Dramacow Ryulong / Michael Cohen - Fanatic Wikisperg, Anti-Gamergater and All Around Asshole

[Hellfire]

Cohen edit wars and rev dels to defend the Nyberg horrorcow.

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/delete&page=List_of_Gamergate_claims

3:40, 19 November 2015 Ryulong (Talk | contribs) changed visibility of a revision on page List of Gamergate claims: content hidden (Potentially libelous information: don't fucking cite Breitbart's hitpieces)

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Gamergate_claims&diff=prev&oldid=1571417

13:51, 17 November 2015‎ Tallulah (Talk | contribs)‎ . . (-341)‎ . . (You don't have to be a gator to think Nyberg's chatlogs are effing creepy.)

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tallulah&diff=prev&oldid=1571418

srhbutts
Stop repeating shit from Breitbart's hitpieces on her.—Ryulong (talk) 03:40, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

 

[The Colonel]

I thought Michael didn't want to be known as a lolcow.

 

[Hellfire]

Mona caused another Ryulong sperg out after getting in a war with Cohen over the Nyberg pedo shit, which Ryulong was using sysop tools to hide after an editor discussed it on the talk page and added some things in about it. David Gerard protected Cohen, once again, claiming Biographies of Living Persons as his excuse.

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:Ryulong#Mona

I have a law degree and practiced defamation law. There was no libel involved. But there are literally no facts, and no reasoning, that apply to Ryu, and David Gerard will stand by him no matter how outrageous he is. As ill as this kind of injustice makes me -- including blocking Tallulah for 3 months -- I accept that this is the way it is. No one is going to significantly oppose David Gerard. I've been instructed on this reality by others and realize it just is what it is.---Mona- (talk) 23:23, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

You keep saying that but have you considered explaining exactly what a libelous hitpiece on someone says about them which was itself based on posts and attacks made against them on untouchable web entities (ED, 8chan) for which there's no legal recourse against is kind of fucked up? But no. I'm wrong in saying we shouldn't contextualize false allegations against someone when it concerns pedophilia.—Ryulong (talk) 23:30, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Don't want to link to it here, as it was removed previously, but the chat logs seem real, and confirmed by Nyberg over twitter. Dismissing it out of hand because "it's Milo at Brietbart" is not a very valid argument, IMHO. Carpetsmoker (talk) 00:18, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Whatever the contents of the logs are, we don't need to give any more context to the allegations against her other than "they accuse her of being a pedo because of what she said in the logs". There is no point in saying anything beyond that, particularly when the Breitbart hitpiece is being sourced.—Ryulong (talk) 00:30, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

The mistake you made Mona (as did Goonie and as did I) is attempt to introduce some reasonable discussion into one of the pages which form the glorious fiefdom of Ryulong and Gerard. Hope you learned your lesson. --TheroadtoWiganPier (talk) 00:39, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:Gooniepunk#All_those_deletions

I would join you in undoing Ryulong's deletions, but there's nothing that can be done. He's immune. David Gerard will stand by him no matter what. He should be de-mopped so he cannot do this kind of stuff, but it isn't going to happen. Gerard won't let it.---Mona- (talk) 22:47, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

What the fuck is both of your problems? Tallulah's additions were giving context to completely libelous accusations flung at this person that we don't need to repeat. What purpose is there to have "she allegedly posted photos of her cousin"?—Ryulong (talk) 22:49, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Simple: when untrustworthy, naughty children (that's you) play with toys that they shouldn't have because they've caused problems with them before and should have those scissors taken away (that's revision delete), it raises red flags. While I continue to dispute the validity of your need to revision delete those sections, I will cede arguing because it isn't worth the fight, and I am unwilling to be the inadvertent source of legal troubles for the RMF on the off-chance I am wrong about that.So far as things go, I agree that content shouldn't have been in the article, just not on the rev. deletion, and assuch, I am not going out of my way to defend the actual content. Gooniepunk (talk) 23:26, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:-Mona-#BLP_revdels

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:David_Gerard#I_knew_you.27d_do_this

I knew you'd do this
It boggles my mind that that person may do anything -- absolutely anything -- and you will protect him. It's most, most unseemly but I realize I am powerless against someone of your status. Nearly everyone is.---Mona- (talk) 22:58, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Per the note on your talk, we have actual reason to take the BLP stuff seriously. You don't arbitrarily desysop someone for acting according to that. Rather than shouting FIGHT THE POWER, you might try discussing whether your judgement is actually accurate with others first. Who knows what the result might be - David Gerard (talk) 22:59, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Arbitrary. Right. You are beyond reason on the subject of this person. Good night.---Mona- (talk) 23:01, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

You realise that having to think about this stuff is literally my problem, right? - David Gerard (talk) 23:03, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

It is unconscionable that you blocked User Tallulah for 3 months. She sought and received consensus on the talk page before making those edits.---Mona- (talk) 01:22, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

"It's not true! She was just an edgelord!!!!"

