Chris Chad
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2018
Imagine a thin beansprout looking British liberal making fun of you for being a manlet and saying that he could kick your ass. How embarrassing for Nick and Beardsoy.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't think Fuentes even has a bad point here, the fact that e-catholics sperg out about the most innane shit. But it does show that he is a hypocrite or not sincere in his beliefs. He talks about how he is a tradcath all the damn time but doesn't even do something as simple as tongue communion?Is this the "Fuentes becomes Ethan Ralph" arc to this ridiculous carnival?
I did a fair amount of searching for the clip of Fuentes giggling like a faggot as he talked about chewing gum while receiving holy Communion and of him mocking the Rosary. So far I've got nothing. However, I do have something tangential to these nuggets of blasphemy:
View attachment 2969622
tldw: Fuentes is attacking "trads" who asked him why he supports Communion in the hand. The key context is that this is right after he had claimed on Twitter, for years, to be a "traditional Catholic" i.e. trade on the reputation of going to Latin Mass, where there isn't any Communion in the hand option. It's worth noting that outside of (pozzed) Western Europe and the Anglophonic world, it's just as common if not more so that Communion is given on the tongue in the Novus Ordo, which was always done prior to the post-WWII era. His line of "if Rome says it's ok, there's nothing wrong with it" shows he hasn't a clue what he is talking about, and certainly no earthy idea of what he claims to be "his family's traditions" as Italians and Mexicans. Sure, permission for something is permission, but that isn't necessarily a good thing: disciplines have flowed and ebbed and almost always track with the general piety of the faithful. This is another case of Nipples having absolutely no depth of discussion potential. If pressed on this by a serious Catholic, he would immediately start talking over him and resort to personal attacks, I am sure of it. Then again, a serious Catholic man with a job and a family wouldn't dignify this lying fraud with the parity of a debate.
I doubt he even goes to Church let alone receive communion, but if he did he wouldn't take it in the mouth for fear of combusting on the spot after years of sucking JadenI don't think Fuentes even has a bad point here, the fact that e-catholics sperg out about the most innane shit. But it does show that he is a hypocrite or not sincere in his beliefs. He talks about how he is a tradcath all the damn time but doesn't even do something as simple as tongue communion?
This is how he'd look without lifts and a favorable camera perspective.
le john oliver momentHere is more UK media promotion for the documentary, spotted on my mother's coffee table.
View attachment 2970929View attachment 2970930View attachment 2970932
For non-Brits, the Radio Times is probably the most popular TV magazine in the UK. A lot of British Granny's are currently being introduced to Nick.
Theroux again hints at him being physically intimidating to America First members.
BAP wonholy shit lol brutal.
View attachment 2971055
the absolute funniest thing that I don't think can ever be said enough is that for how hard Nick fought to distance himself from White Nationalism (i.e, wignats) he still gets called one. That caption would read exactly the same if Theroux were writing about Richard Spencer, Mike Enoch, or literally any one of those people. How's that for irony, Nick?le john oliver moment
View attachment 2971009View attachment 2971010View attachment 2971017
holy shit lol brutal.
View attachment 2971013View attachment 2971014View attachment 2971055
can't wait for this
What's his actual philosophy then? What is America First if it's an international america?Nick fought to distance himself from White Nationalism
His philosophy is literally "I wanna be in charge" which is why he did everything he could to destroy the remnants of the alt rightWhat's his actual philosophy then? What is America First if it's an international america?
Paleoconservatism for autistic faggots.What's his actual philosophy then? What is America First if it's an international america?
He didnt like the alt-right becuase they weren't Catholic so originally it seemed to be "wignats except with performative Catholicism" but has devolved further into these prime tenants:What's his actual philosophy then? What is America First if it's an international america?
He doesn't have one. I don't think he's very clear or articulate, at least in any meaningfully consistent way, on racial issues.What's his actual philosophy then? What is America First if it's an international america?
Don't bother deciphering the ramblings of a coked up midgetWhat's his actual philosophy then? What is America First if it's an international america?
By courting American "white nationalism" in his early career, Nick has placed himself between the proverbial Charybdis of WASP Nordicist purity spiraling and the Scylla of any digression from an "ethnostate" being perceived as globohomo apologia. In a place like Illinois, he would be considered white without question, but many American wignats hold onto some varying degree of a more classic Northwestern European conception of "white." Try to imagine the schizophrenic mental gymnastics that even, say, an Italian American would have to undertake in order to continue association with such people. It would end in self-loathing. Now amplify that by ten and you have Nick. I think it took a toll early on, hence the thinly veiled attempts at hiding behind irony (along with his obvious homosexuality).What's his actual philosophy then? What is America First if it's an international america?
Remember Beardson said he'll sue if they use that footage ? Well Beardson, here Louis big "fuck you" to you and to come and try !!!
Best way I can describe it is Trump American Nationalism but somehow gayer and more cultist with mixture some "Wignat" talking points he takes from TRS from years ago then pretends it was his idea all along then call you a "wignat" and having "bad optics" if you repeat those some TRS talking points he repeated himself.What's his actual philosophy then? What is America First if it's an international america?
All of these are from Ep. 942 (2022-02-05). Mentioning Queen Bees... Groypers aren't simp beta male orbiters. Oh the irony!
View attachment 2963635
Not only is he an incel, he's also a MGTOW:
View attachment 2963657
This hand thing he does here is nothing I've ever seen a straight man do when reminiscing about anything. Girls do this when reminiscing about their first kiss. It is patently effeminite:
View attachment 2963669
Maybe he just wants to feel bad. He can play it off, but it's clear that he's being truthful:
View attachment 2963705
I still can't believe that any self-respecting, straight male would ever entertain the idea of following this fag. It just doesn't compute in my brain.
Someone throw this beaner mutt over to the land of social credit, state sponsored atheism, and capped child births and see how he likes it then.Nick Fuentes battles himself in the marketplace of ideasView attachment 2964586View attachment 2964587View attachment 2964589View attachment 2964590View attachment 2964596
sorry if this is repetitive, but unironically Theroux has a pretty solid understanding of Feuntes' political position
View attachment 2971130
IE: terminally online teenaged angst.