Cultcow Russell Greer / Mr. Green / @ just_some_dude_named_russell29 / A Safer Nevada PAC - Swift-Obsessed Sex Pest, Convicted of E-Stalking, "Eggshell Skull Plaintiff" Pro Se Litigant, Homeless, aspiring brothel owner

If you were Taylor Swift, whom would you rather date?

  • Russell Greer

    Votes: 117 4.5%
  • Travis Kelce

    Votes: 138 5.3%
  • Null

    Votes: 1,449 55.9%
  • Kanye West

    Votes: 283 10.9%
  • Ariana Grande

    Votes: 607 23.4%

  • Total voters
    2,594
Pipsqueak has been so very, very boring for such a long time, but this makes it all worth the wait. I'm very excited to see what happens next. I feel that perhaps the "REEEEEEEEEE-ening" is upon us. If these Hollywood Jew lawyers are able to get Limpet Lips Greer judged as a vexatious litigant, that would just be magical.
 
Shit, I totally missed this, but you're right, it's an exhibit in one of the Taylor suits. Two thoughts: 1. is this girl that Russell was texting with Erika? I think the timeline matches... and 2. God bless talk therapists, some of them are angels on earth, but Russell's problems are well beyond the scope of a Zoom therapy sesh. He really needed that forensic psych from the Erika case. If this AGT suit goes REALLY poorly for him we might still get one as I'm sure Fremantle or Marathon have professional threat management guys in their network 🤞.
It seems to match the Erika timeline, for sure.
Imagine being the therapist who had to listen to him whining about her, whilst also whining about the PTSD he got from Taylor Swift. I’ve always loved the way psychologists and doctors make their true feelings clear in their notes through euphemisms.
 
That's not why he did it. I don't mind if you mock him, but don't mock him for reasons you made up.
View attachment 2959477

He used "reverse psychology" to attempt to get them to not pursue arbitration, not to claim the contract isn't binding (which he did separately in his amended complaint). Sorry if I seem nitpicky.


Holy shit, I missed that! Good catch!

He already did. He admitted to the court and the lawyers that it was bullshit anyway.

Oh, I agree. He should be sanctioned to the fullest extent of the law. The bastard deserves it
I reaffirm that I'm not doing arbitration at all because I simply didn't agree to it in good faith.
:story:
Holy fucking shit Russ. First of all good job admitting you did something in bad faith. But that sounds like a whole lot of your problem. You signed the iron-clad contract buddy, I don't know what to tell ya. What does this even mean, he had his fingers crossed behind his back when he signed it? What a fucking doofus
 
:story:
Holy fucking shit Russ. First of all good job admitting you did something in bad faith. But that sounds like a whole lot of your problem. You signed the iron-clad contract buddy, I don't know what to tell ya. What does this even mean, he had his fingers crossed behind his back when he signed it? What a fucking doofus
No, he just thought that letting him on the show was worth $1700 to them. Would you rather pay that money and take the chance that the arbitration will go Russ's way OOOORRRRRRRR would you rather just give him what he wants? He thought they'd cave if he said the only way he'd do arbitration is if they paid his share. That was his master plan. He has no idea about anything. It's beyond stupid.
 
Does Freemantle stating in their document that they reserve the right to have Russell charged as a vexatious litigant hold any water?
It's a very difficult thing to do. That being said, Russ might be the perfect target for that. We will see. He does pass the lawsuit amount requirment to be declared in Nevada (those lawsuits don't have to have happened in NV as far as I know)
This is technically his first lawsuit in Nevada correct?
I believe so
It's quite the strategy to admit that KF didn't give you PTSD in a legal document while simultaneously suing the owner of KF for giving you PTSD (under the guise of a copywriter claim). Russ never disappoints
The screenshot and his lawsuit against Null are 3 months apart, and he never sued Null for giving him PTSD
Nah, you don’t have to prove emotional harm to win a copyright case.
There are more causes of action in that lawsuit than copyright. But, yes, this is unlikely to be of help
Maybe Skordas could make use of this admission and kill off Rusty's lawlsuit against the farms
Unlikely.
Do restraining orders show up in background checks for jobs?
The ones like Russ got should.
 
