did.

people are fucking retards these days, human intellectual ability is being strangled by this climate.
It's been going for a few years, at this point. Mostly with other topics.

And by extension... according to RPG.net is Christian a race? What about Muslim? Buddhist? Pagan? Is Atheist a race?
I won't be surprised if they have an hateboner against the Christians solely because of the Crusades. They already sided against Europe over the subject of the Mongolians and I suspect that they'll side with the Muslims about that time they took over Constantinople and part of Spain.

And here's some entitlement from the mods.
 
Last edited:
I'm just trying to wrap my head around the idea that being Jewish is somehow a "race", that the racism policy would even apply. So if I convert to Judaism, do I have to change my race from White to Jew? I don't seem to remember that option existing on any government or job forms, lol.
The short version is that A: jews have kept it vague as to what "Judaism" actually is because it's convenient to be able to cry racism if someone criticises Judaism and you can't really do that if it's just a religion apart from an ethnicity and B: jews themselves can't decide what Judaism means. So you get the "schrodinger's whites" with jews where they're either white or a minority depending on what's momentarily advantageous.
I won't be surprised if they have an hateboner against the Christians solely because of the Crusades. They already sided against Europe over the subject of the Mongolians and I suspect that they'll side with the Muslims about that time they took over Constantinople and part of Spain.

And here's some entitlement from the mods.
Yeah you can't mention the crusades in anything but a negative light. Posters have gotten infracted for treating them like just another religious war.

>native american mod
>complains about doing extra work

I don't write the jokes, folks.
 
They keep having to stamp these fires out because their userbase is now comprised of barely-sane lunatics. Lulz.
I honestly don't even understand this site. I think the mods just like banning random people for no reason. Why the fuck are they banning people who hate anti-vaxers when they're all far-left commies who hate them? I think Tanka, the shittiest, worst mod in the history of modding, literally just picked this incredibly lame reason to fuck with some guy he personally has had it in for for a while but couldn't previously go after.

Honestly I would curbstomp Tanka. I fucking hate that loser. I want to see him on a slab.
 
I honestly don't even understand this site. I think the mods just like banning random people for no reason. Why the fuck are they banning people who hate anti-vaxers when they're all far-left commies who hate them? I think Tanka, the shittiest, worst mod in the history of modding, literally just picked this incredibly lame reason to fuck with some guy he personally has had it in for for a while but couldn't previously go after.

Honestly I would curbstomp Tanka. I fucking hate that loser. I want to see him on a slab.
Okay, here’s the crazy thing about RPG.net. They have that rule about group attacks and they actually seem to enforce it across the board. Even when it’s someone they ostensibly like attacking someone that they don’t.

Some pages back, there’s a guy saying that he hopes the unvaxxed die with no remorse and they come down upon him -hard- which, in their defense? That’s a psychotic POV. It’s just that Tanka is such a massive faggot, he’ll go to any length to stamp out anything that look vaguely like a rule violations.
 
Last edited:
I won't be surprised if they have an hateboner against the Christians solely because of the Crusades.
Nah. They have a hateboner against Christians because they still think it's 20 years ago when the religious right in the US had power, and because their parents were Christian and Fuck You Dad I'm a pagan atheist. Also, because of that they think of Christians as white people, and we all know what they think about white people.

There is no longer the 80s Satanic Panic and the attack on D&D, which is likely what they think of when they think of Christians, and would be the understandable source of contempt for the religion. But as the old guard move on or get banned, the users now have that very SJW version of reality where despite all religions theoretically being bad only white Christianity ever gets criticised, and really you're expected to condemn it.

So yes, they'd be vitriolic about the Crusades. But they'd only think of them as the evil white man attacking innocent minorites, because they don't have the ability to see things through any other perspective than their own. A lack of imagination and empathy that would be horrible to roleplay with, but fortunately they don't actually ever play.
 
A user sees the fnords. They pointed out that a thread about whether or not dwarves in RPGs were an offensive caricature wasn't about actually answering the question, but instead an invitation to join in a circlejerk about how RPGNet is home to the moral elite. Naturally, that has to be nipped in the bud.

1.png
2.png
3.png
4.png
5.png
6.png
7.png
 
A user sees the fnords. They pointed out that a thread about whether or not dwarves in RPGs were an offensive caricature wasn't about actually answering the question, but instead an invitation to join in a circlejerk about how RPGNet is home to the moral elite. Naturally, that has to be nipped in the bud.

View attachment 2948189
View attachment 2948190
View attachment 2948191
View attachment 2948192
View attachment 2948193
View attachment 2948194
View attachment 2948195
You know, it's kind of funny how they instantly posted loaded questions like the "Iranian goatherder" post.
 
1643947804378.png

I would LOVE to know how much this jew guy knows about the Brianna Taylor case...

Because I doubt it's much more than he knows about religion - even his own. (And Christianity justified horrific acts against Jews? Well let's start a running Muslim tally shall we???)

The short version is that A: jews have kept it vague as to what "Judaism" actually is because it's convenient to be able to cry racism if someone criticises Judaism and you can't really do that if it's just a religion apart from an ethnicity and B: jews themselves can't decide what Judaism means. So you get the "schrodinger's whites" with jews where they're either white or a minority depending on what's momentarily advantageous.
Look, once upon a time ethnicity* WAS tied to religion. If you believed something - then you belonged to the tribe that believed it. Things have changed over the centuries as so many religion are now heavily conversion ones with more relaxed rituals and rules for joining together, it has muddied the waters. Judiasm being as old as it is is basically a kind of legacy faith which still has this ethnicity component to it. It certainly helps that one of the rituals to join up with it is circumcisions which kind of limits its popularity for conversion.

*Though ancient cultures weren't quite as hung up on ethnicity as we are. Your tribe may be all white, but if a black person went through the rituals and motions to be integrated, then the new black dude would be seen as fully one of you as any other tribe-member with matching skin tone.
 
Last edited:
Back