Breitbart didn't factually report anything. Yiannopoulos pulled the rumors and allegations about Sarah from the Gamergate scrublords and presented whatever he could legally present as fact, prompting the resoponse from her in that Medium.com blog entry. We don't need to add anything locally that gives any actual context to libelous attacks in tabloids.—Ryulong (talk) 01:46, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Hahah! PacWalker is going through diffs Ryulong rev del'd and undeleting them if they were just BS. Cohen is pissed.

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Special:Log/delete

Are you fucking kidding me?
—Ryulong (talk)‎02:20, 20 November 2015

(Block log); 02:42 . . Paravant (Talk | contribs) blocked Ryulong (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 3 seconds (about right) (account creation disabled) ‎(I'm half tempted to either wheel war over your sysop or coop you for how many fucking revdels you've abused)

Paravant took Ryulong to the coop (again) and Cohen desysopped himself.

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:Ryulong#Coop

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=RationalWiki:Chicken_coop&oldid=1572016

(User rights log); 03:27 . . Ryulong (Talk | contribs) changed group membership for User:Ryulong from autopatrolled and Sysop to autopatrolled ‎(fine)

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...en_coop&curid=2919&diff=1572005&oldid=1571992

Fine. I'm relinquishing sysop and I don't give a fuck if I ever get it back.—Ryulong (talk) 03:27, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Cohen then upped his salt level by editing that comment to cry about Gamergate. "Just don't get angry at me when some Gamergate braintrust starts shitting up the pages and I can't fix it."

 

[kcbbq]

It's even better now, since one of his meatpuppets shows up to give it back it was made essentially permanent before Paravant archived it.

I love his passive aggressive crap - he really doesn't get how he makes everyone everywhere he goes hate him.

 

[Cynical]

Cohen then upped his salt level by editing that comment to cry about Gamergate. "Just don't get angry at me when some Gamergate braintrust starts shitting up the pages and I can't fix it."

Cohen, are you so insecure about the ideology you espouse you feel that you must keep things "pure" lest it be tainted with facts you don't like?

Even the smallest deviation from what you consider truth causes a massive spergout, and it's obvious you're a fanatical zealot so insistent on your party line being the only one you come off as such a dishonest shit even those who agree with you find you a fanatical lunatic.

You said you didn't want us to consider you a lolcow, right?

You fucked that goal up a long time ago and we're at the point we'll never stop laughing at you.

 

[Accel_Rider]

What would the RW do without you if a pro-GG article was put up? They're all doomed, I say

 

[AnOminous]

What would the RW do without you if a pro-GG article was put up? They're all doomed, I say

It would literally be the end of the world!

I love his passive aggressive crap - he really doesn't get how he makes everyone everywhere he goes hate him.

What I don't get is why David Gerard white knights this lunatic's ass so hard.

 

[The Colonel]

Can we make an article on rational wiki about him being a cow?

 

[Hellfire]

Previously, an account named DlagonDlagon caused Cohen to spill his spaghetti and a coop case was opened after they were fighting over how long to block that account. They finally decided to rename the DlagonDlagon account and recreate DlagonDlagon and indefinitely block it.

They are now telling DlagonDlagon he has to make an account using his real first name and last initial.

(Block log); 04:10 . . Gooniepunk (Talk | contribs) blocked DlagonDlagon (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of infinite (autoblock disabled) ‎(Old coop case decision: Please re-create your account using your real first name and last initial)

Should be some salt if they make the obvious 'Michael C.' account.

 

[Luminous Being]

You're being cooped, and David isn't ending it early. Your total lack of remorse for abusing your sysop tools ontop of saying we shouldn't undo sysop abuse because "it annoys me that you do" is what tipped me into doing it. --"Paravant" Talk & Contribs 03:15, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Fine.—Ryulong (talk) 03:25, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:Ryulong#Coop

This better be good!

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=RationalWiki:Chicken_coop&oldid=1572666

Moved to: http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:Aneris#Ryulong_.26_PacWalker_.26_Eris_.28aka_Coop_thing.29

EDIT

Looks like that's already been thrown out. Someone on RW who may or may not be named David Gerard seems to have a massive erection for Jewranger.

 

[Optimus Prime]

Can't wait for the eventual user revolt that happens because Gerald is sucking dragiedragie's cock to the point he's destroying what little administrative structure RW exists just to protect seprgsperg.