No, he just thought that letting him on the show was worth $1700 to them. Would you rather pay that money and take the chance that the arbitration will go Russ's way OOOORRRRRRRR would you rather just give him what he wants? He thought they'd cave if he said the only way he'd do arbitration is if they paid his share. That was his master plan. He has no idea about anything. It's beyond stupid.
He has no concept of scale. They probably spend more than $1700 on gourmet coffee for the executive lounge in a week. They would gladly pay his share of the fees if it got rid of him. But to Russ, that's a lot of money, and he can't conceive that other people aren't like him, so he thinks that would be a lot of money for them too. Letting him on the show would be much more expensive. He'd bring NBC bad publicity for letting someone who's clearly not right in the head on to make a fool of themselves, and letting him in the room with Heidi Klum and other attractive women would just be begging for a negligence lawsuit, plus Klum would probably quit the show. No matter how much they have to spend to make Russ go away, it'll be worth it.
The ones like Russ got should.
ROs would make just about any job reluctant to hire him. That's why I think he's not working as a janitor. Even though it's not a customer facing job, he'd still be around people, and he might start harassing a female employee/customer. I think he's working from home where his contact with other people besides his supervisor is minimal.
 
Does Freemantle stating in their document that they reserve the right to have Russell charged as a vexatious litigant hold any water? It would be the best outcome for the women of Vegas but all his previous shenanigans took place in another state. This is technically his first lawsuit in Nevada correct?
My read on that is they meant federally going after a pre-filing injunction or something of the sort to get rid of him. This would affect the whole federal court system. Something I've seen done to vexlits is ordering them to attach a copy of the injunction, which generally also explains why it's in place, to any new filing, triggering an obligation by the court to review the case for merit before the defendant even has to deal with it (something it can already permissively do with in forma pauperis litigants).

The discretion in what is in such an injunction is broad. For instance, it could block filing against just a specific party, in a specific court, in a specific Circuit, or the entire federal system.

One of the harsher conditions (usually reserved for way worse than Russ) is requiring a pre-filing bond to cover the costs and fees should this turn out to be yet another vexatious lawsuit.

Example of way worse than Russ: Jonathan Lee Riches, filer of literally thousands of lawsuits not one of which had the slightest merit.
 

Also, I believe Freemantle's attorney once again called the greasy gourd "troubling" leaving out the "invasive." Saying he established a troubling pattern.

THIS is likely the ground zero for Russell Greer finally being caught "off guard." This just might break his brain and provoke him to either extreme hilarity for us--or the county lockup for him (and still extreme hilarity).
Watch closely...
 
A question for all the wonderful, patient, and learned legal kiwis:

His statements in court documents tend to take on "sob story" components in which he goes on and on at length about his childhood "dreams" and blah blah blah, plights, etc.

Is any of this relevant to the issue legally? Is it procedure for legal documents to contain long, drawn-out bids for pity in order state a case? What about "just the facts?"

Such as: This is the statute, and this is how it was violated. Not all on and on about vomiting and panic attacks. Is this normal?
 
Ok, so the absolute enormity of the milk has temporarily made me unable to read anything that's not written in Russ-ian. The deadline for a response is the 18th-is that a response from Russ, or from the court? And if it's the latter, what's likely gonna happen when(not if) Russ inevitably chimes in anyway to explaaaaaain? Aside from making the judge hate him more, ofc.
 
Is any of this relevant to the issue legally?
There are cases where sob stories can be helpful or relevant. None of Russ' lawsuits are those cases
Is it procedure for legal documents to contain long, drawn-out bids for pity in order state a case? What about "just the facts?"

