Wuhan Coronavirus / COVID-19 Thread 2: Booster Shot - Resume all Corona sperging here.

It won't happen the people are rising up, the gov't here has lost it's legitamacy. All it will take now is for the police to come over to the side of freedom and arrest the criminal gov't.
That's pretty optimistic. The Canadian elites would rather chew off their own leg (Labor) than lose power.
 
It won't happen the people are rising up, the gov't here has lost it's legitamacy. All it will take now is for the police to come over to the side of freedom and arrest the criminal gov't.
Are you joining the truckers in Ottawa? Gonna be part of the rebellion against these "people"?
 
  • Informative
Reactions: What the shit
I took the booster shot and I felt nothing. Still, the Wuflu is a trannyniggerfaggotretard
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gaussiana
@L50LasPak is spergatory still visible for non member users? We have a significant off site presence that cites and crawls the early pages of that thread. Requesting on their behalf to keep the thread in a public board if spergatory happens to not be.
They can, they just need to go to the Forum Discussion board and they’ll find Spergatory.
 
Honestly there is so much information warfare on this, that it's hard to say exactly what is true at any point in time.

Here's what I believe:
1. Covid is labcreated and that's why it was released at wuhan, which both had the nearby lab, is a nexus of transportation and it started just before chinese new year when many people transfer through it to visit their families to ensure a good spread.
2. Like all viruses, every new iteration is somewhat less deadly, because those spread easier. At this point there's no more risk for old people from covid than any other flu. It's just a flu at this point. The small blip in data of deaths and hospital admissions above that are vaccination inflicted.
3. The risk of these vaccines are blood clots among other things.
4. The overarching goal doesn't even seem to be to get people to take these vaccines. Instead it's social credit score, travel restrictions and reversing the populist anti-globalist trend.
5. The vaccines have more risk to harm you than they have chance to protect you.
6. You don't know whom of the vaccinated people are "vaccinated."
7. Getting people to eject themselves from their jobs is a nice side-benefit for those who aren't sheep
8. There are serious risks of fertility, particularly for women due to these vaccines.
EDIT: My opinion is gay and not fully informed. I based my point on the tinfoil theory of a ground-up engineered weapon rather than the more realistic scenario of a chimera with a modified spike protein sequence, that is an entirely realistic (even likely based on what I've read since) theory. I still stand by my second point that this was an accident that the CCP have leveraged to both end the HK demonstrations and stop themselves being the only economic victim. Sorry for being a dumb fag, and thanks for telling me I was being one.

I wanna jump in on point 1 cos I think it's one step away from the (potential) truth and is too easily dismissed out of hand. The odds of the virus being manmade are incredibly low, minor powerlevel but I've studied microbiology and gen-eng (actual, college degree studied); we don't have the technology at present to develop something of this sort, and even if we did there'd be obvious markers that it was manmade. Assuming the technology to develop SARS-Cov-19 does exist there are a million better things you could do with this knowledge, nefarious or benevolent.

What I believe to be much more likely is that the virus had been discovered well before the outbreak (note, there's a virology lab in Wuhan), and it was accidentally or intentionally spread from there due to a lapse in procedure. The CCP then intentionally bungled their response for two reasons:
1. New spooky bug lets them shut down the HK protests.
2. If the entire world gets infected as opposed to just China, they stop themselves from being the only economic victim of the epidemic.
 
Last edited:
1644288712417.png


 
(note, there's a virology lab in Wuhan), and
The wuhan lab in question does gain of function research for novel coronaviruses. Thats a little on the nose for this whole thing dont you think?

there are a million better things you could do with this knowledge, nefarious or benevolent.

I am a layman. But your reasoning seems flawed. You say we don't have the technology, but that depends on the knowledge of that technology being public knowledge, which isn't a necessity.

Second you presume that if the technology does exist, that it would allow things very powerful of which there apparently is no evidence. For that I have two follow up questions:
1. What kind of irresistable uses would it allow which would and/or could not have been kept under wraps?
2. Why are you sure what the technology would allow without having it? This may have been one of those situations where they bumbled/stumbled forward without full understanding everything of the why or even without being able to repproduce the effect reliably. So what makes you sure of the (lack of) limitations of this theoretical tech?
 
>Ethan Ralph Megathread = 3642 pages
>Moviebob thread = 4588 pages
>Chantel Thread = 5680 pages

<Software only hates the Biden megathread and Wuhan corona megathreads
FUCKING HOW?!?!
Those mods hate themselves and their computer's CPUs, this is not the first forum I have seen have to do this with large threads.
 
@L50LasPak is spergatory still visible for non member users? We have a significant off site presence that cites and crawls the early pages of that thread. Requesting on their behalf to keep the thread in a public board if spergatory happens to not be.
Yeah, I just checked and it'll work if you're logged out.
 
The wuhan lab in question does gain of function research for novel coronaviruses. Thats a little on the nose for this whole thing dont you think?



I am a layman. But your reasoning seems flawed. You say we don't have the technology, but that depends on the knowledge of that technology being public knowledge, which isn't a necessity.

Second you presume that if the technology does exist, that it would allow things very powerful of which there apparently is no evidence. For that I have two follow up questions:
1. What kind of irresistable uses would it allow which would and/or could not have been kept under wraps?
2. Why are you sure what the technology would allow without having it? This may have been one of those situations where they bumbled/stumbled forward without full understanding everything of the why or even without being able to repproduce the effect reliably. So what makes you sure of the (lack of) limitations of this theoretical tech?
You're right, sorry I should have been more clear. I've been too exposed to the crackpot bioweapon theory and tend to laser in on that. The technology to develop something like the rona as a bioweapon from the ground up doesn't exist. I've been out of the loop on the newer theories so had to take a minute to do some more reading. Disregard my points on the broader implications of such tech, they're irrelevant and I'm a dumbshit.

I'll correct myself now because I have been a peanut brain: it's a definite possibility that specifically the spike-protein mutation which allowed the virus to infect humans came from the Wuhan lab, BUT this would have been done for research reasons and I don't believe it was released on purpose.

I stand by my original points as to the why and how, but will happily concede that the mutation which allows SARS-Cov-2 to infect humans could very well have been engineered, that's within the scope of both modern tech and the Wuhan lab. I will also say though that this mutation, if it were engineered, was not produced for outwardly malicious reasons (i.e. not a bioweapon).

Forgive me for not doing my due diligence before opening my mouth.
 
Back