Canadian Truckers Convoy 2022 - The Leaf calls you a Nazi as he gasses you

Protip: Powerleveling means Too Much Information in a WTF way

Mentioning where you live technically isn't powerleveling
I always assumed it was when you massively narrow down the places where you can live to the point that doxxing becomes possible if anyone put the work.
So if you say you live in an urban hellhole good fucking luck finding who you are, but if it's a small town then it's just narrowing down by other posts involving employment/age.
 
The AUDACITY
D8D65F5A-94C6-4D75-8E43-488238B96C68.jpeg
 
I'm not here to fedpost, non-violence is still the solution as of right now.

However, a person needs to be thinking about what and where the line is. They are already enacting measures to seize bank accounts, and livelihoods.

How much further does it have to go before a militant solution is the best (and probably only) solution? That's a question best left to answer for yourself. The answer to that should not be posted online, or signaled to strangers.

Hopefully, the continued mass movement of the protests will be able to breakdown the illegitimate dictatorship peacefully. Or perhaps not. Either way, these are the times where it really pays to have good friends and close community connections.
If there's no reason for corrupt politicians like Freeland and Trudeau to relinquish power, then they won't.

The Canadian people need to give them consequences, but I have no idea how they peacefully enforce it except by continually parking their shit on roads - the Canadian government is extracting drivers' license information and license plates from people leaving Coutts anyway. The blockades were working before the police and military came to enforce Trudeau's wildly bullshit laws - not to mention that he's threatening fines and possible jail sentences to towing companies who won't comply. The incredibly overreaching response from the government proves the blockades were working.

If the Canadian government continues to insist that peaceful protest is illegal and the government continues to threaten/punish people for even airing their grievances or for leaving the blockades, the natural conclusion is, "What do the people have to lose from trying something decidedly not peaceful?"

The Canadian government seems like they are trying to prompt a violent response from its citizens - if a violent response is ever forthcoming, the Canadian government will be given a pretext to unload on the protesters and may start to throw dissenters into camps like in Australia. However, if the Canadian government is this far gone with power and is making up rules along the way to crush peaceful protests in such a manner as to interfere with bank accounts and to offer protesters no way out without a record, do they even need or want the pretext?
 
Last edited:
What can't be automated can be outsourced to cheaper places. Think you will be able to work from home full time and keep your big city paycheck? Think again.

View attachment 2986681
COVID proved working remote can work for many office type jobs.



The return to the office has began, it really isn't going to be the "new normal" that was being fed to us.

The matter of the fact is that most big bosses, CEOs, CFOs etc are boomers and 99% of the time they are completely fucking useless and can't rotate a pdf without a team of people to help them. Boomers are still in power, refusing to retire or, in case of the younger ones, learn something, and they are finding it hard to cope working from home.

Can you imagine Biden working from home?
 
I am one of those retards that voted for Castro Jr back in 2015 because of legal weed. I deeply regretted it within months. He gave $10.5 million to the terrorist Omar Khadar, passed censorship laws was endlessly caught being corrupt. I am sorry fellow Canadian Kiwis I failed you and I failed myself.
 
Last edited:
I disagree about the civilization being fucked bit btw, decentralized and spread out more societies seem more eco friendly and less at risk from just these sorts of things. It would suck to adapt but they would but the cities would start breaking down quick.
Yes it would suck to adapt, because you wanna know what a spread out and dencentralized society historically looked like? It looks like a bunch of people in mud huts in Africa, because with a few exceptions most African societies historically were exactly that.
>pesticides, fertilizer, and mechanization, a massive majority of the rural population will starve on the land, just like in old times.
>a massive majority of the rural population will starve on the land, just like in old times
>a massive majority

I sometimes want to go down the bizarre rabbit hole that is modernist education on pre-"enlightenment" history, but I fear the brain damage that would likely arise from it. There were very few famines prior to the industrial revolution in advanced nations (i.e. non nigger nations) and almost all of those were the direct result of some natural disaster (e.g. volcanic winter of 536), though you did see some in Asia which were the result of really foolish corvée policies, most of which involved drafting farmers for municipal labor projects or military campaigns. Very few of those famines produced significant amounts of casualties, and of those casualties, most of them were primarily in city centers. A fair number of these famines were conjoined with plagues, which in some cases actually in really fucked up ways helped rural populations. The Antonine plague and famine that went with it absolutely helped shift the power balance in Western Europe towards wealthy farmers. You really didn't see famines primarily affecting rural populations until the post-"enlightenment" era and until well after the industrial revolution, where the power balance shifted towards urban areas and food was just outright stolen from farmers to keep urbanites from becoming disgruntled. The most notable example of this being Holodomor.

Tldr: Overall, if rural populations have to pick between an adversarial urban population, and a non-existent urban population, history has shown they're much better off with the latter.
This is an astoundingly stupid and self-defeating argument. "Famines never happened except when they did", really? Famines happened every time a major disaster (like a volcanic eruption) occurred or more commonly because the country got invaded and all the men got conscripted and the other side stole all the food. Like just go look at a list of premodern famines, and notice the actual written accounts discuss peasants starving because they couldn't grow enough and someone demanded food they couldn't spare (because your landlord needs to pay his taxes). So yes, if you by some chance had a large natural disaster in a region (which inevitably happens every 30-50 years or so) and didn't have modern agriculture, fertilizer, and pesticides, then yes, you will look like those malnourished people in Africa and you will possibly get sick and die.
 
Because the quiz is pointless. If the logistics of major cities can't be sorted out than civilization is fucked. Also, you don't seem to realize that without a reliable supply of pesticides, fertilizer, and mechanization, a massive majority of the rural population will starve on the land, just like in old times.