Such as: This is the statute, and this is how it was violated. Not all on and on about vomiting and panic attacks. Is this normal?
What is normal is the IRAC standard. You write the issue, then the precedent and applicable laws, then you detail how that precedent and laws work for your case, and lastly you write a conclusion.

The deadline for a response is the 18th-is that a response from Russ, or from the court?
Russ
 
Ok, so the absolute enormity of the milk has temporarily made me unable to read anything that's not written in Russ-ian. The deadline for a response is the 18th-is that a response from Russ, or from the court? And if it's the latter, what's likely gonna happen when(not if) Russ inevitably chimes in anyway to explaaaaaain? Aside from making the judge hate him more, ofc.
The deadline is for Russ to respond. And you know it's going to be glorious, given how the lawyers for Marathon and Freemantle dragged out all his dirty laundry. I'm surprised they didn't include the Facebook post where he says it should be a felony for women to say no to disabled men (him).

EDIT: Beaten like Russ is going to be soon by @AnOminous
 
A question for all the wonderful, patient, and learned legal kiwis:

His statements in court documents tend to take on "sob story" components in which he goes on and on at length about his childhood "dreams" and blah blah blah, plights, etc.

Is any of this relevant to the issue legally? Is it procedure for legal documents to contain long, drawn-out bids for pity in order state a case? What about "just the facts?"

Such as: This is the statute, and this is how it was violated. Not all on and on about vomiting and panic attacks. Is this normal?

Look, you do not need to work in mental health, be a teacher, or work in the court system to know that doofy gourd is just editorializing and no, that ain't normal by any stretch of the imagination.
I'm sure Upstairs Business Collage even taught him "Just the facts, ma'am." :story:
 
$6000 is ridiculous. I have a feeling Russ can't negotiate worth shit and feels like he's getting a good deal. I'm sure all the working girls tack on a creep tax.
I don't know if it was a creep tax or to pay for her therapy after letting Russtard inside her. Which might explain why she needed so much booze and spent so much time running down the clock so she wouldn't have to put up with that.

It's quite the strategy to admit that KF didn't give you PTSD in a legal document while simultaneously suing the owner of KF for giving you PTSD (under the guise of a copywriter claim). Russ never disappoints
No it shows his absolute genius brilliant legal mind. By being able to admit to two contradictory things at the same time that means double the winning! We here at the orchards just aren't on the same legal level as Pipsqueak is. He's truly the Clarence Darrow of his time.
 
I wish one of the band members side to the events of what happened at the zoom audition and what Rusty told them is going on now.
It's a pretty sure bet that they don't work for free even if he is saying " I can get us to the judges panel. Trust me" and do they know about his lawsuit and such.
Russ with his way of distorting events, the band members take would be interesting including on trying to work with him and his attitude toward them
 
Look, you do not need to work in mental health, be a teacher, or work in the court system to know that doofy gourd is just editorializing and no, that ain't normal by any stretch of the imagination.
I'm sure Upstairs Business Collage even taught him "Just the facts, ma'am." :story:
I think it's a holdover from his childhood where he could tattle and the adults would force people to be nice to him.
I wish one of the band members side to the events of what happened at the zoom audition and what Rusty told them is going on now.
It's a pretty sure bet that they don't work for free even if he is saying " I can get us to the judges panel. Trust me" and do they know about his lawsuit and such.
Russ with his way of distorting events, the band members take would be interesting including on trying to work with him and his attitude toward them
I'd really like to get their version of what the producer (or whoever watched the audition) actually said. I seriously doubt any of the band members interpreted "good job" as confirmation they made it on the show.
I don't know if it was a creep tax or to pay for her therapy after letting Russtard inside her. Which might explain why she needed so much booze and spent so much time running down the clock so she wouldn't have to put up with that.
That's actually happened twice! The first was the Olive Garden incident, the second was a local girl in SLC who met Russ for dinner, took a look at him, ran up the tab with booze ensuring Russ couldn't afford sex. He could only pay for a lap dance. He bitched about it on Facebook.
 
Back