 

[APerson]

Previously, an account named DlagonDlagon caused Cohen to spill his spaghetti and a coop case was opened after they were fighting over how long to block that account. They finally decided to rename the DlagonDlagon account and recreate DlagonDlagon and indefinitely block it.

They are now telling DlagonDlagon he has to make an account using his real first name and last initial.



Should be some salt if they make the obvious 'Michael C.' account.

Real first name and last initial? Isn't that what they bitch at Conservapedia for using?

 

[AnOminous]

Real first name and last initial? Isn't that what they bitch at Conservapedia for using?

That is stupid as fuck. I guess it works unless your name is, say, "Dweezil Z."

 

[Bungleboy]

Why did they even keep Ryulong around that long? Nigga didn't contribute to anything, he started more shit than ex-lax and made RW look even worse.
Dude was objectively a liability.

 

[A Random]

Maybe he's sleeping with someone.

 

[MarvinTheParanoidAndroid]

Here I thought that Wikipedia was more mature than this kind of bullshit since it's so old and mainstream. I'm actually taken aback by this revelation.

 

[Hellfire]

The brony moderator scored another victory over Michael and Adam, provoking some sperg outs by protecting an article they were trying to fight over.

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Talk:No_platform#Protection

And also you haven't bothered to actually address the content concerns I put forward and are instead perpetuating this petty dispute you have with me over what is apparently both Gamergate and My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic.—Ryulong (talk) 01:13, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

It should be telling that you bring that up more than me. The answer remains no--"Paravant" Talk & Contribs 01:15, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

It's because you're trying to avoid it and instead insist that the disproportionate use of your moderator and sysop tools against me has any actual foundation in trying to uphold the policies of this website when it instead stems from the petty personal dispute between us. There's no point in protecting this page other than it's me providing conflicting edits. There was no point in fully protecting List of Gamergate claims when I was copying over a citation other than it was me. It's blatantly obvious. Unprotect the page. Stop being like this. Treat me fairly for once. Because right now it's a repeat of every other time you've decided to police my actions on this website. You refuse to acknowledge anything but my complaints about you and ignore my actual attempts to discuss the content of the page for the sake of being slighted two months ago. Judge my proposed changes. Unprotect the page so I can impliment them. Stop this nonsense.—Ryulong (talk) 01:19, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

See that's the problem. What you say becomes less true every time you say it. Also, people disagree with your version, so no, I won't let you edit war over it. Grow the fuck up and get used to being oppossed--"Paravant" Talk & Contribs 01:38, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Talk:No_platform#Page_protection

And Paravant has extended the page protection to a full week which is still bullshit. If I was reprimanded for revdelling something that I thought was genuinely libelous, then Paravant is definitely abusing sysop tools when there's no possible threat of disruption stemming from any of this.—Ryulong (talk) 03:07, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

 

[Trombonista]

Maybe he's sleeping with someone.

I regret that I can only rate this Optimistic once.

 

[MarvinTheParanoidAndroid]

And also you haven't bothered to actually address the content concerns I put forward and are instead perpetuating this petty dispute you have with me over what is apparently both Gamergate and My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic.—Ryulong (talk) 01:13, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

It should be telling that you bring that up more than me. The answer remains no--"Paravant"Talk & Contribs 01:15, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

It's because you're trying to avoid it and instead insist that the disproportionate use of your moderator and sysop tools against me has any actual foundation in trying to uphold the policies of this website when it instead stems from the petty personal dispute between us. There's no point in protecting this page other than it's me providing conflicting edits. There was no point in fully protecting List of Gamergate claims when I was copying over a citation other than it was me. It's blatantly obvious. Unprotect the page. Stop being like this. Treat me fairly for once. Because right now it's a repeat of every other time you've decided to police my actions on this website. You refuse to acknowledge anything but my complaints about you and ignore my actual attempts to discuss the content of the page for the sake of being slighted two months ago. Judge my proposed changes. Unprotect the page so I can impliment them. Stop this nonsense.—Ryulong (talk) 01:19, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

See that's the problem. What you say becomes less true every time you say it. Also, people disagree with your version, so no, I won't let you edit war over it. Grow the fuck up and get used to being oppossed--"Paravant"Talk & Contribs 01:38, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Ever notice that Ryulong always posts the bigger wall of text in an argument?

 

[Luminous Being]

Ever notice that Ryulong always posts the bigger wall of text in an argument?

It's because Ryulong is very much in love with Rylong.

Also, if you have the bigger wall of text on a wiki you win the argumentby default. See: WP:COTD

The rush you feel through your veins as you type it