You might as well argue that your horse is a better, more reliable, source of of transportation than a car because it doesn't require so many inputs. No one takes that seriously.
Those pesticides fertilizers etc just allow a tiny portion of the population to feed the majority. Without them the rural folk go back to mixed/subsistence farming, which my ancestors fine did in this very place. They could feed themselves, it was a lot of work for far less surplus. It’s the surplus that keeps the hive alive.
 
Because the quiz is pointless. If the logistics of major cities can't be sorted out than civilization is fucked. Also, you don't seem to realize that without a reliable supply of pesticides, fertilizer, and mechanization, a massive majority of the rural population will starve on the land, just like in old times.

You might as well argue that your horse is a better, more reliable, source of of transportation than a car because it doesn't require so many inputs. No one takes that seriously.
Precious little of the materials and machinery used in modern agriculture are made in the big cities anymore. Agrochemicals are decidedly a small town industry with a strong small town knowledge base, and even John Deere-level machinery are made in medium-sized towns. The bulk of value creation and the practical knowledge needed to manufacture chemicals/parts are pretty damn decentralized, leaving corporate HQs, accounting, and international sales to metro areas. These industries would be temporarily disrupted on the local level, but relatively easy to get back on their feet. That does not even touch upon repairing robust old machinery, and going back to earlier cultivation solutions, which would be more than sufficient for small town farmer communities if they weren't feeding the cities and the rest of the world.
 
Yes it would suck to adapt, because you wanna know what a spread out and dencentralized society historically looked like? It looks like a bunch of people in mud huts in Africa, because with a few exceptions most African societies historically were exactly that.
Yeah, we can drop them in a city and get largely the same results. cities formed because of how difficult resource acquisition was and the need for man power. We could have town's and counties become the focal points instead of a hive. The part that would suck is rearranging how your society is set up but a modular theme in mind allows for adaptation.
 
What's the news on the ground? Have there been any updates on the overall reaction of convoy participants to this crackdown?
 
lol why the fuck do I even bother coming here? kk, seethe and cope some more. I'll go back to the lolcow threads where even the mouth breathing retards are smarter then you.

The mandates are saving lives. If you don't somehow understand that, look at the 3x (by percentage not capita) disparity of death from covid between Canada and the USA.
You go get that 4th shot as soon as it's available and fuck off to Hell.
 
Sooooooo appareeeeently the Coutts protesters "left" and....regrouped:
coutts 2.0.PNG

For context on the guy that posted this, he owned a pizza place in Calgary that went against the vax passports (Without Papers Pizza, very fitting name) and got closed for it. Afaik he's been with the Coutts people for a while now. His way of recording videos is very weird tho lol

thought edit: idk how many protesters regrouped, or what they're planning exactly, but if they're out of the way it isn't exactly effective anymore. They're just kinda doing a commune lol. I'll try to find more info tho
 
I'm not here to fedpost, non-violence is still the solution as of right now.

However, a person needs to be thinking about what and where the line is. They are already enacting measures to seize bank accounts, and livelihoods.

How much further does it have to go before a militant solution is the best (and probably only) solution? That's a question best left to answer for yourself. The answer to that should not be posted online, or signaled to strangers.

Hopefully, the continued mass movement of the protests will be able to breakdown the illegitimate dictatorship peacefully. Or perhaps not. Either way, these are the times where it really pays to have good friends and close community connections.
I don't think violence will work at all for this because the enemy is not really the actors but the ideology itself. It's not the politicians or the journalists or the activists that are behind the dysfunctional ideology that causes this. It's the ideology that is behind the politicians, journalists and activists. Comitting violence on these people don't harm the ideology, it just validates it. But directly fighting these people trough non violent mean doesn't necessarily harm the ideology either. Embarrassing the ideology, disproving it, or living in a way it seeks to prohibit harms it. That's what this convoy has done to some extent, with the resulting aggressive response from the politicians.

It's probably this distinction that has made it so difficult finding effective means of fighting this stuff. If you target the people involved instead of the belief system they operate under you're fighting inefficiently.

I think living human beings working underneath woke progressivism should be considered less as actors with any real agency and more like lackeys. Or slaves. They are not the enemy, the ideology is the enemy.
 
Because the quiz is pointless. If the logistics of major cities can't be sorted out than civilization is fucked. Also, you don't seem to realize that without a reliable supply of pesticides, fertilizer, and mechanization, a massive majority of the rural population will starve on the land, just like in old times.

You might as well argue that your horse is a better, more reliable, source of of transportation than a car because it doesn't require so many inputs. No one takes that seriously.
You fuckin tarded bro? Modern farming innovations serve to generate massive surplus so the bughives can be fed. If shit collapses in the cities then guess what? Ol Sneed doesn't need quite so much fertiliser and pesticides, cos he can go ahead and sow a tenth of what he normally would.

Plus you talk as tho pre-industrial famines could happen again like we haven't progressed the crops themselves to a point of obscene yield as well. Not to mention we've got a million ways to forecast weather, gauge soil condition, etc etc, that didn't exist back then. None of this needs a disgusting hive of bugmen to function. Read a fucking book.

Also hold up, what the fuck is a "supply of mechanisation?" I bet you struggle with Ikea furniture you colossal thundercunt.
 
Seeing as how the Emergencies Act has been enacted, and GiveSendGo has been hacked and doxxed, and the government is going all in to crush the protest without bringing in the Army, what are the chances the DDOS attacks are coming from someone against the convoys since KF, the most hated site on the Internet, is a place that pro trucker users can gather? I'm starting to feel like they're working to break morale and unity as a last roll of the dice along with trying to bait a violent response before the military is brought in .
 
Back