Russian Invasion of Ukraine (2022): Thread 1 - Ukrainian Liars vs Russian Liars with Air and Artillery Superiority

How well is the combat this going for Russia?

  • ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Blyatskrieg

    Votes: 46 6.6%
  • ⭐⭐⭐⭐ A well planned strike with few faults

    Votes: 45 6.5%
  • ⭐⭐⭐ Competent attack with some upsets

    Votes: 292 42.1%
  • ⭐⭐ Worse than expected

    Votes: 269 38.8%
  • ⭐ Ukraine takes back Crimea 2022

    Votes: 42 6.1%

  • Total voters
    694
Status
Not open for further replies.
Those loss numbers for Stalingrad are garbage. They are generated by considering every single battle and every single death during the entire 1942 German offensive in Southern Russia as part of "battle of Stalingrad". People who died hundreds of miles away from the city of Stalingrad were considered "deaths" in the "battle of Stalingrad".
After the war was over, the Russians decided that Stalingrad had to be the biggest battle in all history and played with the scope of the battle to increase the casualty numbers until it was.

You are right.

They mention 485.000 soviet dead and one many others claim 147.000 german and axis dead.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: IAmNotAlpharius
Isn't it stronker to show you can do it during the day?
Also, doing it openly makes for better optics with the locals and makes it much more difficult for NATO/US propagandists to lie about who was where and when.
Depends on who you want to impress and intimidate.
Ukrainian irregulars with molotovs? Da, is stronk.
Western NATO army? Lol, fuck no.

You also have operational advantages since most people will be in bed while you are taking over the country. Less chance of hurting civilians or getting your people hurt.
All of this just shows that western democracies are fucking weak and ripe for the taking in the long run.

Globohomeo has run its course and all the economists and assorted retards who sais war is unthinkable in 2015+7 just look even more retarded.

I pray that the blodshed stops soon but the U.S. and the E.U. are at fault for allowing it to happen.
"Allowing" because an armed standoff with Russia was never a good idea. Look, Europe already has a cool kids club. Ukraine ain't in it. Too much internal bullshit to be a worthwhile ally. It's too bad Putin is steamrolling them because it makes his peepee hard and to keep the kablamistans in line. But thems the brakes.
 
To elaborate on the no ceasefire thing, the exact statement roughly translates to:

"In light of the possibility of negotiations, the tasks of the Russian military have not been removed. They are relevant."

My interpretation is no ceasefire until Ukraine actually shows up to discuss surrender
 
For the majority of people in the west, especially north america and bongland, the concept of war over the last decade or so has been associated with the following:

Differing opinions
Dislikes on social media
Your favourite tv show not being diverse enough
Not pledging allegiance to your country's left wing political party
Not wearing a mask
Not being vaccinated
Going outside
Attending right wing protests
Not attending left wing protests
Saying banned words
Advocating for free speech
Honking
Not supporting burning down your local neighborhood to save the people you claim to protect

They consider all these things the horrors of war (the last one you could argue is warlike, though oddly enough they supported the warlike actions bc "muh social justice"). When your average north american sees an actual war these days its always one of two thoughts.

1. Complete shock that something like this could happen, while virtue signaling and making the situation all about themselves
2. "Omg its just like [insert flavour of the week consoomer media here]. So cool!"
The US and UK have been involved in two land wars during that time you utter faggot. Imagine seeing the first war in Europe in decades and then seething about "meh SJWs".
 
Last edited:
I sure hope the tactical garbage trucks stop the tanks
They'd do a hell of a lot better to just cram the streets with every vehicle they could find. Tanks can run over a car, not sure they can run over ten thousand cars and trucks without getting bogged down.

Probably it's more to keep the roads clear for Ukrainian troop movements.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: IAmNotAlpharius
He's literally speaking Russian. Not a single word he says in that whole minute is Ukrainian.

Which isn't surprising considering like 50% of Ukrainians don't speak Ukrainian as their primary language.
Who knows the difference, other than Slavs? My Amerimutt ears only hear the same drunken gargling.
 
I am back in the USSR...

Screenshot_20220225-123025-007.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Who knows the difference, other than Slavs? My Amerimutt ears only hear the same drunken gargling.
To be fair, you have to have a very high IQ to understand Slavic languages. The humour is extremely subtle, and without a solid grasp of theoretical semiotics most of the sentence structure and grammar will go over a typical listener's head. There's also the Slav's nihilistic outlook, which is deftly woven into his characterisation- his personal philosophy draws heavily from Narodnaya Volya literature, for instance. Native speakers understand this stuff; they have the intellectual capacity to truly appreciate the depths of the language, to realise that it's not just about swearing- it says something deep about LIFE.
 
To elaborate on the no ceasefire thing, the exact statement roughly translates to:

"In light of the possibility of negotiations, the tasks of the Russian military have not been removed. They are relevant."

My interpretation is no ceasefire until Ukraine actually shows up to discuss surrender

I would take that as saying they will negotiate, but they will not halt operations to negotiate.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back